Notices
Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: The accurate masurement of one spacifiack place

  1. #1 The accurate masurement of one spacifiack place 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    12
    I belive uther than the fact that i can not spell that if we can accuratly mesure the spacifick consistantant signatniture of a place where ever it is and then be in a differant place and recreate the signatniture of the outher place whether it be 1 mile or 100 mile away we can be at that signatniture plase instantanusly by sighning in to the outher signiture.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    that's awesome that you believe that. What evidence do you have for thinking that that's true?


    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3 insuficent resorces 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    12
    I have not the technical or the resorces to investigate my theries. That is my inner burden to bare. thank you for your responce
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    87
    That's ok, but can you at least describe how you would do it if you had the adequate resources? How do you propose to measure the "specific consistent signature" of a place, and what is that anyway?
    grep me no patterns and I'll give you no lines
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5 how i would do this 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    12
    By inserting a veriety if materials from plartic to metal ald evervthing imbetween 12 feet into the earths surface then using every kind of mesuring device in the world serch for that particular places signature and when we found whitch device and material combination enabeled us to see the signature of that place we would move it 10 feef to see the differance between each signature and repeate the process then build a device that can reproduce said signature and be in one place and set the device for a signature allready known 50 miles away and in all probobility the device would appear at the 50 mile mark instantaioiusly
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    87
    Well I don't get it what that signature is. If it's just a configuration of plastic rods inserted into the ground, I don't see how that's relevant, you just have to insert them the same way here and 50 miles away as well. What is this signature you speak of?
    grep me no patterns and I'll give you no lines
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    The map is not the territory.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by AlexandruLazar
    Well I don't get it what that signature is. If it's just a configuration of plastic rods inserted into the ground, I don't see how that's relevant, you just have to insert them the same way here and 50 miles away as well. What is this signature you speak of?
    Look the rods are not the signature te rods are inserted tino the ground to find the signature of that spacifif place it could be the ground beneath yyour feet righh now
    each particle on earth has its own signature the thery is finding out the signature of a certin place anny where on earth

    once you can identify what signature anny alace on earth is and be in a differant place and you have a device that copies the signature of a place 100 miles away said device would thereticaly be thjere instantaniousyl

    You had asked me if i had the resorces and the technical devices at my desposal how would i find this signature look back at my previous answer I thought i answeredyour question read it twice if needed I only answersd the question you asked
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by Ophiolite
    The map is not the territory.

    thank you for your responce
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    Quote Originally Posted by charles e sowers jr
    Quote Originally Posted by Ophiolite
    The map is not the territory.
    thank you for your responce
    Your thanks are appreciated, but I would far rather get an indication that you understood my point; agreed with it, or disagreed with it. That would promote discussion, which I take it to be one of your intentions in posting.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11 to expand on ones thery or to magnify it into reality 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    12
    An answer to your quote is an inconceavable tassk. our knolage of how things work and how things are is so minute that it within its self boggles the mind. The prob is to many people do not use there own minds they take someonselses work that soposidly shoes what the truth is and they blindly work from that. when a new thought or idea comes along to often if it does not fall into previous theries boundries no one takes it seriously or in manny cases they do not even give it anny thought or merrit.

    this was true during the time of sir isec newton einstine and manny outhers it is a sad affair.

    the limitless boundries or not that are posible are itfinate why dismis anny of them unless they are just rediculious.

    have a blessed day

    I dont think i answered your question and i apoligize for that please refraze your question and a I may be more capable of answering it I do not think it was a falt of non clerity on your part i think it is my limitations that did not allow me to answer your question corectly
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    A map is a representation of a piece of land. It is not the piece of land.

    A full description of the signature of a location would not be that location.

    Therefore, in my view, your idea would not work.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by Ophiolite
    A map is a representation of a piece of land. It is not the piece of land.

    A full description of the signature of a location would not be that location.

    Therefore, in my view, your idea would not work.

    corection to first quote the signature is not like a map it is the piece of land that produces a verry distint and consistant marker or signature 1foot from that place has a verry distint and consistant marker or signature.

    Finding out what that marker or signature is is the key to making it all work in doing so we may find in replicating a marker or signature in one place of a nouther place is where it all may fall to pieces it may instantaionusly be at the outher place as i predict or it may produce a form of energy drawn from the earth or it may activate a caticlismic event until we explore this posibilety we will not know it should be done with cautionby

    Answer to Quote 2 the signature of that location is that location in a marker or signature version witchever you want to call it . when i use the word signature it is probably the incorect termanology what i am tring to say is pick a place anny place on earth stick a rock on top of that place exactly where that rock is under neath it enimates a specific marker like a wound wave but not neseceraly a sound wave something ealse that is uniqe to that place 3 inches from taat place would be different this is what my thery is based on finding out what that knote so to speek is and go from there

    I hope i have explaned my self this time in a better light termanolagy and spelling due to my illness has passed me by but that is my burden to bear

    have a blessed day
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    Charles,
    I do understand what you are suggesting. Whether we call it a map, or a signature, or some other appropriate word will not change reality. Duplicating the signature of a place will not allow a connection to exist with the place having the identical signature. There is zero evidence that this might be possible.

    It makes a nice idea for a science fiction story, but without a hint of evidence or theory to support it, it must remain fiction, not science.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #15  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    12
    Quote Originally Posted by Ophiolite
    Charles,
    I do understand what you are suggesting. Whether we call it a map, or a signature, or some other appropriate word will not change reality. Duplicating the signature of a place will not allow a connection to exist with the place having the identical signature. There is zero evidence that this might be possible.

    It makes a nice idea for a science fiction story, but without a hint of evidence or theory to support it, it must remain fiction, not science.
    I must agree with you but so was sellphones planes, moonwalkes, microwave ovens, lasers, computers, etc etc etc etc etc etc wetc it took some one going forward with an idea or thery and wallaw hear they now are i am dieng i have tens of thousands of inventions that right now could be made and the world would be for the most part a better place becouse of them i have never had the finactual means to bring them to light i want some one to hear my therys and mayby something will come of them but i mutch rather some one have my inventions before i die i am 44 with 2 children i am raising with multible debilatating genatic alments and i fear i do not have mutch time left if i can not have the time given to me for the inventions to come to light through my hands than why not someone ealses. give an answer if you may i am looking forword to your reply
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #16  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    Charles,
    all of the inventions you speak of had a base suite of well founded ideas from which to be proposed. I don't see any such ideas underpinning your theory.

    I am sorry to learn of your helath problems and wish you well in this regard. Perhaps I am mistaken and in a hundred years time your great grandchildren and mine will travel around the solar system using this concept. I hope I am mistaken, but I suspect I am not.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #17  
    Forum Masters Degree
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    574
    There is one place defined for you, that,s yourself. You can move around but not be anywhere else then where you are. But That,s for everything and everyone and everyone and everything moves relative to others. Even the earths surface has movement in itself.

    Now you want to have a preferred place with no motion as a point zero. Now suppose when you pick that point and declared it (0,0,0) you take a walk. Now the point is at different distance. You may think it,s only you that has moved but also the point (0,0,0) has a different position to you. When movement is relative position is relative also.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •