Originally Posted by

**MyNameIsVu**
I notice that electrical strength are measured relative to its weakest detection, at least mathematically it vectorisation (introducting positive and negative) allow one to theorise the interaction between "poled material" and the electrical flow up to certainty. Thus, should not the same theory allow the accessible application of nature to which most of its energy primary focus on certain 3-dimensional-analus through the distribution of material types in the wires or the likes via an observation to strongly gravitised "poled material." Indeed, if such interaction exist then "Gauss Law" regarding it realisation should be restated. Even at an elementary level, I can still construct such a magnet with layered strength such that the observation through "heavy poled material" infuse kinetic interaction that artifically mimic what is posted above beside it magnetisized field interaction. Thus, it is arguable in measure-science that magnetic field is in actuality the mathematical vectorisation of measurable interaction of the concerned.

It is rather a system that is important in it application, and it vectorisation allow such accessibility but it place a limit on it mathematical prediction as well as it alinement with observations, hence it mathematical "pressured-bubblisation" is more sensible since it is a natural failure in such study as it is the case of measurement relative to the weakest detection seem like an impossible bypass, without risking simpleton, to quantisation. Indeed, there exist two such techniqued applications to such conception one is purely mathematical and the other is purely applies nature and theirs interaction gives access to precision engineering. Thus it is plausible that one can refine such undertaking for to construct a "anti-gravity" vechile?

I believe so. BTW, excuse my English.