LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
A Theory of Everything
Albert Einstein was working on a 'theory of everything' and after 30 years of his effort, he failed to develope one.
So, through a serendipitous discovery, I got involved in this idea when I bought a second hand book at a library entitled: 'Introduction to Atomic and Nuclear Physics' by Henry Semat, 4th Ed. On page 588, there was a list of atomic mass numbers (AMN) that included all the isotopes of all the elements up to bismuth that is the heaviest of the elements that is stable. This is a complete list of all the isotopes from one to beyond the last stable element that is bismuth at 209. See chart below:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isotope...%28complete%29
Then I noticed a glaring omission of 2 AMN's. They where 5 and 8. These were the only 2 missing numbers that did not seem to make sense since the 'strong force' (SF) was strictly an attractive force that could not explain why these 2 numbers were missing.
There was another peculiarity about this SF that was its 'extremely' short range of 10^-15 meters. This is the diameter of a nucleon! The 'weak force' had a still shorter range of 10^-18 meters.
So I decided to evaluate why the SF did not explain this discrepency.
Since the SF is supposed to be created in the star fusion process, I thought about why it did not function as it should.
So evalating the central region (CR) of the stars and their nature of fusion, I came to the conclusion that the real forces involved in the fusion process were the coulomb force and the magnetic component of these EMF's to bind together to create the SF.
The CR is packed close together to cause the electrons to bypass the protons at very close OPEN orbital passages to cause the protons to spin at very high spin rates. This causes the protons to have very strong magnetic force fields. These protons will align to attract but an electron is needed in between the two protons to complete the bind. This then creates a 'deuteron' nucleus that acts as a powerful 'bar' magnet with an electron sandwiched in between two protons. Then two of these deuteron bar magnets will automatically clamp together to form a helium nucleus.
However, these fusion binds do not create any energies!
The high velocity electrons bypassing the protons generate strong magnetic pulses because of the high velocity variations that the electrons have, to create the photons in these CRs and then work their way up to the surface of the stars to radiate the light that we see.
The fusion I described above that involved the fusion of the helium nucleus, explains why a 5th particle is not involved. A 5th particle here cannot attach to the high spinning protons. The magnetic field patterns and spin rotations are all compatible.
Also, 2 helium nuclei will not bind together because their is no electrons attached to the sides of these HN to bind together to form an AMN 8. So 2 HN cannot attach to each other.
So this fusion process is simply a Quantum effect that involves the EMF's only.
So, we can then create a new Grand Unified Theory by adding the Force of Gravity as a component of the EM forces
There is sufficient evidence for this also. Gravity has 3 similarities to the EM forces to link these forces together.
They all extend to infinte distances, they reduce in strength according to the 'Inverse Square Law relative to distance and a recent find has discovered that gravity propagates at the velocity of light.
So how does this weak force couple with the powerful EM forces?
Well, my opinion is that the protons acquire synchronous spins with the electron orbital movements through the coulomb attraction to create bypolar magnetic fields.
So the protons will align themselves to attract with other protons nearby to create the gravitational attraction. But these attractions will be considerably weakend by the orbital electron mutual repulsions that are cycling. So this is an alternating repulsion while the protons are steadily attracting.
So then there are ONLY the effects of the EM forces that exclude the strong force and the weak forces to result in a GUT of only the EMF's.
This solution cannot be solved mathematically because visualization or imaging is required to come to this conclusion.
Cosmo
Originally Posted by Harry Costas
