Thread: my theory of my may a be wrong ?

i have Theory if we couldt ekaxt be come on zero kelvin the protons and neutros and electron fol apart and suckt up to ohter atoms by grafety laws
then we get a black hole so can as energy get also can get trapt in this
were magnetism can travel in a huge speed trouh this aerea so like a magnet puhls truh this because the paht o the wave get relativ not shorter but by higer speed so we have magnetism in the aerth by use of warm iron parhts moving a round in the core because the heat is trapt in the Earth and travel to the coldest points of the Earth

the sun is burning atoms and in the midel of the sun (planet) is so muhts enegy coliding it so stands stil so it shoud be in the core be also zero kelvin so the sun atrackts the Earth

exemple take an refrige on the back side it give of the heat what was in side
so the sun gives uge amount of heat so the core cools down to zero kelvin or may be less
so the sun its makes no magnetism on the same way

From what little I can understand of your post I'm inclined to say: Yes, your "theory"not only may be wrong, but that it actually is wrong.

Originally Posted by aart

i have Theory if we couldt ekaxt be come on zero kelvin the protons and neutros and electron fol apart and suckt up to ohter atoms by grafety laws

What evidence or reason do you have for thinking this? (The rest of it seems equally arbitrary and unjustified.)

p.s. Your post is almost completely incomprehensible. I recommend you install a spell checker for your browser, or use another program to compose your posts.

sorry first of May bad writting
is this wrong
what happens if we frose a atom under 0 kelvin
presume the atoms build up from neutrons and protons and electons so they sad
if the electron not circulate any more the normal way caused by cool down the must be in the fibrate stage so the inneraction between this
shout be disturbt and the atom fals appart is it thouh or not or is there more degrees under zero point

Originally Posted by aart

what happens if we frose a atom under 0 kelvin

You can't cool anything 0K so you definitely cannot get below 0K.

As things have been cooled to a few billionths of a Kelvin, there is no evidence that anything special happens.

Electrons will not stop circulating.

So there is no evidence to support your speculation.

presume there is a negative charge between the neutron and the proton is eqal wihdt the electron (positve charge)
so the negativ charge fibrate the same than the elecron and the neutron and proton gets unstabel and fals apart
like cooking water
please some one answer this
this is for years in my mind and canot rid of it
so if it wrog please explain this

You are now just making up nonsense. Stop it.

yes bud one of a quantum fisiks say if you cooling down to zero kelvin what was theory the electrons start to behave as they fibrate and not more a straid line

Ignore list edited. Your science is almost as bad as your (deliberately?) poor English and I have a suspicion you're just trolling.

it my take some time but il be back whidt some proof on the internet

Originally Posted by aart

yes bud one of a quantum fisiks say if you cooling down to zero kelvin what was theory the electrons start to behave as they fibrate and not more a straid line

1. You can't cool to 0K.

2. Electrons wouldn't behave like that. For all sorts of reasons, including the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, Pauli exclusion principle (Fermi-Dirac statistics), the Schroedinger wave equation, etc.

It sounds as if you are trying to apply classical, non-quantum thinking to quantum phenomena.

Electrons are not little balls orbiting the nucleus. Arguably, they do not "orbit" at all. The would continue to behave the same way however close to absolute zero you get.

Originally Posted by aart

it my take some time but il be back whidt some proof on the internet

Please make sure your "proof" is evidence from peer-reviewed scientific papers and not youtoob videos.

MIT team achieves coldest temperature ever - MIT News Office
read about atoms

Originally Posted by aart

MIT team achieves coldest temperature ever - MIT News Office
read about atoms

Right. So there is absolutely (*) nothing in there that supports what you claim.

1. It confirms that you cannot reach absolute zero.

2. It talks about atoms, not electrons.

(*) See what I did there.

i can not make this proof

Originally Posted by aart

i can not make this proof

That is correct. (Because the idea is wrong. )

As an aside, why is it that so many people say, "here is my idea, it might be wrong" and then, when it is explained why it is wrong they say, "no it isn't wrong"...

Thanks but.... thinking of it gives a new dimension of thinking (a black hole)

Originally Posted by aart

Thanks but.... thinking of it gives a new dimension of thinking (a black hole)

Oh no. Here we go again....

no no in my mind a mean

Originally Posted by aart

thinking of it gives a new dimension of thinking (a black hole)

Correct. And that black hole is between your ears.

Moderator Action: aart, this is a science forum. One of its functions is to help educate people who have an interest in science. One way in which such an interest is often expressed is in thinking up some ideas of how things might work. This is an excellent thing to do and, indeed, is part of the way in which science advances.

You have had an idea of how things might work. However, it has now been explained to you, by more than one member, why your particular idea is wrong. Let me repeat the main reasons for rejecting it:

1. We cannot cool an object to 0^o K. Therefore we certainly cannot cool it below this value.
2. We have cooled objects to almost absolute zero and atoms and electrons do not behave in the way you suspected they might.

Having the idea in the first place was a really good thing. You were employing a small, but important part of the scientific method.
Continuing to have a belief in the idea after it has been shown to be wrong is unscientific and is a really bad thing.

I see no point in further discussion. Thread closed. (If anyone disagrees and can offer a sound reason for re-opening the thread, send me a PM.)

Locking Action