Thread: Application of algebraic topology.

Hi,
I use algebraic geometry to calculate the 6-axis machines.
I have heard that may use methods of algebraic topology for calculatethe robots coordinates.
Can anybody give me a book on the subject?
Thanks.

Sounds unlikely. Topology is the study of properties that don't involve coordinates.

Originally Posted by mathman

Sounds unlikely. Topology is the study of properties that don't involve coordinates.

1. Scale-Free Coordinates for Multi-Robot Systems with Bearing-only Sensors
2. Grasping Objects with Holes: A Topological Approach
3. Topological Mapping of Unknown Environments using an Unlocalized Robotic Swarm
etc.
If you do not understand anything in it do not comment! You disgraced the whole world. That's what causes examinations by tests. According to the commentary it is clear who is on this forum. I'll put a screenshot response to my blog. Scared to ask about the Lie group in robotics. I go on from this forum. Somebody remove me from the forum. I suspect that the comment made ​​by stupid moderator , who has a lot of accounts on the forum. In order not to embarrass myself , it will ignore 1-3 which I attached, will block my account and will be write the foolish messages. This is the opinion of the moderator will be scientific ethics .

Originally Posted by spacecolonization.info

If you do not understand anything in it do not comment! You disgraced the whole world. That's what causes examinations by tests. According to the commentary it is clear who is on this forum. I'll put a screenshot response to my blog. Scared to ask about the Lie group in robotics. I go on from this forum. Somebody remove me from the forum. I suspect that the comment made ​​by stupid moderator , who has a lot of accounts on the forum. In order not to embarrass myself , it will ignore 1-3 which I attached, will block my account and will be write the foolish messages. This is the opinion of the moderator will be scientific ethics .

Originally Posted by spacecolonization.info

Originally Posted by mathman

Sounds unlikely. Topology is the study of properties that don't involve coordinates.

1. Scale-Free Coordinates for Multi-Robot Systems with Bearing-only Sensors
2. Grasping Objects with Holes: A Topological Approach
3. Topological Mapping of Unknown Environments using an Unlocalized Robotic Swarm
etc.
If you do not understand anything in it do not comment! You disgraced the whole world. That's what causes examinations by tests. According to the commentary it is clear who is on this forum. I'll put a screenshot response to my blog. Scared to ask about the Lie group in robotics. I go on from this forum. Somebody remove me from the forum. I suspect that the comment made ​​by stupid moderator , who has a lot of accounts on the forum. In order not to embarrass myself , it will ignore 1-3 which I attached, will block my account and will be write the foolish messages. This is the opinion of the moderator will be scientific ethics .

Sooooo, you just wanted to insult the first person to comment and be a flagrant asshat? How kind of you, douche

Blank responses argue that forum traffic and users number are artificially increased. Therefore, moderators have a lot of accounts and talk nonsense from different accounts. I came to forum, that positions itself as science forum. However, if there are answers only from nothing-understanding fakes, then forum isn't real. If one person justifies another person stupid answer and changes subject, it means that there are the same persone for two accounts and this person knows nothing about subject. He just read in Wikipedia about algebraic topology and wrote answer. Such response is called reproductive. Usually thare are children who have reproductive thinking because they repeat and see in absolute terms. For example, he read in Wikipedia algebraic topology definition and repeated it. Thinking in its infancy. If the second user is real, he even disgraced worse than the first respondent. There is nothing worse than connive people with reproductive thinking.
Moderators have multiple accounts on a forum and prepare readers to the fact that I am breaking the rules of the forum. Members or users you need to understand what you write. Each time your answers all the more stupid. The forum is not serious!
Dear Jeff Machesky and Sahil Gupta,
Please, delete my account.

Originally Posted by spacecolonization.info

Blank responses argue that forum traffic and users number are artificially increased. Therefore, moderators have a lot of accounts and talk nonsense from different accounts. I came to forum, that positions itself as science forum. However, if there are answers only from nothing-understanding fakes, then forum isn't real. If one person justifies another person stupid answer and changes subject, it means that there are the same persone for two accounts and this person knows nothing about subject. He just read in Wikipedia about algebraic topology and wrote answer. Such response is called reproductive. Usually thare are children who have reproductive thinking because they repeat and see in absolute terms. For example, he read in Wikipedia algebraic topology definition and repeated it. Thinking in its infancy. If the second user is real, he even disgraced worse than the first respondent. There is nothing worse than connive people with reproductive thinking.
Moderators have multiple accounts on a forum and prepare readers to the fact that I am breaking the rules of the forum. Members or users you need to understand what you write. Each time your answers all the more stupid. The forum is not serious!
Dear Jeff Machesky and Sahil Gupta,
Please, delete my account.

Why would the Staff want to delete your account?
The members of the Science Forum are keen on watching your emotional ranting.

Originally Posted by spacecolonization.info

Please, delete my account.

MODERATOR INTERVENTION : We don't delete accounts here, but I'll be happy to oblige your desire to depart by sending you on a permanent vacation. Gone.

Well, I'm not sorry to see him go, but I'd still like to ask him - wht does 'reproductive thinking' mean?
(OK, that's not the only incomprehensible statement he made, but it's the wierdest).

Clarissa