For the purposes of this discussion, all rings are commutative with identity/unity. You can do all of this with noncommutative rings, but it'll be easier to just deal with commutative rings.
Letbe a ring. An (ascending) chain of ideals of
is a sequence of ideals
of
such that
. We say that
is Noetherian if
satisfies the ascending chain condition (ACC) on ideals. That is to say, given any ascending chain
of ideals of
, there exists an integer
(depending on the chain) such that for all
,
.
Note: I tend to say that the chain stabilizes in the above case, by which I mean it is eventually constant, where any sequence is eventually constant if it differs from a constant sequence by a finite number of terms.
Examples of Noetherian rings include the integers and polynomial rings over a field. Indeed, we have the
Proposition: Letbe a principal ideal ring. Then
is Noetherian.
Proof: Letbe a chain of ideals of
, and let
. Check that
is indeed an ideal. Since
is a principal ideal ring, there is an element
of
such that
. Since
, there must exist some
such that
. But then
. Clearly
, and so
. But then for any
, we have
, whence we clearly have
. Thus the ACC is satisfied, and
is Noetherian.
As the integers and any polynomial ring over a field are Euclidean domains, they are PID's and hence must be Noetherian.
There are some other useful characterizations of Noetherian rings. One of them is an important finiteness criterion which is useful in, say, algebraic geometry. Another is a property which allows us to pick out ideals maximal with respect to basically any given condition, which is what I will be using a lot in the algebraic number theory thread. To be specific, we have the
Theorem: The following are equivalent:
i.is Noetherian;
ii. every ideal ofis finitely generated; and
iii. every nonempty set of ideals ofcontains a maximal element (i.e., given a set
of ideals of
, there is an ideal
such that if
and
, then
).
Proof:Let
be any ideal of
, and construct a chain of ideals as follows: let
be any element, and let
. If
, we are done. Otherwise, let
, and let
. Then
. If
, we are done. Otherwise, continue the process, throwing in another element of
to create a bigger ideal, stopping if the newly created ideal is equal to
and continuing otherwise. Since
satisfies the ACC on ideals, this process must stop at some point, as otherwise we would be able to construct a strictly increasing chain of ideals of
. Thus we must have
for some
, and clearly
is generated by
elements.
This proof is very similar to the proof that every principal ideal ring is Noetherian--just take a chain of ideals, look at the union (which must be an ideal and hence finitely generated), and then show that all of the elements generating the union must lie in some ideal in the chain.
Let
be a nonempty set of ideals of
. Construct a chain of ideals as follows: let
be any ideal. If
is maximal, we're done. Otherwise, there must exist
so that
. Continue the process: if you find a maximal element, stop; otherwise, you can find a bigger ideal and continue the chain. This process must stop, as otherwise we would be able to construct a strictly increasing chain of ideals of
. Thus our chain must stop at some maximal element.
Let
be a chain of ideals, and let
be the set of ideals in this chain. Then
contains a maximal element, say
. But then for any
, we have
. Since
is maximal, we must have
. Thus
satisfies the ACC and is Noetherian.
![]()