I am not qualified in any of the sciences but I am interested in them all to varying extents. I am also very interested in the nature of conceptual thinking which is used in all sciences and if unexplored will continue to produce theory and technology which is severely limited. Current advances are fascinating and yet built into their development is the apparent contradiction that they cannot guarantee individual or global human happiness, flourishing and the mental and emotional stability that all humans seek. These qualities of being human are essential and a science that emerges from a community that does not experience unhappiness or instability will not only be of great benefit to the earth and all creatures and life forms on it but also beyond. Such a science will inherently be for the benefit of all. It would also be a solution based science which does not perceive a range of problems that must be investigated and resolved. Only conceptual thought-based knowledge would take that approach.
When science and humanity on an individual basis shifts its emphasis from over-thinking, over-analysing and trying too hard to find solutions that it believes are not already available, then there will be a relaxation from a pursuit that has contributed to division and instability for many decades. If this seems harsh or even wrong, take a look at the relationships between yourself and others in this community or other communities and the relationships between scientists in your own country and globally. You will find some positive aspects. But what else do you find? I apologise in advance that I am not always able to spend a long time in the Forum in discussion but will be able to return to an ongoing thread intermittently. Thank you for taking the time to read this. Ged![]()