
Originally Posted by
Halliday
Saying the thread comes close to being a "personal blog" is not necessarily a criticism of the content of the these posts.
Yes, correct, it isn't.
How would you assess the quality, of Geometrogenesis's posts, for those of us who tend to be suspicious of this type of post, but are not certain about the accuracy of our own opinions.
This is not directed at you, Halliday, but I am no longer sure what I am supposed to comment on threads like this one ? The truth, or the politically correct thing ? Or perhaps I should keep my mouth shut, and refrain from commenting altogether, letting this stand as-is in the main physics section ?
Maybe it is just me, but lately I get the feeling that being politically correct seems to be more important than expressing a truthful and informed opinion on here, which is something I had truly hoped would never happen.
But to answer your question - my assessment is that this is meaningless word salad, sprinkled with generous helpings of equally meaningless high school algebra. I will not, however, get sucked into wasting my time trying to dissect this rather voluminous bowl of salad, so let's just say that's my personal opinion, and be done with it. I'll leave you with a few choice bits and pieces :
toroidal topology of our massless charge
the electron in it's most elegantly explained form, is that it is a lightlike particle which follows in which the spin is determined by the internal helical dynamics where it even has a curvature and a frequency
The magnetic moment of course, can only exist if there is a circular motion involved
This must happen to maintain the speed of light
What synchrotron radiation is, is when a charged particle is following a curved geodesic will emit radiation similar to the Larmor effect, but the electron is really a massless charge following a geodesic.
If electrons where not actually pointlike, this wouldn't change physics such that we would have to rewrite everything
The geodesic spoke of in which our gravitationally-induced photon is moving in, can be thought of a line element (Weyl).
Do we really consider the electron to be a "massless charge" moving along a torus, magically producing more charge ? Are electrons really "light-like" particles, whose "helical dynamics" give rise to spin ? Must we really "maintain" the speed of light of a particle ? Would the physics of electrons truly remain the same if it wasn't considered point-like ? Are photons "gravitationally induced" ?
Is any of this really science ?
You decide yourselves. To me, it most certainly isn't.