abstract

yet another big bang theory. nuff said.

proposal

the universe is expressed by, or an expression of, pure number: it’s counting upwards from 1,or into increasingly smaller fractions of 1.

or: the universe is an expression of the number count we represent in standard English as 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13... all the way through to 10 to the power 40960000000000000000000 or whatever number we’d be at now if time was just an upward count from 1,or a count derived from 1 being divided into increasingly finer fractions.

the universe is expressing or an expression of the numbers 1 to 1/(∞-1)

Universe/Time = 1/(∞-1)

further

space, energy and mass are emergent properties of the pattern coding potential of high count numbers – 10 to many powers at a guess.

this pattern encoding is expressed at higher magnitude powers of number in objects interacting through a polydimensional space

testing

if the hypothesis is correct, there should be correlations between:

a) data encoding potential of number at increasingly higher counts

and

b) high energy proto-particle interactions and anomolies.

specifically there would be anomolies indicating that the size ratio between us and early particles was slowly changing over time.

i predict that the smallest particles would very slowly be getting bigger, relative to us over time, as we both became smaller relative to the universe at different rates.

further, the rate at which our size changes relative to protoparticles will be a function of the rate of expansion of the universe.

___

references

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emergence

http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/lloyd2/lloyd2_p2.html this latter's just an example of the data coding potential, although the paper cited uses Hydrogen atoms as bit points, whereas this one reckons that any and every co-ordinate in a single dimension is a bit point

implications

our universe began when something crossed the event horizon of a black hole. at that point time stopped for the something, but its dimensions began to stretch. the only thing we can know from our perspective is that is was something.

in our reality, we experience this as time (and other 'higher' dimensions) being stretched in a stable set of physical dimensions

the other important impkication is that the particles produced at the LHC are discreet sets of fractions of parts of the universe. we can never know the exact fraction they are due to the ongoing count of time.

we can know what fractions they are relative to us but this ratio will be changing over time, how fast i don't know (although i'm hoping it's real slow lmao)

i postulate that the Higgs' Boson is the difference between what we can know about a particle (relative to us) and what we can't know (relative to the universe)

.

.

.

.

.

.

shoot me down lol