3Likes
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
A physicist is standing on a bridge that spans a river that empties into a lake. On the side of the bridge opposite the lake the physicist drops in a bunch of floats. The physicist runs to the other side of the bridge and watches the floats move away from one another as they empty into the lake. The physicist insists there was a big bang under the bridge.
Even the founders of the Inflationary Cosmology/Big Bang/Cosmological Constant (BB) model are starting to understand it is absurd nonsense.
The Inflation Debate
"In Brief
- Cosmic inflation is so widely accepted that it is often taken as established fact. The idea is that the geometry and uniformity of the cosmos were established during an intense early growth spurt.
- But some of the theory’s creators, including the author, are having second thoughts. As the original theory has developed, cracks have appeared in its logical foundations.
- Highly improbable conditions are required to start inflation. Worse, inflation goes on eternally, producing infinitely many outcomes, so the theory makes no firm observational predictions.
- Scientists debate among (and within) themselves whether these troubles are teething pains or signs of a deeper rot. Various proposals are circulating for ways to fix inflation or replace it."
Anything which has "infinitely many outcomes" is not disprovable which means it is not a theory.
Look at the nonsense Stanford University -- Dept. of Physics -- Andrei Linde is making up to try and rationalize the current state of mainstream physics.
"Gradually, however, the big bang theory became a part of inflationary cosmology. Recent versions of inflationary theory assert that instead of being a single, expanding ball of fire described by the big bang theory, the universe looks like a huge growing fractal. It consists of many inflating balls that produce new balls, which in turn produce more new balls, ad infinitum. Therefore the evolution of the universe has no end and may have no beginning."
Can you believe mainstream physics has gotten to the point where it is describing "inflating balls that produce new balls, which in turn produce more new balls, ad infinitum"?
Mainstream physics has gotten so far off track that it can't even stop itself from making up untestable nonsense like new balls creating new balls, ad infinitum.
Whenever a physicist describes something using infinity it is a 'tell' that they don't know what they are talking about and are just making stuff up.
At least mainstream physics is finally getting to the point of acknowledging there is no evidence of a beginning to the Universe or an end.
Our Universe is a larger version of a black hole polar jet.
Mysterious Cosmic 'Dark Flow' Tracked Deeper into Universe
"The clusters appear to be moving along a line extending from our solar system toward Centaurus/Hydra, but the direction of this motion is less certain. Evidence indicates that the clusters are headed outward along this path, away from Earth, but the team cannot yet rule out the opposite flow. "We detect motion along this axis, but right now our data cannot state as strongly as we'd like whether the clusters are coming or going," Kashlinsky said."
The clusters are headed along this path because our Universe is a larger version of a black hole polar jet.
Cosmos may be curved, scientists say
"Now cosmologists suggest these anomalies occur because the universe is not flat. Instead, these researchers propose the universe may be ever so slightly "open," curved in such a way that parallel lines, which never converge or diverge when traveling on a flat surface, will eventually diverge from one another, like on a saddle."
Our Universe is open because it is a larger version of a black hole polar jet.
The following is an image analogous of the Universal jet.
Evaporated matter is continually being emitted into the Universal jet. In the image above, '1st Stars' is where the continual emission of evaporated matter into the Universal jet causes the pressure to build up which causes it to condense back into particles of matter. Three dimensional space associated with the Universe itself is not expanding. What we see in our telescopes is the matter associated with our Universe moving outward and away from the Universal jet emission point.
The following is a more accurate image of our Universe as an ongoing process.
The following may help you visualize the Universal jet.
Our Universe is a larger version of a black hole polar jet.
Our Universe is part of an ongoing process.
An analogy which might help is to imagine a fire hose in zero gravity. The water would move outward and away from the nozzle. Now, what if that hose was spinning? The water exiting the nozzle would be spinning as it moved outward and away from the nozzle as in the following image.
We are moving outward and away from the Universal jet emission point.
Dark energy is evaporated matter continuously emitted into the Universal jet.
The lid represents where '1st Stars' is in the following image.
The following represents our Universe as an ongoing process.
It's not the Big Bang; it's the Big Ongoing.
Originally Posted by nothing.weighs.something
