For those out there who have not had the joy of reading about "circular geometrical time loops of 3-d space as the building blocks of space-time", prepare yourself for a simple run-down of the following claims.

Basically, I am not going to offer any equations of proof here, now, in this post. I am going to outline what has been achieved care of those equations of proof. The equations of proof can be found at the www website download feature below.

I was able to construct (using the equations of a circle as an algorithm connecting the geometry betwen a theoretical "past" 3-d space with a theoretical "future" 3-d space) a virtual reality of space-time that explains the construction of that 3-d space (constantly in a "now" time zone, comapred to the theoretical PAST and FUTURE time zones (which are really the algorithm of "before" and "after" circular-equation calculus)) in a manner so similar to what we already understand of space-time it is uncanny. The circular calculus explains all the relevant and salient features of atomic physics, subatomic physics, quantum physics (inculuding quantum entanglement), and astrophysics (including black holes and quasars). Please take your time to review the heavily documented article (www feature below).As yet, no criticism has been able to challenge any of the presented tenets since it's release 4 months ago.

For those though who don't have the time, Ior want more enticement, if I could ask a question, it would be a question of "theoretical physics". My question would be this: would it be possible that a new use of "time" could be employed to better explain space-time. Another question: "is it possible to derive space-time purely in theory". Another question, if the answer of that question is no, then what has (for instance) Einstein achieved with his pure theory that has or has not lent itself to a purely theoretical understanding of space-time.