Neverfly, I answered all your questions in previous posts but as an act of politeness I will do it once again.
The succeeding phase transitions of the modified Higgs field lead to the closed strings the neutrinos consist of, to the Einstein spacetime (the ES) components i.e. the binary systems of neutrinos, to the cores of baryons (the torus + ball) and to the protoworlds after the era of inflation. The ground state of the ES consists of the non-rotating-spin binary systems of neutrinos. Since the binary systems of neutrinos are moving with the speed of light (they are the carriers of photons and gluons) and do not rotate so they cannot transfer any energy to detectors. It is the reason that we cannot detect the ES components but they are there. The binary systems of neutrinos can decay due to the weak interactions so we should observe a neutrino shower in the LHC experiments and it is true.
In my opinion, not numerous superluminal neutrinos should be observed in the earlier experiments when number of emitted neutrinos per volume was much higher than in the last experiments. But such detections are very difficult because almost all neutrinos have the speed c.
It is the number of superluminal neutrinos per unit of volume.
Such model acts when there is a remnant i.e. neutron star, but we do not see neutron star in the place of explosion of the supernova SN 1987A. Of course, somebody can claim that we do not see a remnant due to the high mass density of the gas. But it is only the interpretation. I, within one coherent model, proved that in lack of neutron star the time distance follows from the superluminal speeds of neutrinos. The CALCULATED time distance overlaps with the observational fact. So I claim that the detected neutrinos indeed are the superluminal neutrinos.