Thread: Natural Theory of Space Quantum - Next Addendum

The Force F_b Relating to Boundary Size:

The force F we used to calculate boundary size applies to the force of gravity between a mass on the Earth’s surface and the Earth itself. That is our experience and corresponds to boundary size b for us here.

The gravity-space force itself is a function of the square of space (r²) and the sum of two masses m₁ and m₂ in a one dimensional sense.

A lower force of space-gravity, for example on our moon, implies a larger boundary dimension and a larger energy “barrier” than we experience here.

For example, in a different gravitational environment:

1. Since we apparently lose certain internal energies (“age”) at each boundary, those energies could be altered (could become larger) through larger boundaries (barriers) than we experience here.

2. In locations with small F_b and a corresponding large boundary, larger energies should be able to experience spatial intersections that only small energies experience here.

A weightless environment, for example an “orbit around” a large mass should only affect the boundary (barrier) size by the effective radius change regarding the real force F_b.


The Square Law in Higher Dimensions:

For us here, there are fundamental square law forces like sound and gravity.

In 5 dimensions, we should experience “cubed” law forces, and so on.


Conclusions:

Fibonacci space is real. The concept of time is not physically real.

Many measurements innately use time and so do all of our perceptions and especially our language(s).

Energy and space are real. They both grow directionally.

Sometimes, we represent our three-dimensional world with our derived three-dimensional mathematics and we become confused (overwhelmed) and cannot soundly (physically) enter into the sequence of natural growth.

Reconciling the natural sequence should lead to an understanding that cannot be achieved in three dimensions alone.

Reverse and dimensional forward entropy are likely waiting for our own enlightenment.



References:

What?

Additional text so my post is above the minimum characters.

Dunno, but he seems to have started three threads full of these incomprehensible meanderings.

Originally Posted by Strange

Dunno, but he seems to have started three threads full of these incomprehensible meanderings.

And I thought he was an intellectual giant!
I found out later he has a relation called moronboy.