Notices
Results 1 to 66 of 66
Like Tree7Likes
  • 1 Post By Neverfly
  • 1 Post By Strange
  • 3 Post By shlunka
  • 1 Post By Neverfly
  • 1 Post By AlexG

Thread: I am your New Einstein. Do you believe me?

  1. #1 I am your New Einstein. Do you believe me? 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    .. a little humor does not hurt.

    My Blog --> http://blogs.scienceforums.net/ArnaudAntoineANDRIEU/
    Thanks.


    Last edited by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu; April 8th, 2013 at 07:00 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,758
    I've had a look at your blog.
    It's a pity, but you could have used that web space for writing about science and factual things.
    What makes you think you'll learn anything about our "true origins" by reading the bible?


    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Moderator Moderator Markus Hanke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    7,302
    I am your New Einstein. Do you believe me?


    No.

    Though I am not sure I understood everything correctly ( my French is not brilliant, and the English link doesn't work for me ), I don't see anything of scientific value there. Don't you have a properly formulated model with the appropriate maths etc ?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Quagma SpeedFreek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    London, UK
    Posts
    2,787
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    .. a little humor does not hurt.
    I'm glad you admit you are joking, as nobody should take that blog article seriously.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Markus Hanke View Post
    I am your New Einstein. Do you believe me?


    No.

    Though I am not sure I understood everything correctly ( my French is not brilliant, and the English link doesn't work for me ), I don't see anything of scientific value there. Don't you have a properly formulated model with the appropriate maths etc ?
    Yes I don't know why my blog doesn't work correctly.

    The best link in English that I have is : Asymmetry-and-monodynamic page-2

    I introduced this principle in December 2011


    Quote Originally Posted by SpeedFreek View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    .. a little humor does not hurt.
    I'm glad you admit you are joking, as nobody should take that blog article seriously.
    The humor was for the sentence of the "new Einstein". The blog is serious but it not display everything properly.







    Photon in the stimulated emission
    (http://en.wikipedia....ulated_emission)

    Photon before emission
    :





    Atom before in excited state
    / photon in post-emission :



    Photon during emission :






    The spontaneous symmetry breaking
    (Mexican Hat)






    Quark confinement and Spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking
    (SCSB)




    Everything works with a simple and unique oscillator field.





    E² = m²c4 + p²c²
    ----> Ev=(nλ)c² [1λ = 4πω]

    Attached Images
    Last edited by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu; April 11th, 2013 at 04:21 AM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,758
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    The blog is serious
    Yes!
    That's the funniest part about it.
    You manage to keep a straight face and present your nonsense as if it were something actually worth reading and paying attention to.

    Congratulations on that, not many people could manage it.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    The blog is serious
    Yes!
    That's the funniest part about it.
    You manage to keep a straight face and present your nonsense as if it were something actually worth reading and paying attention to.

    Congratulations on that, not many people could manage it.
    It's you who has responded -15% instead +115% of a simple math problem? .. in my opinion you should do better if you want that I can take your consideration. My blog returns many pages written in French. I only began in English. You can see some comments (in English) to the blog and you will see that there who appreciate my "way to see". Let me time to show you in an eyeful. See you soon. Friendship
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    16,963
    Your diagrams and words make absolutely no sense.

    You are not the new Einstein. You are just the latest in a tediously long line of scientifically illiterate crackpots. Welcome to the forum.

    Hopefully this thread will soon be moved to pseudoscience or trash, where it belongs.

    If I am wrong, please let me know which peer-reviewed scientific journals your "theory" has been published in.
    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,758
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    It's you who has responded -15% instead +115% of a simple math problem?
    Except that it wasn't a "simple maths problem".
    There was no actual mathematics involved.
    YOU made assumptions (incorrect ones) predicated on zero evidence.
    I simply followed your "logic" as you'd presented it.

    in my opinion you should do better if you want that I can take your consideration.
    Yeah. Your opinion...

    My blog returns many pages written in French.
    Oh! How did I miss the fact they were in French as I was reading them?

    you will see that there who appreciate my "way to see".
    Crankdom is an international thing. It's not (unfortunately) limited to any particular nationality or linguistic group.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Strange View Post

    If I am wrong, please let me know which peer-reviewed scientific journals your "theory" has been published in.
    And official!

    Mon Figaro - Théorie du tout - selon mes idées
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    copyrighted ..
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    16,963
    Since when has Le Figaro been a peer-reviewed scientific journal?

    (And why does a relatively respectable newspaper allow crackpots to post merde on its web site. I despair sometimes.)
    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    16,963
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    copyrighted ..
    Don't worry. No one here wants to copy crap.

    (And of course its copyrighted; France is a member of the Bern Convention. Sheesh.)
    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by PhDemon View Post
    OK I'm reading this through google translator (my French is not good) but this appears to be a blog or newspaper website not a peer reviewed journal. It may have been "moderated" but this is not the same as peer review

    Peer review - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    Unless you are agreeing that non-scientists are your "peers" in that they have as much understanding of science as you appear to (i.e. not much)...

    no no, it's simply a patent. (Filing Papers in Court)

    Patent - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    This is the story of an iron ball that use gravity with one magnetic field. That it.
    You said it doesn't work, it doesn't work. Not probem.

    Attached Images
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #15  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    16,963
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    no no, it's simply a patent. (Filing Papers in Court)
    So you lied?

    If you have applied for a patent why didn't you post a link to the patent application?

    Yes, thank you. I know what a patent is. I have been working in the field for about 15 years.
    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #16  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    It's you who has responded -15% instead +115% of a simple math problem?
    Except that it wasn't a "simple maths problem".
    For you. It's a pity too.

    Quote Originally Posted by Strange View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    no no, it's simply a patent. (Filing Papers in Court)
    So you lied?

    If you have applied for a patent why didn't you post a link to the patent application?

    Yes, thank you. I know what a patent is. I have been working in the field for about 15 years.
    Not really. As you know it's a long process. My writing are simply protected as a forum with a specific Charter rights protection. The moderators have told me there was no problem in case of discovery (January and February 2012) - (I know you think this is not a good idea). Since I watch for eventual plagiarism and in the same time I'm trying to explain ("my theory"). I see that it is a failure for me. That's why.




    I never wanted to be boring or something others like "hijacking". Because my story will be too long to explain mathematically speaking. I was only, however in the beginning of the introduction. But soon the scientific world will understand what they wanted or looking for. I have nothing more to say, just "God protect us". Thank you all.

    Arnaud.
    Last edited by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu; April 10th, 2013 at 06:12 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #17  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Apocalyptic Paradise
    Posts
    6,613
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    Since I watch for eventual plagiarism and in the same time I'm trying to explain ("my theory").
    Even if someone steals trash, no one would buy it.
    Dywyddyr likes this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #18  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    16,963
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    My writing are simply protected as a forum with a specific Charter rights protection.
    I have no idea what that is supposed to mean.

    ince I watch for eventual plagiarism and in the same time I'm trying to explain ("my theory"). I see that it is a failure for me. That's why.
    So your "theory" is meaningless nonsense AND you can't explain it. Great combination.

    But soon the scientific world will understand what they wanted or looking for.
    Possibly. But not from you.

    I have nothing more to say
    Good.
    Halliday likes this.
    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #19  
    Ascended Member Ascended's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    3,414
    Hey there, tough crowd here right? Maybe start with something a little less ambitious next time, claims of being the second coming of Einstein arn't usually received that well anywhere nevermind around here.
    Everything has its beauty, but not everyone sees it. - confucius
    Reply With Quote  
     

  21. #20  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Strange View Post

    I have nothing more to say

    Good.
    Just the Higgs data could spell trouble for leading Big Bang theory . LOL
    Higgs data could spell trouble for leading Big Bang theory : Nature News & Comment

    My solution is.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  22. #21  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    16,963
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    Just the Higgs data could spell trouble for leading Big Bang theory . LOL
    Higgs data could spell trouble for leading Big Bang theory : Nature News & Comment
    I can only assume you didn't understand that article and know absolutely nothing about the big bang theory. As the article notes, the analysis is about inflation. Steinhardt was one of the developers of the inflationary model but, more recently, has been arguing that it is unnecessary and wrong. So this report is not too surprising.

    My solution is.
    Your "solution" is what? Meaningless crap?
    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  23. #22  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    613
    Quote Originally Posted by Strange View Post
    My solution is.
    Your "solution" is what? Meaningless crap?
    I think the correct scientific adjective is billevesée

    I happen to own the following patent: "A process by which you would guarantee that any idea whatsoever got recorded in due form so that any further development on the subject can be prevented, and that only the fewest people could benefit from it".

    Now that I own a patent on patents, I am the master of the world, I am your new Rockefeller, can you believe it ?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  24. #23  
    Malignant Pimple shlunka's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Dogbox in front of Dywyddyr's house.
    Posts
    1,785
    Welcome to scienceforum, where your dreams of scientific prowess are shattered and the pieces lost forever.
    "MODERATOR NOTE : We don't entertain trolls here, not even in the trash can. Banned." -Markus Hanke
    Reply With Quote  
     

  25. #24  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    I've had a look at your blog.
    It's a pity, but you could have used that web space for writing about science and factual things.

    What makes you think you'll learn anything about our "true origins" by reading the bible?

    Everything comes from wiki. But as you tell me about the Bible, what do you think about of the prophecy of the Destruction of Jerusalem(temple) and Signs before the End according to the Gospels
    of

    Matthew 24 or Luke 21 ?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  26. #25  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Apocalyptic Paradise
    Posts
    6,613
    7 Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. There will be famines and earthquakes in various places. 8 All these are the beginning of birth pains.
    A very general statement. Consider that these things were going on long before Christ and have been going on ever since.
    Everything from there to 36- General statements anyone could guess.
    The Day and Hour Unknown

    36 “But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son,[f] but only the Father. 37 As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. 38 For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark; 39 and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man
    Ah, nothing like the generalized prediction... you never know when...

    The temple was destroyed about 70 years later. Considering the politics, it is not unreasonable that someone might believe it would be soon destroyed. It's not unreasonable that it would end up destroyed since nothing built lasts. He gave No Time Frame, no cause, no true motivation, accused no one of the act- he only gave a very general prediction without even giving a date. It happened 70 years later and that was almost two thousand years ago minus a few decades.

    Nothing in that supports any of what you said. It does not even support itself. It is as substantial as this guy.

    In other words, totally lacking in substance. And what the heck does it have to do with your promotion of your "alternative to Relativity" hypothesis?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  27. #26  
    ▼▼ dn ʎɐʍ sıɥʇ ▼▼ RedPanda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,737
    Quote Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
    In other words, totally lacking in substance.
    *nods*
    Postdiction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    "...a non-specific claim. For example, it predicts a "disaster" of some kind but not what it is. Such a prediction can be massaged to fit any number of events. Likewise, a prediction that does not state dates or places, or allows itself a large window of possible dates can be made to fit many possibilities."
    SayBigWords.com/say/3FC

    "And, behold, I come quickly;" Revelation 22:12

    "Religions are like sausages. When you know how they are made, you no longer want them."
    Reply With Quote  
     

  28. #27  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,758
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    Everything comes from wiki.
    By that I assume you mean you've got all of your "knowledge" from Wiki?
    Oh boy...

    But as you tell me about the Bible
    Your website, i.e. YOU, is the one that referenced it.

    what do you think about of the prophecy of the Destruction of Jerusalem(temple) and Signs before the End according to the Gospels of Matthew 24 or Luke 21 ?
    Bunk.
    Is it a "prophecy" or is it a comment on contemporary (i.e. the time it was written) issues?
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  29. #28  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    117
    Lol
    Reply With Quote  
     

  30. #29  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    Everything comes from wiki.
    By that I assume you mean you've got all of your "knowledge" from Wiki?

    Oh boy...
    from Origine .. yes, why ? (95% come from wiki and 4% French TV and 1% comment about Bible)


    But as you tell me about the Bible
    Your website, i.e. YOU, is the one that referenced it.
    What ? Which website ? do you have a link please ?

    what do you think about of the prophecy of the Destruction of Jerusalem(temple) and Signs before the End according to the Gospels of Matthew 24 or Luke 21 ?
    Bunk.
    Is it a "prophecy" or is it a comment on contemporary (i.e. the time it was written) issues?
    "about the prophecy"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  31. #30  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,758
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    from Origine .. yes, why ? (95% come from wiki and 4% French TV and 1% comment about Bible)
    So you haven't actually bothered with a real education in science.
    And why would you get "information" from the bible?

    What ? Which website ? do you have a link please ?
    Er, the one YOU linked to in the first post of this thread.

    "about the prophecy"
    I'll repeat the question: Is it a "prophecy" or is it a comment on contemporary (i.e. the time it was written) issues?
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  32. #31  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Strange View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    Just the Higgs data could spell trouble for leading Big Bang theory . LOL
    Higgs data could spell trouble for leading Big Bang theory : Nature News & Comment
    I can only assume you didn't understand that article and know absolutely nothing about the big bang theory. As the article notes, the analysis is about inflation. Steinhardt was one of the developers of the inflationary model but, more recently, has been arguing that it is unnecessary and wrong. So this report is not too surprising.

    My solution is.
    Your "solution" is what? Meaningless crap?
    LOL

    To me ... I think you don't really understand what happens.


    --->March 14, 2013 ---> CERN: We've found 'a Higgs boson'; but is it predicted version? CERN: We've found 'a Higgs boson'; but is it predicted version? - Los Angeles Times

    ---> April 14, 2013 --->Seconde Higgs Boson? The discovery of the Higgs boson is indeed real, but physicists aren't sure about whether the new particle they've found is going to fit their predictions or not. http://www.examiner.com/article/2nd-higgs-boson-physicists-debate-the-possibility-of-a-new-particle A Second Higgs Boson? Physicists Debate New Particle | American Physical Society 2013 Meeting | LiveScience


    Why the first Higgs doesn't work? You are a Clown. really
    Reply With Quote  
     

  33. #32  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    from Origine .. yes, why ? (95% come from wiki and 4% French TV and 1% comment about Bible)
    <br>
    So you haven't actually bothered with a real education in science.<br>
    And why would you get "information" from the bible?<br>
    <br>
    What ? Which website ? do you have a link please ?
    <br>
    Er, the one YOU linked to in the first post of this thread.<br>
    and you're lying.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  34. #33  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,758
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    and you're lying.
    Really?
    Care to point which portions are "lies"?
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  35. #34  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Apocalyptic Paradise
    Posts
    6,613
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    and you lying.
    Where is the lie? You did post a link to your blog in the O.P.

    I think you should take your time and type out, in the most coherent post you can, what it is that you are trying to describe. Don't assume that others do or do not understand you. Don't make assumptions about whether or not they will. You started the thread- Finish what you start.
    Give the topic some substance. Be prepared to answer questions.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  36. #35  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    and you're lying.
    Really?
    Care to point which portions are "lies"?
    Every points. You are a clown too
    Reply With Quote  
     

  37. #36  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    and you lying.
    Where is the lie? You did post a link to your blog in the O.P.

    I think you should take your time and type out, in the most coherent post you can, what it is that you are trying to describe. Don't assume that others do or do not understand you. Don't make assumptions about whether or not they will. You started the thread- Finish what you start.
    Give the topic some substance. Be prepared to answer questions.
    Your name is Dywyddyr ?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  38. #37  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Apocalyptic Paradise
    Posts
    6,613
    In France, clowns are mimes.
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    Your name is Dywyddyr?
    No, but that doesn't stop me from asking you questions. It is a legitimate question.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  39. #38  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,758
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    Every points. You are a clown too
    Let's see:
    I asked: By that I assume you mean you've got all of your "knowledge" from Wiki?
    And you replied: yes, why ?
    In other words: you HAVEN'T bothered getting a genuine science education.
    A science education comes from going to classes and getting information from tutors, experiment and text books. Not Wiki, the TV or the bible.

    I also wrote: And why would you get "information" from the bible?
    How is a question a lie?

    I wrote: Er, the one YOU linked to in the first post of this thread.
    Did you, or did you not, link to a website in your post?
    For reference I'll quote post #1
    My Blog --> Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU | String theory & Matter waves
    Thanks.

    I also wrote: I'll repeat the question: Is it a "prophecy" or is it a comment on contemporary (i.e. the time it was written) issues?
    Again, how is a question a lie?

    Now, who's the clown?
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  40. #39  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    Every points. You are a clown too
    Let's see:
    I asked: By that I assume you mean you've got all of your "knowledge" from Wiki?
    And you replied: yes, why ?
    In other words: you HAVEN'T bothered getting a genuine science education.
    A science education comes from going to classes and getting information from tutors, experiment and text books. Not Wiki, the TV or the bible.

    I also wrote: And why would you get "information" from the bible?
    How is a question a lie?

    I wrote: Er, the one YOU linked to in the first post of this thread.
    Did you, or did you not, link to a website in your post?
    For reference I'll quote post #1
    My Blog --> Arnaud Antoine ANDRIEU | String theory & Matter waves
    Thanks.

    I also wrote: I'll repeat the question: Is it a "prophecy" or is it a comment on contemporary (i.e. the time it was written) issues?
    Again, how is a question a lie?

    Now, who's the clown?
    Where is the word Bible?

    LOL !!!!


    Quote Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
    In France, clowns are mimes.
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    Your name is Dywyddyr?
    No, but that doesn't stop me from asking you questions. It is a legitimate question.
    Ok. Sorry.

    ---> April 14, 2013 --->Second Higgs Boson? The discovery of the Higgs boson is indeed real, but physicists aren't sure about whether the new particle they've found is going to fit their predictions or not.

    Because in France they stole all my ideas, and I want to prove it front your eyes
    Last edited by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu; April 30th, 2013 at 10:37 PM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  41. #40  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,758
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    Where is the word Bible?
    I wonder...
    Oh, wait.
    Did someone else write this?
    Si je m’en tiens aux premier écrits biblique de la Genèse 2 lors de L’alliance d’Eden au verset 15,
    Alors oui l’on pourrait imaginer ce que l’on veut ; (chacun le voit comme il le veut) Il est le chemin et la vérité

    Extrait de la Bible du Semeur (Gn 2.15)
    “L’Eternel Dieu prit l’homme et l’établit dans le jardin d’Eden pour le cultiver et le garder.”



    And even IF you hadn't mentioned the bible that would have made ONE of my comments incorrect, not "Every points".
    In other words, no lies on my part. But there are on yours.

    ---> April 14, 2013 --->Seconde Higgs Boson? The discovery of the Higgs boson is indeed real, but physicists aren't sure about whether the new particle they've found is going to fit their predictions or not.
    Of course they aren't.
    Those links say so, don't they?
    Physicists confirmed in March that a new particle discovered at the world's largest atom smasher, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), is, in fact, the Higgs boson.
    it’s the Higgs or it’s something so much like it that it’s silly to call it anything else.
    Maybe you should learn to read.

    Because in France they stole all my idea, and I want to prove it front your eyes
    Why would genuine scientists want to "steal" pseudoscientific nonsense?
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  42. #41  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Maybe you should learn to read.

    You too
    . An official link say ---> The discovery of the Higgs boson is indeed real, but physicists aren't sure about whether the new particle they've found is going to fit their predictions or not.


    ...

    because my solution is.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  43. #42  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Apocalyptic Paradise
    Posts
    6,613
    ArnaudAntoineAndrieu, why you are clicking "like" on many posts that oppose your point of view? Now, don't get me wrong. I don't mind receiving a new "like."
    But I am wondering if you've got the wrong idea- I do not want to take advantage of your good will.

    What does the Higgs Boson and second finding have to do with this and what ideas were stolen from you?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  44. #43  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,758
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    You too. An official link say ---> The discovery of the Higgs boson is indeed real, but physicists aren't sure about whether the new particle they've found is going to fit their predictions or not.
    Quite: if you could read you'd have seen that that is merely the hook, which usually (I say usually because obviously it didn't work for you) gets people to read further.
    IF you'd read further you'd have seen:
    Some of these theories predict five or more Higgs bosons of different masses... Physicists confirmed in March that a new particle discovered at the world's largest atom smasher, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), is, in fact, the Higgs boson.

    In other words, what was found DOES fit predictions.
    But they haven't found ALL of the predicted POSSIBLE Higgs bosons.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  45. #44  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,758
    Quote Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
    ArnaudAntoineAndrieu, why you are clicking "like" on many posts that oppose your point of view?
    He keeps doing that to me, too.
    Innate masochism maybe?
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  46. #45  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48

    "When the theory of decoherence shows that the density matrix is diagonalized, it remains to show why and by what mechanism the nature chooses an interpretation of the matrix rather than another."



    The continuous straight line does not exist, and never existed. ---> http://sites.google.com/site/continu...tlinenotexist/
    Reply With Quote  
     

  47. #46  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Apocalyptic Paradise
    Posts
    6,613
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    He keeps doing that to me, too.
    Innate masochism maybe?
    I don't think I have been especially mean... I'm tempted to go click "like" on all his posts so that we're even... But I don't want others to think I am being supportive of pseudoscience... What a dilemma.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  48. #47  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,758
    A couple of points:
    1) are you going to A) acknowledge that you were wrong to accuse me of lying and apologise for it B) apologise for actually lying yourself?
    2) try to stick to the topic and ensure that your posts refer to something relevant? (Ideally by stating what it is you're "replying" to).
    3) quoting YOUR OWN work isn't really a smart way to make your point.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  49. #48  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    1) are you going to A) acknowledge that you were wrong to accuse me of lying and apologise for it B) apologise for actually lying yourself?

    You have first to say I am lying. But I'm not. And you?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  50. #49  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,758
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    You have first to say I am lying. But I'm not.
    You lied when you declared that I was lying.
    You lied when you said that "every point" of my post was a lie.
    You lied when you implicitly denied any mention of the bible on your website.

    And you?
    If you can show where I lied then I'll certainly acknowledge it and apologise.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  51. #50  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Apocalyptic Paradise
    Posts
    6,613
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    1) are you going to A) acknowledge that you were wrong to accuse me of lying and apologise for it B) apologise for actually lying yourself?

    You have first to say I am lying. But I'm not. And you?
    You need to clarify what you accused Dywyddyr of lying about. Was it just lashing out for feeling accused of a lie, yourself?

    You also need to clarify your intentions in this thread. What is the idea, in a nutshell, that you wish to convey? You drop hints about pulsars and such, then call someone else a clown. Maybe I'm just a little bit slow- maybe it is because I do not speak any French- but your hypothesis, so far, is undefined and so scattered across the thread between ad hom exchanges that I have no idea what your hypothesis even IS at this point.
    Please take a moment to type out a strong synopsis of what your hypothesis is, with a few details that support it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  52. #51  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    Every points. You are a clown too
    I also wrote: I'll repeat the question: Is it a "prophecy" or is it a comment on contemporary (i.e. the time it was written) issues?
    Again, how is a question a lie?

    Now, who's the clown?
    I said : what do you think about of the prophecy of the Destruction of Jerusalem(temple) and Signs before the End according to the Gospels of Matthew 24 or Luke 21 ?

    I can formulate like : what do you think about to the Gospels of Matthew 24 or Luke 21 ?

    Do you better understand?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  53. #52  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,758
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    I said : what do you think about of the prophecy of the Destruction of Jerusalem(temple) and Signs before the End according to the Gospels of Matthew 24 or Luke 21 ?
    I can formulate like : what do you think about to the Gospels of Matthew 24 or Luke 21 ?
    Do you better understand?
    I'll repeat:
    Is it a "prophecy" or is it a comment on contemporary (i.e. the time it was written) issues?
    Again, how is a question a lie?


    And what do biblical references, "prophecies" or otherwise, have to do with science?
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  54. #53  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post

    Please take a moment to type out a strong synopsis of what your hypothesis is, with a few details that support it.
    It's what I am doing during one and half year from now. Just a few months and I will can you give it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  55. #54  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    I said : what do you think about of the prophecy of the Destruction of Jerusalem(temple) and Signs before the End according to the Gospels of Matthew 24 or Luke 21 ?
    I can formulate like : what do you think about to the Gospels of Matthew 24 or Luke 21 ?
    Do you better understand?
    I'll repeat:
    Is it a "prophecy" or is it a comment on contemporary (i.e. the time it was written) issues?
    Again, how is a question a lie?


    And what do biblical references, "prophecies" or otherwise, have to do with science?
    I was not me who wrote the Bible. Can you understand that ?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  56. #55  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,758
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    I was not me who wrote the Bible. Can you understand that ?
    Beside the point.
    I asked a question: how is a question a lie?
    And what do biblical references, "prophecies" or otherwise, have to do with science?

    1) are you going to A) acknowledge that you were wrong to accuse me of lying and apologise for it B) apologise for actually lying yourself?
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  57. #56  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    I was not me who wrote the Bible. Can you understand that ?
    Beside the point.
    I asked a question: how is a question a lie?
    And what do biblical references, "prophecies" or otherwise, have to do with science?

    1) are you going to A) acknowledge that you were wrong to accuse me of lying and apologise for it B) apologise for actually lying yourself?
    1) you have first talking about Bible. Why ?

    2) I have some legal proof (police)

    So?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  58. #57  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,758
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    1) you have first talking about Bible. Why ?
    What?
    YOUR SITE, the one YOU linked to references the bible.

    2) I have some legal proof (police)
    Legal proof of what?
    That YOU lied?
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  59. #58  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Apocalyptic Paradise
    Posts
    6,613
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post

    1) you have first talking about Bible. Why ?

    2) I have some legal proof (police)

    So?
    At this point---- everyone just smile and nod while backing away slowly...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  60. #59  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    You don't know me ? You don't know my story.


    9 januray 2012 - Cour d'Appel de Paris
    Tribunal de Grande Instance d'Evry - PV n° 2012/74 Athis-Mons
    Service : Pole des affaires générales.
    N°Parquet : 12086000247
    Reply With Quote  
     

  61. #60  
    Genius Duck Moderator Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    11,758
    So, basically, you're telling us that you're so stupid you can't stick to the actual conversation and reply to questions and points raised, or that you're so dishonest you'll do anything to avoid the subject under discussion.
    Got it.

    Ignore list.
    I don't like liars.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  62. #61  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    So, basically, you're telling us that you're so stupid you can't stick to the actual conversation and reply to questions and points raised, or that you're so dishonest you'll do anything to avoid the subject under discussion.
    Got it.

    Ignore list.
    I don't like liars.




    I think you did not understand. I tell you the truth.

    You must understand that I'm talking about January 2012 until yet.

    You said "you can't stick to the actual conversation and reply to questions and points raised"

    What do you really want to know?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  63. #62  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Dywyddyr View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    Where is the word Bible?
    I wonder...
    Oh, wait.
    Did someone else write this?
    Si je m’en tiens aux premier écrits biblique de la Genèse 2 lors de L’alliance d’Eden au verset 15,
    Alors oui l’on pourrait imaginer ce que l’on veut ; (chacun le voit comme il le veut) Il est le chemin et la vérité

    Extrait de la Bible du Semeur (Gn 2.15)
    “L’Eternel Dieu prit l’homme et l’établit dans le jardin d’Eden pour le cultiver et le garder.”



    And even IF you hadn't mentioned the bible that would have made ONE of my comments incorrect, not "Every points".
    In other words, no lies on my part. But there are on yours.
    yes, I said ---> "and 1% comment about Bible"

    do you know where ?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  64. #63  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Apocalyptic Paradise
    Posts
    6,613
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    yes, I said ---> "and 1% comment about Bible"

    do you know where ?
    Whatever personal religious beliefs you have are your business. And it's totally acceptable for you to have them. However, the bible is not a scientific text- it is a text about spiritual beliefs, morality, lifestyles and worship. It was never intended to be a science book.
    Using it as a source for a scientific hypothesis about cosmology is simply not going to work. You cannot use a Dr. Suess book as a resource for a talk on physics.
    That is not the purpose of Geisel's book.

    I asked you what your hypothesis is. I think you also claimed your hypothesis was stolen...
    Either way, you said it will be a year and a half before you reveal your hypothesis.

    I have a proposition:

    Come back in a year and a half.
    Strange likes this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  65. #64  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    France
    Posts
    48
    Quote Originally Posted by Neverfly View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    yes, I said ---> "and 1% comment about Bible"

    do you know where ?
    Whatever personal religious beliefs you have are your business. And it's totally acceptable for you to have them. However, the bible is not a scientific text- it is a text about spiritual beliefs, morality, lifestyles and worship. It was never intended to be a science book.
    Using it as a source for a scientific hypothesis about cosmology is simply not going to work. You cannot use a Dr. Suess book as a resource for a talk on physics.
    That is not the purpose of Geisel's book.

    I asked you what your hypothesis is. I think you also claimed your hypothesis was stolen...
    Either way, you said it will be a year and a half before you reveal your hypothesis.

    I have a proposition:

    Come back in a year and a half.
    I'll prove you're a clown too and also before one year and a half. Do you believe me ?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  66. #65  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Apocalyptic Paradise
    Posts
    6,613
    Quote Originally Posted by ArnaudAntoineAndrieu View Post
    I'll prove you're a clown too and also before one year and a half. Do you believe me ?
    I don't think you understand me very well. If you showed me to be a clown- I would be happy.

    If you provided a more accurate model- I would be happy.

    If you contributed greatly to astronomy- I would be happy.

    If you provide a model that is a better fit for observations, has more predictability and replaces current mainstream models- I would be happy.
    So by all means, please do show me to be a clown. This is not sarcasm.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  67. #66  
    Anti-Crank AlexG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,809
    I don't think you understand me very well. If you showed me to be a clown- I would be happy.

    If you provided a more accurate model- I would be happy.

    If you contributed greatly to astronomy- I would be happy.
    You are doomed to unhappiness.
    Its the way nature is!
    If you dont like it, go somewhere else....
    To another universe, where the rules are simpler
    Philosophically more pleasing, more psychologically easy
    Prof Richard Feynman (1979) .....

    Das ist nicht nur nicht richtig, es ist nicht einmal falsch!"
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Einstein
    By bobdonatelle in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: December 14th, 2012, 03:02 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 20th, 2011, 12:45 AM
  3. Tsolkas or Einstein ?
    By tsolkas-1 in forum Pseudoscience
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: December 12th, 2008, 05:07 AM
  4. The new Einstein!
    By Robin Hood in forum Physics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: May 5th, 2008, 01:52 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •