Notices
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 100 of 186
Like Tree50Likes

Thread: Hello Science Forum members

  1. #1 Hello Science Forum members 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Robittybob1 here,
    Way down in NZ .... do you know where that is?

    I might be a bit slow, but I will get to understand the topic before too long. I'll pull your leg and try and make you laugh, so don't be offended but see the funny side.
    I just hope to become a valuable member.

    Cheers
    Robittybob1

    Call me Bob OK.


     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Robittybob1 here,
    Way down in NZ .... do you know where that is?

    I might be a bit slow, but I will get to understand the topic before too long. I'll pull your leg and try and make you laugh, so don't be offended but see the funny side.
    I just hope to become a valuable member.

    Cheers
    Robittybob1

    Call me Bob OK.
    Just in case I get lonely - Hi there Bob


     

  4. #3  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    10,827
    Just so long as you don't start crank claims the way you did on Sciforums.
    stonecutter likes this.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
     

  5. #4  
    Ascended Member Ascended's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,380
    Hey Bob welcome to the forum
    Everything has its beauty, but not everyone sees it. - confucius
     

  6. #5  
    Anti-Crank AlexG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,810
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Just so long as you don't start crank claims the way you did on Sciforums.
    Or Physforum.

    I don't think he can help himself. He combines the worst aspects of trolls and crank.
    Its the way nature is!
    If you dont like it, go somewhere else....
    To another universe, where the rules are simpler
    Philosophically more pleasing, more psychologically easy
    Prof Richard Feynman (1979) .....

    Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!"
     

  7. #6  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Just so long as you don't start crank claims the way you did on Sciforums.
    Great starting comment. I've learned a lot of science since I started on the forums a couple of years back. So don't hold too much of the past against me please.
    Can you recall any particular claims I made?
     

  8. #7  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by AlexG View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Just so long as you don't start crank claims the way you did on Sciforums.
    Or Physforum.

    I don't think he can help himself. He combines the worst aspects of trolls and crank.
    Even before I saw your avatar I thought of you. Hi there mate.
     

  9. #8  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Ascended View Post
    Hey Bob welcome to the forum
    Thanks I'll talk to you instead.
     

  10. #9  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    10,827
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Just so long as you don't start crank claims the way you did on Sciforums.
    Great starting comment. I've learned a lot of science since I started on the forums a couple of years back. So don't hold too much of the past against me please.
    Can you recall any particular claims I made?
    There was extensive, and interminable, posting on how the Earth is growing if I recall correctly.
    Trivium likes this.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
     

  11. #10  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    12,515
    Aloha Bob....dang I feel funny saying that! Welcome.....I am hoping to visit NZ next year....I have been to Australia and have a friends in Taz but never been to NZ...hear it's just lovely!
     

  12. #11  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,169
    Welcome to the forum. I don't think you are the only member from Middle Earth.
     

  13. #12  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Just so long as you don't start crank claims the way you did on Sciforums.
    Great starting comment. I've learned a lot of science since I started on the forums a couple of years back. So don't hold too much of the past against me please.
    Can you recall any particular claims I made?
    There was extensive, and interminable, posting on how the Earth is growing if I recall correctly.
    You obviously didn't read my posts very well, for I was saying in order for the Earth to "expand" it had to lose mass, so was it wasn't growing but actually shrinking.
    Are you a moderator here or just a member FBM?
     

  14. #13  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    Aloha Bob....dang I feel funny saying that! Welcome.....I am hoping to visit NZ next year....I have been to Australia and have a friends in Taz but never been to NZ...hear it's just lovely!
    First word you'll need to learn is Ki ora (Aloha).
     

  15. #14  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    10,827
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    You obviously didn't read my posts very well, for I was saying in order for the Earth to "expand" it had to lose mass, so was it wasn't growing but actually shrinking.
    So you missed the highlighted part?
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    There was extensive, and interminable, posting on how the Earth is growing if I recall correctly.
    Either way, it was nonsense.
    I gave it the attention it was due.
    Presumably then you don't hold that view any more.
    And neither do you think that "in order for the Earth to "expand" it had to lose mass".
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
     

  16. #15  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    12,515
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    Aloha Bob....dang I feel funny saying that! Welcome.....I am hoping to visit NZ next year....I have been to Australia and have a friends in Taz but never been to NZ...hear it's just lovely!
    First word you'll need to learn is Ki ora (Aloha).
    M

    I know!

    I do my homework on that before I go to any country....Hello, Goodbye, Thank you and TOILET!
     

  17. #16  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    Aloha Bob....dang I feel funny saying that! Welcome.....I am hoping to visit NZ next year....I have been to Australia and have a friends in Taz but never been to NZ...hear it's just lovely!
    First word you'll need to learn is Ki ora (Aloha).
    M

    I know!

    I do my homework on that before I go to any country....Hello, Goodbye, Thank you and TOILET!
    Yeah we don't do that in the bathroom.
     

  18. #17  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    You obviously didn't read my posts very well, for I was saying in order for the Earth to "expand" it had to lose mass, so was it wasn't growing but actually shrinking.
    So you missed the highlighted part?
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    There was extensive, and interminable, posting on how the Earth is growing if I recall correctly.
    Either way, it was nonsense.
    I gave it the attention it was due.
    Presumably then you don't hold that view any more.
    And neither do you think that "in order for the Earth to "expand" it had to lose mass".
    You recalled correctly all right. My views are mine right, so it would be premature to presume anything about my views. I'm looking for the truth to many scientific mysteries.
     

  19. #18  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    10,827
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    You recalled correctly all right.
    Yet your previous post stated that I hadn't.

    My views are mine right, so it would be premature to presume anything about my views. I'm looking for the truth to many scientific mysteries.
    Ah, I see.
    My presumption was predicated on your statement that you've "learned a lot of science since [you] started on the forums a couple of years back".
    If you haven't changed your mind, i.e. my presumption was incorrect, then you obviously haven't learned "a lot" of science at all.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
     

  20. #19  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,169
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    [Ah, I see.
    My presumption was predicated on your statement that you've "learned a lot of science since [you] started on the forums a couple of years back".
    If you haven't changed your mind, i.e. my presumption was incorrect, then you obviously haven't learned "a lot" of science at all.
    You cannot deduce (accurately) that because his mind is unchanged on one point that he has not learned a lot of science on other topics.
     

  21. #20  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    10,827
    Quote Originally Posted by John Galt View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    [Ah, I see.
    My presumption was predicated on your statement that you've "learned a lot of science since [you] started on the forums a couple of years back".
    If you haven't changed your mind, i.e. my presumption was incorrect, then you obviously haven't learned "a lot" of science at all.
    You cannot deduce (accurately) that because his mind is unchanged on one point that he has not learned a lot of science on other topics.
    While you're basically correct don't you think it would be rather silly to not bother learning even the basics 1 of a subject he's shown a previous interest in?
    And his comment about learning "a lot of science" was a response to my comment on the lack of knowledge he'd shown in his previous posts - more or less a declaration that he is talking about subjects he'd previously posted on.

    Meh, of course, it's possible that he's given up on that subject altogether and moved on to another aspect of science.


    1 Part of my presumption was that he no longer "think[s] that "in order for the Earth to "expand" it had to lose mass". I.e. it's rather hard to understand that how someone could claim to know a" lot of science" and still believe that expansion requires a loss of mass.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
     

  22. #21  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,169
    You may have heard of empathy. Here is how it is relevant to this thread. Consider a four element matrix. The columns are headed, respectively, Existing Members Show Empathy and Existing Members Don't. The rows are Neophyte Has Learned From His Past Errors. Neophyte has not learned from his past errors.

    A moment's contemplation should show you that there is only one combination that delivers the best result. Since members are in control of one leg of that combination don't you think they should opt for the one with the positive outcome?
     

  23. #22  
    AI's Have More Fun Bad Robot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Washington state
    Posts
    6,114
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Robittybob1 here,
    Way down in NZ .... do you know where that is?

    I might be a bit slow, but I will get to understand the topic before too long. I'll pull your leg and try and make you laugh, so don't be offended but see the funny side.
    I just hope to become a valuable member.

    Cheers
    Robittybob1

    Call me Bob OK.
    Do you know what they call a guy in the ocean with no arms and legs Bob?
     

  24. #23  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    10,827
    Quote Originally Posted by John Galt View Post
    You may have heard of empathy. Here is how it is relevant to this thread. Consider a four element matrix. The columns are headed, respectively, Existing Members Show Empathy and Existing Members Don't. The rows are Neophyte Has Learned From His Past Errors. Neophyte has not learned from his past errors.

    A moment's contemplation should show you that there is only one combination that delivers the best result. Since members are in control of one leg of that combination don't you think they should opt for the one with the positive outcome?
    Er, I was showing "empathy"!
    I voiced a presumption - and declared it as such.
    I.e. it was another way of asking whether or not he subscribed to his previous views. With, I might add, the benefit of the doubt deliberately expressed in his favour.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
     

  25. #24  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Bad Robot View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Robittybob1 here,
    Way down in NZ .... do you know where that is?

    I might be a bit slow, but I will get to understand the topic before too long. I'll pull your leg and try and make you laugh, so don't be offended but see the funny side.
    I just hope to become a valuable member.

    Cheers
    Robittybob1

    Call me Bob OK.
    Do you know what they call a guy in the ocean with no arms and legs Bob?
    Is it a Dywyddyr?
     

  26. #25  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by John Galt View Post
    You may have heard of empathy. Here is how it is relevant to this thread. Consider a four element matrix. The columns are headed, respectively, Existing Members Show Empathy and Existing Members Don't. The rows are Neophyte Has Learned From His Past Errors. Neophyte has not learned from his past errors.

    A moment's contemplation should show you that there is only one combination that delivers the best result. Since members are in control of one leg of that combination don't you think they should opt for the one with the positive outcome?
    Er, I was showing "empathy"!
    I voiced a presumption - and declared it as such.
    I.e. it was another way of asking whether or not he subscribed to his previous views. With, I might add, the benefit of the doubt deliberately expressed in his favour.
    Showing empathy!

    Well it felt like a person I used to know.
    Flying off his handle
    Buttress - argues like a brickshithouse.
    Man - some might call him that.

    But it wasn't such a great welcome.
    astromark likes this.
     

  27. #26  
    AI's Have More Fun Bad Robot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Washington state
    Posts
    6,114
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bad Robot View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Robittybob1 here,
    Way down in NZ .... do you know where that is?

    I might be a bit slow, but I will get to understand the topic before too long. I'll pull your leg and try and make you laugh, so don't be offended but see the funny side.
    I just hope to become a valuable member.

    Cheers
    Robittybob1

    Call me Bob OK.
    Do you know what they call a guy in the ocean with no arms and legs Bob?
    Is it a Dywyddyr?
    Okay I'm not seeing the funny side, but anyway welcome to this forum and you will see many of your SF forum buddies over here too.
     

  28. #27  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,169
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by John Galt View Post
    You may have heard of empathy. Here is how it is relevant to this thread. Consider a four element matrix. The columns are headed, respectively, Existing Members Show Empathy and Existing Members Don't. The rows are Neophyte Has Learned From His Past Errors. Neophyte has not learned from his past errors.

    A moment's contemplation should show you that there is only one combination that delivers the best result. Since members are in control of one leg of that combination don't you think they should opt for the one with the positive outcome?
    Er, I was showing "empathy"!
    I voiced a presumption - and declared it as such.
    I.e. it was another way of asking whether or not he subscribed to his previous views. With, I might add, the benefit of the doubt deliberately expressed in his favour.
    Just so you know, you came across as arrogant, offensive and aggressive. I assumed that was the effect you were going for. If you weren't, you might what to rethink the style.
     

  29. #28  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Bad Robot View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bad Robot View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Robittybob1 here,
    Way down in NZ .... do you know where that is?

    I might be a bit slow, but I will get to understand the topic before too long. I'll pull your leg and try and make you laugh, so don't be offended but see the funny side.
    I just hope to become a valuable member.

    Cheers
    Robittybob1

    Call me Bob OK.
    Do you know what they call a guy in the ocean with no arms and legs Bob?
    Is it a Dywyddyr?
    Okay I'm not seeing the funny side, but anyway welcome to this forum and you will see many of your SF forum buddies over here too.
    I don't attract friends as you know.
    Bad Robot likes this.
     

  30. #29  
    AI's Have More Fun Bad Robot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Washington state
    Posts
    6,114
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    I don't attract friends as you know.
    I give <LIKES> for the post whoever the poster may be. So we really don't have to be friends. In case you haven't noticed yet, there are a lot of females members in this forum. It is a bit different but you might like it.
     

  31. #30  
    has lost interest seagypsy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    3,107
    Quote Originally Posted by Bad Robot View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    I don't attract friends as you know.
    I give <LIKES> for the post whoever the poster may be. So we really don't have to be friends. In case you haven't noticed yet, there are a lot of females members in this forum. It is a bit different but you might like it.
    Yeah, the bratty hormonal cat fights are more frequent. lol. And feelings are sometimes more important than reality or logic when that happens. But I still like it better than SF. No Bells or whistles here lol.

    I am not aware that anyone attracts friends. I was always under the impressions that friends were made, not attracted. Flies get attracted though.
    wegs likes this.
    Speaking badly about people after they are gone and jumping on the bash the band wagon must do very well for a low self-esteem.
     

  32. #31  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    12,515
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    Aloha Bob....dang I feel funny saying that! Welcome.....I am hoping to visit NZ next year....I have been to Australia and have a friends in Taz but never been to NZ...hear it's just lovely!
    First word you'll need to learn is Ki ora (Aloha).
    M

    I know!

    I do my homework on that before I go to any country....Hello, Goodbye, Thank you and TOILET!
    Yeah we don't do that in the bathroom.

    Are ya sure? *L*
     

  33. #32  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    12,515
    Quote Originally Posted by Bad Robot View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Robittybob1 here,
    Way down in NZ .... do you know where that is?

    I might be a bit slow, but I will get to understand the topic before too long. I'll pull your leg and try and make you laugh, so don't be offended but see the funny side.
    I just hope to become a valuable member.

    Cheers
    Robittybob1

    Call me Bob OK.
    Do you know what they call a guy in the ocean with no arms and legs Bob?
    Actually that is incorrect, in most women's terminology of BOB
     

  34. #33  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,169
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    [Actually that is incorrect, in most women's terminology of BOB
    Shh! There are children in the room.
     

  35. #34  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    12,515
    Quote Originally Posted by John Galt View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    [Actually that is incorrect, in most women's terminology of BOB
    Shh! There are children in the room.

    OOPS!! I tend to be quite candid.

    You may spank me with a wet noodle! *Whew* that one is safe as it is a VERY OLD TIME expression!
     

  36. #35  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bad Robot View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Robittybob1 here,
    Way down in NZ .... do you know where that is?

    I might be a bit slow, but I will get to understand the topic before too long. I'll pull your leg and try and make you laugh, so don't be offended but see the funny side.
    I just hope to become a valuable member.

    Cheers
    Robittybob1

    Call me Bob OK.
    Do you know what they call a guy in the ocean with no arms and legs Bob?
    Actually that is incorrect, in most women's terminology of BOB
    What does Bob mean to you?
     

  37. #36  
    AI's Have More Fun Bad Robot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Washington state
    Posts
    6,114
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    What does Bob mean to you?
    Bob is just a guy with an easy name to remember.

    But I found this interesting article below.

    Slang Dictionary

    bob
    n. At Demon Internet, all tech support personal are called "Bob". (Female support personnel have an option on "Bobette"). This has nothing to do with Bob the divine drilling-equipment salesman of the Church of the SubGenius. Nor is it acronymized from "Brother Of BOFH", though all parties agree it could have been. Rather, it was triggered by an unusually large draft of new tech-support people in 1995. It was observed that there would be much duplication of names. To ease the confusion, it was decided that all support techs would henceforth be known as "Bob", and identity badges were created labelled "Bob 1" and "Bob 2". (No, we never got any further).

    The reason for "Bob" rather than anything else is due to a luser calling and asking to speak to "Bob", despite the fact that no "Bob" was currently working for Tech Support. Since we all know "the customer is always right", it was decided that there had to be at least one "Bob" on duty at all times, just in case.

    This sillyness inexorably snowballed. Shift leaders and managers began to refer to their groups of "bobs". Whole ranks of support machines were set up (and still exist in the DNS as of 1999) as bob1 through bobN. Then came alt.tech-support.recovery, and it was filled with Demon support personnel. They all referred to themselves, and to others, as `bob', and after a while it caught on. There is now a Bob Code (Bob code) describing the Bob nature.
     

  38. #37  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    12,515
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bad Robot View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Robittybob1 here,
    Way down in NZ .... do you know where that is?

    I might be a bit slow, but I will get to understand the topic before too long. I'll pull your leg and try and make you laugh, so don't be offended but see the funny side.
    I just hope to become a valuable member.

    Cheers
    Robittybob1

    Call me Bob OK.
    Do you know what they call a guy in the ocean with no arms and legs Bob?
    Actually that is incorrect, in most women's terminology of BOB
    What does Bob mean to you?

    Can I answer this question without being SUSPENDED? *L*

    I think I will try to PM It to you! *Laughing*
     

  39. #38  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    This is the reason they gave for today’s permanent ban over on Sciforums. Is this a good reason to ban me? For exposing the fact that child porn was being allowed by the moderators?

    “You have been banned for the following reason:
    Continuously posting and commenting of child/underage pornographic content and that which
    sexualized underage kids despite repeated warnings to stop. Harassment of moderation staff despite
    repeated requests for cessation of activities.
    Date the ban will be lifted: Never”


    Fancy that because I identified child pornography on their forum, and highlighted the inaction of the moderators to do anything about it, they ban me!
    The other day accused me of pornography and setting up sock puppets. Both totally false but they wouldn't understand. I see why now they had stuff to hide.

    That exposure thread was in the forum Government section.

    My other thread which you are welcome to commandeer is the Beautiful Christian Song thread in the Religion forum.
     

  40. #39  
    Anti-Crank AlexG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,810
    Pervert gets banned, pervert shows up someplace to defend his perversion.
    Tranquille and Beer w/Straw like this.
    Its the way nature is!
    If you dont like it, go somewhere else....
    To another universe, where the rules are simpler
    Philosophically more pleasing, more psychologically easy
    Prof Richard Feynman (1979) .....

    Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!"
     

  41. #40  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    12,515
    you don't repost pictures that are child porn...it is against the law....and can also get a chat room and forum SHUT DOWN!!!

    That doesn't take a BRAIN SCIENTIST or a PAPER PERSON to figure out!

    You deserved the ban.
     

  42. #41  
    Forum Masters Degree Tranquille's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Solar System
    Posts
    733
    Nah.

    He gets banned everywhere he goes for harassing women and acting like a pervert.

    I just went and had a look at the latest one and he was probably banned for harassing the women who post there, even a mod by the looks of it. Surprised they let it go as long as it did. The child porn thing looks like he just kept reposting it and asking why that got through from like 6 years ago and he couldn't post erotica you tube links or something. Ten pages later and he kept sexually harassing the women and one of the female mods there and calling it flirting and they finally booted him when he refused to stop.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robittytbob1
    Fancy that because I identified child pornography on their forum, and highlighted the inaction of the moderators to do anything about it, they ban me!
    The other day accused me of pornography and setting up sock puppets. Both totally false but they wouldn't understand. I see why now they had stuff to hide.

    That exposure thread was in the forum Government section.
    I read it and you're wrong. You deserved to be banned just from what I read in that open government thread and dragging your perverted stuff here is very uncool.
     

  43. #42  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    12,515
    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquille View Post
    Nah.

    He gets banned everywhere he goes for harassing women and acting like a pervert.

    I just went and had a look at the latest one and he was probably banned for harassing the women who post there, even a mod by the looks of it. Surprised they let it go as long as it did. The child porn thing looks like he just kept reposting it and asking why that got through from like 6 years ago and he couldn't post erotica you tube links or something. Ten pages later and he kept sexually harassing the women and one of the female mods there and calling it flirting and they finally booted him when he refused to stop.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robittytbob1
    Fancy that because I identified child pornography on their forum, and highlighted the inaction of the moderators to do anything about it, they ban me!
    The other day accused me of pornography and setting up sock puppets. Both totally false but they wouldn't understand. I see why now they had stuff to hide.

    That exposure thread was in the forum Government section.
    I read it and you're wrong. You deserved to be banned just from what I read in that open government thread and dragging your perverted stuff here is very uncool.
    Tranquille, I have ZERO tolerance for child porn in any way shape or form. Period.
     

  44. #43  
    Forum Masters Degree Tranquille's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Solar System
    Posts
    733
    You and me both.
    babe likes this.
     

  45. #44  
    Administrator KALSTER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    8,232
    Please report any offensive behaviour. It will be dealt with.
    Disclaimer: I do not declare myself to be an expert on ANY subject. If I state something as fact that is obviously wrong, please don't hesitate to correct me. I welcome such corrections in an attempt to be as truthful and accurate as possible.

    "Gullibility kills" - Carl Sagan
    "All people know the same truth. Our lives consist of how we chose to distort it." - Harry Block
    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle
     

  46. #45  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    12,515
    Quote Originally Posted by KALSTER View Post
    Please report any offensive behaviour. It will be dealt with.
    I will do that without a second thought. I find it abhorrent!!!!!
     

  47. #46  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    you don't repost pictures that are child porn...it is against the law....and can also get a chat room and forum SHUT DOWN!!!

    That doesn't take a BRAIN SCIENTIST or a PAPER PERSON to figure out!

    You deserved the ban.
    What it is better to let them continue having it on their site? If they are doing nothing about it how do I know it is "child porn" in the first place? What would we do on Science Forum if some poster puts what looks like porn on the site?
    If they do nothing about it, after having it alerted to them, does that mean it wasn't porn to begin with? I am totally confused as to how to deal with the subject?
    So if I reported a post to a moderator as "suspect material" is that the wrong thing to do?
     

  48. #47  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    12,515
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    you don't repost pictures that are child porn...it is against the law....and can also get a chat room and forum SHUT DOWN!!!

    That doesn't take a BRAIN SCIENTIST or a PAPER PERSON to figure out!

    You deserved the ban.
    What it is better to let them continue having it on their site? If they are doing nothing about it how do I know it is "child porn" in the first place? What would we do on Science Forum if some poster puts what looks like porn on the site?
    If they do nothing about it, after having it alerted to them, does that mean it wasn't porn to begin with? I am totally confused as to how to deal with the subject?
    So if I reported a post to a moderator as "suspect material" is that the wrong thing to do?
    report it to a Moderator.....it is ILLEGAL!!!
     

  49. #48  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquille View Post
    Nah.

    He gets banned everywhere he goes for harassing women and acting like a pervert.

    I just went and had a look at the latest one and he was probably banned for harassing the women who post there, even a mod by the looks of it. Surprised they let it go as long as it did. The child porn thing looks like he just kept reposting it and asking why that got through from like 6 years ago and he couldn't post erotica you tube links or something. Ten pages later and he kept sexually harassing the women and one of the female mods there and calling it flirting and they finally booted him when he refused to stop.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robittytbob1
    Fancy that because I identified child pornography on their forum, and highlighted the inaction of the moderators to do anything about it, they ban me!
    The other day accused me of pornography and setting up sock puppets. Both totally false but they wouldn't understand. I see why now they had stuff to hide.

    That exposure thread was in the forum Government section.
    I read it and you're wrong. You deserved to be banned just from what I read in that open government thread and dragging your perverted stuff here is very uncool.
    I don't like it that you have just taken their allegations and repeated them. Did you not read that I denied all their claims against me? It is not nice when a rumour is repeated so often it appears to be a fact. There is no truth in what the people on Sciforums are saying about me.

    All I want to do on here is to learn the correct way of reporting pornography on these science forums

    OK as Babe says I should not have reposted it, but all I asked at the beginning was why they hadn't done anything about the post that I was referring too? So I won't repost suspect ones ever again.
    I have learnt that one. But when I did that, the one and only time, I didn't know that that was wrong. it wasn't covered in the rules and it was fitting to the topic being discussed. So why would I know it was wrong?

    If you do something that you don't know is wrong (i.e. not covered in the Rules) ... is that a bannable offense?
     

  50. #49  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    12,515
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquille View Post
    Nah.

    He gets banned everywhere he goes for harassing women and acting like a pervert.

    I just went and had a look at the latest one and he was probably banned for harassing the women who post there, even a mod by the looks of it. Surprised they let it go as long as it did. The child porn thing looks like he just kept reposting it and asking why that got through from like 6 years ago and he couldn't post erotica you tube links or something. Ten pages later and he kept sexually harassing the women and one of the female mods there and calling it flirting and they finally booted him when he refused to stop.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robittytbob1
    Fancy that because I identified child pornography on their forum, and highlighted the inaction of the moderators to do anything about it, they ban me!
    The other day accused me of pornography and setting up sock puppets. Both totally false but they wouldn't understand. I see why now they had stuff to hide.

    That exposure thread was in the forum Government section.
    I read it and you're wrong. You deserved to be banned just from what I read in that open government thread and dragging your perverted stuff here is very uncool.
    I don't like it that you have just taken their allegatiions and reposted them. Did you not read that I deny all their claims against me. It is not nice when one rumour is repeated so often it appears to be a fact. There is no truth in what the people on Sciforums say about me. All I want to do on here is to learn the correct way of reporting pornography.

    OK as Babe says I should not have reposted it, but all I asked was why they hadn't done anything about the post i was referring too. So I won't repost suspect ones.
    I have learn't that one. But when I did that the one and only time I didn't know that was wrong. it wasn't covered in the rules and it was fitting to the topic being discussed.

    If you do something that you don't know is wrong (not covered in the Rules) ... is that a bannable offense?
    CHILD PORNOGRAPHY IS ALWAYS COVERED BY THE RULES!! IT IS AN UNSPOKEN RULE!! IT IS USING YOUR BRAIN! IT IS KNOWING IT IS ILLEGAL IN ANY CONTEXT!!!

    THERE IS NEVER an EXCUSE for reposting of child pornography!!

    NEVER!

    EVER!

    And no one is that na´ve to think it is ok.
     

  51. #50  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    12,515
    I will let the Moderator's deal with this.
     

  52. #51  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    you don't repost pictures that are child porn...it is against the law....and can also get a chat room and forum SHUT DOWN!!!

    That doesn't take a BRAIN SCIENTIST or a PAPER PERSON to figure out!

    You deserved the ban.
    What it is better to let them continue having it on their site? If they are doing nothing about it how do I know it is "child porn" in the first place? What would we do on Science Forum if some poster puts what looks like porn on the site?
    If they do nothing about it, after having it alerted to them, does that mean it wasn't porn to begin with? I am totally confused as to how to deal with the subject?
    So if I reported a post to a moderator as "suspect material" is that the wrong thing to do?
    report it to a Moderator.....it is ILLEGAL!!!
    And then if nothing is done about it (after you alert the moderators), does that mean it wasn't considered pornography in the first place?
     

  53. #52  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    12,515
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    you don't repost pictures that are child porn...it is against the law....and can also get a chat room and forum SHUT DOWN!!!

    That doesn't take a BRAIN SCIENTIST or a PAPER PERSON to figure out!

    You deserved the ban.
    What it is better to let them continue having it on their site? If they are doing nothing about it how do I know it is "child porn" in the first place? What would we do on Science Forum if some poster puts what looks like porn on the site?
    If they do nothing about it, after having it alerted to them, does that mean it wasn't porn to begin with? I am totally confused as to how to deal with the subject?
    So if I reported a post to a moderator as "suspect material" is that the wrong thing to do?
    report it to a Moderator.....it is ILLEGAL!!!
    And then if nothing is done about it (after you alert the moderators), does that mean it wasn't considered pornography in the first place?
    WHAT THE **** do you think?

    ABSOLUTELY!

    I also do not believe ONE MODERATOR in here would ignore that. Period.

    I just contacted a moderator. It is there job, actually, not mine to respond to this.
     

  54. #53  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquille View Post
    Nah.

    He gets banned everywhere he goes for harassing women and acting like a pervert.

    I just went and had a look at the latest one and he was probably banned for harassing the women who post there, even a mod by the looks of it. Surprised they let it go as long as it did. The child porn thing looks like he just kept reposting it and asking why that got through from like 6 years ago and he couldn't post erotica you tube links or something. Ten pages later and he kept sexually harassing the women and one of the female mods there and calling it flirting and they finally booted him when he refused to stop.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robittytbob1
    Fancy that because I identified child pornography on their forum, and highlighted the inaction of the moderators to do anything about it, they ban me!
    The other day accused me of pornography and setting up sock puppets. Both totally false but they wouldn't understand. I see why now they had stuff to hide.

    That exposure thread was in the forum Government section.
    I read it and you're wrong. You deserved to be banned just from what I read in that open government thread and dragging your perverted stuff here is very uncool.
    I don't like it that you have just taken their allegatiions and reposted them. Did you not read that I deny all their claims against me. It is not nice when one rumour is repeated so often it appears to be a fact. There is no truth in what the people on Sciforums say about me. All I want to do on here is to learn the correct way of reporting pornography.

    OK as Babe says I should not have reposted it, but all I asked was why they hadn't done anything about the post i was referring too. So I won't repost suspect ones.
    I have learn't that one. But when I did that the one and only time I didn't know that was wrong. it wasn't covered in the rules and it was fitting to the topic being discussed.

    If you do something that you don't know is wrong (not covered in the Rules) ... is that a bannable offense?
    CHILD PORNOGRAPHY IS ALWAYS COVERED BY THE RULES!! IT IS AN UNSPOKEN RULE!! IT IS USING YOUR BRAIN! IT IS KNOWING IT IS ILLEGAL IN ANY CONTEXT!!!

    THERE IS NEVER an EXCUSE for reposting of child pornography!!

    NEVER!

    EVER!

    And no one is that na´ve to think it is ok.
    That is not quite true for my immediate concern was the angle of the picture, I thought it was a bit rude. At the time of reposting it I had not even noticed that the girl may have been underage, until the moderator mentioned that to me. That caught me by surprise that the moderators knew it was child porn when I had not even considered that as a likelihood.
     

  55. #54  
    Administrator KALSTER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    8,232
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquille View Post
    Nah.

    He gets banned everywhere he goes for harassing women and acting like a pervert.

    I just went and had a look at the latest one and he was probably banned for harassing the women who post there, even a mod by the looks of it. Surprised they let it go as long as it did. The child porn thing looks like he just kept reposting it and asking why that got through from like 6 years ago and he couldn't post erotica you tube links or something. Ten pages later and he kept sexually harassing the women and one of the female mods there and calling it flirting and they finally booted him when he refused to stop.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robittytbob1
    Fancy that because I identified child pornography on their forum, and highlighted the inaction of the moderators to do anything about it, they ban me!
    The other day accused me of pornography and setting up sock puppets. Both totally false but they wouldn't understand. I see why now they had stuff to hide.

    That exposure thread was in the forum Government section.
    I read it and you're wrong. You deserved to be banned just from what I read in that open government thread and dragging your perverted stuff here is very uncool.
    I don't like it that you have just taken their allegations and repeated them. Did you not read that I denied all their claims against me? It is not nice when a rumour is repeated so often it appears to be a fact. There is no truth in what the people on Sciforums are saying about me.

    All I want to do on here is to learn the correct way of reporting pornography on these science forums

    OK as Babe says I should not have reposted it, but all I asked at the beginning was why they hadn't done anything about the post that I was referring too? So I won't repost suspect ones ever again.
    I have learnt that one. But when I did that, the one and only time, I didn't know that that was wrong. it wasn't covered in the rules and it was fitting to the topic being discussed. So why would I know it was wrong?

    If you do something that you don't know is wrong (i.e. not covered in the Rules) ... is that a bannable offense?
    Here, if you find some questionable content, report it. That report shows up in the mod section and we will deal with it if needed. That would definitely include pornography of any kind, not to mention child pornography.

    Under no circumstances do you post pornographic images, no matter where it came from. IF you need to make a post about it, you can simply post a link, but only if it is somewhere on this forum. No links to other sites containing pornography of any kind is allowed and will get you swiftly banned.

    If the Report does not illicit a response, then it did not warrant any action as judged by a wide variety of mods who MOST CERTAINLY take care of anything approaching child pornography.

    We can't speak about what happened at Sciforums. I don't know how you acted over there. But if you had posted pornographic content here, you would have been banned as well. "I didn't know" is not a good enough excuse for that.
    babe likes this.
    Disclaimer: I do not declare myself to be an expert on ANY subject. If I state something as fact that is obviously wrong, please don't hesitate to correct me. I welcome such corrections in an attempt to be as truthful and accurate as possible.

    "Gullibility kills" - Carl Sagan
    "All people know the same truth. Our lives consist of how we chose to distort it." - Harry Block
    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle
     

  56. #55  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    12,515
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquille View Post
    Nah.

    He gets banned everywhere he goes for harassing women and acting like a pervert.

    I just went and had a look at the latest one and he was probably banned for harassing the women who post there, even a mod by the looks of it. Surprised they let it go as long as it did. The child porn thing looks like he just kept reposting it and asking why that got through from like 6 years ago and he couldn't post erotica you tube links or something. Ten pages later and he kept sexually harassing the women and one of the female mods there and calling it flirting and they finally booted him when he refused to stop.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robittytbob1
    Fancy that because I identified child pornography on their forum, and highlighted the inaction of the moderators to do anything about it, they ban me!
    The other day accused me of pornography and setting up sock puppets. Both totally false but they wouldn't understand. I see why now they had stuff to hide.

    That exposure thread was in the forum Government section.
    I read it and you're wrong. You deserved to be banned just from what I read in that open government thread and dragging your perverted stuff here is very uncool.
    I don't like it that you have just taken their allegatiions and reposted them. Did you not read that I deny all their claims against me. It is not nice when one rumour is repeated so often it appears to be a fact. There is no truth in what the people on Sciforums say about me. All I want to do on here is to learn the correct way of reporting pornography.

    OK as Babe says I should not have reposted it, but all I asked was why they hadn't done anything about the post i was referring too. So I won't repost suspect ones.
    I have learn't that one. But when I did that the one and only time I didn't know that was wrong. it wasn't covered in the rules and it was fitting to the topic being discussed.

    If you do something that you don't know is wrong (not covered in the Rules) ... is that a bannable offense?
    CHILD PORNOGRAPHY IS ALWAYS COVERED BY THE RULES!! IT IS AN UNSPOKEN RULE!! IT IS USING YOUR BRAIN! IT IS KNOWING IT IS ILLEGAL IN ANY CONTEXT!!!

    THERE IS NEVER an EXCUSE for reposting of child pornography!!

    NEVER!

    EVER!

    And no one is that na´ve to think it is ok.
    That is not quite true for my immediate concern was the angle of the picture, I thought it was a bit rude. At the time of reposting it I had not even noticed that the girl may have been underage, until the moderator mentioned that to me. That caught me by surprise that the moderators knew it was child porn when I had not even considered that as a likelihood.
    Take it up with them. I have said all I am going to say.
     

  57. #56  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    you don't repost pictures that are child porn...it is against the law....and can also get a chat room and forum SHUT DOWN!!!

    That doesn't take a BRAIN SCIENTIST or a PAPER PERSON to figure out!

    You deserved the ban.
    What it is better to let them continue having it on their site? If they are doing nothing about it how do I know it is "child porn" in the first place? What would we do on Science Forum if some poster puts what looks like porn on the site?
    If they do nothing about it, after having it alerted to them, does that mean it wasn't porn to begin with? I am totally confused as to how to deal with the subject?
    So if I reported a post to a moderator as "suspect material" is that the wrong thing to do?
    report it to a Moderator.....it is ILLEGAL!!!
    And then if nothing is done about it (after you alert the moderators), does that mean it wasn't considered pornography in the first place?
    WHAT THE **** do you think?

    ABSOLUTELY!

    I also do not believe ONE MODERATOR in here would ignore that. Period.

    I just contacted a moderator. It is there job, actually, not mine to respond to this.
    How come you can't write a full sentence on the topic Babe? "WHAT THE **** do you think?" "Absolutely" "I also do not believe ONE MODERATOR in here would ignore that. Period." All incomplete sentences that leave me guessing as to what you are really meaning. Please, I hope a moderator will explain how they would respond to a complaint of suspect pornography.
    Thanks, I'll await their response.
     

  58. #57  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by KALSTER View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquille View Post
    Nah.

    He gets banned everywhere he goes for harassing women and acting like a pervert.

    I just went and had a look at the latest one and he was probably banned for harassing the women who post there, even a mod by the looks of it. Surprised they let it go as long as it did. The child porn thing looks like he just kept reposting it and asking why that got through from like 6 years ago and he couldn't post erotica you tube links or something. Ten pages later and he kept sexually harassing the women and one of the female mods there and calling it flirting and they finally booted him when he refused to stop.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robittytbob1
    Fancy that because I identified child pornography on their forum, and highlighted the inaction of the moderators to do anything about it, they ban me!
    The other day accused me of pornography and setting up sock puppets. Both totally false but they wouldn't understand. I see why now they had stuff to hide.

    That exposure thread was in the forum Government section.
    I read it and you're wrong. You deserved to be banned just from what I read in that open government thread and dragging your perverted stuff here is very uncool.
    I don't like it that you have just taken their allegations and repeated them. Did you not read that I denied all their claims against me? It is not nice when a rumour is repeated so often it appears to be a fact. There is no truth in what the people on Sciforums are saying about me.

    All I want to do on here is to learn the correct way of reporting pornography on these science forums

    OK as Babe says I should not have reposted it, but all I asked at the beginning was why they hadn't done anything about the post that I was referring too? So I won't repost suspect ones ever again.
    I have learnt that one. But when I did that, the one and only time, I didn't know that that was wrong. it wasn't covered in the rules and it was fitting to the topic being discussed. So why would I know it was wrong?

    If you do something that you don't know is wrong (i.e. not covered in the Rules) ... is that a bannable offense?
    Here, if you find some questionable content, report it. That report shows up in the mod section and we will deal with it if needed. That would definitely include pornography of any kind, not to mention child pornography.

    Under no circumstances do you post pornographic images, no matter where it came from. IF you need to make a post about it, you can simply post a link, but only if it is somewhere on this forum. No links to other sites containing pornography of any kind is allowed and will get you swiftly banned.

    If the Report does not illicit a response, then it did not warrant any action as judged by a wide variety of mods who MOST CERTAINLY take care of anything approaching child pornography.

    We can't speak about what happened at Sciforums. I don't know how you acted over there. But if you had posted pornographic content here, you would have been banned as well. "I didn't know" is not a good enough excuse for that.
    Thanks for that.

    OK so from that I got:
    1. Report "suspect posts".
    2. If nothing is done about it, it means that the "suspect posts" was acceptable to the moderators on the site.
    3. therefore subsequent reposting of that original "suspect post" would not then be considered wrong, should it?

    OK so then you go on to say "But if you had posted pornographic content here ...." but that brought out the question that I was asking based on the premise that if a whole lot of different stuff seems to be acceptable, what was different about what I posted that it got classed as pornography? (Especially as the link had been accepted by YT for many years?
    How do the moderators define the acceptable limit?
     

  59. #58  
    Administrator KALSTER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    8,232
    Like I said, I can't speak for Sciforums.

    I'd prefer it if you don't try and find out what the limit is.
    babe likes this.
    Disclaimer: I do not declare myself to be an expert on ANY subject. If I state something as fact that is obviously wrong, please don't hesitate to correct me. I welcome such corrections in an attempt to be as truthful and accurate as possible.

    "Gullibility kills" - Carl Sagan
    "All people know the same truth. Our lives consist of how we chose to distort it." - Harry Block
    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle
     

  60. #59  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by KALSTER View Post
    Like I said, I can't speak for Sciforums.

    I'd prefer it if you don't try and find out what the limit is.
    Thanks. I have just been going through the thread where the forum members have posted pictures of themselves. That was fun, for it is great to know who one is talking to.

    There are a couple of glimpses of me in the Anikamoo Youtube clip. These rest of the faces are my kids and grandkids.
    Anikamoo - YouTube
     

  61. #60  
    Forum Masters Degree Tranquille's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Solar System
    Posts
    733
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post

    I don't like it that you have just taken their allegations and repeated them. Did you not read that I denied all their claims against me? It is not nice when a rumour is repeated so often it appears to be a fact. There is no truth in what the people on Sciforums are saying about me.

    All I want to do on here is to learn the correct way of reporting pornography on these science forums

    OK as Babe says I should not have reposted it, but all I asked at the beginning was why they hadn't done anything about the post that I was referring too? So I won't repost suspect ones ever again.
    I have learnt that one. But when I did that, the one and only time, I didn't know that that was wrong. it wasn't covered in the rules and it was fitting to the topic being discussed. So why would I know it was wrong?

    If you do something that you don't know is wrong (i.e. not covered in the Rules) ... is that a bannable offense?
    You brought it up here. I went and read it. From what I could clearly see, not only were you banned for posting pornography on their site, you also harassed some of their female members and moderators. Then it looked as if you tried to prove a point, by going digging and found a post from years back that had clearly been missed by their moderators and kept reposting it and linking it and demanding why the person who had posted it years ago was not banned and you were banned for your more recent transgression.

    This was clear from reading just your posts over there. While you attempted to deny their claims, at the same time, you were proving them right by sexually harassing other members and moderators. Reading through the private messages that were posted by one moderator after you asked her to post it in the forum, frankly, I was disgusted by what you had actually thought appropriate to ask her. I am not surprised she was upset and angry and I am not surprised at the visceral reaction you received from everyone who responded. Had you done the same here, I suspect the reaction would have been the same.

    I do not know whether you reported that image there from years back. From what I could clearly see, you just kept posting it repeatedly and at one point, appeared to ask other members by referring to one as a young lad and asking him if he liked it in such a way as to show that you were asking him if he enjoyed it. Your posts to the female members of that site were also deeply disturbing. And the way in which you stated you wished you could know the sex of the people you are speaking to and using that as an excuse for your sexual harassment of female members who were responding to your posts was deeply disturbing. Reading through your posts there after you dragged your issues over there to this site does not make me happy to see you posting here, if I am to be honest with you. Having seen your "work" and posts on some other sites, your now showing up here does not bring me any joy whatsoever.

    Hopefully you will respect the male and female members of this site and not repeat the same perverted mistakes you made in previous sites.
    babe likes this.
     

  62. #61  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquille View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post

    I don't like it that you have just taken their allegations and repeated them. Did you not read that I denied all their claims against me? It is not nice when a rumour is repeated so often it appears to be a fact. There is no truth in what the people on Sciforums are saying about me.

    All I want to do on here is to learn the correct way of reporting pornography on these science forums

    OK as Babe says I should not have reposted it, but all I asked at the beginning was why they hadn't done anything about the post that I was referring too? So I won't repost suspect ones ever again.
    I have learnt that one. But when I did that, the one and only time, I didn't know that that was wrong. it wasn't covered in the rules and it was fitting to the topic being discussed. So why would I know it was wrong?

    If you do something that you don't know is wrong (i.e. not covered in the Rules) ... is that a bannable offense?
    You brought it up here. I went and read it. From what I could clearly see, not only were you banned for posting pornography on their site, you also harassed some of their female members and moderators. Then it looked as if you tried to prove a point, by going digging and found a post from years back that had clearly been missed by their moderators and kept reposting it and linking it and demanding why the person who had posted it years ago was not banned and you were banned for your more recent transgression.

    This was clear from reading just your posts over there. While you attempted to deny their claims, at the same time, you were proving them right by sexually harassing other members and moderators. Reading through the private messages that were posted by one moderator after you asked her to post it in the forum, frankly, I was disgusted by what you had actually thought appropriate to ask her. I am not surprised she was upset and angry and I am not surprised at the visceral reaction you received from everyone who responded. Had you done the same here, I suspect the reaction would have been the same.

    I do not know whether you reported that image there from years back. From what I could clearly see, you just kept posting it repeatedly and at one point, appeared to ask other members by referring to one as a young lad and asking him if he liked it in such a way as to show that you were asking him if he enjoyed it. Your posts to the female members of that site were also deeply disturbing. And the way in which you stated you wished you could know the sex of the people you are speaking to and using that as an excuse for your sexual harassment of female members who were responding to your posts was deeply disturbing. Reading through your posts there after you dragged your issues over there to this site does not make me happy to see you posting here, if I am to be honest with you. Having seen your "work" and posts on some other sites, your now showing up here does not bring me any joy whatsoever.

    Hopefully you will respect the male and female members of this site and not repeat the same perverted mistakes you made in previous sites.
    Hi Tranquille,
    It was just as well you mentioned my denial. I denied all of the allegations and i asked for proof but got none.

    It is easy for someone, particularly a Sciforums moderator, to say "Robittybob1 wrote me a PM asking me sexual questions and I told him to stop and he didn't".
    It is a bannable offence to disclose what was said in PMs but it apparently doesn't apply to them.
    And not only that but lie about it at the same time. I know the PMs contained nothing to support their case so I asked for them to be published in full. A few were published but not the ones that supposedly sparked the incident.

    "Then it looked as if you tried to prove a point, by going digging and found a post from years back that had clearly been missed by their moderators and kept reposting it and linking it and demanding why the person who had posted it years ago was not banned and you were banned for your more recent transgression."
    The only reason I found that old post was that someone had bumped that thread with a comment obviously referring to the "suspect post" So if my reposting was wrong them bumping and commenting on it, and saying you liked it should have been wrong too. That was my initial argument, and i might have brought it up again when it appeared the "suspect post" was not removed as per the site rules. So if what the moderator Kalster has told us, that implies it was OK, so it shouldn't have caused trouble if it was reposted, but it did.

    Reading through the private messages that were posted by one moderator after you asked her to post it in the forum, frankly, I was disgusted by what you had actually thought appropriate to ask her.
    Private messages are private and who knows what it is said in private! If I say something in a PM, you are welcome to reply in a PM and say that was inappropriate or something like that, but if you say nothing no one knows.

    From what I could clearly see, you just kept posting it repeatedly and at one point, appeared to ask other members by referring to one as a young lad and asking him if he liked it in such a way as to show that you were asking him if he enjoyed it. Your posts to the female members of that site were also deeply disturbing.
    There were people (ex moderators) that were saying that they thought the image was OK and harmless, so if that is the case why isn't alright to ask someone else whether it is OK? For it was at this point I was being told off for reposting it, but it was alright for others to say it was not pornographic. Somehow it was OK to look at it and comment on it but not to repost it! Would that be fair comment? That is a real mixed message I was getting.

    Your posts to the female members of that site were also deeply disturbing. And the way in which you stated you wished you could know the sex of the people you are speaking to and using that as an excuse for your sexual harassment of female members who were responding to your posts was deeply disturbing.
    But on here we have a thread where we can all post photos of ourselves. That was the sort of thing I was meaning, so we know who we are talking to. It didn't have to be photos. I liked that thread on here and you can see what I look like too.
    When you are being annoyed by someone, you say things based on you assumption of their gender. Like you wouldn't be talking to me like you are if you thought I might be female. I think it is important to know who you are talking to. All the rest was based on comments others made about me. They were not my words.
    Reading through your posts there after you dragged your issues over there to this site does not make me happy to see you posting here, if I am to be honest with you. Having seen your "work" and posts on some other sites, your now showing up here does not bring me any joy whatsoever.
    I have been here longer than that. I have been registered here for a couple of months prior to this Sciforums banning.
    I don't know if my posts bring joy or not but I will always try and get to the bottom of an issue.

    I felt Kalster gave me pretty open and honest answers and it really gave me confidence that this forum is a better place to be.

    Hopefully you will respect the male and female members of this site and not repeat the same perverted mistakes you made in previous sites.
    Of course i will, but if i am going to be falsely accused by you with words like "perverted mistakes you made" we're not off to a very good start are we?

    I did not make any errors or mistakes but the whole lot ganged up on me to get rid of me, and in the process defamed me. I am very tempted to see my lawyer to see if there is anything that can be done to redress the injustice.
    So please don't make the same mistakes here as they did over there.
     

  63. #62  
    Ascended Member Ascended's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    3,380
    Hey Bob you've explained why you feel hard done by on another forum, asked about the rules and procedures and recieved polite responces, now this is after all an introduction thread for trying to make a good impression on fellow members so they may wish to engage with you in future discussions so perhaps it would be a good time to end this particular discussion and move onto something that will enable you to make a better impression, because I can asure you this current one isn't doing you any favours at all.
    astromark and babe like this.
    Everything has its beauty, but not everyone sees it. - confucius
     

  64. #63  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Ascended View Post
    Hey Bob you've explained why you feel hard done by on another forum, asked about the rules and procedures and recieved polite responces, now this is after all an introduction thread for trying to make a good impression on fellow members so they may wish to engage with you in future discussions so perhaps it would be a good time to end this particular discussion and move onto something that will enable you to make a better impression, because I can assure you this current one isn't doing you any favours at all.
    Well Kalster has impressed me with his answers. Babe and Tranquille are obviously going to be difficult to convince. And you Ascended are at least hoping for better things.
    So far both moderators have been very fair.
    It will take a while to get over the shock of a life-long ban on Sciforums. So bare with me for a while, I am venturing into the New Posts a bit, so i might come right soon.
     

  65. #64  
    Forum Masters Degree Tranquille's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Solar System
    Posts
    733
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Well Kalster has impressed me with his answers. Babe and Tranquille are obviously going to be difficult to convince. And you Ascended are at least hoping for better things.
    So far both moderators have been very fair.
    It will take a while to get over the shock of a life-long ban on Sciforums. So bare with me for a while, I am venturing into the New Posts a bit, so i might come right soon.
    Having read through your posts over there and having been unfortunate enough to witness your behaviour on other forums that also saw you banned, I do not believe you.

    Sciforums and the moderators there appeared to give you more than enough chances to tell the truth and to be honest and you openly failed to do so, often lying about your own words, as you are doing here in this thread. I have seen that mistake repeated a few times with you. I do not believe that you are sincere for one second. As I said in my previous post, I hope you have learned from the many lessons you have received and at the very least, will not sexually harass the female members here as you have a record and history of doing on other sites. There are many of us here who have obviously encountered you on other sites and we all appear to have the exact same view of you. That usually means it is not the whole world that is wrong, but you.

    We shall see what lies ahead for you here. I hope that you will conduct yourself more appropriately on this site. However, I do not think you will prove me wrong. But we shall see.
     

  66. #65  
    Administrator KALSTER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    8,232
    We will judge Robittybob1 on his actions here. If anyone thinks he or anyone else is stepping over the line, please feel free to report the post. We'll take it from there if needed.

    How about we forget about the other forums for now and just go from here. Thanks.
    seagypsy, astromark and babe like this.
    Disclaimer: I do not declare myself to be an expert on ANY subject. If I state something as fact that is obviously wrong, please don't hesitate to correct me. I welcome such corrections in an attempt to be as truthful and accurate as possible.

    "Gullibility kills" - Carl Sagan
    "All people know the same truth. Our lives consist of how we chose to distort it." - Harry Block
    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle
     

  67. #66  
    has lost interest seagypsy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    3,107
    Quote Originally Posted by KALSTER View Post
    We will judge Robittybob1 on his actions here. If anyone thinks he or anyone else is stepping over the line, please feel free to report the post. We'll take it from there if needed.

    How about we forget about the other forums for now and just go from here. Thanks.
    Agreed, this forum does have a standard of not banning members based on petty emotional strife that originated on another forum or simply because one or two members here are disgusted by a member's behavior on other forums. I have notice that while a person may behave one way on one forum, it does not automatically mean that they must and will behave the same way on another. Sometimes ill behavior is the result of bad chemistry between particular members and/or piss poor consistency of integrity at the hands of moderators.

    For instance Pete Brown and I were bitter enemies on this forum but get along perfectly fine on another one. I even get along with MikePotter on another forum. But their behavior here was different and provoked me to want to put curses on their gonads. Leave sciforums at sciforums. This is TSF. Let other forums be like Las Vegas.
    Speaking badly about people after they are gone and jumping on the bash the band wagon must do very well for a low self-esteem.
     

  68. #67  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquille View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Well Kalster has impressed me with his answers. Babe and Tranquille are obviously going to be difficult to convince. And you Ascended are at least hoping for better things.
    So far both moderators have been very fair.
    It will take a while to get over the shock of a life-long ban on Sciforums. So bare with me for a while, I am venturing into the New Posts a bit, so i might come right soon.
    Having read through your posts over there and having been unfortunate enough to witness your behaviour on other forums that also saw you banned, I do not believe you.

    Sciforums and the moderators there appeared to give you more than enough chances to tell the truth and to be honest and you openly failed to do so, often lying about your own words, as you are doing here in this thread. I have seen that mistake repeated a few times with you. I do not believe that you are sincere for one second. As I said in my previous post, I hope you have learned from the many lessons you have received and at the very least, will not sexually harass the female members here as you have a record and history of doing on other sites. There are many of us here who have obviously encountered you on other sites and we all appear to have the exact same view of you. That usually means it is not the whole world that is wrong, but you.

    We shall see what lies ahead for you here. I hope that you will conduct yourself more appropriately on this site. However, I do not think you will prove me wrong. But we shall see.
    I know for certain that everything i say is truth, as far as i know, like there is no deliberate intention to deceive and I pride myself on doing that for as long as I live. OK so you think I'd lied but that must be a misunderstanding on your part. Judge me afresh on what i say on this forum as Kalster is suggesting.
    If you want to PM me outlining any old issues I'd be only too happy to discuss them, but let's just keep it off the open forums.
    seagypsy likes this.
     

  69. #68  
    Forum Masters Degree Tranquille's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Solar System
    Posts
    733
    Quote Originally Posted by KALSTER View Post
    We will judge Robittybob1 on his actions here. If anyone thinks he or anyone else is stepping over the line, please feel free to report the post. We'll take it from there if needed.

    How about we forget about the other forums for now and just go from here. Thanks.
    Agreed.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1
    If you want to PM me outlining any old issues I'd be only too happy to discuss them
    Thanks, but no thanks.

    Having seen you in action on numerous occasions, I would rather you never send me a private message. I refuse to provide you with any platform to justify your actions on other forums.

    I would rather just do as Kalster says. Just post here and concern with matters here.
     

  70. #69  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquille View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KALSTER View Post
    We will judge Robittybob1 on his actions here. If anyone thinks he or anyone else is stepping over the line, please feel free to report the post. We'll take it from there if needed.

    How about we forget about the other forums for now and just go from here. Thanks.
    Agreed.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1
    If you want to PM me outlining any old issues I'd be only too happy to discuss them
    Thanks, but no thanks.

    Having seen you in action on numerous occasions, I would rather you never send me a private message. I refuse to provide you with any platform to justify your actions on other forums.

    I would rather just do as Kalster says. Just post here and concern with matters here.
    Has this site got a method of blocking the receipt of PMs from individual members? I have never done it myself but this forum feels a bit like Sciforums and it was possible there. If anyone doesn't want a PM from myself from time to time block me now or whenever.
    Maybe the method could be discussed so we all know how this is done efficiently. Does anyone know how or where this is detailed?
    If you don't want a PM from me, block me, and please, stop trying to continue to embarrass me please.
     

  71. #70  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    794
    this is the best topic
     

  72. #71  
    Forum Masters Degree Tranquille's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Solar System
    Posts
    733
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post

    Has this site got a method of blocking the receipt of PMs from individual members? I have never done it myself but this forum feels a bit like Sciforums and it was possible there. If anyone doesn't want a PM from myself from time to time block me now or whenever.
    Maybe the method could be discussed so we all know how this is done efficiently. Does anyone know how or where this is detailed?
    If you don't want a PM from me, block me, and please, stop trying to continue to embarrass me please.
    Or you can simply not send a private message to someone after they tell you to not send them a private message.
    Last edited by Tranquille; October 26th, 2013 at 02:02 AM.
     

  73. #72  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by blackscorp View Post
    this is the best topic
    We haven't got going yet! I found it highly embarrassing to be told to "stop PM-ing a certain person" ( on the open forum discussion) when the proper method is to PM the party concerned and asking them politely to stop or to block them. But it certainly sends a nasty message to everyone when it is read "Don't PM such and such". That made me feel like total rubbish, and it shouldn't happen. Etiquette demands that interpersonal disputes should be handled via PMs and if unresolvable blocking can be resorted to.
    I am a fair person.
    I will abide by the forum rules.
     

  74. #73  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquille View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post

    Having seen you in action on numerous occasions, I would rather you never send me a private message. I refuse to provide you with any platform to justify your actions on other forums.

    I would rather just do as Kalster says. Just post here and concern with matters here.
    Has this site got a method of blocking the receipt of PMs from individual members? I have never done it myself but this forum feels a bit like Sciforums and it was possible there. If anyone doesn't want a PM from myself from time to time block me now or whenever.
    Maybe the method could be discussed so we all know how this is done efficiently. Does anyone know how or where this is detailed?
    If you don't want a PM from me, block me, and please, stop trying to continue to embarrass me please.
    Or you can simply not send a private message to someone after they tell you to not send them a private message.
    No that is not the right way. Sure it sends an shitty message to the person concerned, but did they deserve that? Probably not. It is like telling me already not to PM you even before you have given me a chance to redeem myself, and that immediately after you had agreed to Kalster's directive. Give me a second chance please.
     

  75. #74  
    Forum Masters Degree Tranquille's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Solar System
    Posts
    733
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post

    No that is not the right way. Sure it sends an shitty message to the person concerned, but did they deserve that? Probably not. It is like telling me already not to PM you even before you have given me a chance to redeem myself, and that immediately after you had agreed to Kalster's directive. Give me a second chance please.
    It is not for me to control your behavior. I said I do not ever want you to send me a private message. The onus is entirely on you to respect that.

    No means no.

    I would like to comply with Kalster's comments. Please stop.
     

  76. #75  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquille View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post

    No that is not the right way. Sure it sends an shitty message to the person concerned, but did they deserve that? Probably not. It is like telling me already not to PM you even before you have given me a chance to redeem myself, and that immediately after you had agreed to Kalster's directive. Give me a second chance please.
    It is not for me to control your behavior. I said I do not ever want you to send me a private message. The onus is entirely on you to respect that.

    No means no.

    I would like to comply with Kalster's comments. Please stop.
    You stop it first then. It is not up to me to remember who has given me these odd-ball instructions, no it is up to you to set up your mailbox so that I can't PM you.
    When you signed up to Science Forums you agreed to abide by the rules. Is there a rule that allows us to issue these little directives to each other?
    Where are the rules in this forum?

    Extract from Forum Usage
    Contacting other Members

    Can I email other members?
    Yes. To send an email to another member, you can either find them on the member list, or choose the Send Email option from the username menu in any post they have written.
    This will usually open a page that contains a form where you can enter your message. When you have finished typing your message, press the 'send email' button and your message will be sent instantly.
    Can I see email addresses?
    For privacy reasons, the recipient's email address is not revealed to you during this process.
    Why can't I send an email to someone?


    If you cannot find an email button or link for a member, it means either that the administrator has disabled email functions for this forum, or that the member has said that they do not wish to receive email from other members.
    What I want to now find out if I can specifically block "Tranquille"?

    If I add "Tranquille" to my ignore list does that stop Tranquille from PM-ing me?


    Last edited by Robittybob1; October 26th, 2013 at 03:19 AM.
     

  77. #76  
    Administrator KALSTER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    8,232
    Here they are: The Science Forum Guidelines

    These are rough guidelines for acceptable behaviour. There is nothing specifically about PMs to each other, but common courtesy suggests that it is reasonable for one member to request another not to send them PMs. Repeatedly ignoring this request can be considered harassment and can warrant further action. A member can report a PM if they feel uncomfortable with it and request the mod team to relay a request to stop. The content of the PMs do not necessarily have to contravene any of the general forum guidelines for a member to request that they not receive further PMs from another member.

    I suggest you guys abandon this thread and place each other on the ignore list in order to avoid any further conflict. As far as I know, if another member is on your ignore list, you won't receive their PMs.
    Disclaimer: I do not declare myself to be an expert on ANY subject. If I state something as fact that is obviously wrong, please don't hesitate to correct me. I welcome such corrections in an attempt to be as truthful and accurate as possible.

    "Gullibility kills" - Carl Sagan
    "All people know the same truth. Our lives consist of how we chose to distort it." - Harry Block
    "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle
     

  78. #77  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by KALSTER View Post
    Here they are: The Science Forum Guidelines

    These are rough guidelines for acceptable behaviour. There is nothing specifically about PMs to each other, but common courtesy suggests that it is reasonable for one member to request another not to send them PMs. Repeatedly ignoring this request can be considered harassment and can warrant further action. A member can report a PM if they feel uncomfortable with it and request the mod team to relay a request to stop. The content of the PMs do not necessarily have to contravene any of the general forum guidelines for a member to request that they not receive further PMs from another member.

    I suggest you guys abandon this thread and place each other on the ignore list in order to avoid any further conflict. As far as I know, if another member is on your ignore list, you won't receive their PMs.
    I was reading those guidelines as well. Of course if someone asks you via an email "please stop emailing" that seems reasonable but if there is a big public announcement on an open forum it is obviously meant to embarrass and that is specifically mentioned as a no no in the guidelines
    Follow these rules, use your common sense, and be nice to each other, and everything will be fine. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to PM the administrator(s).
     

  79. #78  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    12,515
    Quote Originally Posted by KALSTER View Post
    Here they are: The Science Forum Guidelines

    These are rough guidelines for acceptable behaviour. There is nothing specifically about PMs to each other, but common courtesy suggests that it is reasonable for one member to request another not to send them PMs. Repeatedly ignoring this request can be considered harassment and can warrant further action. A member can report a PM if they feel uncomfortable with it and request the mod team to relay a request to stop. The content of the PMs do not necessarily have to contravene any of the general forum guidelines for a member to request that they not receive further PMs from another member.

    I suggest you guys abandon this thread and place each other on the ignore list in order to avoid any further conflict. As far as I know, if another member is on your ignore list, you won't receive their PMs.
    Good idea
     

  80. #79  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KALSTER View Post
    Here they are: The Science Forum Guidelines

    These are rough guidelines for acceptable behaviour. There is nothing specifically about PMs to each other, but common courtesy suggests that it is reasonable for one member to request another not to send them PMs. Repeatedly ignoring this request can be considered harassment and can warrant further action. A member can report a PM if they feel uncomfortable with it and request the mod team to relay a request to stop. The content of the PMs do not necessarily have to contravene any of the general forum guidelines for a member to request that they not receive further PMs from another member.

    I suggest you guys abandon this thread and place each other on the ignore list in order to avoid any further conflict. As far as I know, if another member is on your ignore list, you won't receive their PMs.
    Good idea
    I see you spend a lot of time on the Chat board. I Might have to try and join in one day. There certainly is no hiding around here.
     

  81. #80  
    Theatre Whore babe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Resident of Big Island of Hawai'i since 2003, and in Bayside, Ca. since 1981, Humboldt since 1977
    Posts
    12,515
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KALSTER View Post
    Here they are: The Science Forum Guidelines

    These are rough guidelines for acceptable behaviour. There is nothing specifically about PMs to each other, but common courtesy suggests that it is reasonable for one member to request another not to send them PMs. Repeatedly ignoring this request can be considered harassment and can warrant further action. A member can report a PM if they feel uncomfortable with it and request the mod team to relay a request to stop. The content of the PMs do not necessarily have to contravene any of the general forum guidelines for a member to request that they not receive further PMs from another member.

    I suggest you guys abandon this thread and place each other on the ignore list in order to avoid any further conflict. As far as I know, if another member is on your ignore list, you won't receive their PMs.
    Good idea
    I see you spend a lot of time on the Chat board. I Might have to try and join in one day. There certainly is no hiding around here.
    Great place to interact....but rules apply there also. *S*..no offense intended.
     

  82. #81  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by babe View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by KALSTER View Post
    Here they are: The Science Forum Guidelines

    These are rough guidelines for acceptable behaviour. There is nothing specifically about PMs to each other, but common courtesy suggests that it is reasonable for one member to request another not to send them PMs. Repeatedly ignoring this request can be considered harassment and can warrant further action. A member can report a PM if they feel uncomfortable with it and request the mod team to relay a request to stop. The content of the PMs do not necessarily have to contravene any of the general forum guidelines for a member to request that they not receive further PMs from another member.

    I suggest you guys abandon this thread and place each other on the ignore list in order to avoid any further conflict. As far as I know, if another member is on your ignore list, you won't receive their PMs.
    Good idea
    I see you spend a lot of time on the Chat board. I Might have to try and join in one day. There certainly is no hiding around here.
    Great place to interact....but rules apply there also. *S*..no offense intended.
    No couldn't decipher that sorry.


    First post on Chat = From a pessimist's POV - Everyday is a bad day it is just that some are worse than others!!
    Last edited by Robittybob1; October 26th, 2013 at 04:20 PM.
     

  83. #82  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,034
    Quote Originally Posted by blackscorp View Post
    this is the best topic
    Yes, curiosity gets the better of me sometimes as well.
     

  84. #83  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Beer w/Straw View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by blackscorp View Post
    this is the best topic
    Yes, curiosity gets the better of me sometimes as well.
    Did you see this thread?
    Post a picture of yourself so we can see
    I
    went to bed last night wondering if Bw/s comes on the Science Forums and first thing i see this morning is that you've made your first two post here.
    Pleased to see you again.
    The live chat is quite good as well. (sometimes)
     

  85. #84  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,034
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beer w/Straw View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by blackscorp View Post
    this is the best topic
    Yes, curiosity gets the better of me sometimes as well.
    Did you see this thread?
    Post a picture of yourself so we can see
    I
    went to bed last night wondering if Bw/s comes on the Science Forums and first thing i see this morning is that you've made your first two post here.
    Pleased to see you again.
    The live chat is quite good as well. (sometimes)
    And that's what makes it so interesting -you think about me so much!
     

  86. #85  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Beer w/Straw View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beer w/Straw View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by blackscorp View Post
    this is the best topic
    Yes, curiosity gets the better of me sometimes as well.
    Did you see this thread?
    Post a picture of yourself so we can see
    I
    went to bed last night wondering if Bw/s comes on the Science Forums and first thing i see this morning is that you've made your first two post here.
    Pleased to see you again.
    The live chat is quite good as well. (sometimes)
    And that's what makes it so interesting -you think about me so much!
    Well I thought of you, but it wasn't like "I hope B/S never finds this place", but more "what will it be like when she does".
    More the merrier it seems, I don't know that many here yet.
     

  87. #86  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    1,034
    Well, AlexG in familiar with you. You are free to make other impressions, I guess.

    There are, however, more interesting things here than you. So, have fun.
     

  88. #87  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Beer w/Straw View Post
    Well, AlexG in familiar with you. You are free to make other impressions, I guess.

    There are, however, more interesting things here than you. So, have fun.
    Well tell me what you find interesting, and I might join in. I just feel a bit burnt out lately.
     

  89. #88  
    AI's Have More Fun Bad Robot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Washington state
    Posts
    6,114
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beer w/Straw View Post
    Well, AlexG in familiar with you. You are free to make other impressions, I guess.

    There are, however, more interesting things here than you. So, have fun.
    Well tell me what you find interesting, and I might join in. I just feel a bit burnt out lately.
    Do you like jokes?

    Jokes
    babe and sir ir r aj like this.
     

  90. #89  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Bad Robot View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beer w/Straw View Post
    Well, AlexG in familiar with you. You are free to make other impressions, I guess.

    There are, however, more interesting things here than you. So, have fun.
    Well tell me what you find interesting, and I might join in. I just feel a bit burnt out lately.
    Do you like jokes?

    Jokes
    None of them are funny today.
     

  91. #90  
    AI's Have More Fun Bad Robot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Washington state
    Posts
    6,114
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bad Robot View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beer w/Straw View Post
    Well, AlexG in familiar with you. You are free to make other impressions, I guess.

    There are, however, more interesting things here than you. So, have fun.
    Well tell me what you find interesting, and I might join in. I just feel a bit burnt out lately.
    Do you like jokes?

    Jokes
    None of them are funny today.
    Surely there's something you find funny or that just makes you smile and then you post it. If this thread is an indication of where your at you could use a little humor in your life.
     

  92. #91  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Bad Robot View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bad Robot View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Beer w/Straw View Post
    Well, AlexG in familiar with you. You are free to make other impressions, I guess.

    There are, however, more interesting things here than you. So, have fun.
    Well tell me what you find interesting, and I might join in. I just feel a bit burnt out lately.
    Do you like jokes?

    Jokes
    None of them are funny today.
    Surely there's something you find funny or that just makes you smile and then you post it. If this thread is an indication of where your at you could use a little humor in your life.
    I do like jokes and cartoons in the newspapers, so I have quite a good sense of humour generally, but after having been banned three times across various forums and have suffered my threads being deleted and trashed, nothing will make me smile, until the Beautiful Christian Music thread is put back on line.

    Did you like the joke in there?

    What do you mean by god? How would you define it?
    It is true, I can't define God, but God will be proven by the advent of results that only could be attributed to "God". So it will come down to the statistical analysis of the outcomes to determine whether they happened just by chance. It will be like the James Randi Paranormal challenge but performed on the Science Forum.
    Any experiment might also show a null result. The James Randi Paranormal challenge had a first prize of 1 million dollars but here our prize will be 1 million new guests or pageviews.

    I am hoping God will go along with this experiment and do his bit. Like if God got stubborn and said "God Dammit I'm not joining in with Robittybob's stupid antics" , well it will be difficult to get anywhere, won't it?
     

  93. #92  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    16,602
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    but after having been banned three times across various forums and have suffered my threads being deleted and trashed
    Do you see the common element to those incidents?

    until the Beautiful Christian Music thread is put back on line.
    Maybe if you explained the purpose ...
    Without wishing to overstate my case, everything in the observable universe definitely has its origins in Northamptonshire -- Alan Moore
     

  94. #93  
    AI's Have More Fun Bad Robot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Washington state
    Posts
    6,114
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    I do like jokes and cartoons in the newspapers, so I have quite a good sense of humour generally, but after having been banned three times across various forums and have suffered my threads being deleted and trashed, nothing will make me smile, until the Beautiful Christian Music thread is put back on line.

    Did you like the joke in there?

    What do you mean by god? How would you define it?
    It is true, I can't define God, but God will be proven by the advent of results that only could be attributed to "God". So it will come down to the statistical analysis of the outcomes to determine whether they happened just by chance. It will be like the James Randi Paranormal challenge but performed on the Science Forum.
    Any experiment might also show a null result. The James Randi Paranormal challenge had a first prize of 1 million dollars but here our prize will be 1 million new guests or page views.

    I am hoping God will go along with this experiment and do his bit. Like if God got stubborn and said "God Dammit I'm not joining in with Robittybob's stupid antics" , well it will be difficult to get anywhere, won't it?
    If that's a joke I wouldn't have ever posted it in the first place. Not very funny.

    One thing this forum has that the other forum doesn't is a like button for each post. When you read something you like let the poster know. While you can get likes if people like your posts, you tend to get more of them if your willing to give a few. Next many of the people here don't believe in God, so if you want to talk about God make sure it's in the proper sub-forums. Don't bore them by interjecting God in their topics.

    As far as bringing your past problems with you, it really helps if you don't keep the same ID when you find a new forum to post in. Most of the posters in this forum also post in several other forums and they will know what your baggage is (good or bad). I think it's better to live and learn then start fresh if you can.
    seagypsy and babe like this.
     

  95. #94  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    10,827
    Quote Originally Posted by Strange View Post
    until the Beautiful Christian Music thread is put back on line.
    Maybe if you explained the purpose ...
    Surely his purpose is obvious: he's trying to justify his delusion.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
     

  96. #95  
    Forum Masters Degree Tranquille's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Solar System
    Posts
    733
    Quote Originally Posted by Strange View Post

    Do you see the common element to those incidents?
    He never has in the past.


    Maybe if you explained the purpose ...
    He wants people to read about his dreams and he uses the youtube videos as a representation of those dreams. Having read through the threads about his obsession on the other sites, he gets banned because he starts dreaming about certain female members and then starts harassing them and asking them all sorts of personal stuff, like what turns them on, for example. He stalked one member, who also posts here, so much that he was banned. That's just on one forum. There is no purpose because he treats it like his personal blog. It's why he advertises it everywhere, even on the youtube videos he posts. He just gets a buzz talking about his dreams and linking videos that describe them and he thinks its scientific, until he starts to claim that his dreams are prophesies. The crew here did a good thing in shutting it down and the ones on the last forum did a good deed in deleting it by the looks of it, because he would have done the same thing here. He does it everywhere he posts on.

    There is no purpose. There never has been. It's just his wanting to post about stuff that do not belong on science forums.
     

  97. #96  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Strange View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    but after having been banned three times across various forums and have suffered my threads being deleted and trashed
    Do you see the common element to those incidents?

    until the Beautiful Christian Music thread is put back on line.
    Maybe if you explained the purpose ...
    No there was no common element that I can put my finger on. But like I'll be back on Physforum tomorrow, but I was banned after asking the moderator there a question, yet this forum wants us to asks questions of the moderators.
    Sciforums banned me "permanently" for pointing out they had double standards over pornography. (That to me seems stupid for they too had a section where issues with the forum were supposed to be discussed some Forum Government section". The section seemed like "Death Row". Everyone who complains has so far got the chop.)

    The purpose of the Beautiful Christian Songs thread was to detail the religious experiences I have had and my attempt to prove God is real. It is an on-going thing so the work is still in progress. I'll explain it as I go.
     

  98. #97  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Bad Robot View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Robittybob1 View Post
    I do like jokes and cartoons in the newspapers, so I have quite a good sense of humour generally, but after having been banned three times across various forums and have suffered my threads being deleted and trashed, nothing will make me smile, until the Beautiful Christian Music thread is put back on line.

    Did you like the joke in there?

    What do you mean by god? How would you define it?
    It is true, I can't define God, but God will be proven by the advent of results that only could be attributed to "God". So it will come down to the statistical analysis of the outcomes to determine whether they happened just by chance. It will be like the James Randi Paranormal challenge but performed on the Science Forum.
    Any experiment might also show a null result. The James Randi Paranormal challenge had a first prize of 1 million dollars but here our prize will be 1 million new guests or page views.

    I am hoping God will go along with this experiment and do his bit. Like if God got stubborn and said "God Dammit I'm not joining in with Robittybob's stupid antics" , well it will be difficult to get anywhere, won't it?
    If that's a joke I wouldn't have ever posted it in the first place. Not very funny.

    One thing this forum has that the other forum doesn't is a like button for each post. When you read something you like let the poster know. While you can get likes if people like your posts, you tend to get more of them if your willing to give a few. Next many of the people here don't believe in God, so if you want to talk about God make sure it's in the proper sub-forums. Don't bore them by interjecting God in their topics.

    As far as bringing your past problems with you, it really helps if you don't keep the same ID when you find a new forum to post in. Most of the posters in this forum also post in several other forums and they will know what your baggage is (good or bad). I think it's better to live and learn then start fresh if you can.
    Well the songs thread and this one have both been started by me. So they are OK then?

    I've pressed the like button several times. I have not felt up to delving into any deep discussion at the moment, but when I come right i'll tick Likes, don't worry.

    I have had "Robittybob1" for many years so either you like me or hate me, it doesn't really matter.
     

  99. #98  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Tranquille View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Strange View Post

    Do you see the common element to those incidents?
    He never has in the past.


    Maybe if you explained the purpose ...
    He wants people to read about his dreams and he uses the youtube videos as a representation of those dreams. Having read through the threads about his obsession on the other sites, he gets banned because he starts dreaming about certain female members and then starts harassing them and asking them all sorts of personal stuff, like what turns them on, for example. He stalked one member, who also posts here, so much that he was banned. That's just on one forum. There is no purpose because he treats it like his personal blog. It's why he advertises it everywhere, even on the youtube videos he posts. He just gets a buzz talking about his dreams and linking videos that describe them and he thinks its scientific, until he starts to claim that his dreams are prophesies. The crew here did a good thing in shutting it down and the ones on the last forum did a good deed in deleting it by the looks of it, because he would have done the same thing here. He does it everywhere he posts on.

    There is no purpose. There never has been. It's just his wanting to post about stuff that do not belong on science forums.
    That was a very biased view of Robittybob1 made by Tranquille.

    Throughout the Bible God spoke to the prophets and others via dreams, so I write about the dreams I consider inspired.

    Look it is easy to say negative things about me, but who knows what people write about in PMs to each other? Do you? Are there rules around the content of PMs? I can't recall them actually but one thing that was made certain to me years ago and that is you don't disclose anything another person has said in a PM. Does that rule apply here too?

    These Science forums don't just discuss science, there are subsections for a variety of topics. It will be a matter of finding the right subsection for the Beautiful Christian Songs thread.

    Bells?? Is that who Tranquille is referring to? I wouldn't have a clue. I'd write to many people, and since Bells was flirting with the idea of meeting a handsome young man, I joined in and flirted with her. I didn't think there was anything wrong with that, but the forum manager contacted me and said I should stop it, so I did.

    So I'd say Tranquille is talking about someone else, as you never know what is being said behind your back through PMs.
    Last edited by Robittybob1; October 29th, 2013 at 12:19 AM.
     

  100. #99  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    4,138
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Strange View Post
    until the Beautiful Christian Music thread is put back on line.
    Maybe if you explained the purpose ...
    Surely his purpose is obvious: he's trying to justify his delusion.
    You'd be all for that wouldn't you?
     

  101. #100  
    has lost interest seagypsy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    3,107
    Just out of curiosity, where are the actual rules for this forum posted. I know I read them once but now I can't find them. I think the link needs to be more obvious.

    @Robbitybob1, it is my understanding that no one is to discuss the contents of PMs received from other members without clear consent from the sending member.
    Speaking badly about people after they are gone and jumping on the bash the band wagon must do very well for a low self-esteem.
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 24
    Last Post: October 2nd, 2012, 11:10 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: September 12th, 2012, 11:03 AM
  3. Replies: 21
    Last Post: August 8th, 2012, 09:47 PM
  4. Replies: 1
    Last Post: June 13th, 2012, 01:27 AM
  5. Science Forum News - members only!
    By Theoryofrelativity in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: November 8th, 2007, 06:06 AM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •