I'm certain the sequence for the recursive rule above is already popularized under some name (so what is it?)
Interesting properties? What about an explicit formula (I'm sure it'll includetoo)
![]()
|
I'm certain the sequence for the recursive rule above is already popularized under some name (so what is it?)
Interesting properties? What about an explicit formula (I'm sure it'll includetoo)
![]()
Root 1 Root 2 Root 3 S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8 S9 S10 0 0 1 1 2 4 6 12 22 40 74 136 250 0 1 0 1 2 3 6 11 20 37 68 125 230 1 0 0 1 1 2 4 7 13 24 44 81 149 1 5 10 16 31 57 104 192 353 649 1194 2196 4039 1 2 3 6 11 20 37 68 125 230 423 778 1431
:P
Never mind. Tribonacci numbers (how did I not catch that?).
A systematic way to get explicit expressions out of a recursion relation is the z-transform: Z-transform - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
« Essential Singularities in trigonometric functions | Logical equivalence problem » |