# Thread: Can somebody explain the Riemann hypothesis?

1. I just want a quick answer, I'll try to close this as soon as I get one. I'm just a little confused. The Riemann-Zeta function is defined as zeta(x) = 1 + 1/2^x + 1/3^x + 1/4^x. Originally I believed the Riemann hypothesis stated that if zeta(x) = 0 then x is a complex number with a real part of 0.5. This made sense to me. However they stated the "non-trivial" zeros, and then stated the trivial zeros were the negative even integers. However, for a negative even integer like -6, zeta(-6) = 1 + 1/(2^-6) + 1/(3^-6)... = 1 + 2^6 + 3^6 + 4^6..., how does this equal zero? Does this formula not apply to all values of x?  2.

3. Nevermind, I figured it out with Ramanujan sums and methods to sum divergent series. If only I could find a way to delete this thread, or if somebody moves it to the trash...  Bookmarks
 Posting Permissions
 You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts   BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On [VIDEO] code is On HTML code is Off Trackbacks are Off Pingbacks are Off Refbacks are On Terms of Use Agreement