Notices
Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Monty Hall Paradox

  1. #1 Monty Hall Paradox 
    Time Lord zinjanthropos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Driving in my car
    Posts
    5,982
    Monty Hall was the host of TV game show ‘Lets Make a Deal”. Contestants had to pick between 1 of 3 curtains to see what’s behind it…..well…. check out this Wiki piece before I mess up.

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_problem

    Not sure if this particular subject has come up before. For us mathematically challenged, it’s a head scratcher but I think I get it after reading up on it. Marilyn vos Savant obviously had no problem with it. Problem has boggled the minds of many number enthusiasts and I’m not sure if the answer is accepted in some parts. Other factors come into play. Interesting if you haven’t seen it before.


    All that belongs to human understanding, in this deep ignorance and obscurity, is to be skeptical, or at least cautious; and not to admit of any hypothesis, whatsoever; much less, of any which is supported by no appearance of probability...Hume
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    KJW
    KJW is offline
    Forum Professor
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,733
    I don't know if it's been discussed here, but I have seen it discussed elsewhere. I'm quite familiar with the problem and do understand the solution. It has even been featured on Mythbusters.


    There are no paradoxes in relativity, just people's misunderstandings of it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Forum Professor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    New York State
    Posts
    1,238
    1+1=2 is a slightly easier version of the problem.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Time Lord zinjanthropos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Driving in my car
    Posts
    5,982
    Quote Originally Posted by mathman View Post
    1+1=2 is a slightly easier version of the problem.
    Everyone loves simplicity Mathman.

    I think you’re saying having one of the 3 choices revealed doesn’t change the denominator. Revealed pick and original pick’s odds each remain at 1/3 but by switching, the new pick has 2/3 chance. Technically a 2nd pick thus the numerator becomes 1+1. Denominator remains at 3. That’s how I saw it but been wrong before.
    All that belongs to human understanding, in this deep ignorance and obscurity, is to be skeptical, or at least cautious; and not to admit of any hypothesis, whatsoever; much less, of any which is supported by no appearance of probability...Hume
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    KJW
    KJW is offline
    Forum Professor
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,733
    Instead of probability, consider a large number of trials, say 1000 trials:

    For all of the 1000 trials, I choose door A as my initial choice.

    Of these 1000 trials, the prize will be behind door A approximately 333 times, behind door B approximately 333 times, and behind door C approximately 333 times.

    Of the 333 times the prize is behind door A, door B will be revealed to be empty approximately 167 times, and door C will be revealed to be empty approximately 167 times.

    Of the 333 times the prize is behind door B, door C will be revealed to be empty all 333 times.

    Of the 333 times the prize is behind door C, door B will be revealed to be empty all 333 times.

    Thus, of the 1000 trials in total, door B will be revealed to be empty approximately 500 times, and door C will be revealed to be empty approximately 500 times.

    Of the 500 times door B was revealed to be empty, the prize was behind door A approximately 167 times, and not behind door A approximately 333 times.

    Of the 500 times door C was revealed to be empty, the prize was behind door A approximately 167 times, and not behind door A approximately 333 times.

    Thus, of the 1000 trials in total, the prize was behind door A approximately 333 times, and not behind door A approximately 667 times.

    Thus, revealing empty doors does not alter the fact that the prize is behind the initially chosen door only 1/3 of the time, and therefore behind the other door 2/3 of the time. What revealing empty doors does is reduce the number of doors other than the initially chosen door from two to one.
    There are no paradoxes in relativity, just people's misunderstandings of it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Time Lord zinjanthropos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Driving in my car
    Posts
    5,982
    Wow! Gave that one a lot of thought KJ. Nice going.

    We did a fun experiment today. My friend put 3 cards face down on a table 100 times. Of the 3 cards , one was red suited. I would pick a card that might be red suited and he would then reveal one of the black suited cards leaving two still face down. I would switch my pick and reveal that card. By switching I was able to get the red card 62 times. We repeated experiment but I had to stick with my original pick and I was successful only 41 times. So it was fairly close to the 2/3 switch vs 1/3 stick success rate.
    All that belongs to human understanding, in this deep ignorance and obscurity, is to be skeptical, or at least cautious; and not to admit of any hypothesis, whatsoever; much less, of any which is supported by no appearance of probability...Hume
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    791
    I recall reading about a version of this but with pigeons and food rewards. The pigeons figured it out quicker than most people.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Hall of Fame
    By zinjanthropos in forum Scientific Study of Religion
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: February 25th, 2013, 03:52 PM
  2. The lever paradox and the elevator paradox
    By Xinwei Huang in forum Personal Theories & Alternative Ideas
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: April 27th, 2010, 12:30 AM
  3. Monty Python's The Galaxy Song
    By eximius in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 28th, 2008, 08:37 PM
  4. Dalai Lama at the Albert Hall........
    By Selene in forum Philosophy
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: February 26th, 2008, 10:01 AM
  5. Hall-Heroult process (electrolysis)
    By a in forum Chemistry
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: June 10th, 2006, 01:36 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •