Notices
Results 1 to 93 of 93
Like Tree12Likes
  • 1 Post By Mayflow
  • 1 Post By icewendigo
  • 1 Post By dan hunter
  • 2 Post By Daecon
  • 1 Post By Write4U
  • 1 Post By Cogito Ergo Sum
  • 3 Post By Chucknorium
  • 2 Post By stander-j

Thread: What is 7+7*7+7/7-7

  1. #1 What is 7+7*7+7/7-7 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    And how do you arrive at the answer


    Kirito likes this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  

    Related Discussions:

     

  3. #2  
    Forum Cosmic Wizard icewendigo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,150
    50: I eliminate the 7+ -7 at either ends, which leaves 49+1 (7*7+7/7)


    Mayflow likes this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Forum Cosmic Wizard
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    2,408
    Algebraic Expressions, Order of Operations/P.E.M.D.A.S. I

    Think 7+(7*7)+(7/7)-7 = 7 + 49 + 1 - 7 = 57 - 7 = 50
    Mayflow likes this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Forum Professor Daecon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    1,288
    7 + 7 * 7 + 7 / 7 - 7 Multiplication and division always happen first if there are no parentheses.

    7 + (7*7) + (7/7) - 7

    7 + 49 + 1 - 7 Addition and subtraction read left-to-right.

    56 + 1 - 7

    57 - 7

    50
    Mayflow and Anathema like this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    940
    since it has been shown that you are a troll and crank i just want to say that this is a 'problem' that any 13 year old could do, where algebra is taught. order of operands is one of first things learned. this may confuse people on social websites but not science people.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucknorium View Post
    since it has been shown that you are a troll and crank i just want to say that this is a 'problem' that any 13 year old could do, where algebra is taught. order of operands is one of first things learned. this may confuse people on social websites but not science people.
    So this shows I am a troll? I am a person, and one who thinks you have convinced me that I think you are a jackass. Others answered this with correct answers. You just came in and acted like a jerk.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    So this shows I am a troll? I am a person, and one who thinks you have convinced me that I think you are a jackass. Others answered this with correct answers. You just came in and acted like a jerk.
    your english is worse than mine. hard to believe. please reread. i said 'it has been shown that you are a troll ...' i was just pointing out your lack of maths. i am not caring much what you think of me. your opinions do not matter.

    i will give you a little math problem. rearrange this problem using reverse polish notation so it is not ambiguous any more
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,595
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucknorium View Post
    your english is worse than mine. hard to believe. please reread. i said 'it has been shown that you are a troll ...'
    Mayflow has severe comprehension 1 problems.
    Be gentle.


    1 Among other things.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucknorium View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    So this shows I am a troll? I am a person, and one who thinks you have convinced me that I think you are a jackass. Others answered this with correct answers. You just came in and acted like a jerk.
    your english is worse than mine. hard to believe. please reread. i said 'it has been shown that you are a troll ...' i was just pointing out your lack of maths. i am not caring much what you think of me. your opinions do not matter.

    i will give you a little math problem. rearrange this problem using reverse polish notation so it is not ambiguous any more
    The math problem is? And why is it Polish? or reverse polish, what ever that is?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucknorium View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    So this shows I am a troll? I am a person, and one who thinks you have convinced me that I think you are a jackass. Others answered this with correct answers. You just came in and acted like a jerk.
    your english is worse than mine. hard to believe. please reread. i said 'it has been shown that you are a troll ...' i was just pointing out your lack of maths. i am not caring much what you think of me. your opinions do not matter.

    i will give you a little math problem. rearrange this problem using reverse polish notation so it is not ambiguous any more
    The math problem is? And why is it Polish? or reverse polish, what ever that is?
    rearrange this problem using reverse polish notation so it is not ambiguous any more. that is pretty clear what you have to do.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11  
    Forum Radioactive Isotope MagiMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    3,440
    @Mayflow, Try Wikipedia.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucknorium View Post
    your english is worse than mine. hard to believe. please reread. i said 'it has been shown that you are a troll ...'
    Mayflow has severe comprehension 1 problems.
    Be gentle.


    1 Among other things.
    If you ever make a post I will desire to comprehend, I will give it go.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    [QUOTE=MagiMaster;548133]@Mayflow, Try Wikipedia.[QUOTE]

    I don't see how that sort of convolution relates to the subject. It was a very simple math thing. I do, however appreciate niceness, which few here have offered. I knew the answer before I asked the question, and it is very simple math.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    and it is very simple math.
    yes it is. a 13 year old can solve this problem. setting the same problem using RPN is equally easy.

    also any 10 year old could use a smartphone to do a internet search to find out what RPN is
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #15  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    940
    since i know you will not or can not convert this problem to RPN and you will not try to learn here is the answer:

    7 7 * 7 7 / + 7 + 7 -

    this is only one solution. there are others.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #16  
    ***** Participant Write4U's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,245
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucknorium View Post
    since i know you will not or can not convert this problem to RPN and you will not try to learn here is the answer:

    7 7 * 7 7 / + 7 + 7 -

    this is only one solution. there are others.
    2 questions;

    a) what did I just learn about mathematics on this Mathematics Forum?

    b) what did I just learn about a human being who calls himself Chucknorium?
    dan hunter likes this.
    "Art is the creation of that which evokes an emotional response, leading to thoughts of the noblest kind" (W4U)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #17  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,155
    For part b, it could be that he sometimes let's frustration get the better of him ( as we all do at times), the exchange here was a direct result of some very childish trolling by the OP in another thread (this is why they are currently suspended). Carrying over arguments from thread to thread is not good but we've all done it...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #18  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by Write4U View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucknorium View Post
    since i know you will not or can not convert this problem to RPN and you will not try to learn here is the answer:

    7 7 * 7 7 / + 7 + 7 -

    this is only one solution. there are others.
    2 questions;

    a) what did I just learn about mathematics on this Mathematics Forum?

    b) what did I just learn about a human being who calls himself Chucknorium?
    a) maybe you learned a little more than the OP. my friends tell me that algebra is first taught in seventh grade here in usa. the OP is seventh grade maths. RPN is slightly more advanced. did you already know RPN ? these types of maths 'problems' in the OP are common on social sites like facebook. first one i have seen on a science forum. but that is ok too because i think there are children here who can learn from this. or adults trying to improve maths skills.

    b) that i was overzealous in pursuing a known troll. a troll that was suspended. i admit i should not have come to this thread in my zeal. but please take a few moments to read the post by this troll in other threads. here is a good one for starting: Ok, brainiacs, and all, any thoughts on this? but still, i should not have come to this thread. i am sorry for doing that. but i am not sorry for my treatment of this troll.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #19  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by PhDemon View Post
    For part b, it could be that he sometimes let's frustration get the better of him ( as we all do at times), the exchange here was a direct result of some very childish trolling by the OP in another thread (this is why they are currently suspended). Carrying over arguments from thread to thread is not good but we've all done it...
    thank you. that explains it better than i can. and you are right, it is not good for me to jump over to this thread.

    the troll was ranting quite childishly so maybe she is a child and this maths was something new to her.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  21. #20  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,155
    No worries, been there and done it myself. Some people are so ignorant they wind you up so much you lose perspective.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  22. #21  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by icewendigo View Post
    50: I eliminate the 7+ -7 at either ends, which leaves 49+1 (7*7+7/7)
    Probably the most elegant formula. Process of elimination is always a good troubleshooting technique.

    Now, how about this one? What does 9x-7i>3(3x-7u) =? (I tossed in the parenthesis stuff on this one) :-)
    Ps if you know internet slang, do NOT interpret the answer too personally literally!!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  23. #22  
    Moderator Moderator Cogito Ergo Sum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    2,519
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by icewendigo View Post
    50: I eliminate the 7+ -7 at either ends, which leaves 49+1 (7*7+7/7)
    Probably the most elegant formula. Process of elimination is always a good troubleshooting technique.

    Now, how about this one? What does 9x-7i>3(3x-7u) =? (I tossed in the parenthesis stuff on this one) :-)
    Ps if you know internet slang, do NOT interpret the answer too personally literally!!

    "The only safe rule is to dispute only with those of your acquaintance of whom you know that they possess sufficient intelligence and self-respect not to advance absurdities; to appeal to reason and not to authority, and to listen to reason and yield to it; and, finally, to be willing to accept reason even from an opponent, and to be just enough to bear being proved to be in the wrong."

    ~ Arthur Schopenhauer, The Art of Being Right: 38 Ways to Win an Argument (1831), Stratagem XXXVIII.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  24. #23  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Right answer, you think therefore you are....

    Here is one I do not know the answer for:

    Is ego sum, ut pinor equal to or less than or maybe the reciprocal of Cogito ergo sum?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  25. #24  
    Moderator Moderator Cogito Ergo Sum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    2,519
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Is ego sum, ut pinor equal to or less than or maybe the reciprocal of Cogito ergo sum?

    Could you rephrase that, please?
    "The only safe rule is to dispute only with those of your acquaintance of whom you know that they possess sufficient intelligence and self-respect not to advance absurdities; to appeal to reason and not to authority, and to listen to reason and yield to it; and, finally, to be willing to accept reason even from an opponent, and to be just enough to bear being proved to be in the wrong."

    ~ Arthur Schopenhauer, The Art of Being Right: 38 Ways to Win an Argument (1831), Stratagem XXXVIII.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  26. #25  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by Cogito Ergo Sum View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Is ego sum, ut pinor equal to or less than or maybe the reciprocal of Cogito ergo sum?

    Could you rephrase that, please?
    Sure. It just means how do you view the ideas of "I am therefore I think" with "I think therefore I am"?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  27. #26  
    Moderator Moderator Cogito Ergo Sum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    2,519
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Sure. It just means how do you view the ideas of "I am therefore I think" with "I think therefore I am"?

    Although that question falls beyond the scope of the Mathematics sub-forum, I will give a brief answer:
    I see no (logical) connection between those statements. The former is not related to the latter statement (which has its own shortcomings, cf. post #18).
    "The only safe rule is to dispute only with those of your acquaintance of whom you know that they possess sufficient intelligence and self-respect not to advance absurdities; to appeal to reason and not to authority, and to listen to reason and yield to it; and, finally, to be willing to accept reason even from an opponent, and to be just enough to bear being proved to be in the wrong."

    ~ Arthur Schopenhauer, The Art of Being Right: 38 Ways to Win an Argument (1831), Stratagem XXXVIII.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  28. #27  
    Forum Ph.D. stander-j's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Winnipeg
    Posts
    854
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucknorium View Post
    since it has been shown that you are a troll and crank i just want to say that this is a 'problem' that any 13 year old could do, where algebra is taught. order of operands is one of first things learned. this may confuse people on social websites but not science people.
    I can do ANOVA, T-Tests, Z-Tests, Quadratic formulations etc... But if you asked my to do long division (Which IIRC is like 4th grade math) it would probably take me 30 minutes just to recall the steps/procedure involved -or- to solve it in a way that takes many unnecessary steps.
    "Cultivated leisure is the aim of man."
    Reply With Quote  
     

  29. #28  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by stander-j View Post
    But if you asked my to do long division (Which IIRC is like 4th grade math) it would probably take me 30 minutes just to recall the steps/procedure involved -or- to solve it in a way that takes many unnecessary steps.
    if you said that you forgot how to determine a square root by hand i might believe. forgetting how do long division is like forgetting how to ride a bicycle.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  30. #29  
    Forum Ph.D. stander-j's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Winnipeg
    Posts
    854
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucknorium View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by stander-j View Post
    But if you asked my to do long division (Which IIRC is like 4th grade math) it would probably take me 30 minutes just to recall the steps/procedure involved -or- to solve it in a way that takes many unnecessary steps.
    if you said that you forgot how to determine a square root by hand i might believe. forgetting how do long division is like forgetting how to ride a bicycle.
    What could I possibly gain by fibbing about not remembering how to do long division? I am telling the truth, and hope you'll just take my word for it. The fact is I haven't had to apply those skills since elementary school - and I've never had to divide 1564 apples amongst 32 friends either.

    *I haven't ridden a bike in many years either - I'd probably suck at that too now.
    "Cultivated leisure is the aim of man."
    Reply With Quote  
     

  31. #30  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by Cogito Ergo Sum View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Sure. It just means how do you view the ideas of "I am therefore I think" with "I think therefore I am"?

    Although that question falls beyond the scope of the Mathematics sub-forum, I will give a brief answer:
    I see no (logical) connection between those statements. The former is not related to the latter statement (which has its own shortcomings, cf. post #18).
    You may think about re-considering your user name then.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  32. #31  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Hey, how do you determine a square root by hand?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  33. #32  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Hey, how do you determine a square root by hand?
    Google is your friend. use it.

    you know, there was a time when people did not have calculators. square roots can be determined using slide rule. it can also be done with a pencil, paper.
    Last edited by Chucknorium; April 5th, 2014 at 05:59 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  34. #33  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by stander-j View Post
    What could I possibly gain by fibbing about not remembering how to do long division? I am telling the truth, and hope you'll just take my word for it. The fact is I haven't had to apply those skills since elementary school - and I've never had to divide 1564 apples amongst 32 friends either.

    *I haven't ridden a bike in many years either - I'd probably suck at that too now.
    i was not accujsing you of 'fibbing' i was trying to make a joke. i thought you were joking. it is my poor english at fault i think. (i had to look up 'fibbing')
    Reply With Quote  
     

  35. #34  
    Forum Ph.D. stander-j's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Winnipeg
    Posts
    854
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucknorium View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by stander-j View Post
    What could I possibly gain by fibbing about not remembering how to do long division? I am telling the truth, and hope you'll just take my word for it. The fact is I haven't had to apply those skills since elementary school - and I've never had to divide 1564 apples amongst 32 friends either.

    *I haven't ridden a bike in many years either - I'd probably suck at that too now.
    i was not accujsing you of 'fibbing' i was trying to make a joke. it is my poor english at fault i think. (i had to look up 'fibbing')
    No, it's not your English - which is quite good if it isn't your primary language. I'm just terrible at distinguishing between serious comments and jokes on the internet. The lack of tone and social cues makes it almost impossible for me to understand when something is meant as a joke.
    "Cultivated leisure is the aim of man."
    Reply With Quote  
     

  36. #35  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by stander-j View Post
    I'm just terrible at distinguishing between serious comments and jokes on the internet. The lack of tone and social cues makes it almost impossible for me to understand when something is meant as a joke.
    i have very hard time with humor and slang.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  37. #36  
    Moderator Moderator Cogito Ergo Sum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    2,519
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    You may think about re-considering your user name then.

    If you have valid reasons for why I should reconsider my username, then do not hesitate to provide them.
    exchemist likes this.
    "The only safe rule is to dispute only with those of your acquaintance of whom you know that they possess sufficient intelligence and self-respect not to advance absurdities; to appeal to reason and not to authority, and to listen to reason and yield to it; and, finally, to be willing to accept reason even from an opponent, and to be just enough to bear being proved to be in the wrong."

    ~ Arthur Schopenhauer, The Art of Being Right: 38 Ways to Win an Argument (1831), Stratagem XXXVIII.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  38. #37  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    I am not seeing anyone telling me how to figure out a square root of a number by hand yet.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  39. #38  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    I am not seeing anyone telling me how to figure out a square root of a number by hand yet.
    you really do not want to read or learn something on your own. do you ? if you did an interent search like i suggested you would find dozens of sites. here is one.

    Calculate square root without a calculator
    Reply With Quote  
     

  40. #39  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    I can do it by guess already. That did not help to do it by formula.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  41. #40  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    I can do it by guess already. That did not help to do it by formula.
    you read the first sentence of that site. go down a few paragraphs. do you want someone to read it to you now ?

    Finding square roots using an algorithm

    There is also an algorithm that resembles the long division algorithm, and was taught in schools in days before calculators. See the example below to learn it. While learning this algorithm may not be necessary in today's world with calculators, working out some examples can be used as an exercise in basic operations for middle school students, and studying the logic behind it can be a good thinking exercise for high school students.
    that algorithm will give you sqaure roots to decimal places. try guessing that.

    and there are dozens of other web sites with this algorithm. . maybe you need a video. try youtube
    Reply With Quote  
     

  42. #41  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Ok, I guess guessing at it and narrowing it down is as good as it gets. That is all that algorithm does.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  43. #42  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Ok, I guess guessing at it and narrowing it down is as good as it gets. That is all that algorithm does.
    that algorithm will give as many deciaml places as you want.

    you do understand that scientists and engineers had to do these tasks before there were even mechanical calculators. slide rules were used after about 1600.

    there are several other algorithms easily found with internet search
    Last edited by Chucknorium; April 5th, 2014 at 07:02 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  44. #43  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Good old 40^2 hummm? You do realize that good old me can do this by hand as well. Well actually that one I just could figure in my head. Doing squares is easy, the square roots are not as easy.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  45. #44  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    16,682
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Ok, I guess guessing at it and narrowing it down is as good as it gets. That is all that algorithm does.
    It is the same technique that calculators and computers use.
    Without wishing to overstate my case, everything in the observable universe definitely has its origins in Northamptonshire -- Alan Moore
    Reply With Quote  
     

  46. #45  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,595
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Doing squares is easy
    Only the trivially simple ones.
    How about 1379.6742?
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  47. #46  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    1903500.346
    Reply With Quote  
     

  48. #47  
    Forum Ph.D. stander-j's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Winnipeg
    Posts
    854
    something something .45 something something.
    Dywyddyr and precious siraj like this.
    "Cultivated leisure is the aim of man."
    Reply With Quote  
     

  49. #48  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Good old 40^2 hummm?
    that was a date. (rolls eyes) 1600 CE. it was the approx date the slide rule was invented. go back and try reading my post this time.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  50. #49  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    1903500.346
    congratulations. you are capable of copying and pasting into a calculator. you just passed 3rd grade.

    if you did it by hand you just passed 4th grade. i believe you did it by hand if some of digits were incorrect. i know i would have made a multiplication error or two.
    Last edited by Chucknorium; April 5th, 2014 at 07:53 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  51. #50  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucknorium View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    1903500.346
    congratulations. you are capable of copying and pasting into a calculator. you just passed 3rd grade.

    if you did it by hand you just passed 4th grade.
    Naw, I just used Excel. Too much to do by head and too boring to do with pen and paper. Got lazy after 3rd grade you know.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  52. #51  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,595
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Naw, I just used Excel. Too much to do by head and too boring to do with pen and paper.
    In other words not that simple.

    Got lazy after 3rd grade you know.
    In more ways than one. We've noticed.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  53. #52  
    Forum Bachelors Degree One beer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    442
    Reply to original question: Here is a mnemonic to remember in which order to perform calculations:


    BODMAS: Brackets Off*, Divide, Multiply, Add, Subtract.


    * in other words perform all the operations inside any brackets


    So in your question:
    there are no brackets.
    next perform the division 7/7 = 1
    next perform the multiplication 7*7 = 49
    so now you have 7+49+1-7
    next do the additions 7+49+1=57, so now you have 57-7
    finally the subtraction 57-7=50


    OB
    Last edited by One beer; April 9th, 2014 at 01:24 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  54. #53  
    Forum Professor Dave Wilson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Northumbria UK
    Posts
    1,005
    Quote Originally Posted by One beer View Post
    Reply to original question: Here is a mnemonic to remember in which order to perform calculations:


    BODMAS: Brackets Off*, Divide, Multiply, Add, Subtract.


    * in other words perform all the operations inside any brackets


    So in your question:
    there are no brackets.
    next perform the division 7/7 = 1
    next perform the multiplication 7*7 = 49
    so now you have 7+49+1-7
    next do the additions 7+49+1=57, so now you have 57-7
    finally the subtraction 57-7=50


    OB
    What about roots ?
    Latinos are Republican. They just don't know it yet.
    Ronald Reagan
    Reply With Quote  
     

  55. #54  
    exchemist
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,264
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucknorium View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Hey, how do you determine a square root by hand?
    Google is your friend. use it.

    you know, there was a time when people did not have calculators. square roots can be determined using slide rule. it can also be done with a pencil, paper.
    I find you harsh. Determining square roots with a slide rule (as I did at school and university) is the same doing them with log tables. But if you do not have either of these, then doing really "by hand" needs some form of iterative procedure. This is far from trivial and a perfectly reasonable question for Mayflow to ask.

    The Wiki answer attached shows what a pain it is:Methods of computing square roots - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    I would not blame anyone for finding these pages of hieroglyphics intimidating.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  56. #55  
    ***** Participant Write4U's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1,245
    Is that why the Egyptians used the wheel? It always yielded a predictable distance, based on Pi
    "Art is the creation of that which evokes an emotional response, leading to thoughts of the noblest kind" (W4U)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  57. #56  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    If you mean square roots, all I know is to fumble around until I can close in on them, or use my beloved Excel.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  58. #57  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    16,682
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    If you mean square roots, all I know is to fumble around until I can close in on them.
    Even the Babylonians could do better than "fumble around":
    The basic idea is that if x is an overestimate to the square root of a non-negative real number S then \scriptstyle S/x\, will be an underestimate and so the average of these two numbers may reasonably be expected to provide a better approximation
    See exchemsist's link for details.

    I say "even" but obviously they developed pretty advanced maths (and gave us 60 minutes, 360 degrees, etc) because calendars were really important to them (because of geography).
    Without wishing to overstate my case, everything in the observable universe definitely has its origins in Northamptonshire -- Alan Moore
    Reply With Quote  
     

  59. #58  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    I saw the link. Exchemist is a helpful poster!, but it is still stumbling around. I just make a guess and square it, and then go higher or lower as needed.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  60. #59  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    16,682
    The point of the better iterative methods is to have a more accurate idea of how much to go higher or lower. (And minimise the number of iterations to get to a desired level of accuracy.)
    Without wishing to overstate my case, everything in the observable universe definitely has its origins in Northamptonshire -- Alan Moore
    Reply With Quote  
     

  61. #60  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    I think I found the process.

    How to Calculate a Square Root - YouTube
    Reply With Quote  
     

  62. #61  
    Forum Bachelors Degree One beer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    442
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Wilson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by One beer View Post
    Reply to original question: Here is a mnemonic to remember in which order to perform calculations: BODMAS: Brackets Off*, Divide, Multiply, Add, Subtract. * in other words perform all the operations inside any bracketsSo in your question: there are no brackets. next perform the division 7/7 = 1next perform the multiplication 7*7 = 49so now you have 7+49+1-7next do the additions 7+49+1=57, so now you have 57-7finally the subtraction 57-7=50OB
    What about roots ?
    I am not a mathematician, ('BODMAS' was given to me by my maths teacher many years ago), but I am 99% certain that you treat the root symbol like brackets too, in other words perform all operations written under the root symbol's horizontal line before finding the root of the result. Then continue with BODMAS.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  63. #62  
    exchemist
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,264
    Quote Originally Posted by One beer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Wilson View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by One beer View Post
    Reply to original question: Here is a mnemonic to remember in which order to perform calculations: BODMAS: Brackets Off*, Divide, Multiply, Add, Subtract. * in other words perform all the operations inside any bracketsSo in your question: there are no brackets. next perform the division 7/7 = 1next perform the multiplication 7*7 = 49so now you have 7+49+1-7next do the additions 7+49+1=57, so now you have 57-7finally the subtraction 57-7=50OB
    What about roots ?
    I am not a mathematician, ('BODMAS' was given to me by my maths teacher many years ago), but I am 99% certain that you treat the root symbol like brackets too, in other words perform all operations written under the root symbol's horizontal line before finding the root of the result. Then continue with BODMAS.
    Yes, you can write a root expression as √(blahblahblah), so I'm sure that's a good way to look at it.

    Ah, BODMAS take me back…..to a dusty classroom, high above a side street in South Kensington in the mid 60s, with a geriatric teacher in a brown suit and a terrible pipe smoker's cough. My 10yr old son learnt BDMAS last year (they've dropped the "O" as being unnecessary and confusing, evidently. I was taught it meant "Of", as in 1/5th "of" 20 = 4).
    Reply With Quote  
     

  64. #63  
    Genius Idiot Rajnish Kaushik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    168
    56
    "Think like a man of action,act like a man of action"
    Henry Louis Bergson"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  65. #64  
    exchemist
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,264
    Quote Originally Posted by Rajnish Kaushik View Post
    56
    Oh dear oh dear.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  66. #65  
    Forum Professor Zwolver's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,667
    Quote Originally Posted by exchemist View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rajnish Kaushik View Post
    56
    Oh dear oh dear.
    What you do..

    1; Start excel
    2; ctrl + c (7+7*7+7/7-7)
    3; enter (=) in any cell
    4; ctrl + v (7+7*7+7/7-7)
    5; press enter
    6; solution is 50

    Don't calculate by yourself, just know how to get to the answer.

    Be a manager, the less you know how to do, the more people you know who can do things, the better you seem to be, without doing anything. I feel there is a meaningfull quote in here somewhere.
    Growing up, i marveled at star-trek's science, and ignored the perfect society. Now, i try to ignore their science, and marvel at the society.

    Imagine, being able to create matter out of thin air, and not coming up with using drones for boarding hostile ships. Or using drones to defend your own ship. Heck, using drones to block energy attacks, counterattack or for surveillance. Unless, of course, they are nano-machines in your blood, which is a billion times more complex..
    Reply With Quote  
     

  67. #66  
    exchemist
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,264
    Quote Originally Posted by Zwolver View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by exchemist View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rajnish Kaushik View Post
    56
    Oh dear oh dear.
    What you do..

    1; Start excel
    2; ctrl + c (7+7*7+7/7-7)
    3; enter (=) in any cell
    4; ctrl + v (7+7*7+7/7-7)
    5; press enter
    6; solution is 50

    Don't calculate by yourself, just know how to get to the answer.

    Be a manager, the less you know how to do, the more people you know who can do things, the better you seem to be, without doing anything. I feel there is a meaningfull quote in here somewhere.
    Or just use BODMAS as advised earlier in the thread………...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  68. #67  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Is it easier if it is posted as 7+(7*7)+(7/7)-7?

    You can cast aside the 7 and -7 as they equal 0.

    Now you have (7*7)+(7/7)

    which reduces to 49+1 which equals 50.

    The order of procedure was not outlined without the parenthesis, but it still needs to be followed for the correct answer. If you put it as originally stated and punch it into a calculator you will get 56, which incidentally is closer than a lot of answers I got by some relatively intelligent people like 1, 7, and most disappointing, by a friend who knows math a lot better than I do, 49.

    Order of Operations - BODMAS
    Reply With Quote  
     

  69. #68  
    exchemist
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,264
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Is it easier if it is posted as 7+(7*7)+(7/7)-7?

    You can cast aside the 7 and -7 as they equal 0.

    Now you have (7*7)+(7/7)

    which reduces to 49+1 which equals 50.

    The order of procedure was not outlined without the parenthesis, but it still needs to be followed for the correct answer. If you put it as originally stated and punch it into a calculator you will get 56, which incidentally is closer than a lot of answers I got by some relatively intelligent people like 1, 7, and most disappointing, by a friend who knows math a lot better than I do, 49.

    Order of Operations - BODMAS
    Quite. BODMAS. As a number of us have been saying throughout. Even my 11yr old son could get this right.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  70. #69  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by exchemist View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Is it easier if it is posted as 7+(7*7)+(7/7)-7?

    You can cast aside the 7 and -7 as they equal 0.

    Now you have (7*7)+(7/7)

    which reduces to 49+1 which equals 50.

    The order of procedure was not outlined without the parenthesis, but it still needs to be followed for the correct answer. If you put it as originally stated and punch it into a calculator you will get 56, which incidentally is closer than a lot of answers I got by some relatively intelligent people like 1, 7, and most disappointing, by a friend who knows math a lot better than I do, 49.

    Order of Operations - BODMAS
    Quite. BODMAS. As a number of us have been saying throughout. Even my 11yr old son could get this right.
    Sometimes 11 year olds are going to outdo older people because of better teaching or parenting and because certain things are just fresher in the mind for them. Just saying Bodmas may not be a good teaching process without explaining what Bodmas are though.

    Now, if your 11 year old understands 1/2 spin better than I do, - (he probably can't understand it less than I do.) Or photons. Those guys baffle me. This is all good, a lot to enjoy learning.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  71. #70  
    exchemist
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,264
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    Sometimes 11 year olds are going to outdo older people because of better teaching or parenting and because certain things are just fresher in the mind for them. Just saying Bodmas may not be a good teaching process without explaining what Bodmas are though.
    No one is just saying BODMAS: the explanation has been given higher up in this thread.

    What is mildly unexpected, to me at least, is that there are contributors to this forum who can't do this correctly. Could it be a modern dependence on calculators, do you think, or is it that we just have some members who, while expressing an interest in natural science, are nonetheless poor at basic arithmetic?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  72. #71  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    16,682
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    If you put it as originally stated and punch it into a calculator you will get 56
    It depends on the calculator; some correctly handle operators and some don't. And, of course, some use Reverse Polish Notation ...

    closer than a lot of answers I got by some relatively intelligent people
    There seems to have been a spate of posts on LinkedIn recently, where people post trivial arithmetic problems like this with headlines like "99% get this wrong" (usually followed by 99% getting it right). Very annoying.

    Order of Operations - BODMAS
    I don't find BODMAS a particularly useful mnemonic as it isn't a real word. I have to work out what the mnemonic was supposed to be from the precedence rules...
    Without wishing to overstate my case, everything in the observable universe definitely has its origins in Northamptonshire -- Alan Moore
    Reply With Quote  
     

  73. #72  
    Genius Idiot Rajnish Kaushik's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    168
    miscalculations sorry
    "Think like a man of action,act like a man of action"
    Henry Louis Bergson"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  74. #73  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by Rajnish Kaushik View Post
    miscalculations sorry
    Your calculations were fine, just a trick question.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  75. #74  
    Forum Freshman Anathema's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by Write4U View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucknorium View Post
    since i know you will not or can not convert this problem to RPN and you will not try to learn here is the answer:

    7 7 * 7 7 / + 7 + 7 -

    this is only one solution. there are others.
    2 questions;

    a) what did I just learn about mathematics on this Mathematics Forum?
    I dunno, but I learned that I don't know what reverse polish notation is, and further more that it's not particularly intuitive...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  76. #75  
    Forum Freshman Anathema's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by stander-j View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Chucknorium View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by stander-j View Post
    But if you asked my to do long division (Which IIRC is like 4th grade math) it would probably take me 30 minutes just to recall the steps/procedure involved -or- to solve it in a way that takes many unnecessary steps.
    if you said that you forgot how to determine a square root by hand i might believe. forgetting how do long division is like forgetting how to ride a bicycle.
    What could I possibly gain by fibbing about not remembering how to do long division? I am telling the truth, and hope you'll just take my word for it. The fact is I haven't had to apply those skills since elementary school - and I've never had to divide 1564 apples amongst 32 friends either.

    *I haven't ridden a bike in many years either - I'd probably suck at that too now.
    I understand the theory behind long division. But quite honestly I suck at arithmetic anymore. Computers and calculators have ruined me. I doubt I could get the correct answer doing long division by hand nowadays - even though I have a degree in math, and I graduated with 4.0 even! Of course, I don't use that math in my day job, so it hardly counts much anymore

    Quote Originally Posted by stander-j View Post
    No, it's not your English - which is quite good if it isn't your primary language. I'm just terrible at distinguishing between serious comments and jokes on the internet. The lack of tone and social cues makes it almost impossible for me to understand when something is meant as a joke.


    I have this same problem...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  77. #76  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,155
    A month or two ago as part of my preparation for starting a teacher training course I did a week of being a teaching assistant in a primary school (9/10 year olds), and helped most with the maths. From my admittedly limited experience, long division now seems to be taught almost exclusively by something called the "chunking method". I'd never heard of this and had to pick it up on the fly to avoid the kids thinking I was an idiot. Basically if you are trying to divide a number by say 15, the kids write in the corner the "chunks" of 1 x 15 = 15; 2 x 15 = 30; 5 x 15 =75 and 10 x 15 = 150. They then subtract the largest possible "chunk" from the number to be divided and repeat until you can go no further and make note of the remainder (if any). Then they go back and add up the chunks they have subtracted to get the answer. Is this how it is taught elsewhere nowadays?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  78. #77  
    exchemist
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,264
    Quote Originally Posted by PhDemon View Post
    A month or two ago as part of my preparation for starting a teacher training course I did a week of being a teaching assistant in a primary school (9/10 year olds), and helped most with the maths. From my admittedly limited experience, long division now seems to be taught almost exclusively by something called the "chunking method". I'd never heard of this and had to pick it up on the fly to avoid the kids thinking I was an idiot. Basically if you are trying to divide a number by say 15, the kids write in the corner the "chunks" of 1 x 15 = 15; 2 x 15 = 30; 5 x 15 =75 and 10 x 15 = 150. They then subtract the largest possible "chunk" from the number to be divided and repeat until you can go no further and make note of the remainder (if any). Then they go back and add up the chunks they have subtracted to get the answer. Is this how it is taught elsewhere nowadays?
    Interesting, because that is not how my son was taught it (he is just turning 11). He has been taught the old way, more or less as I recall doing it myself. But he is at an independent school preparing for Common Entrance, which I imagine may be more traditional than the state system is.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  79. #78  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,155
    The school I ws helping at was an independent (but not fee paying) church school. I don't know if the standard state schools do it differently...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  80. #79  
    Your Mama! GiantEvil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, Wa
    Posts
    2,280
    Quote Originally Posted by PhDemon View Post
    A month or two ago as part of my preparation for starting a teacher training course I did a week of being a teaching assistant in a primary school (9/10 year olds), and helped most with the maths. From my admittedly limited experience, long division now seems to be taught almost exclusively by something called the "chunking method". I'd never heard of this and had to pick it up on the fly to avoid the kids thinking I was an idiot. Basically if you are trying to divide a number by say 15, the kids write in the corner the "chunks" of 1 x 15 = 15; 2 x 15 = 30; 5 x 15 =75 and 10 x 15 = 150. They then subtract the largest possible "chunk" from the number to be divided and repeat until you can go no further and make note of the remainder (if any). Then they go back and add up the chunks they have subtracted to get the answer. Is this how it is taught elsewhere nowadays?
    I was also taught the traditional long division algorithm, but for doing division in my head I "naturally" just assumed the "chunking" method. It also works well for multiplication, considering that multiplication and division are inverse operations. And also keeping in mind the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmatic.
    Of course I never told any teacher ever what I was doing in my head.
    Rewarding memorization and ignoring synthesis, no wonder America is educationally a shithole.
    I was some of the mud that got to sit up and look around.
    Lucky me. Lucky mud.
    -Kurt Vonnegut Jr.-
    Cat's Cradle.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  81. #80  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,155
    Careful!
    America is educationally a shithole
    You seem to be channelling RomanK here
    Reply With Quote  
     

  82. #81  
    Your Mama! GiantEvil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Vancouver, Wa
    Posts
    2,280
    Quote Originally Posted by PhDemon View Post
    Careful!
    America is educationally a shithole
    You seem to be channelling RomanK here
    That would be because a stopped clock is still right twice a day.

    I'm not saying that a good proper education is unavailable in America, but a shitty one is readily available; South Carolina Christian School Fourth Grade Science Quiz
    I was some of the mud that got to sit up and look around.
    Lucky me. Lucky mud.
    -Kurt Vonnegut Jr.-
    Cat's Cradle.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  83. #82  
    Forum Freshman Anathema's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    31
    I honestly have no idea what they teach anymore. I've just been volunteered to help a friend's daughter, who has been having a hard time with long division. Her dad just "knows" the answers for each step in long division, and can't explain it to her, and she's getting very frustrated. So I'll explain how I do it, which is apparently much more similar to the chunking method you described, although I always thought of it more like bootstrap estimation.

    Consider 435 divided by 25. Obviously 25 can't go into 4, so we'll start with the 43 - the first bit bigger than 25. But we can ignore the 3 for now, and just start with the 40, it'll make it easier. And realistically, we can round 25 up to 30 as well. So what we're talking about for our first pass is how many times can 30 go into 40? Only once, of course. So you write down 1 over the 3, and you multiply 25 times 1 and write the answer under 43 and subtract to get 18.

    Now this usually works, but sometimes it doesn't - that's part of the deal when you're estimating. If your remainder in that first step is larger than 25, then you just have to increase your multiplier and do it again. So next step: You drop the next number to make your numerator larger than your denominator, and you're looking at 185 divided by 25. Only we're going to round again and call it 180 divided by 30... so we'll guesstimate 6. Now it just so happens this gives you 150, which leaves a remainder of 35, which is bigger than 25, so you have to up it by one. Bump it to 7 and do over - now you get 175 and a remainder of 10.

    Then it's a matter of whether you're doing remainders or fractions or decimals... Same process applies though. Just round to a reasonable level, make a decent starting guess, and run with it. It works well enough without having to somehow magically know that 25 goes into 185 seven times... because I just don't carry that in my head. It's not how my brain works.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  84. #83  
    Forum Junior anticorncob28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Nebraska, USA
    Posts
    272
    7+7*7+7/7-7
    = 7+49+7/7-7
    = 7+49+1-7
    = 56+1-7
    = 57-7
    = 50
    Any objections?
    "A 4 degree Celsius warmer world can, and must be, avoided"
    -Jim Young Kim (World Bank President)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  85. #84  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,155
    I was taught long division the "traditional" way but the way I do it in on the fly is to divide numerator and denominator by a common factor until I get to something "sensible" that I can work out in my head.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  86. #85  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    1,040
    Quote Originally Posted by anticorncob28 View Post
    7+7*7+7/7-7
    = 7+49+7/7-7
    = 7+49+1-7
    = 56+1-7
    = 57-7
    = 50
    Any objections?
    Your answer is accurate.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  87. #86  
    Forum Bachelors Degree One beer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    442
    Quote Originally Posted by Strange View Post
    I don't find BODMAS a particularly useful mnemonic as it isn't a real word. I have to work out what the mnemonic was supposed to be from the precedence rules...
    Oh dear. Well you probably won't like this one for calculating triangles: SOHCAHTOA

    sin = opposite over hypotenuse
    cos = adjacent over hypotenuse
    tan = opposite over adjacent
    Reply With Quote  
     

  88. #87  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,034
    My main problem with math is trying to get over the feeling that I'm dumb by doing it slow.

    I know if I don't do it slow I'll screw up cause eventually I wont be able to read my own handwritting correctly
    Reply With Quote  
     

  89. #88  
    Quagma SpeedFreek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    2,787
    Quote Originally Posted by One beer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Strange View Post
    I don't find BODMAS a particularly useful mnemonic as it isn't a real word. I have to work out what the mnemonic was supposed to be from the precedence rules...
    Oh dear. Well you probably won't like this one for calculating triangles: SOHCAHTOA

    sin = opposite over hypotenuse
    cos = adjacent over hypotenuse
    tan = opposite over adjacent
    I was taught this differently.

    Some People Have Curly Brown Hair Til Perfectly Bald.

    Sin = Perpendicular/Hypotenuse
    Cosine = Base/Hypotenuse
    Tangent = Perpendicular/Base



    And I remember it, 35 years later!
    "Ok, brain let's get things straight. You don't like me, and I don't like you, so let's do this so I can go back to killing you with beer." - Homer
    Reply With Quote  
     

  90. #89  
    Forum Bachelors Degree One beer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    442
    That's the thing isn't it - whether you remember it? Doesn't really matter whether it's a mnemonic or whatever, as long as it can be easily remembered.

    Silly Old Hens Can't Always Have Twins On Asking: SOHCAHTOA. This again was from my maths teacher, (hello Miss Cook).

    I daresay I could come up with a slightly more 'hip' mnemonic, but hers still works for me.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  91. #90  
    Forum Freshman pzkpfw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    79
    My class was taught H=Hypotenuse, B=Beside and O=Opposite (~ P in post #88).

    The mnemonic was "Old Human Beings Have Old Bones", with Sin, Cos, Tan just assumed (remembered) as the order.

    But in my head I mostly just remembered that with Sin and Cos it was one of the smaller sides divided by the hypotenuse (otherwise you'd not get a number less than 1) and Sin was "Ugly" and Cos was "Nice". Somehow with the angle A being calculated at the intersection of H and B made it more "balanced", whereas with Sin using the opposite side, it seemed disjointed.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  92. #91  
    Forum Bachelors Degree One beer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    442
    Quote Originally Posted by Zwolver View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by exchemist View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rajnish Kaushik View Post
    56
    Oh dear oh dear.
    What you do..

    1; Start excel
    2; ctrl + c (7+7*7+7/7-7)
    3; enter (=) in any cell
    4; ctrl + v (7+7*7+7/7-7)
    5; press enter
    6; solution is 50

    Don't calculate by yourself, just know how to get to the answer.

    Be a manager, the less you know how to do, the more people you know who can do things, the better you seem to be, without doing anything. I feel there is a meaningfull quote in here somewhere.
    I beg to differ,

    It is very valuable to have a rough idea of the approximate answer as you are calculating the actual answer. This was the key to using a slide rule, you knew roughly what the answer was going to be, which enabled you to correctly place the decimal point, and guarded against gross errors.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  93. #92  
    Moderator Moderator Cogito Ergo Sum's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Belgium
    Posts
    2,519
    Quote Originally Posted by Cogito Ergo Sum View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayflow View Post
    You may think about re-considering your user name then.

    If you have valid reasons for why I should reconsider my username, then do not hesitate to provide them.

    I am still waiting for your criticism, member Mayflow.
    "The only safe rule is to dispute only with those of your acquaintance of whom you know that they possess sufficient intelligence and self-respect not to advance absurdities; to appeal to reason and not to authority, and to listen to reason and yield to it; and, finally, to be willing to accept reason even from an opponent, and to be just enough to bear being proved to be in the wrong."

    ~ Arthur Schopenhauer, The Art of Being Right: 38 Ways to Win an Argument (1831), Stratagem XXXVIII.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  94. #93  
    Forum Freshman Anathema's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by Beer w/Straw View Post
    My main problem with math is trying to get over the feeling that I'm dumb by doing it slow.

    I know if I don't do it slow I'll screw up cause eventually I wont be able to read my own handwritting correctly
    What has speed got to do with anything? Likewise use of fingers? Honestly, I have a degree in math, I'm good at math. But I'm very slow at arithmetic, and I'm slow at algebra or I make errors. And if I'm doing arithmetic mentally, I use my fingers! I was never particularly good at memorizing stuff - I am much better and understanding concepts. So I understand how addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division work. I grok the concepts. What else is necessary, really? Why should I have to memorize and be able to regurgitate addition at the drop of a hat, when I can simply memorize a few key points, and know how to get to where I need to be form there?
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •