Notices
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: How viable / effective would a Tsunami bomb be?

  1. #1 How viable / effective would a Tsunami bomb be? 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    8
    Tsunami Bomb - In essence exactly what it sounds like, a bomb that is dropped into the ocean in a place where it will be able to generate a tsunami to destroy (roughly) the area desired.


    There are conspiracies and what not about if these bomb's exist, but I want to know, how viable would one actually be? Could a bomb make a destructive wave like this or is this just a silly concept?

    As well as this, let's say that Tsunami bombs are in the process of being manufactured and are in theory viable. How effective would these bombs be? Would they in any way change warfare ( when it includes any land close to water )


    Thanks.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Forum Professor pyoko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    1,092
    You would have to spend much more energy creating a tsunami that will destroy the land area desired than dropping a much smaller energy bomb on the actual area and destroying the same area. For several reasons, including the fact that the energy dissipates in all directions, including all those you do not want (a tsunami effectively being a two dimensional bomb), hence huge energy loss. Unless you create some sort of gargantuan physical "wave wall" hundreds of kilometers long and use bombs to push said wall in the desired direction. This wall would also have to be very deep​, because a surface wave, no matter how large, would simply break down before reaching the target.
    The energy released in an earthquake capable of creating a destructive tsunami wave is gargantuan. The energy released in the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami was calculated to be able to power the entire world for 220 years.


    It is by will alone I set my mind in motion.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Comet Dust Collector Moderator
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    New Jersey, USA
    Posts
    2,848
    Agree with pyoko, it's a complete waste of energy. You need a decent sized asteroid to create a damaging tsunami.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Moderator Moderator Markus Hanke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    7,180
    I agree with the above posts...it would be a waste of resources. If you are really after destruction on an epic scale, you are probably best off just upsizing the good old hydrogen bomb. It's effectiveness is really just limited by the delivery system employed, which is something that is much easier to work on than an artificial tsunami...
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Making scientific conferences more effective
    By kowalskil in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: September 16th, 2010, 06:20 AM
  2. Standards of Effective Communication
    By marcusclayman in forum Site Feedback
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 25th, 2009, 10:11 AM
  3. Age of universe and effective receding speed in sync?
    By KALSTER in forum Astronomy & Cosmology
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: January 16th, 2009, 12:42 PM
  4. Replies: 4
    Last Post: March 11th, 2008, 01:45 PM
  5. A viable union of discontinuous QM with continuous waves?
    By That Rascal Puff in forum Physics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: July 12th, 2006, 05:00 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •