Notices
Results 1 to 7 of 7
Like Tree2Likes
  • 2 Post By Flick Montana

Thread: My philosophical ideas

  1. #1 My philosophical ideas 
    New Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1
    Prologue

    Nowadays it is hard to publish your ideas related with physics when you are notan accredited physicist. Also it is hard to make people find your ideasseriously, especially when your ideas intersect famous scientistsí ideas or theories.And the funniest thing is that those physicians, who are not able to create oreven think rationally, are just all talk and no action, they can only mock and donothing. Conceited fools.
    Enunciation


    I thoughtabout some physical principles (in the philosophical sense) and exposed them inmy website Ė ( http://mmphilosphy.weebly.com). If my ideas are correct, it is possible to create some useful inventions(which I described). Naturally, to proof my ideas/theories, I must invent them.Well, or at least try to invent them. However, unfortunately I cannot do it bymyself due to some circumstances. That is why I am looking for people who haveabilities, potential, willingness to experiment.
    Epilogue


    If my ideasare successful, I allow patent my ideas/inventions to people who constructedit.

    - I will not discuss my ideas personally. Try (disproof) or shut up.
    - My website has no ads, so there is no possibility to make money. Irepeat - I have nothing to advertise, so my website is not SPAMís tool and Iímnot spamming. Unless you think that sharing your ideas about physics in physicsforum is SPAM.

    The end.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    16,680
    Quote Originally Posted by montekristo View Post
    Nowadays it is hard to publish your ideas related with physics when you are notan accredited physicist.
    What is an "accredited physicist"? There are examples of people who not associated with universities or research organizations, dedicated amateurs if you like, who get papers published in science journals. They just need to be good science and well written.

    Also it is hard to make people find your ideasseriously, especially when your ideas intersect famous scientists’ ideas or theories.
    More likely, if your ideas have no content and appear to based on little understanding of science.

    I thoughtabout some physical principles (in the philosophical sense) and exposed them inmy website
    I skimmed through this. All it seems to expose is your very limited grasp of science. Do you want me to go through and point out the errors one by one? Or it might be better if you actually studied physics and then tried again.

    If my ideas are correct, it is possible to create some useful inventions
    As you ideas are so vague and unquantified (apart from being based on a total lack of knowledge of physics), I see no reason to think that anything useful could come from them. Perhaps if you could develop the mathematics showing how they work ...

    Naturally, to proof my ideas/theories, I must invent them.
    You don't need to invent anything. You just need to develop your ideas to the level of testable hypothesis: i.e. make quantifiable, measurable predictions so that they can be tested by experiment. That is generally how new scientific ideas are developed.

    I will not discuss my ideas personally.
    Then why post on a discussion forum?

    Try (disproof) or shut up.
    As there are no quantified predictions, there is nothing to disprove.


    Without wishing to overstate my case, everything in the observable universe definitely has its origins in Northamptonshire -- Alan Moore
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Administrator KALSTER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    8,231
    Moving to New Hypothesis.
    Disclaimer: I do not declare myself to be an expert on ANY subject. If I state something as fact that is obviously wrong, please don't hesitate to correct me. I welcome such corrections in an attempt to be as truthful and accurate as possible.

    "Gullibility kills" - Carl Sagan
    "All people know the same truth. Our lives consist of how we chose to distort it." - Harry Block
    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Comet Dust Collector Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    2,848
    Generous of you to give it a stop on the way to the Trash Can...I see no "hypothesis" here.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Administrator KALSTER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    8,231
    Indeed.
    Disclaimer: I do not declare myself to be an expert on ANY subject. If I state something as fact that is obviously wrong, please don't hesitate to correct me. I welcome such corrections in an attempt to be as truthful and accurate as possible.

    "Gullibility kills" - Carl Sagan
    "All people know the same truth. Our lives consist of how we chose to distort it." - Harry Block
    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Life-Size Nanoputian Flick Montana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Flatland
    Posts
    5,437
    The great thing about the internet is that anyone can have their own webpage. The bad thing about the internet is that ANYONE can have their own webpage.

    Water transitioning from liquid to gas phase is not called "disintegrating". Just, you know, for when you get published.
    KALSTER and adelady like this.
    "Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us." -Calvin
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Forum Professor Zwolver's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,667
    Quote Originally Posted by Flick Montana View Post
    Water transitioning from liquid to gas phase is not called "disintegrating". Just, you know, for when you get published.
    So my disintegration ray, where i boil water... is invalid? Back to the drawing board. Maybe i'll give the disruptor another thought, where i mix sand with penetrating oil...
    Growing up, i marveled at star-trek's science, and ignored the perfect society. Now, i try to ignore their science, and marvel at the society.

    Imagine, being able to create matter out of thin air, and not coming up with using drones for boarding hostile ships. Or using drones to defend your own ship. Heck, using drones to block energy attacks, counterattack or for surveillance. Unless, of course, they are nano-machines in your blood, which is a billion times more complex..
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. sigurdV on Philosophical Logic.
    By sigurdW in forum Philosophy
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: August 30th, 2012, 12:11 PM
  2. Debates Multiplayer Game (philosophical)
    By RodrigoA in forum Links
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 9th, 2012, 06:13 PM
  3. Philosophical Beliefs
    By gottspieler in forum Philosophy
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: May 9th, 2009, 07:48 AM
  4. Philosophical Smart Alecs
    By DaBOB in forum Philosophy
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: February 14th, 2007, 09:03 AM
  5. Philosophical Discussion good move
    By (In)Sanity in forum Site Feedback
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: October 29th, 2004, 03:07 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •