Notices
Results 1 to 10 of 10
Like Tree3Likes
  • 2 Post By Strange
  • 1 Post By anticorncob28

Thread: I need a Physics theory disproved

  1. #1 I need a Physics theory disproved 
    New Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1
    Hy I'm a scientist working freelance. It beats thumb twittling. I need a theory disproved. The theory is a multifield source. The fields being projected from the atomic scale. The lines of projections with harmonics.I need to know how this agrees or disagrees with known physics. I will not post because again because reading your forum I will be viewed a quack.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Apocalyptic Paradise
    Posts
    6,613
    Quote Originally Posted by Ted Mack View Post
    Hy I'm a scientist working freelance.
    Well, HY there...
    Quote Originally Posted by Ted Mack View Post
    It beats thumb twittling.
    Yeeeaahhh...
    Quote Originally Posted by Ted Mack View Post
    I need a theory disproved.
    I thought you said you were a Scientist?
    Quote Originally Posted by Ted Mack View Post
    The theory is a multifield source. The fields being projected from the atomic scale. The lines of projections with harmonics.
    Did you mean, "Hypotheses?"
    Quote Originally Posted by Ted Mack View Post
    I need to know how this agrees or disagrees with known physics.
    Well, you'd need to give the details of the hypotheses...
    Quote Originally Posted by Ted Mack View Post
    I will not post because again because reading your forum I will be viewed a quack.
    "Crank," actually.
    That is possible, if the shoe fits. If it doesn't, then you would have no need to worry about such.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    13,149
    Quote Originally Posted by Ted Mack View Post
    Hy I'm a scientist working freelance. It beats thumb twittling. I need a theory disproved. The theory is a multifield source. The fields being projected from the atomic scale. The lines of projections with harmonics.I need to know how this agrees or disagrees with known physics. I will not post because again because reading your forum I will be viewed a quack.
    I think more as a student trying to get information w/o doing their own research....get thee to the library and the many places on the internet, and the best of luck to you!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,168
    Quote Originally Posted by Ted Mack View Post
    Hy I'm a scientist working freelance. It beats thumb twittling. I need a theory disproved. The theory is a multifield source. The fields being projected from the atomic scale. The lines of projections with harmonics.I need to know how this agrees or disagrees with known physics. I will not post because again because reading your forum I will be viewed a quack.
    So, I can understand why a scientist would join the forum. I cannot understand why someone would then declare a need, but immediately reject the forum as a possible source for meeting that need. Coulf you explain? Try to keep it simple, I'm not all that bright.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    16,965
    Quote Originally Posted by Ted Mack View Post
    I need a theory disproved.
    Then you would need to provide more detail. Your description ("The theory is a multifield source. The fields being projected from the atomic scale. The lines of projections with harmonics.") doesn't mean much to me. Maybe others will get more out of it.

    I need to know how this agrees or disagrees with known physics.
    Without more (preferably mathematical) detail it seems impossible to tell.

    I will not post because again
    That's a shame. I doubt you will get much useful feedback then.
    LuciDreaming and DogLady like this.
    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Moderator Moderator Markus Hanke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    7,302
    You need to give more details, including maths, or else no one will be able to address this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Forum Ph.D. merumario's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    nigeria
    Posts
    844
    Did you guys read the first line even? 'I am a scientist' and he goes again 'I ωαηт to know how this agree with known physics'.....which kind of scientist are you? A botanist or zoologist?

    'You will not be posting again'; who cares if you jump off the cliff because you a scientist that doesn't know anything(would have said enough but you actually presented nothing!) And you are protecting your image of laziness#

    And who told you that we haven't seen scientist/physicist and how do you know some of us ain't one or still studying to be one? You are just a sucker from start to finish. How so much I hate your 1st and probably only post#
    "I am sorry for making this letter longer than usual.I actually lacked the time to make it shorter."###
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Life-Size Nanoputian Flick Montana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Flatland
    Posts
    5,437
    Quote Originally Posted by Ted Mack View Post
    I will not post because again because reading your forum I will be viewed a quack.
    Any chance you could spread this philosophy among other cranks?
    "Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us." -Calvin
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Forum Junior anticorncob28's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Nebraska, USA
    Posts
    277
    A crank is somebody who disagrees with things that are accepted as fact by most of the scientific community. Cranks include:
    - Creationists
    - Global warming deniers
    - Relativity deniers
    - People who think 0.999... =/= 1
    - People who think it is possible to create a square with the same area of a given circle with a straightedge and compass.
    etc.
    "crank" is not a term that is made up and use only here. There's a Wikipedia page about it. You do not get banned for ignorance, you get banned for not being willing to learn or change your mind on issues.
    Strange likes this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Forum Ph.D. merumario's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    nigeria
    Posts
    844
    Quote Originally Posted by anticorncob28 View Post
    A crank is somebody who disagrees with things that are accepted as fact by most of the scientific community. Cranks include:
    - Creationists
    - Global warming deniers
    - Relativity deniers
    - People who think 0.999... =/= 1
    - People who think it is possible to create a square with the same area of a given circle with a straightedge and compass.
    etc.
    "crank" is not a term that is made up and use only here. There's a Wikipedia page about it. You do not get banned for ignorance, you get banned for not being willing to learn or change your mind on issues.
    Adding.....

    They also have a place in oxford dictionary#

    As stated; a person with strange fixed ideas,esp on a particular subject#
    "I am sorry for making this letter longer than usual.I actually lacked the time to make it shorter."###
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Mostly New Physics - Yet Another Theory of Everything
    By mnpguy in forum Personal Theories & Alternative Ideas
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: May 4th, 2012, 01:50 PM
  2. I MAY WIN A NOBEL FOR THIS... IVE DISPROVED NEWTON!!!
    By I AM A SUPER GENIUS in forum Pseudoscience
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: February 13th, 2009, 06:18 AM
  3. I MAY WIN A NOBEL FOR THIS... IVE DISPROVED PYTHAGORAS!!!
    By I AM A SUPER GENIUS in forum Pseudoscience
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: February 12th, 2009, 11:32 PM
  4. I MAY WIN A NOBEL FOR THIS... IVE DISPROVED THE RIGHT ANGLE!
    By I AM A SUPER GENIUS in forum Pseudoscience
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: February 11th, 2009, 08:06 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •