# Thread: Time travel ,is it possible.

1. Domain of Relativistic Mechanics.

- - - - - - - - - .• - - - - - - - - - -
1.Introduction
Einstein's Theory undermined.
A century old theory is being
investigated by a mind for 20 years.
The result in this case, Einstein’s
theory seems to be shattered.
We will prove it in 3 parts.
PART1: A three way related algebraic
formula developed by me and its
significance like number theory could
be the basis of even a theory like
Special theory of Relativity.
PART2: In the shadow of Einstein.
PART3:Relativistic Mechanics
probed to find the domain of it.Note
that , part3 might seem independent,
but the formula derived in part1 has a
bearing on this. International Journal of Scientific & EngineeringResearch, Volume 4,Issue 4,April‐2013 561
ISSN 2229‐5518

Part – 1:
2.Lord Kelvin’s Statement
“I often say, if you can express what
you know of something, in numbers,
Otherwise, your knowledge is of a
meager and unsatisfactory kind. It
may be the beginning of knowledge,
but you have scarcely in your
thoughts advanced to the stage of
science, whatever the matter may be”.
3.The bombshell of the 21st century:
An algebraic formula developed by
me
I was preparing for SAT almost 2
decades back. I studied and observed
squares of numbers.
20²=400
21²=441
22²=484
23²=529
24²=576
25²=625
26²=676
27²=729
28²=784
29²=841
30²=900
The difference between the first and
last numbers, second and second last
numbers and so on are as follows:
500, 400, 300, 200 and 100. This
difference looked unbelievable to me.
To my observation, it was stunning to
observe that the squares of the
difference of numbers was falling into
a definite pattern.
30² ― 20²= 500 = [26² ― 24²] x 5
29² ― 21²= 400 = [26² ― 24²] x 4
28² ― 22²= 300 = [26² ― 24²] x 3
27² ― 23²= 200 = [26² ― 24²] x2
26² ― 24²= 100 = [26² ― 24²] x1International Journal of Scientific & EngineeringResearch, Volume 4,Issue 4,April‐2013 562
ISSN 2229‐5518

At this stage, insight, institution
triggered. The pattern, was
further checked and studied by
extending itto10‐20range.
10² =100
11²=121
12²=144
13²=169
14²=196
15²=225
16²=256
17²=289
18²=324
19²=361
20²=400
20²―10²=300=60x5
19²―11²=240=60x4
18²―12²=180=60x3
17²―13²=120=60x2
16²―14²=60=60x1
These observations, were further
extensively checked and it led me to the
formula.
[N² ― (N―2)² ]X=4(N‐
1)X=[N―(1―X)]²―[N―(1+X)]² whereNand
X are are two variables.
Now, it is the triumph of creativity.It is a
three way related formulae and
hence ,can be used to pose a question like
given an equation,
[A² ― B²] C = D= E²― F² where given E and
F
to findA,B,C and D. or alternatively posed
as givenAand C,to findB, D,E and F.where
the
Capital letters denote numbers, either
Real or Complex.This is a formula so
revolutionary
that I would call it miracle equation.It is
God’s gift to me.Note,that my formula is
capable
of solving 2 variables in a single
equation,which is conventionally
impossible from a mathematical
point of view.Also,understand that the
modified form of special theory of
relativity equations
contain 3 variables.For instance(t′)²=(t)²―(
tv/c)².Using my formula,2 of the variables
are determinate. Hence, the only
remaining variable, which is the only
unknown now could be found out.In
effect,in totality,in reality, all the variables
can be determined orsolved ie meaningful
interpretation of the same an be
,this in mind.No longer,is the Special
Theory of Relativity Equations
mysterious,inscrutable or
perplexing.Armed with a formula like the
above,we will pursue the same.
Pythagoreans believed that the number 4
governs the world. It is there in my
formula.
Number theory can be the key to the
understanding or unlocking the limits of
the special theory of Relativity. It
reinforces the maxim “Mathematics is the
Mother of all sciences”.
4.VITAL DEDUCTION: The formula
developed by me, serves as a way of
solving two variables minimum or upto 3,
maximum in a single equation relating two
sets of difference of squares of numbers.
Hence, it is a paradox from mathematical
point of view, although ,it is only a
particular solution. That can be
miraculous, in nature, will be proved later,
when considered it is analogous to special
relativity equations in number theory
form. Something of trivial significance, is
mentioned below.
5.Deviation Formula has one more use)
Let me rearrange the formula:
[√[ {N²―(N―2)²}X]²
+[N―(1+X)]²=[N―(1―X)]²ie ofthe form A²
+B² = C²
Hence,
Pythagorean triplets can be generated by
using this formula.International Journal of Scientific & EngineeringResearch, Volume 4,Issue 4,April‐2013 564
ISSN 2229‐5518

6.IN THE SHADOW OF EINSTEIN –
Applications in Special Theory of Relativity
The formula was invented 2 decades back. It
was rejected, or considered trivial among
most people I met or submitted, in India.
Subsconsciously, feeling always, analogous
to Special Relativity-- those issues, were
boiling in my mind, for more
than a decade, when at last, it was serving as
a catapult to my long standing cherished
view, that it could be applied to Special
Relativity equations and the domain of
Relativistic Mechanics could be identified. I
was awestruck at how ,I arrived at it.
The sequence of events:
Knowledge of inequalities(Algebra branch)
is required in order to understand this.
TIME DILATON EQUATION
t = t′
√ (1― v²/c²)
where t is the time measured in S
frame is slower than the time t′
measured in inertial frame S′ by time
dilation equations.In all these cases, c
stands for velocity of light and equal
to it,whereas v is the velocity of the
frame S′ with respect to S.
On rearranging the relativistic
equation ,simplifies to( t′c)²=(tc
(t′)²=(t)²―( tv/c)²
We proceed like this:At this stage,my
invented formula’s most simplified
form will be adequate in proving my
contention. A simpler form of my
formula could be treated as ,the
formula 4AB= (A+B)² ―
(A―B)²,when we apply(N-1)=A and
X=B which on further simplification
AB=[(A+B)/2 ]² ― [ ( A ― B)/2]² by
rearranging.,will thereby have the
merits and advantages of my formula ,
which is worth mentioning.
( A+B)/2 > (A―B)/2 for both A and B greater
than 0.
. 8.CASE1

BOARD A/PHYSICS
STEP1
(t′)²=(t)²―(tv/c)²,time
dilation equation
modified form involving
3 variables,which have
their usual meanings.
STEP2
Note,that each term of
the above equation has
the same unit.(second
squared)
STEP3
But t>0 and t′ >0 and
t < k,hence maximum of
t=k,comparing physics
equation divested of its
units,with mathematics
equation
BOARD B/NUMBER
THEORY
STEP1
AB=[(A+B)/2 ]² ― [ ( A ―
B)/2]² is true and has the
properties of miracle
equation
STEP2
All Equations are
analogous to
X² = Y²― Z²,in which X
equals squareroot of(AB) or
[k(k― 2w)].This is the
instance when physics and
mathematics are
identical.STEP3
Maximum of tv/c=kv/c is
the first value of w.
STEP4
Equating first value of w
with second value,we get
kv/c=k/2.Cancelling out k
from both sides in it and
rearranging,we get
maximum of v=c/2 units.
BOARD C
\MATHEMATICS
STEP1
(k)(k―2 w)=(k―w)²― (w)² is an
algebraic identity involving 2
vqariables.
STEP2
Furtherlet Z=w= tv/c above.
Let usintroduce w= t v/c,then
(k)(k―2tv/c)=(k―tv/c)²― (tv/c)²
SinceA>0 , B>0&
A>B,we get (tv < ck/2) ,
Also(A+B/2)>0
gives(tv<ck),
ergo,tv<ck/2 is the
deduction.Hence,the
maximum value of
tv= ck/2,since even(AB/2)>0
STEP3
It follows since max. of
tv= ck/2,therefore ,max.
of tv/c=k/2.This is the
second value of w.
VERY IMPORTANT
In the basic equation [N²―
(N―2)² ]X=4(N-
1)X=[N―(1―X)]²―[N―(1+X)]²
where N and X are are two
variables.,N,(N ― 1) and
(N ― 2) ought to be
positive which implies k
has to be greater than1.
9.CASE2
For values of k<1,
the valid equation is
t = t′
√ (1― v²/c²)
,where Einstein’s special
theory of relativity be valid
and the limitations,I tried
to impose upon
invalid.Hence v almost
could be equal to c
,implies t< 1,which also
implies t′ <1.
.

10.Conclusion:
Yes, we can reduce a two dimensional multiplication to a squaring operation in a single
dimension (though this can raise the question of whether or not higher dimensional spaces
can inversely be constructed by operations performed within a single dimension! I think this
is true and that the dimensionality of a space arises from quantities and the inherent
diversity of qualities in the context of which information is presented)
CASE1
Maximum of v=c/2

units in tv<kc/2 , time in frame S′, t′, element of 1to k seconds
and also t<k seconds,where k stands for any fixed value ,however large in
seconds,greater than 1.
In case 1 not only numerical verification is done by number theory developed by
me, even if ,units and dimensions are considered as issues,will not hamper the
conclusion.
In less than or equal to 1 second time interval between events,mass less than 1 kg
or length contraction less than 300000km,Einstein’s special theory of relativity is
100% accurate.Beyond the same,it is only accurate upto half the speed of light,for
Time dilation , mass variation and Length contraction .Also, Special Relativity is
absurd in momentum and energy considerations also in this affected domain.
Ergo, my theory serves to destroy, a century's unabashed approval of Special
Theory of Relativity by world's leading scientists , of much, of its miraculous
nature. Einstein's view “The distinction between past, present and future is illusory,
however tenacious, it may appear to be” does not seem vindicated.
Cosmic speed or speed barrier for particles above 1kg is proved to be half the
speed of light.There is no Theory of Everything.

2.

3. Moderator Comment: I've moved this to New Hypotheses and Ideas. It was out of place in Introductions.

Moderator Warning: This is for all the usual suspects. You know who you are. Play nice. Address the idea, not the man. Personal attacks or remarks may result in an immediate ban. Negative characterisations of the content, without substantiation will be judged to be the same.

4. The formatting makes it almost impossible to read.

5. Originally Posted by AlexG
The formatting makes it almost impossible to read.
http://www.gsjournal.net/old/files/4..._MECHANICS.pdf

Note,that my formula is
capable
of solving 2 variables in a single
equation,which is conventionally
impossible from a mathematical
point of view.
That sounds really interesting.

Could you - using your formula - solve for these 2 variables:

M x N = 2304

What are the values of M and N?

7. I could not read that. My apologies. It made zero sense to me. Would someone be so kind to explain it in lay terms?

8. Originally Posted by babe
It made zero sense to me.
Your interpretation appears to be correct.

Pythagoreans believed that the number 4 governs the world. It is there in my formula.
What does that have to do with anything?

9. Ergo, my theory serves to destroy, a century's unabashed approval of SpecialTheory of Relativity by world's leading scientists , of much, of its miraculous
nature
It seems to be numerology and some algebraic nonsense.

10. Originally Posted by Dywyddyr
Originally Posted by babe
It made zero sense to me.
Your interpretation appears to be correct.