Notices
Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: is a screen inversely proportional to real life

  1. #1 is a screen inversely proportional to real life 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    7
    Ok this was locked on the raspberry pi forum. Good forum by the way.

    Because what we see on screen = what we see in real life and one projects the image yet the other gets looked upon. Does that make it inversely proportional.

    In what reality is this true?


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    ▼▼ dn ʎɐʍ sıɥʇ ▼▼ RedPanda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,737
    Quote Originally Posted by jran1216 View Post
    Does that make it inversely proportional.
    Does that make what inversely proportional?
    What measurements are you comparing?


    SayBigWords.com/say/3FC

    "And, behold, I come quickly;" Revelation 22:12

    "Religions are like sausages. When you know how they are made, you no longer want them."
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    7
    Luminosity I suppose. And the detail in colour. So reactivity.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,124
    You are making absolutely no sense...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    ▼▼ dn ʎɐʍ sıɥʇ ▼▼ RedPanda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,737
    Quote Originally Posted by jran1216 View Post
    Luminosity I suppose. And the detail in colour. So reactivity.
    The luminosity of the screen is not inversely proportional to the luminosity we see.
    The colour details of the screen are not inversely proportional to the colour details we see.

    I am not sure what you mean by "reactivity".
    Do you mean chemical reactivity?
    SayBigWords.com/say/3FC

    "And, behold, I come quickly;" Revelation 22:12

    "Religions are like sausages. When you know how they are made, you no longer want them."
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    7
    Well although the focus of two comparitively similar images in external world and computer screens are different, the two can be compared identically comparing on the quality of image. But the method, which is where we have to compare signs, which would be the focus are different. So I suppose disparity would be dividing luminosity or vice versa? Is this true, the logics there. I shall think a little harder.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    ▼▼ dn ʎɐʍ sıɥʇ ▼▼ RedPanda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,737
    Quote Originally Posted by jran1216 View Post
    Well although the focus of two comparitively similar images in external world and computer screens are different
    What do you mean by 'focus'?

    Quote Originally Posted by jran1216 View Post
    the two can be compared identically comparing on the quality of image.
    No. The image quality of a screen is far below the image quality we see when looking.

    Quote Originally Posted by jran1216 View Post
    But the method, which is where we have to compare signs, which would be the focus are different.
    That doesn't make any sense.
    Please rephrase.

    Quote Originally Posted by jran1216 View Post
    So I suppose disparity would be dividing luminosity or vice versa?
    That doesn't make any sense.
    Please rephrase.
    SayBigWords.com/say/3FC

    "And, behold, I come quickly;" Revelation 22:12

    "Religions are like sausages. When you know how they are made, you no longer want them."
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    7
    So this might make a little more sense how do we project an image from memory into the external world and Disparitise that from perception of matter. The two must be identical but the focus of images swaps place. So when we perceive an external the picture is first. And a picture external comes first. If this is philosophy, ill go elswhere and develop.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,774
    Quote Originally Posted by jran1216 View Post
    Ok this was locked on the raspberry pi forum
    For good reason. It belongs in Trash.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    7
    As something is further away our pupils contract to I suppose concentrate information. So its the same, but how physically? Does a reference frame prove unreality. Now if the two are identical, it would be luminosity, however the difference is disparity. Now the cognition must be the same but one is concentrated on and the other expands latter being the picture.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    7
    And what is your reason exactly. Perhaps if I am disproved correctly the question will cease to exist.

    And lets look at this in more detail disparity is a recognition of the distance right. The two are different and as you have to perceive the right screen at a marginally right distance to recognise it. The disparity of our perceived world is being observed at some cognitive disparity. However reflections although absorbed in particles are more complex in the external world and yet still the cognitive function remains the same. Now what is the physical difference, to me they are opposite. One scattered one not. And cognitively they are the same.
    Last edited by jran1216; July 23rd, 2014 at 11:31 AM.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    ▼▼ dn ʎɐʍ sıɥʇ ▼▼ RedPanda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,737
    Quote Originally Posted by jran1216 View Post
    As something is further away our pupils contract to I suppose concentrate information.
    No, they don't contract when something is further away.
    And eyes don't concentrate information - unless you are using the loosest of definitions of concentrate and information.

    Quote Originally Posted by jran1216 View Post
    So its the same, but how physically?
    No, it is not the same.

    Quote Originally Posted by jran1216 View Post
    Does a reference frame prove unreality.
    No.
    SayBigWords.com/say/3FC

    "And, behold, I come quickly;" Revelation 22:12

    "Religions are like sausages. When you know how they are made, you no longer want them."
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    7
    Alright ill go to a psychology forum. But I still remain that if reference frames dont prove unreality, this is still physics, because if the two focus differently, they must be from two different references, but the recognition is the same. Meaning physically, there must be similarities and inversely references are physically different, but cognitively we realise that what we see is identical to an image previously perceived and the two join together. You have two seperate reference frames, but I suppose what your saying is that the recognition is far more intense in external and so the two cant be compared. So that's quickly ruined my idea of computing. Lol.
    Thanks
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Posts
    1,774
    Quote Originally Posted by jran1216 View Post
    Alright ill go to a psychology forum.
    Better to go to psychiatry forum.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #15  
    ▼▼ dn ʎɐʍ sıɥʇ ▼▼ RedPanda's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    2,737
    Quote Originally Posted by jran1216 View Post
    but I suppose what your saying is that the recognition is far more intense in external and so the two cant be compared.
    tbh, the main thing I would say is that little of what you have written makes any sense.
    SayBigWords.com/say/3FC

    "And, behold, I come quickly;" Revelation 22:12

    "Religions are like sausages. When you know how they are made, you no longer want them."
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 66
    Last Post: May 19th, 2014, 11:52 AM
  2. Help on a real life physics problem
    By jacate in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: October 26th, 2013, 08:44 AM
  3. Using real life brands in your book.
    By Raziell in forum Science-Fiction and Non-Fiction
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: January 24th, 2011, 10:59 AM
  4. How to make the screen Flip Vertically(screen mirroring)?
    By philonema in forum Computer Science
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: August 22nd, 2010, 03:54 AM
  5. Art into Real Life
    By gailem in forum Pseudoscience
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: May 2nd, 2008, 06:55 AM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •