Notices
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: New Fundamental Conception

  1. #1 New Fundamental Conception 
    Vak
    Vak is offline
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    2

    My Universe outlook conception: LINK DELETED



     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Moderator Moderator TheBiologista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,564
    Welcome Vak. Please note that this is primarily a discussion forum, not a space for self-promotion. It is generally frowned upon for users to provide a link to their own or someone else's content without some reasonable amount of commentary attached, to encourage discussion here. We're not here to provide you with traffic.

    Please stick around, engage with us, start some discussion. Then we won't mind the links so much.


     

  4. #3 To TheBiologista 
    Vak
    Vak is offline
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Russia
    Posts
    2

    To discuss, it is necessary to read. Therefore I have given my link. What for here to write partially if by my link it was possible to read completely. The short text a little that will clear.
    You have in vain deleted my link as it is duplicated by button WWW.

     

  5. #4 Re: To TheBiologista 
    Moderator Moderator TheBiologista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,564
    Quote Originally Posted by Vak

    To discuss, it is necessary to read. Therefore I have given my link. What for here to write partially if by my link it was possible to read completely. The short text a little that will clear.
    Sorry, but there has to be some give and take here. Give us some indication of your main arguments and use your site as a source. A terse comment and a link will probably not inspire much discussion.

    Quote Originally Posted by Vak
    You have in vain deleted my link as it is duplicated by button WWW.
    Okay, but I can delete your posts too. So we can play it like this if you like, but there's really no need. I am interested in hearing what you have to say, I just want you to say it here. Fair enough?
     

  6. #5  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    55
    Even if your link had not been deleted I would not have clicked on it. I never click on links posted by new members with only one post/thread, unless I know for sure that the link is safe. I suspect that most other members are the same. So if you want to be heard you should say it here.
     

  7. #6  
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    171
    As stated by the others in this topic, a link with no description of it, prompts no discussion. Most people are wary of random links from random people. If you posted the link and gave a description, about what is on your site, and why we should care, it is much more likely the link would not be removed, and you would actually get some feedback.

    So, try it again. Post the link, and a summery of your ideas and why we should care, and see what happens. If what you say catches someones interest, and they want to read more, they might visit your site to get all of the information.
    Always minimize the variables.

    Semper Paratus
     

  8. #7  
    Forum Cosmic Wizard spuriousmonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,191
    So far your theory looks good.

    Not so optimistic for the future though.
    "Kill them all and let God sort them out."

    - Arnaud Amalric

    http://spuriousforums.com/index.php
     

  9. #8 I am shocked!!! 
    Wak
    Wak is offline
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    5

    I am shocked!!!
    Who is the spammer???!!! I am the spammer???!!!
    You have cruelly offended me!!!
    I am very indignant!!!

    Wak Vak


     

  10. #9  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    Hello Wak/Vak,
    do you think it is unreasonable on a discussion forum to ask for people to give something of substance to discuss on the forum?

    Do you think it is unreasonable to ask someone to follow the rules of the forum?

    Do you think it is unreasonable to ask someone to take a little time studying how a paticualr forum works before posting?

    Do you think the world revolves around you?

    Based on your last post it seems you think all of these things are unreasonable and you do believe the world revolves around you.

    Everyone was very reasonable and measured in their responses. You didn't want to play ball according to the rules. I don't think you have any reason to be feel offended.
     

  11. #10 ! ! ! 
    Wak
    Wak is offline
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    5

    Ophiolite, it is not necessary to talk to me mentor tone!


    The moderator has deleted my topic "Hello All!" (in forum "Introductions") with other users's posts!

    Wak Vak

     

  12. #11 Re: ! ! ! 
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    Quote Originally Posted by Wak

    Ophiolite, it is not necessary to talk to me mentor tone!
    Which tone should I use to respond to an injured teen angst tone?
     

  13. #12  
    Wak
    Wak is offline
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Posts
    5

    From the injured old man I hear!

     

  14. #13  
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    Drop the spiteful hurt act and move on. Your topic was quashed due to an inability on your part to follow the rules. You created a duplicate account after being banned and labeled a spammer, just move on dude.
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

     

  15. #14  
    Forum Cosmic Wizard SkinWalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Grand Prairie, TX
    Posts
    2,377
    At the protest of Vak/Wak, I have reviewed the decision to terminate his account due to spamming, a decision that was reached since he/she repeated posted links without discussion in an attempt to move traffic from our site to his/hers.

    I find that I must side with Vak/Wak and offer an apology. I have rescinded the account termination due to spamming since his links were not in attempt to market a commercial product like shoes, cell phones or viagra.

    Instead, I've updated the status of his/her account termination as "trolling" since he/she was marketing his/her website and probable crackpot idea.

    And I've terminated the duplicate account as, well, a duplicate account.
     

  16. #15  
    Moderator Moderator TheBiologista's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,564
    And with that very welcome clarification, I close this thread.
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •