Thread: misleading science

The future of our solar system depends upon the Sun and the Earth(also the Moon) is a home to humans. Humans think they will be able to colonise other planets in the Galaxy. I think this idea impossible. The reason is that no one can predict the life cycle of a star. Even a young star may blow up in a supernova. Only the Suns life cycle is predictable and hence life is possible only on Earth.

Originally Posted by parag29081973

I think this idea impossible. The reason is that no one can predict the life cycle of a star.

Predicting the life cycle of a star has nothing to do with whether or not we'll make it out into the galaxy.

Only the Suns life cycle is predictable

Er...

no one can predict the life cycle of a star

You DO know that the Sun is a star, don't you?

and hence life is possible only on Earth.

Unsupported supposition.

Originally Posted by parag29081973

The future of our solar system depends upon the Sun and the Earth(also the Moon) is a home to humans. Humans think they will be able to colonise other planets in the Galaxy. I think this idea impossible. The reason is that no one can predict the life cycle of a star. Even a young star may blow up in a supernova. Only the Suns life cycle is predictable and hence life is possible only on Earth.

~ Almost all of what you have said is wrong.
A astronomer of any worthy experience can talk with you of Solar cycles and the life of Stars. The types of stars and the predicted life span is by observation and study well understood. Radio telescopes across planet Earth have been recording the changes of emissions from thousands of Stars.. We KNOW a great deal of what we study. Please understand that the near to us star ' The SUN' will support life on this planet without threat for a few billion years, No worries.. That will not be what takes humanity out. Search through some of the many free science sites to find and read of what we understand of stars.. It's lot's.

Originally Posted by parag29081973

The future of our solar system depends upon the Sun and the Earth(also the Moon) is a home to humans. Humans think they will be able to colonise other planets in the Galaxy. I think this idea impossible. The reason is that no one can predict the life cycle of a star. Even a young star may blow up in a supernova. Only the Suns life cycle is predictable and hence life is possible only on Earth.

Dywyddyr did a very good job debunking your misconceptions. Let me pour some more cold water on your ideas: the Sun (a star) will last another 5 billion years. Humankind will not last anywhere close to that, a Hitler/Stalin/Putin/Ahmedinajad/Kim will emerge , one fully armed with WMDs. And lots of idiots will be ready to follow him, just as they followed/follow .... Hitler/Stalin/Putin/Ahmedinajad/Kim. It is sad to see that the most advanced being is also the most destructive and evil. So, no need to worry about the Sun extinction.... humankind will "manage" much sooner to....

I want some useful links that really debunk my observations.anyone?

Look at his past posts and threads. Like this one:

http://www.thescienceforum.com/trash...-god-moon.html

He's not going to believe any scientific explanations. It's a waste of time to converse with him. I have no idea why he is even on this forum.

Originally Posted by parag29081973

I want some useful links that really debunk my observations.anyone?

That statement boils down to a common crank catchphrase: "Prove me wrong!"
It is up to you to support your statements; the onus lies on you.

Originally Posted by parag29081973

I want some useful links that really debunk my observations.anyone?

You're going to have to do a better job of explaining your point before we can debate it.

I'm still not sure what exactly you're getting at.

dThe reason is that no one can predict the life cycle of a star.

Arguing from incredulity.

Originally Posted by parag29081973

I want some useful links that really debunk my observations.anyone?

Your main claim was that we cannot predict the life of stars. This is obviously wrong; they don't behave randomly.
Hertzsprung–Russell_diagram
Stellar nucleosynthesis - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Does it seem like we're being deluged with idiots lately?

Originally Posted by parag29081973

I want some useful links that really debunk my observations.anyone?

Sun - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Sun is the star at the center of the Solar System.

Originally Posted by AlexG

Does it seem like we're being deluged with idiots lately?

Yes.

I think nuclear fusion is not evenly distributed in the star. A part of the star may show uncontrolled fusion reaction resulting in disruption of the stellar stability.

Originally Posted by parag29081973

I think nuclear fusion is not evenly distributed in the star. A part of the star may show uncontrolled fusion reaction resulting in disruption of the stellar stability.

And what reason do you have for thinking that? What evidence or theory supports this view? Or is it, perhaps, just some random idea you made up?

Originally Posted by Strange

And what reason do you have for thinking that? What evidence or theory supports this view? Or is it, perhaps, just some random idea you made up?

He's just trying to mislead science. I think it was very courteous of him to confess his agenda in the thread's title.

I request all the posters to gain knowledge about our SUN. As some scientists have said "Surprises are in store". I am definitely not against 'real science' but against speculative science. I apologize if I have given wrong impression about my intentions.

As some scientists have said "Surprises are in store"

Who?

Originally Posted by parag29081973

I request all the posters to gain knowledge about our SUN.

Something you have apparently failed to do.

I am definitely not against 'real science' but against speculative science.

And yet that's all you post (except when you resort to outright nonsense).

Originally Posted by parag29081973

I am definitely not against 'real science' but against speculative science.

Real science tells us that our sun is just another star.

I apologize if I have given wrong impression about my intentions.

No, don't worry. It is quite clear that your intention is simply to post uninformed nonsense.

parag29081973 : We are observing our sun from just 150 million km away. It is so close That the telescopes radio wave sensors can sweep across the solar disk.. We can not do this with any other star they are all just single emission points.. I can tell you that all of the emissions of high energy x-ray and other inicators of fusion ( fission ) whatever.. are being generated in a very small area at the core of the Sun. A area a little larger than the Planet Jupiter ( from this distance..) Its actually about a quarter of the suns size.. NOT all over the solar disk at all. The gravity of the mass of the sun is what balance's the solar cycle.. The study of Sun like stars has been conducted over such a long time that a image of what type of star is our Sun has been arrived at. No guess work, no room for argument, known knowledge. Tested observed and tested some more.. Before you make such sweeping statements as you have.. please read some real science.. Do not research science on u-tube.. Look up and search out radio astronomy.. You may be amazed at what we can see.. and know.