| Author |
Message
|
| Alzamora |
 Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 5:32 am Post subject: gravity |
 |
|
Forum Freshman
Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 9
|
Gravity is only indirectly related to mass. It has more to do with the effect of mass on space. Spacial displacement.
Planets form and masses form despite space's efforts to neutralize them. (reach a homeostasis or a state that was more like pre-big-bang)They resist against an already ever-present "liquid" space.
Pressure is more accurate. On the Atomic level the pressure or gravity is relatively insignificant, at least to any form of our ability to perceive.
The revolutions of the planets are attracted to larger bodies because the larger bodies are drawing them into their own coagulations while the smaller bodies resist to maintain their own coagulative sovreignty
hmmmm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| (Q) |
| Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 7:13 am Post subject: Re: gravity |
|
|
Forum Ph.D.
Joined: 12 May 2005
Posts: 989
|
| Alzamora wrote: |
| Gravity is only indirectly related to mass. It has more to do with the effect of mass on space. Spacial displacement. |
How does that account for the density of mass and the relative increase in gravity?
_________________
I may have no understanding of the current theory of evolution. But that's because science keeps changing it. A few weeks ago I read in the newspaper that it had once again been adjusted & just the other day I discovered a new book called "The New Theory of Evolution" ~~Steven Titchenell : W.V.B.I.G. President. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| SuperNatendo |
| Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 7:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Junior
Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Posts: 264
Location: Nashville, TN USA
|
(Q) wrote:
How does that account for the density of mass and the relative increase in gravity?
The more mass, the greater it's affect on space-time fabric around it, the more "pressure" exerted on the almost liquid-like fabric of space time, the greater the "force" of gravity. The density of the mass determines how focused this "pressure" is and the more focused the pressure, the greater the increase in the perceived "force" of gravity.
Would that be a correct assumption, Alzamora?
_________________
Click this link to see the video that convinced me of evolution.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7766953598776147281&q=apes+that+write+start+fires&ei=Gu8PSL_bOo-E4gKqzMGpBA&hl=en
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| (Q) |
| Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 8:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Ph.D.
Joined: 12 May 2005
Posts: 989
|
| SuperNatendo wrote: |
| The density of the mass determines how focused this "pressure" is and the more focused the pressure, the greater the increase in the perceived "force" of gravity. |
That makes no sense, please explain?
_________________
I may have no understanding of the current theory of evolution. But that's because science keeps changing it. A few weeks ago I read in the newspaper that it had once again been adjusted & just the other day I discovered a new book called "The New Theory of Evolution" ~~Steven Titchenell : W.V.B.I.G. President. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| sak |
| Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 12:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Freshman
Joined: 21 Sep 2007
Posts: 81
|
| (Q) is right as long as one couldn’t present a proof or at least an example. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Cold Fusion |
| Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Bachelors Degree
Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Posts: 465
Location: In the circuitous haze of my mind
|
Thats true according to its corresponding model of space.
A star only has so much gravity to begin with, but if it takes the path of turning into a neutron star, its gravitational density increases dramatically. The same total amount of gravity is there, only more dense than before.
_________________
Forget all that you know, achievements can only be accomplished by starting from nothing and selectively applying facts that are purely objective and absolutely necessary. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Alzamora |
| Posted: Mon May 05, 2008 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Freshman
Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 9
|
Well, the greater the mass, the more gravity. because more material has come together which then displaces the "liquid" space. Liquid is a bad example but it best shows the displacement aspect.
it is a different way of seeing space in that space is not bound by a human definition of time. I dont buy the Space Time aspect of relativity, i think this is why the GUT (grand unified theory ) doesnt exist yet. I think gravity isnt so much affecting Spacetime as much as it is displacing pre big bang material, call it what you will (dark matter).
this all makes sense when considering my theory of direct repurcussionism:
time doesnt define space. all that is happening is happening now regardless of one's placement in the universe and how long it would take light, or you for that matter, to get here or there.
what do you make of that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ophiolite |
| Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 7:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Radioactive Isotope
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 4022
Location: Scotland
|
I'd make a lot more of it if there were some maths. 
_________________
The Universe is not only weirder than we imagine it is weirder than we can imagine. J.B.S.Haldane. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Alzamora |
| Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 6:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Freshman
Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 9
|
math is easy,
you can make math fit to anything.
I just don't do math.
give it to a math wiz, and see what elegance they come up with.
The math can sometimes limit the real face of reality, which is really quite simple. All things repeat in scale in each direction, macro micro. its the details that are different.
Alzamora |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Alzamora |
| Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 6:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Freshman
Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 9
|
Hi Cold Fusion,
wow! you are right about the star collapsing thing. same gravity different density. I really think this spacial displacement theory might actually have some bearings here. If you think of it, Big Bang is some force that is spurred into a mass of "something/nothing/darkmatter" everything after that is the universe trying to equalize back to a state that is closest to its pre big bang state.
so all this stuff that is in space is an intrusion into the "something/nothing/darkmatter"
king of like a dust bag being popped underwater with out gravity to make the particles go any particular direction. imagine that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Alzamora |
| Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 6:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Freshman
Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 9
|
for example . look what crude oil does in the ocean, it coagulates into crusty nasty little tar balls.
oil and water don't mix.
Dark matter and matter don't mix. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Alzamora |
| Posted: Tue May 06, 2008 6:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Freshman
Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 9
|
our atmosphere insulates us from interacting with dark matter. look what happens when a human goes out too far into space. they dont mix well.
dark matter that is detected is just vast expanses of space that does not have any star, planetary or galactic presence |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Dishmaster |
| Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 12:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Sophomore
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Posts: 126
Location: Heidelberg, Germany
|
| Alzamora wrote: |
our atmosphere insulates us from interacting with dark matter. look what happens when a human goes out too far into space. they dont mix well.
dark matter that is detected is just vast expanses of space that does not have any star, planetary or galactic presence |
Well, here is another contributer, who has no idea, what he is talking about. But arrogant enough to say "I don't do math." Really funny.  No math, no science. As simple as that.
Do you know, what dark matter is and why it was invented? Have you any idea about the observations and their conclusions to the reality of dark matter? Well, here it is: "Dark Matter" is just an expression for something we don't understand. The rotation curves of galaxies seem to show that they contain more mass than we see. This "hidden" mass is called "Dark Matter", and it was the first phenomenon that led to its definition. There you see that your statement is totally wrong. Nobody actually knows, what it is or if it actually exists. The problem with it is that it obviously only interacts with normal matter via gravity. So, how can our atmosphere shield us from gravity? But if it exists, there must be lots of it in and around every galaxy and galaxy cluster. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| (Q) |
| Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 6:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Ph.D.
Joined: 12 May 2005
Posts: 989
|
| Alzamora wrote: |
| Well, the greater the mass, the more gravity. because more material has come together which then displaces the "liquid" space. Liquid is a bad example but it best shows the displacement aspect. |
Again, you continue to spout this nonsense without addressing the main issue of volume and density.
| Quote: |
| it is a different way of seeing space in that space is not bound by a human definition of time. I dont buy the Space Time aspect of relativity |
You have no concept of Relativity - here is the proof of that:
"I just don't do math."
Hence, you have no clue as to what theories are currently accepted and why, and you are unable to refute them.
| Quote: |
| i think this is why the GUT (grand unified theory ) doesnt exist yet. I think gravity isnt so much affecting Spacetime as much as it is displacing pre big bang material, call it what you will (dark matter). |
A fantasy on your part, based on some loose terms tossed together.
| Quote: |
this all makes sense when considering my theory of direct repurcussionism:
time doesnt define space. all that is happening is happening now regardless of one's placement in the universe and how long it would take light, or you for that matter, to get here or there.
what do you make of that? |
Gibberish discharge.
_________________
I may have no understanding of the current theory of evolution. But that's because science keeps changing it. A few weeks ago I read in the newspaper that it had once again been adjusted & just the other day I discovered a new book called "The New Theory of Evolution" ~~Steven Titchenell : W.V.B.I.G. President. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Alzamora |
| Posted: Wed May 07, 2008 4:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Freshman
Joined: 03 May 2008
Posts: 9
|
well well well,
it seems we have a couple of defensive forum goers out there. Im just putting forth ideas that stem from observation of our world, JUST as Einstein did , and Im not trying to make a Bomb so the practical uses of math for my postulations do not interest me or apply to what I am talking about. Einstein sought the help of a Math expert to define a number of "theories" that weren't math based initially.
Creativity and imagination come before math. Math describes in empirical terms what that process is. Look for it and you'll find it.
VOLUME and DENSITY, they are exactly as they are, I dont know why i would need to address them.
I do understand RELATIVITY, I just don't agree with all of it. Or i would have to add to it to make it more complete.
DARK MATTER, it is said has a frequency that is akin to the pre big bang frequencies. It is then assumed that what we consider dark matter, or the big unknown yet present stuff in space is what may have been here prior to the interruption of the Big Bang. AND TO THINK THAT DARK MAATTER WAS "INVENTED" IS RIDICULOUS. It was discovered to address the phenomenon of the stuff that is and has been there.
keep you FANTASIES to yourself.
GRAVITY ATMOSPHERE SHIELD?. What?? I dindt say out atmosphere shields us from gravity. Our atmosphere defines ourt gravity , just as the moon's defines its own gravity, there is less atmosphere therefor less gravity. Im not making stuff up here. It interacts with normal gravity via matter because it is what defines gravity. The galaxies are in essence foreigners, they tend to clump together not because of gravity, but because they are of similar materials in a dissimilar environment. (DARK MATTER)
[b][i]Saturn's mass is about 5.69 x 1026 kg. Although this is 95 times the mass of the Earth, the gravity on Saturn is only 1.08 times the gravity on Earth. This is because Saturn is such a large planet (and the gravitational force a planet exerts upon an object at the planet's surface is proportional to its mass and to the inverse of its radius squared).
A 100 pound person would only weigh 108 pounds on Saturn. [/i][/b]
If we too were 318 times our own mass,(as is proportionate to jupiter) we would actually weigh less on Jupiter. Our atmosphere gives our gravity more clout. More band for the buck if you will. So proportionately bigger doesn't mean proportionately more gravity. It is relative to atmosphere.
think about that.
And don't be jerks!
Alzamora[/b][/i] |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
