Notices
Results 1 to 9 of 9
Like Tree3Likes
  • 1 Post By AlexG
  • 1 Post By RedPanda
  • 1 Post By AlexG

Thread: Time travel ,is it possible.

  1. #1 Time travel ,is it possible. 
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    3
    Domain of Relativistic Mechanics.
    Pradeep Koshy

    - - - - - - - - - .• - - - - - - - - - -
    1.Introduction
    Einstein's Theory undermined.
    A century old theory is being
    investigated by a mind for 20 years.
    The result in this case, Einstein’s
    theory seems to be shattered.
    We will prove it in 3 parts.
    PART1: A three way related algebraic
    formula developed by me and its
    significance like number theory could
    be the basis of even a theory like
    Special theory of Relativity.
    PART2: In the shadow of Einstein.
    PART3:Relativistic Mechanics
    probed to find the domain of it.Note
    that , part3 might seem independent,
    but the formula derived in part1 has a
    bearing on this. International Journal of Scientific & EngineeringResearch, Volume 4,Issue 4,April‐2013 561
    ISSN 2229‐5518
    IJSER 2013


    Part – 1:
    2.Lord Kelvin’s Statement
    “I often say, if you can express what
    you know of something, in numbers,
    you know something about it.
    Otherwise, your knowledge is of a
    meager and unsatisfactory kind. It
    may be the beginning of knowledge,
    but you have scarcely in your
    thoughts advanced to the stage of
    science, whatever the matter may be”.
    3.The bombshell of the 21st century:
    An algebraic formula developed by
    me
    I was preparing for SAT almost 2
    decades back. I studied and observed
    squares of numbers.
    20=400
    21=441
    22=484
    23=529
    24=576
    25=625
    26=676
    27=729
    28=784
    29=841
    30=900
    The difference between the first and
    last numbers, second and second last
    numbers and so on are as follows:
    500, 400, 300, 200 and 100. This
    difference looked unbelievable to me.
    To my observation, it was stunning to
    observe that the squares of the
    difference of numbers was falling into
    a definite pattern.
    30 ― 20= 500 = [26 ― 24] x 5
    29 ― 21= 400 = [26 ― 24] x 4
    28 ― 22= 300 = [26 ― 24] x 3
    27 ― 23= 200 = [26 ― 24] x2
    26 ― 24= 100 = [26 ― 24] x1International Journal of Scientific & EngineeringResearch, Volume 4,Issue 4,April‐2013 562
    ISSN 2229‐5518
    IJSER 2013


    At this stage, insight, institution
    and creativity had been
    triggered. The pattern, was
    further checked and studied by
    extending itto10‐20range.
    10 =100
    11=121
    12=144
    13=169
    14=196
    15=225
    16=256
    17=289
    18=324
    19=361
    20=400
    20―10=300=60x5
    19―11=240=60x4
    18―12=180=60x3
    17―13=120=60x2
    16―14=60=60x1
    These observations, were further
    extensively checked and it led me to the
    formula.
    [N ― (N―2) ]X=4(N‐
    1)X=[N―(1―X)]―[N―(1+X)] whereNand
    X are are two variables.
    Now, it is the triumph of creativity.It is a
    three way related formulae and
    hence ,can be used to pose a question like
    given an equation,
    [A ― B] C = D= E― F where given E and
    F
    to findA,B,C and D. or alternatively posed
    as givenAand C,to findB, D,E and F.where
    the
    Capital letters denote numbers, either
    Real or Complex.This is a formula so
    revolutionary
    that I would call it miracle equation.It is
    God’s gift to me.Note,that my formula is
    capable
    of solving 2 variables in a single
    equation,which is conventionally
    impossible from a mathematical
    point of view.Also,understand that the
    modified form of special theory of
    relativity equations
    contain 3 variables.For instance(t′)=(t)―(
    tv/c).Using my formula,2 of the variables
    are determinate. Hence, the only
    remaining variable, which is the only
    unknown now could be found out.In
    effect,in totality,in reality, all the variables
    can be determined orsolved ie meaningful
    interpretation of the same an be
    made.From,hereon,we proceed keeping
    ,this in mind.No longer,is the Special
    Theory of Relativity Equations
    mysterious,inscrutable or
    perplexing.Armed with a formula like the
    above,we will pursue the same.
    Pythagoreans believed that the number 4
    governs the world. It is there in my
    formula.
    Number theory can be the key to the
    understanding or unlocking the limits of
    the special theory of Relativity. It
    reinforces the maxim “Mathematics is the
    Mother of all sciences”.
    4.VITAL DEDUCTION: The formula
    developed by me, serves as a way of
    solving two variables minimum or upto 3,
    maximum in a single equation relating two
    sets of difference of squares of numbers.
    Hence, it is a paradox from mathematical
    point of view, although ,it is only a
    particular solution. That can be
    miraculous, in nature, will be proved later,
    when considered it is analogous to special
    relativity equations in number theory
    form. Something of trivial significance, is
    mentioned below.
    5.Deviation Formula has one more use)
    Let me rearrange the formula:
    [√[ {N―(N―2)}X]
    +[N―(1+X)]=[N―(1―X)]ie ofthe form A
    +B = C
    Hence,
    Pythagorean triplets can be generated by
    using this formula.International Journal of Scientific & EngineeringResearch, Volume 4,Issue 4,April‐2013 564
    ISSN 2229‐5518
    IJSER 2013


    6.IN THE SHADOW OF EINSTEIN –
    Applications in Special Theory of Relativity
    The formula was invented 2 decades back. It
    was rejected, or considered trivial among
    most people I met or submitted, in India.
    Subsconsciously, feeling always, analogous
    to Special Relativity-- those issues, were
    boiling in my mind, for more
    than a decade, when at last, it was serving as
    a catapult to my long standing cherished
    view, that it could be applied to Special
    Relativity equations and the domain of
    Relativistic Mechanics could be identified. I
    was awestruck at how ,I arrived at it.
    The sequence of events:
    Knowledge of inequalities(Algebra branch)
    is required in order to understand this.
    TIME DILATON EQUATION
    t = t′
    √ (1― v/c)
    where t is the time measured in S
    frame is slower than the time t′
    measured in inertial frame S′ by time
    dilation equations.In all these cases, c
    stands for velocity of light and equal
    to it,whereas v is the velocity of the
    frame S′ with respect to S.
    On rearranging the relativistic
    equation ,simplifies to( t′c)=(tc
    )―(tv),which finally leads to
    (t′)=(t)―( tv/c)
    We proceed like this:At this stage,my
    invented formula’s most simplified
    form will be adequate in proving my
    contention. A simpler form of my
    formula could be treated as ,the
    formula 4AB= (A+B) ―
    (A―B),when we apply(N-1)=A and
    X=B which on further simplification
    leads to
    AB=[(A+B)/2 ] ― [ ( A ― B)/2] by
    rearranging.,will thereby have the
    merits and advantages of my formula ,
    which is worth mentioning.
    Please note also, in reality,
    ( A+B)/2 > (A―B)/2 for both A and B greater
    than 0.
    . 8.CASE1


    BOARD A/PHYSICS
    STEP1
    (t′)=(t)―(tv/c),time
    dilation equation
    modified form involving
    3 variables,which have
    their usual meanings.
    STEP2
    Note,that each term of
    the above equation has
    the same unit.(second
    squared)
    STEP3
    But t>0 and t′ >0 and
    t < k,hence maximum of
    t=k,comparing physics
    equation divested of its
    units,with mathematics
    equation
    BOARD B/NUMBER
    THEORY
    STEP1
    AB=[(A+B)/2 ] ― [ ( A ―
    B)/2] is true and has the
    properties of miracle
    equation
    STEP2
    All Equations are
    analogous to
    X = Y― Z,in which X
    equals squareroot of(AB) or
    [k(k― 2w)].This is the
    instance when physics and
    mathematics are
    identical.STEP3
    Maximum of tv/c=kv/c is
    the first value of w.
    STEP4
    Equating first value of w
    with second value,we get
    kv/c=k/2.Cancelling out k
    from both sides in it and
    rearranging,we get
    maximum of v=c/2 units.
    BOARD C
    \MATHEMATICS
    STEP1
    (k)(k―2 w)=(k―w)― (w) is an
    algebraic identity involving 2
    vqariables.
    STEP2
    Furtherlet Z=w= tv/c above.
    Let usintroduce w= t v/c,then
    (k)(k―2tv/c)=(k―tv/c)― (tv/c)
    SinceA>0 , B>0&
    A>B,we get (tv < ck/2) ,
    Also(A+B/2)>0
    gives(tv<ck),
    ergo,tv<ck/2 is the
    deduction.Hence,the
    maximum value of
    tv= ck/2,since even(AB/2)>0
    STEP3
    It follows since max. of
    tv= ck/2,therefore ,max.
    of tv/c=k/2.This is the
    second value of w.
    VERY IMPORTANT
    In the basic equation [N―
    (N―2) ]X=4(N-
    1)X=[N―(1―X)]―[N―(1+X)]
    where N and X are are two
    variables.,N,(N ― 1) and
    (N ― 2) ought to be
    positive which implies k
    has to be greater than1.
    9.CASE2
    For values of k<1,
    the valid equation is
    t = t′
    √ (1― v/c)
    ,where Einstein’s special
    theory of relativity be valid
    and the limitations,I tried
    to impose upon
    invalid.Hence v almost
    could be equal to c
    ,implies t< 1,which also
    implies t′ <1.
    .



    10.Conclusion:
    Yes, we can reduce a two dimensional multiplication to a squaring operation in a single
    dimension (though this can raise the question of whether or not higher dimensional spaces
    can inversely be constructed by operations performed within a single dimension! I think this
    is true and that the dimensionality of a space arises from quantities and the inherent
    diversity of qualities in the context of which information is presented)
    CASE1
    Maximum of v=c/2

    units in tv<kc/2 , time in frame S′, t′, element of 1to k seconds
    and also t<k seconds,where k stands for any fixed value ,however large in
    seconds,greater than 1.
    In case 1 not only numerical verification is done by number theory developed by
    me, even if ,units and dimensions are considered as issues,will not hamper the
    conclusion.
    In less than or equal to 1 second time interval between events,mass less than 1 kg
    or length contraction less than 300000km,Einstein’s special theory of relativity is
    100% accurate.Beyond the same,it is only accurate upto half the speed of light,for
    Time dilation , mass variation and Length contraction .Also, Special Relativity is
    absurd in momentum and energy considerations also in this affected domain.
    Ergo, my theory serves to destroy, a century's unabashed approval of Special
    Theory of Relativity by world's leading scientists , of much, of its miraculous
    nature. Einstein's view “The distinction between past, present and future is illusory,
    however tenacious, it may appear to be” does not seem vindicated.
    Cosmic speed or speed barrier for particles above 1kg is proved to be half the
    speed of light.There is no Theory of Everything.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    Moderator Comment: I've moved this to New Hypotheses and Ideas. It was out of place in Introductions.

    Moderator Warning: This is for all the usual suspects. You know who you are. Play nice. Address the idea, not the man. Personal attacks or remarks may result in an immediate ban. Negative characterisations of the content, without substantiation will be judged to be the same.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Anti-Crank AlexG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,809
    The formatting makes it almost impossible to read.
    Cogito Ergo Sum likes this.
    Its the way nature is!
    If you dont like it, go somewhere else....
    To another universe, where the rules are simpler
    Philosophically more pleasing, more psychologically easy
    Prof Richard Feynman (1979) .....

    Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    ▼▼ dn ʎɐʍ sıɥʇ ▼▼ RedPanda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,737
    Quote Originally Posted by AlexG View Post
    The formatting makes it almost impossible to read.
    Here's a PDF version:
    http://www.gsjournal.net/old/files/4..._MECHANICS.pdf
    SayBigWords.com/say/3FC

    "And, behold, I come quickly;" Revelation 22:12

    "Religions are like sausages. When you know how they are made, you no longer want them."
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    ▼▼ dn ʎɐʍ sıɥʇ ▼▼ RedPanda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,737
    Quote Originally Posted by 07PRADEEP View Post
    Note,that my formula is
    capable
    of solving 2 variables in a single
    equation,which is conventionally
    impossible from a mathematical
    point of view.
    That sounds really interesting.

    Could you - using your formula - solve for these 2 variables:

    M x N = 2304

    What are the values of M and N?
    Last edited by RedPanda; July 3rd, 2013 at 07:14 AM.
    Dywyddyr likes this.
    SayBigWords.com/say/3FC

    "And, behold, I come quickly;" Revelation 22:12

    "Religions are like sausages. When you know how they are made, you no longer want them."
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    13,065
    I could not read that. My apologies. It made zero sense to me. Would someone be so kind to explain it in lay terms?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,589
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    It made zero sense to me.
    Your interpretation appears to be correct.


    Quote Originally Posted by 07PRADEEP
    Pythagoreans believed that the number 4 governs the world. It is there in my formula.
    What does that have to do with anything?
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Anti-Crank AlexG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,809
    Ergo, my theory serves to destroy, a century's unabashed approval of SpecialTheory of Relativity by world's leading scientists , of much, of its miraculous
    nature
    It seems to be numerology and some algebraic nonsense.
    PhDemon likes this.
    Its the way nature is!
    If you dont like it, go somewhere else....
    To another universe, where the rules are simpler
    Philosophically more pleasing, more psychologically easy
    Prof Richard Feynman (1979) .....

    Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    13,065
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    It made zero sense to me.
    Your interpretation appears to be correct.


    Quote Originally Posted by 07PRADEEP
    Pythagoreans believed that the number 4 governs the world. It is there in my formula.
    What does that have to do with anything?
    Whatever
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Higher Space Time and Time Travel.
    By mmatt9876 in forum Personal Theories & Alternative Ideas
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: August 18th, 2013, 12:02 AM
  2. Time travel
    By physicsphreak in forum Physics
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: April 30th, 2013, 11:29 AM
  3. time travel
    By thacheezinator in forum Astronomy & Cosmology
    Replies: 56
    Last Post: November 15th, 2012, 11:08 AM
  4. time travel
    By gravityguru in forum Personal Theories & Alternative Ideas
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: July 17th, 2010, 04:07 PM
  5. TIME TRAVEL ?
    By BARCUD in forum Pseudoscience
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: January 1st, 2009, 04:22 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •