Notices
Results 1 to 87 of 87

Thread: 6÷2(1+2) = ?

  1. #1 6÷2(1+2) = ? 
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    115
    As per title's question, is the answer 9 or 1?


     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Forum Radioactive Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Posts
    4,014
    Depends where you are putting your brackets. If there is a bracket around the 6 divided by 2 then the answer is 9.

    But I am not sure how you do your notation.

    You have to be clear in your own mind how you write the calculations before you can know what the answer is.


     

  4. #3  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,338
    I would say it is 1.

    First get rid of the brackets (Order of operations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) and it becomes 6 / 6
     

  5. #4  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    9
     

  6. #5  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    8,795
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    9
    You should either explain your answer, or else stay out of the hard science section of the forum. Now, why do you think it's 9?
     

  7. #6  
    KJW
    KJW is offline
    Forum Professor
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,507
    9. Multiplication and division have equal priority and are performed left to right. Thus, 6÷2(1+2) = 6÷2×3 = 3×3 = 9
    There are no paradoxes in relativity, just people's misunderstandings of it.
     

  8. #7  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,338
    Fair enough, apparently wrongly I always tend to treat things like 2(1+3) as a single term to evaluate first. TBH though if anyone gave me something like the question in the OP at work I'd tell them to make it more clear what they meant. As in writing so too in maths, if there is room for ambiguity you need to express yourself better
     

  9. #8  
    KJW
    KJW is offline
    Forum Professor
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,507
    Quote Originally Posted by PhDemon View Post
    Fair enough, apparently wrongly I always tend to treat things like 2(1+3) as a single term to evaluate first.
    I'll admit that was my first inclination.
    There are no paradoxes in relativity, just people's misunderstandings of it.
     

  10. #9  
    KJW
    KJW is offline
    Forum Professor
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,507
    What is interesting is that if the problem had been "6÷2×(1+2) = ?", it would have been obvious, but the removal of "×" provided a closeness between "2" and "(1+2)" that incorrectly suggested a change in the order.
    There are no paradoxes in relativity, just people's misunderstandings of it.
     

  11. #10  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by Harold14370 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    9
    You should either explain your answer, or else stay out of the hard science section of the forum. Now, why do you think it's 9?
    What exacTly do you think 3 * 3 equals? You divide 6 by 2 and you get 3. Then you multipy it by (2+1) WhaT DO YOU GET?
     

  12. #11  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,766
    If you enter it as written into Mathcad the answer is 1.


    To get "9" you have to deliberately and consciously add extra parentheses.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
     

  13. #12  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    9 is correct.
     

  14. #13  
    KJW
    KJW is offline
    Forum Professor
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    1,507
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    If you enter it as written into Mathcad the answer is 1.


    To get "9" you have to deliberately and consciously add extra parentheses.

    What happens if you include the explicit multiplication sign?
    There are no paradoxes in relativity, just people's misunderstandings of it.
     

  15. #14  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    It is simple math guys. Now KJ, what is this implicate order thing?
     

  16. #15  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,766
    Quote Originally Posted by KJW View Post
    What happens if you include the explicit multiplication sign?
    1 again.
    It merely places a "." to explicitly indicate the multiplication.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
     

  17. #16  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    The answer is still 9.
     

  18. #17  
    Forum Bachelors Degree One beer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    442
    According to BODMAS:

    Brackets off
    Divide
    Multiply
    Add
    Subtract.


    However since some people freely interchange Divide and Multiply; in the OP example you can get an answer of 1 or 9. Therefore the question is ambiguous and needs more brackets.

    OB
     

  19. #18  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    The answer is still 9. It is not complicated.
     

  20. #19  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,338
    However since some people freely interchange Divide and Multiply
    From KJW's post it seems they are given equal priority and carried out in order left to right.
     

  21. #20  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    8,795
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Harold14370 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    9
    You should either explain your answer, or else stay out of the hard science section of the forum. Now, why do you think it's 9?
    What exacTly do you think 3 * 3 equals? You divide 6 by 2 and you get 3. Then you multipy it by (2+1) WhaT DO YOU GET?
    Well, as you have seen, some people have given reasons why they think it should be 1. If those people just said "It's 1, period, end of discussion" and other people say "it's 9 period, end of discussion" then we wouldn't get very far towards arriving at an answer, would we?

    You like to defy moderator requests, don't you?
     

  22. #21  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Harold read the posts., I already explained - You divide 6 by 2 and you get 3. Then you do the simple math in the paragraphs to get 3. Then you multilpy 3 * 3 and you get 9.
     

  23. #22  
    Forum Junior anticorncob28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Nebraska, USA
    Posts
    277
    What happens if you include the explicit multiplication sign?
    1 again.
    It merely places a "." to explicitly indicate the multiplication.
    So 6÷2*(1 + 2) = 1?
    I thought you did multiplication and division left to right, so first you must simplify the (1 + 2) to 3, so we get 6÷2*3 = 3*3 = 9.
    PEMDAS is more like PE(MD)(AS). You don't do multiplication and then division, you do them both together left to right, and the same with addition and subtraction. Otherwise 100 - 1 + 1 would be 100 - 2 or 98.
    "A 4 degree Celsius warmer world can, and must be, avoided"
    -Jim Young Kim (World Bank President)
     

  24. #23  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by anticorncob28 View Post
    What happens if you include the explicit multiplication sign?
    1 again.
    It merely places a "." to explicitly indicate the multiplication.
    So 6÷2*(1 + 2) = 1?
    I thought you did multiplication and division left to right, so first you must simplify the (1 + 2) to 3, so we get 6÷2*3 = 3*3 = 9.
    PEMDAS is more like PE(MD)(AS). You don't do multiplication and then division, you do them both together left to right, and the same with addition and subtraction. Otherwise 100 - 1 + 1 would be 100 - 2 or 98.
    Good example. You do the division of 6/2 first with a resultant of 3. Then you do what is in the (parenthisis) which also results in 3, then you multiply 3*3. Good god even a second grader could get that.
     

  25. #24  
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,620
    Yeah, you can go looking for notational ambiguities if you really want to find them, but most mathematicians would have no difficulty interpreting the OP as



    As to whether introducing, say, or any other convention for arithmetic multiplication would alter the result I remain puzzled why anyone should think so........
     

  26. #25  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,338
    But Mayflow (and everyone else at a second grade maths level) knows you are wrong
     

  27. #26  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    What? you just said 1 = 1 = 1=1 but it had nothing to do to do wth 6/2(1+2) which is just 3*3=9.
     

  28. #27  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by PhDemon View Post
    But Mayflow (and everyone else at a second grade maths level) knows you are wrong
    He wasn't wrong- but it had nothing to do with 6/2*(1+2)
     

  29. #28  
    Forum Freshman pzkpfw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    79
    My two cents: multiplication and division are equivalent (e.g. 2 x 2 = 2 ÷ 0.5) and addition and subtraction are equivalent (e.g. 1 - 2 = 1 + (-2)), so they are just done left to right.

    So I get: 6÷2(1+2) = 6÷2x3 = 3x3 = 9

    (Sorry Mayflow post #23, the parenthesis comes first. (However the result still 9, in this case.))

    But I agree with KJW post #9 that showing the multiplication as 2(...) not 2 x (...) does seem to imply an ordering. So I wouldn't be very surprised if a "real mathematician" told me that by convention (which BODMAS or its variants is after all) it does comes first, giving 1.
    Last edited by pzkpfw; July 14th, 2014 at 03:58 PM. Reason: Add "very"
     

  30. #29  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Yeah, the kitty is correct, but really, people on a science forum could not get this?
     

  31. #30  
    Forum Professor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    New York State
    Posts
    1,059
    I have long ago abandoned relying on conventions to determine the order of operations. Use parentheses whenever there is a possibility of ambiguity.
     

  32. #31  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Good greif - how much ambiguity is there to 3 times 3?
     

  33. #32  
    Anti-Crank AlexG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,809
    The ambiguity isn't 3 time 3. It's whether the terms, as written, resolve to 3 time 3.
    Its the way nature is!
    If you dont like it, go somewhere else....
    To another universe, where the rules are simpler
    Philosophically more pleasing, more psychologically easy
    Prof Richard Feynman (1979) .....

    Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!"
     

  34. #33  
    ▼▼ dn ʎɐʍ sıɥʇ ▼▼ RedPanda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,737
    Quote Originally Posted by mathman View Post
    I have long ago abandoned relying on conventions to determine the order of operations. Use parentheses whenever there is a possibility of ambiguity.
    There speaks a pragmatically minded man.

    *tries to click the 'Like' button*
    SayBigWords.com/say/3FC

    "And, behold, I come quickly;" Revelation 22:12

    "Religions are like sausages. When you know how they are made, you no longer want them."
     

  35. #34  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    So how is 6/2 not 3, and 1+2 not 3?
     

  36. #35  
    Anti-Crank AlexG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,809
    If you evaluate the terms first in the parenthesis and then from right to left, you get 6 / 2 * 3 which resolves to 6 / 6.

    The discussion is about what order you resolve the operations in.
    Its the way nature is!
    If you dont like it, go somewhere else....
    To another universe, where the rules are simpler
    Philosophically more pleasing, more psychologically easy
    Prof Richard Feynman (1979) .....

    Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!"
     

  37. #36  
    Northern Horse Whisperer Moderator scheherazade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Yukon, Canada
    Posts
    4,066
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    So how is 6/2 not 3, and 1+2 not 3?
    This has to do with the order that the operations are performed in, Mayflow. The link that PhDemon posted early on describes which functions get done first, depending on how the equation is written. It is not a case of simply starting at the left and continuing to the right.

    Here is the link once again.

    Order of operations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
     

  38. #37  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,766
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    So how is 6/2 not 3, and 1+2 not 3?
    You REALLY need to visit an optometrist.
    This has already been explained.
    It's because there's the possibility that it's NOT (6/2)x(1+2) but, as shown very clearly in PhDemon's post #7 and my post #11, 6/(2x(1+2)).
    Do try to keep up.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
     

  39. #38  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,338
    So I wouldn't be very surprised if a "real mathematician" told me that by convention (which BODMAS or its variants is after all) it does comes first, giving 1.
    AFAIK Guitarist is the only real mathematician who has posted so far so I'll take his word for it (especially as it agrees with my post#3 )
     

  40. #39  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    [QUOTE=AlexG;579859]If you evaluate the terms first in the parenthesis and then from right to left, you get 6 / 2 * 3 which resolves to 6 / 6.

    The discussion is about what order you resolve the operations in. you go from left to right. Order of Operations - PEMDAS
     

  41. #40  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by PhDemon View Post
    So I wouldn't be very surprised if a "real mathematician" told me that by convention (which BODMAS or its variants is after all) it does comes first, giving 1.
    AFAIK Guitarist is the only real mathematician who has posted so far so I'll take his word for it (especially as it agrees with my post#3 )
    In your case, second grade math is too advanced. Go play guitar with your friend.
     

  42. #41  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,338
    Pathetic troll is pathetic...
     

  43. #42  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    And the answer is still 9. I am sorry you could not make second grade, but you need to be able to read from left to right, and understand simple math first.
     

  44. #43  
    Anti-Crank AlexG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,809
    Even when you try to civil to May, it doesn't work.
    Its the way nature is!
    If you dont like it, go somewhere else....
    To another universe, where the rules are simpler
    Philosophically more pleasing, more psychologically easy
    Prof Richard Feynman (1979) .....

    Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!"
     

  45. #44  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,338
    True, it seems she can't go more than 5 posts without trolling or being an asshole...
     

  46. #45  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    And the answer is still 9.
     

  47. #46  
    Anti-Crank AlexG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,809
    Her poetry stinks as well.
    Its the way nature is!
    If you dont like it, go somewhere else....
    To another universe, where the rules are simpler
    Philosophically more pleasing, more psychologically easy
    Prof Richard Feynman (1979) .....

    Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!"
     

  48. #47  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    And the answer is still 9.
     

  49. #48  
    Forum Professor Daecon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    1,288
    6/2(1+2) = 6/2(3)

    However the lack of operator between the 2 and the 3 does seem to imply that it is supposed to be done before any other mathematical operation, (at least from what I remember of algeba) so in this case it seems to me that it should read 6/6 which =1.
     

  50. #49  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    I see what my second grade teacher must have gone through now. People have a difficult time knowing how to read from left to right.
     

  51. #50  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,766
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    And the answer is still 9. I am sorry you could not make second grade, but you need to be able to read from left to right, and understand simple math first.
    Yeah.
    You seem to be conveniently forgetting that the rules of maths dictate that the operation on the right should be done first.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
     

  52. #51  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Where did that right to left rule come from? Mars?
     

  53. #52  
    Forum Radioactive Isotope MagiMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,440
    As a mathematician I would not count on either answer. If this were in a paper, I'd look at the authors other work. If it was something from a student, I would ask them to fix it. If it showed up on a test, I'd make my decision clear by writing in some extra parentheses.

    As a computer scientist (this almost never comes up with hand-written math), the answer is 9 because computers follow a rigid set of rules and would parse that as (6/2)*(1+2). You'd write 6/2/(1+2) or 6/(2*(1+2)) to get 1.

    In between the two, I do often bump in to this simply due to the limits of a keyboard for dealing with math notation. (I prefer the long bar for division as it's mostly unambiguous, but that's usually not an option on a computer.) What I do most of the time is just include possibly extraneous parentheses to make the meaning clearer.

    And yes, the way it's written it looks like the 2(1+2) was intended to be a single term, but without the author telling you, I wouldn't count on it.
     

  54. #53  
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    city of wine and roses
    Posts
    6,222
    [QUOTE=Mayflow;579863]
    Quote Originally Posted by AlexG View Post
    If you evaluate the terms first in the parenthesis and then from right to left, you get 6 / 2 * 3 which resolves to 6 / 6.

    The discussion is about what order you resolve the operations in. you go from left to right. Order of Operations - PEMDAS
    I'm going to quote part of your own link.
    How Do I Remember It All ... ? PEMDAS !
    P
    Parentheses first
    E
    Exponents (ie Powers and Square Roots, etc.)
    MD
    Multiplication and Division (left-to-right)
    AS
    Addition and Subtraction (left-to-right)
    So even the instructions you claim to be following tell you to do the parentheses (brackets) first before you start distinguishing multiplication and division from addition and subtraction or going from left to right.

    Following the instructions you claim to rely on

    First step. Parentheses out.
    The term containing the parentheses is 2(1+2).
    2x1 + 2x2 = 2+4
    2+4= 6.

    Put the expression back together and it now reads 6÷6.

    Which is 1.
    "Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen." Winston Churchill
    "nature is like a game of Jenga; you never know which brick you pull out will cause the whole stack to collapse" Lucy Cooke
     

  55. #54  
    Forum Freshman pzkpfw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    79
    It all comes down to the implied multiplication, and whether that's given any particular significance in order of evaluation.

    Did some googling, and found a Dr Math post on it: Math Forum - Ask Dr. Math

    That says, in reference to a question from someone:

    Some texts make a rule, as in your second solution, that
    multiplication without a symbol ("implied multiplication") should be
    done before any other operations in an expression, including "explicit
    multiplication" using a symbol. Following this rule, you would
    multiply a by x, then multiply b and y, then divide one by the other.
    Some (probably most) texts don't mention such a rule - but some of
    those may use it without saying so, which is far worse.

    I don't know of a general rule among mathematicians that implied
    multiplication should be done before explicit multiplication. As far
    as I'm concerned, all multiplications fit in the same place in the
    order of operations. It's not an unreasonable rule, though, since it
    does seem that implied multiplication ties the operands together more
    tightly, at least visually; but the idea of Order of Operations (or
    precedence, as it is called in the computer world) is supposed to be
    to ensure that everyone will interpret an otherwise ambiguous
    expression the same way - so if some texts change the rules, or if
    people do what feels natural, the purpose has been lost.
    ... so for now I'll stick with my 9. But if someone said "1" I wouldn't laugh and point, nor slap them with a fish.
    Last edited by pzkpfw; July 14th, 2014 at 07:11 PM. Reason: Remove "Yep" as my post no longer follows the post I expected.
     

  56. #55  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,766
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Where did that right to left rule come from? Mars?
    You're still having trouble reading aren't you?
    Nowhere did say there was right to left rule.
    But, as you SHOULD have learned at school, the FIRST thing you should do (as has been stated numerous times in this thread by more than poster) is "remove the brackets".
    They happen to be AT THE RIGHT.
    Ergo, you start at the right. Which is exactly what I said.

    (And also succinctly explained by Adelady in the above post).
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
     

  57. #56  
    Forum Freshman pzkpfw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    79
    Quote Originally Posted by adelady View Post
    ... The term containing the parentheses is 2(1+2). ...
    I don't agree with Mayflows' rudeness, but I don't agree with this, either. In PEMDAS (or its variants) with "Parenthesis first", that refers to what's inside the parenthesis, and does not in itself justify treating the initial question as: 6÷(2x(1+2)) versus (6÷2)x(1+2).

    i.e. The part of the equation containing parenthesis is "(1+2)", not "2(1+2)".

    If implied multiplication is going to be treated as having special precedence, then that needs to be made a standard, not something assumed.
     

  58. #57  
    Forum Freshman pzkpfw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    79
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Where did that right to left rule come from? Mars?
    You're still having trouble reading aren't you?
    Nowhere did say there was right to left rule.
    But, as you SHOULD have learned at school, the FIRST thing you should do (as has been stated numerous times in this thread by more than poster) is "remove the brackets".
    They happen to be AT THE RIGHT.
    Ergo, you start at the right. Which is exactly what I said.

    (And also succinctly explained by Adelady in the above post).
    I don't think it was succinct (or at least, not correct).

    By that logic, if you saw 2 x 2 + (1 + 2) and treated anything inside - and outside the brackets - as having precedence, then you'd do that as (2 x (2 + (1 + 2))) and get 10; and that would surprise me a lot. (I'd expect ((2 x 2) + (1 + 2)) getting 7.)
    Last edited by pzkpfw; July 14th, 2014 at 07:26 PM. Reason: Fix tag
     

  59. #58  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    All removing the brackets does is give A 3 that times another three is still 9.
     

  60. #59  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,766
    Quote Originally Posted by pzkpfw View Post
    I don't think it was succinct (or at least, not correct).
    Tsk, you missed the point.
    Regardless of whether or not you do the implied operation (and, as I showed, Mathcad at least DOES take that route), the simple fact that the parentheses are done first (by the basic rules of maths) puts the lie to Mayflow's repeated "read from left to right".
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
     

  61. #60  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    [QUOTE=adelady;579886]
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by AlexG View Post
    If you evaluate the terms first in the parenthesis and then from right to left, you get 6 / 2 * 3 which resolves to 6 / 6.

    The discussion is about what order you resolve the operations in. you go from left to right. Order of Operations - PEMDAS
    I'm going to quote part of your own link.
    How Do I Remember It All ... ? PEMDAS !
    P
    Parentheses first
    E
    Exponents (ie Powers and Square Roots, etc.)
    MD
    Multiplication and Division (left-to-right)
    AS
    Addition and Subtraction (left-to-right)
    So even the instructions you claim to be following tell you to do the parentheses (brackets) first before you start distinguishing multiplication and division from addition and subtraction or going from left to right.

    Following the instructions you claim to rely on

    First step. Parentheses out.
    The term containing the parentheses is 2(1+2).
    2x1 + 2x2 = 2+4
    2+4= 6.

    Put the expression back together and it now reads 6÷6.

    Which is 1.
    No the term in the brackets is (1+2) the 2 before the brackets is a divisor of 6, and 6 becomes 3 before multiplyng the other 3 to make 9. Trust me, I am not a doctor! But... I am right.

    Besides, how the heck could you have ever get 6/6 out of this?
     

  62. #61  
    Forum Freshman pzkpfw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    79
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pzkpfw View Post
    I don't think it was succinct (or at least, not correct).
    Tsk, you missed the point.
    Regardless of whether or not you do the implied operation (and, as I showed, Mathcad at least DOES take that route), the simple fact that the parentheses are done first (by the basic rules of maths) puts the lie to Mayflow's repeated "read from left to right".
    Sorry, but that's a rather contrived example. And Mayflow is correct that you do the math left to right, on (yes, the bit he or she usually misses out) the bits of equal precedence. Yes, the brackets here get done first, and they are on the right, but after that the real question is whether the divide or multiply is done next, and left to right, I would say the divide (unless, as noted, the implied multiply is given special treatment) is first.

    The guts of your example (post #55), was a reference to the post by adelady, which I believe was wrong. Your example was not, ahem, succinct. (Your post #50 needed more context; as stated, it seems like a general rule, not a reference to a specific example.)
     

  63. #62  
    Forum Freshman pzkpfw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    79
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    ...

    Besides, how the heck could you have ever get 6/6 out of this?
    In turn, I don't think it's hard to accept that some people do see the implied multiplication as having special precedence.

    i.e. some people see 6 ÷ 2(1 + 2) as 6 ÷ (2 x (1+2)) giving 6 ÷ (2 x 3) giving 6 ÷ 6 giving 1.

    You may not agree with these people, but you don't need to think of them as idiots. Take a breath.
     

  64. #63  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by MagiMaster View Post
    As a mathematician I would not count on either answer. If this were in a paper, I'd look at the authors other work. If it was something from a student, I would ask them to fix it. If it showed up on a test, I'd make my decision clear by writing in some extra parentheses.

    As a computer scientist (this almost never comes up with hand-written math), the answer is 9 because computers follow a rigid set of rules and would parse that as (6/2)*(1+2). You'd write 6/2/(1+2) or 6/(2*(1+2)) to get 1.

    In between the two, I do often bump in to this simply due to the limits of a keyboard for dealing with math notation. (I prefer the long bar for division as it's mostly unambiguous, but that's usually not an option on a computer.) What I do most of the time is just include possibly extraneous parentheses to make the meaning clearer.

    And yes, the way it's written it looks like the 2(1+2) was intended to be a single term, but without the author telling you, I wouldn't count on it.

    Well the math seemed good until whatever you derived 2*3 from, where did you get that? The 2 was clearly a divisor of 6 as evidenced by a divisor sign between them.
     

  65. #64  
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Posts
    115
    Hey all,

    Try solving this :

    6÷2(x+2) = 1

    and

    6÷2(x+2) = 9

    And we'll see whether 1 or 9 is correct.
     

  66. #65  
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    city of wine and roses
    Posts
    6,222
    Let's try this again. As introductory algebra.

    6÷2(1+2)

    Rewrite this with all the numbers replaced with a,
    b, c.

    It becomes
    a÷b(c+b).

    Which should really be written properly, but I'll just do it without fussing - but with biiiig spaces for thinkies.

    a
    _______

    b (c + b)

    which becomes
    a
    _______

    bc + b2


    We can now substitute whatever values we like for the unknowns.
    6
    _______

    2 x 1+ 22

    which equals
    6
    _______

    2+ 4

    which equals
    1


    In fact. For those who don't really get it, it's worth doing with a few different sets of numbers for the
    a, b, c or plugging in different numbers into the original 6÷2(1+2) and seeing how different approaches turn out. My own view is that if you get different results from the algebra and the arithmetic, the algebra approach is always the better option.




    "Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen." Winston Churchill
    "nature is like a game of Jenga; you never know which brick you pull out will cause the whole stack to collapse" Lucy Cooke
     

  67. #66  
    Anti-Crank AlexG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,809
    Whoever said math was unambiguous?
    Its the way nature is!
    If you dont like it, go somewhere else....
    To another universe, where the rules are simpler
    Philosophically more pleasing, more psychologically easy
    Prof Richard Feynman (1979) .....

    Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!"
     

  68. #67  
    Forum Freshman pzkpfw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    79
    Quote Originally Posted by adelady View Post
    Let's try this again. As introductory algebra.

    ...
    You are still making the assumption that the division comes after the multiplication. You are trying to solve the real question (about precedence) by making an assumption about precedence. That's circular.
     

  69. #68  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by molecool View Post
    Hey all,

    Try solving this :

    6÷2(x+2) = 1

    and

    6÷2(x+2) = 9

    And we'll see whether 1 or 9 is correct.

    I am not sure how to solve 3X+6 = 1 I suppose X would have to be A negative number equal to 1/3 of -5. If you could multiply 3X you could get -5 to add to 6 to get 1. I can work on this tomorrow. Right now my pickup has a dead battery!

    Now let me think ... 3x+6= 9 that's too easy, x would be 1..
     

  70. #69  
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Western US
    Posts
    2,845
    Quote Originally Posted by pzkpfw View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by adelady View Post
    Let's try this again. As introductory algebra.

    ...
    You are still making the assumption that the division comes after the multiplication. You are trying to solve the real question (about precedence) by making an assumption about precedence. That's circular.
    The argument is outside of the domain of pure mathematics and within the domain of conventions. There being no fundamentally wrong or right about such things, I don't see a problem, as long as one is careful to specify which convention is being used. Or, by appropriate use of parentheses, force the expression into a form that is evaluated the same way, regardless of which convention is used.

    I was taught two different conventions (I get 9 for the OP's question if I follow what I was taught in grade school, and 1 if I follow what I was taught at university). That has made me watchful about adding parentheses to my own equations, just to avoid the very sorts of arguments we're seeing here.
     

  71. #70  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,766
    Quote Originally Posted by pzkpfw View Post
    Sorry, but that's a rather contrived example.
    Not at all, simply because... we're discussing THIS EXACT example.

    (yes, the bit he or she usually misses out)
    I.e. she was being less than accurate/ precise 1.
    I.e the rule is NOT left to right, it is, as has been stated, PEMDAS (or whatever the new-fangled thing is. BODMAS is what I learnt).

    The guts of your example (post #55), was a reference to the post by adelady, which I believe was wrong.
    Again, no.
    Mayflow asked how we managed to get 1 as an answer.
    Adelady's post showed that (regardless of whether or not it's considered "correct" it was a lucid and succinct explanation of how the answer "1" was obtained).

    1 Which is "normal" for her.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
     

  72. #71  
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    8,416
    Yep it's about a really poor question and conventions. Sadly seen similar obscure examples on test, but most often embedded the work of students trying to work out a solution and confusing themselves which of course leads them to the wrong answer.
    Meteorologist/Naturalist & Retired Soldier
    “The Holy Land is everywhere” Black Elk
     

  73. #72  
    Forum Freshman pzkpfw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    79
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    ...
    I.e the rule is NOT left to right, it is, as has been stated, PEMDAS (or whatever the new-fangled thing is. BODMAS is what I learnt).
    ...
    The thing is you're being imprecise when complaining about someone being imprecise. It's correct to say (paraphrased) "the rule is not 'left to right'". But it's also incorrect to imply it isn't relevant at all. See "left to right" in the quote in the post by adelady (#53) who used the link provided by Mayflow in post #39.

    "BODMAS", as you learned, puts Division and Multiplication ahead of Addition and Subtraction. That's normal. But because "D" is before "M" do you think that puts division ahead of multiplication? Does that contradict "M" before "D" in "PEMDAS"?

    ... of course not. In normal usage, multiplication and division are of equal precedence - so are calculated left to right, as in the quote that adelady used.

    So yes, Mayflow (who I agree behaves like an arse) is imprecise when making posts that only mention "left to right", but you are hardly better in saying things like "it is, as has been stated, PEMDAS" - as though that makes left-to-right irrelevant.
     

  74. #73  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,766
    Quote Originally Posted by pzkpfw View Post
    But it's also incorrect to imply it isn't relevant at all.
    Not what I stated, nor what I implied.
    I'll leave it at that.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
     

  75. #74  
    Forum Professor Daecon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    1,288
    Just to be a little silly...

    6÷2(1+2) = 6÷2(3) = 6÷23 = approx. 0.26

    This thread need a little silliness before the arguments get too heated.
     

  76. #75  
    Forum Professor river_rat's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    1,517
    Um, the answer here is undefined as the normal orders of precedence are not fully specified (as One beer mentioned may posts ago). So you are free to do the multiplication and division in either order and get 9 or 1. In fact, feel free to throw that expression into your favorite REPL shell and see what you get.


    • Python gives 9
    • Scheme gives 1
    • Matlab gives 9
    • Lua gives 9
    • Mathcad gives 1


    I think there was a whole minute physics episode on this silly fact a while ago.
    As is often the case with technical subjects we are presented with an unfortunate choice: an explanation that is accurate but incomprehensible, or comprehensible but wrong.
     

  77. #76  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Well, I can see the answer 1 now but then it should not be presented so ambiguously. How about 6/(2*(1+2))=1?

    The math God Excel asked if I would like to correct the equation to 6/2*(1+2) - which is what I interpreted it to mean in the first place
    but the answer was 9.

    I consider it like Implicate order. See Neils Bohr.
    Last edited by Mayflow; July 15th, 2014 at 06:11 AM.
     

  78. #77  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,338
    So after yesterdays trolling you now try and pretend to be reasonable to avoid a possible suspension. You are so transparent it is laughable...
     

  79. #78  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by PhDemon View Post
    So after yesterdays trolling you now try and pretend to be reasonable to avoid a possible suspension. You are so transparent it is laughable...
    Dude, stick to the topic? What was your answer, and why?
     

  80. #79  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,338
    After yesterdays trolling you have the gall to tell people to stay on topic

    Learn. To. Read. I gave my answer (and some more discussion on it) earlier in the thread. Tell me do you actually read what others post before you troll?
     

  81. #80  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by PhDemon View Post
    After yesterdays trolling you have the gall to tell people to stay on topic

    Learn. To. Read. I gave my answer (and some more discussion on it) earlier in the thread. Tell me do you actually read what others post before you troll?
    Was your answer 9 and if other - why?
     

  82. #81  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,338
     

  83. #82  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Yeah so much for a math discussion, huh?
     

  84. #83  
    Northern Horse Whisperer Moderator scheherazade's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    Yukon, Canada
    Posts
    4,066
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Yeah so much for a math discussion, huh?
    Indeed.

    Post #3, page #1.

    Originally posted by PhDemon.
    July 14th, 2014, 08:51 AM
    I would say it is 1.

    First get rid of the brackets (Order of operations - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia) and it becomes 6 / 6

    PhDemon posted a link right from the start that explained why this equation was ambiguous. I generally sit on the fence regarding these discussions. Congratulations on convincing me that I should venture into one, not once but three times.

    There is nothing more for me to contribute on this topic.

     

  85. #84  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,338
    LIKE for the above. It is pointless trying to communicate with her, I give up, hopefully she'll carry on in the same vein and get perma-banned soon...
     

  86. #85  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    I leave the math here To Ph and Nothern Horse Whisperer. The topic has lost my interest now.
     

  87. #86  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,338
    I patiently await the day the forum as a whole loses your interest and you piss off back to your world of woo.
     

  88. #87  
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,620
    Mod note I think this thread has about run its course

    Locked
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •