applying probabilty at reprodution implies humanitycantexist

lets see it this way, girls are purely matrilineal lines and boys purely patrilineal ones

i finally solved the way to find the chances a boy keeps an exclusivily patrilineal line in the future:

if the population is to keep he will have two counting childs which each will have another two and so on

so lets consider a coin toss game, a tail is a boy and a head a girl

the game to find the chances is simple:

toss a coin two times and for every tail you get two extra tosses, you keep playing till you run out of tosses

thise are your chances of having a patrilineal line in the future

but the tossing game in the end can be reduced or simplified to:

you have one toss and for every tail you get an extra toss, you keep playing till you run out of tosses and lose

exactly for the boys in here your chances to get a patrilineal line in the future are 2 elevated to the number of generations

now if even the hole globality dont have the chances to keep a patrilineal line in the case of boys and a matrilineal in the case of girls, humanity cant exist in 64 generations

so is it human reproduction a myth or probability fails in this case

Re: applying probabilty at reprodution implies humanitycante

Quote:

Originally Posted by **luxtpm**

so is it human reproduction a myth

hehe made me laugh

yup.. it's just a fairytale we tell you kids to keep you behaving "you'll never get a gal if you act like that" and all

I really don't get your line of thinking at all, there seems to be lots of faults

You seem to have decided only men can reproduce (for each man you get two extra throws). You've forgotten a woman is also neccessary

you also seem to have missed the point that we can in fact have more than two kids. If by some miracle the population starts to dwindle, people will have half a dozen kids and we will thrive again

If we have 10 men and one woman, the woman will be constantly pregnant and there will be lots of siblings. while this would initially lead to incest (as written in that unholy pile of rot the Bible) after a few generations enviromental influences would alter the genepool enough to iron out the flaws

with 10 woman and one man, the man will be constantly impregnating multiple woman. there will be less incestual impact but again it will be sorted.

I honestly have no idea where you've come up with this 'myth'

Men are Xy, women are Xx

babies are mix the Xx and Xy combine and form either

XX

Xy

xX

xy

so theres a clear 50/50 chance of boy or girl

so yes if everyone had two kids, there would be cases where both were boys, however there would also be cases where both are girls. IT EVENS OUT

for example, the population is currently tilted slightly towards women, about 60/50. in a few generations it will bounce the other way

you've also forgotten to take Identical twins, twins, triplets, quadruplets etc. Transexuals, homosexuals and mutants into your 'equation'

Re: applying probabilty at reprodution implies humanitycante

Quote:

Originally Posted by **luxtpm**

so is it human reproduction a myth or probability fails in this case

Probability does not fail, you do.