Notices
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 101 to 116 of 116

Thread: Paradoxes

  1. #101  
    Forum Sophomore Absane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    105
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    proving 0,999.....=1 is quite simple
    x=0,999...
    10x=9,9999...
    9x=9,9999...-0,9999...=9
    therefor x=1
    Yes.. but if you look you are making a number of assumptions. You need to be able to justify each statement.

    But yes I am sure everyone and their mothers know this proof
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2. #102  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    there isnt any assumption exept that 9=9 anbd 10=10 and .... means its repeating
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  3. #103  
    Forum Professor Zwolver's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,667
    endless is undefinable because endless is unimaginable..

    when we go smaller than atoms with calculation (by now) we can define it as true.. so 0,99999 isn't 1 but 0,999999999999999999999999 is 1.

    that until smaller particles have been found..

    1/3 * 3 is obviously 1..
    1 * 3/3 is also 1..
    0.333..+0.333..+0.333.. is 1 because one of the 1/3 has a 4 instead of a 3.

    it's like electromagnetism... the combining electron is nowhere and everywhere.. it connects them..

    now stop argueing!!
    Growing up, i marveled at star-trek's science, and ignored the perfect society. Now, i try to ignore their science, and marvel at the society.

    Imagine, being able to create matter out of thin air, and not coming up with using drones for boarding hostile ships. Or using drones to defend your own ship. Heck, using drones to block energy attacks, counterattack or for surveillance. Unless, of course, they are nano-machines in your blood, which is a billion times more complex..
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #104  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    endless isnt undefinable. definition, no matter how much you can write it on, digital or analog, you allways have to write more.
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #105  
    Forum Sophomore Absane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    105
    Define a point.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #106  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    0 dimensions
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #107  
    Forum Sophomore Absane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    105
    LOL.

    We could keep going. Define zero dimenstions.

    Basically a point is undefined. It can't be. However a point is the building block of a lot of things, even 1-dimenstion.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #108  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    a real point have 0 dimensions, a dimension is the degree of freedom objects have, 0 means no freedom, no movement. while 1 dimension means 1° of freedom, you can move back/forth no more, and so on for a infinite amount of dimensions
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #109  
    Forum Masters Degree
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    651
    Quote Originally Posted by Absane
    Basically a point is undefined.
    A point is defined, and has meaning only in the context of its definition. There are no geometric points in the real world.

    However a point is the building block of a lot of things, even 1-dimenstion.
    Just as points have no existence in the real world, neither do geometric lines.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #110  
    Forum Sophomore Absane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    105
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    a real point have 0 dimensions, a dimension is the degree of freedom objects have, 0 means no freedom, no movement. while 1 dimension means 1° of freedom, you can move back/forth no more, and so on for a infinite amount of dimensions
    For one... we aren't talking reality. Two, those are just properties of a point.

    The point is (pun intended) a point is a basic object, so it has no definition within mathematics. Just like axioms have no proof within the system.

    Everyone knows what a point is, but defining it is impossible.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #111  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    0 dimensional object
    dimension is a degree of freedom
    freedom is the amount it can move
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #112  
    Forum Masters Degree
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    651
    Quote Originally Posted by Absane
    The point is (pun intended) a point is a basic object, so it has no definition within mathematics. Just like axioms have no proof within the system.

    Everyone knows what a point is, but defining it is impossible.
    I do not think that a point is an object. It does have a definition within mathematics, at least within geometry. Axioms have no proof, but points are not given by axiom, but by definition. No one knows what a point is except by defintion, which is very easy. I am not sure what you mean when you say that it is impossible to define a point. Without a definition, then it would have no meaning, such that no one would know what a point is.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #113  
    Forum Sophomore Absane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    105
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    0 dimensional object
    dimension is a degree of freedom
    freedom is the amount it can move
    You don't think an object in 0D can move? It can. Movement can be static or rotational.It's still a point.

    Remember.. we are talking about a geometrical point. And a point is a BASIC object in mathematics... so it cannot be defined.

    To define a point, you need to list all of it's properties and be absolutely sure that nothing else can be said about it. You also need to use objects/properties that do not presuppose the existance of a point that created these objects/properties. Dimensions are composed of points. 0D happens to have one unique point, but you could easily say it has an infinite number of points (we just won't identify that they are all the same point).
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #114  
    Forum Sophomore Absane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Atlanta, Georgia
    Posts
    105
    Quote Originally Posted by Hermes
    I do not think that a point is an object. It does have a definition within mathematics, at least within geometry. Axioms have no proof, but points are not given by axiom, but by definition. No one knows what a point is except by defintion, which is very easy. I am not sure what you mean when you say that it is impossible to define a point. Without a definition, then it would have no meaning, such that no one would know what a point is.
    Well every topic in mathematics works by building on assumptions and undefined terms. You need to start somewhere.

    Saying that without a definition we would not know what a point is and it has no meaning is silly. That is analogous to saying that without proof of axioms, we don't know that mathematics works. Well we don't know that these axioms are contradiction free because we cannot prove them. However, they have worked good so far.

    What are the basic building blocks of mathematics that define a point? If you can answer this... I will shut up
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #115  
    Forum Masters Degree
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    651
    Quote Originally Posted by Absane
    What are the basic building blocks of mathematics that define a point? If you can answer this... I will shut up
    I am not sure what your question is. What do you consider to be a building blocks of mathematics? Are you asking for the fundamental constituent building blocks of the point? I doubt that. So, what are you asking for. I am not sure of your point.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #116  
    Forum Professor river_rat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    1,510
    Quote Originally Posted by Hermes
    I am not sure what your question is. What do you consider to be a building blocks of mathematics? Are you asking for the fundamental constituent building blocks of the point? I doubt that. So, what are you asking for. I am not sure of your point.
    Absane is talking about the philosophical problem of infinite definition descent : for example the idea of "set" is left undefined in mathematics, we talk about the properties of sets (and classes to be more correct) with out every actually defining what those things are. You can map the idea of a "point" onto any structure you want, for example in a function space functions make up the "points".
    As is often the case with technical subjects we are presented with an unfortunate choice: an explanation that is accurate but incomprehensible, or comprehensible but wrong.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •