Thread: Recent advice on what to do in nuclear attack

https://www.ready.gov/nuclear-explosion

Originally Posted by ox

https://www.ready.gov/nuclear-explosion

Looks like a scammy URL to me.

WTF is "ready.gov" when it's at home? I'm not clicking on that.

Originally Posted by exchemist

Originally Posted by ox

https://www.ready.gov/nuclear-explosion

Looks like a scammy URL to me.

WTF is "ready.gov" when it's at home? I'm not clicking on that.

Regardless if a scam or not, working to survive a nuclear war might seem like the ultimate act in futility.

Survivability would depend a great deal on the number and yield of weapons detonated, and where.

This is also a scam.

https://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/nor...wales-16340587

Is this correct?

https://inews.co.uk/news/nuclear-wea...lained-1525069

Russia 4500, UK 58.

Originally Posted by ox

Is this correct?

https://inews.co.uk/news/nuclear-wea...lained-1525069

Russia 4500, UK 58.

The U.K. has many more backing it up from France and U.S.

The worry is about any use of nuclear weapons, not the number possessed by Russia, or anyone else.

This seems more reliable.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/co...ons-by-country

If say the UK is attacked would France or the US direct their missiles on Russia?

Originally Posted by ox

This seems more reliable.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/co...ons-by-country

If say the UK is attacked would France or the US direct their missiles on Russia?

The U.K also has nuclear submarines (Vanguard-class) and could respond by an attack on Russia with its own ballistic missiles.

But NATO's article 5 would be invoked, and one assumes that a retaliatory strike by U.K. and other NATO powers would result.