Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: About Non-Perfect Squares

  1. #1 About Non-Perfect Squares 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    This is about determining the square root of a non-perfect square. There is a method in calculus for doing this, as we know, and it is complicated. Obviously we have calculators now, so there is no need for such a method.

    I thought about a different way to determine the square root of a non-perfect square (without a calculator). It is much simpler than the calculus method, which I think involves differentials. It has been some time since I took that course. I have not heard of this method I am mentioning in any math course I have taken; it is just something I thought of, although it could have been mentioned somewhere else. I tried it on the square root of 54.

    So the number 54 falls between two perfect squares: 49 and 64. Where between the two numbers does it fall? It is 5 numbers after 49. There is a total of 15 numbers between 49 and 64.

    The number 54 is the 5th out of 15 numbers (5/15). Therefore, it is one third of the way between 49 and 64. So, according to this method, the square root of 54 should also fall one third of the way between the square roots of 49 and 64, which are 7 and 8.

    The answer we get would be 7 and 1/3, or 7.33 repeating. The calculator answer is 7.348. I cannot remember what answer the calculus method produces, but it is closer than the method I mentioned. However, the simplicity of this method is to be taken into consideration. It also produces an answer that is pretty close to the calculator answer.

    I tried to find a way to get the exact answer without the calculator, but I could not do it. It is also worth mentioning that this methodís accuracy increases with the increase of the number of the non-perfect square.

    We can look at the square root of 78. Accoriding to this method, the answer would be 8.8235. The calculator answer is 8.8318. The difference between the two is 0.0083. This last number is less than the difference in the case of the square root of 54. The difference in that case was 0.015 (7.348-7.333).

    This proves that the methodís accuracy is higher when the number of the non-perfect square is higher.

    We do not need such methods anyway, since we have calculators now. But some math enthusiasts might find this interesting.

    Reply With Quote  


  3. #2  
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    You are simply interpolating, which is approximating a curve by a straight line between two points on the curve. This works pretty well for all kinds of functions, not just square roots, if the points are not too far apart and you don't need too much accuracy.
    Linear interpolation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Reply With Quote  

  4. #3  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Thanks for providing the exact term for this method.
    Reply With Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Perfect Babies?
    By Jasper in forum Philosophy
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: December 3rd, 2009, 09:19 PM
  2. The 'Perfect' Vacuum
    By Tenacity in forum Physics
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: September 14th, 2008, 06:15 PM
  3. sum of squares
    By siegfried in forum Mathematics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: August 13th, 2008, 08:56 PM
  4. squares
    By AlexP in forum Mathematics
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: June 26th, 2007, 01:00 PM
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts