Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By jocular

Thread: Fission vs Fusion

  1. #1 Fission vs Fusion 
    New Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    I am a student studying for my doctorate's degree in nuclear physics and would love to discuss these differences and similarities.

    Reply With Quote  


  3. #2  
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    I'm not an expert or anything what I know about fission is that it is sort of good for producing power. It has its drawbacks in that it relies on absorption as a control and if it gets out of hand it can cause a dangerous glow that can last a thousand years. Fusion seems a little different in that it produces energy while fusing elements together. It also has drawbacks in that it interacts fusing most containment material. It has to be contained using a magnetic field. Fusion works real good for stars. It would probably also good for space propulsion where it dosen't need a containment field using just an open fuel material supply. Probably also hard to shut the thing off.

    Reply With Quote  

  4. #3  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Outside of my comfort zone. HBH has discussed the two from the viewpoint of power generation. I imagine you were wanting to focus more on mechanism. From that standpoint the two seem radically different. (different mechanisms, different forces at work, different locations, differ rates, different controlling conditions) The only similarity I see is that a great deal of energy is released from small masses. You are training to become the expert. What do you see as the similarities? (I guess we should add that in each case we end up with different elements.)
    Reply With Quote  

  5. #4  
    Forum Professor
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    The important differences: Fission reactions create by-products (radio isotopes) many of which are very long-lived, dangerous to handle and store, and nigh unto impossible to get rid of (blast them out into outer space?).

    Fusion reactions create fewer, in some instances NO, dangerous by-products (this concern depending on possible creation of radioactive substances due to neutron irradiation of surrounding substances.

    Thus, fission might be called "dirty", fusion might be called "clean".

    It's all subjective. jocular
    Hill Billy Holmes likes this.
    Reply With Quote  

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: July 7th, 2012, 10:38 AM
  2. Fission and fusion
    By Joshua Stone in forum Pseudoscience
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: December 22nd, 2011, 06:27 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: March 25th, 2011, 11:47 AM
  4. driving fusion with fission?
    By dejawolf in forum Physics
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: May 29th, 2009, 11:50 AM
  5. Nuclear fusion and fission power
    By kojax in forum Physics
    Replies: 70
    Last Post: June 2nd, 2008, 06:51 PM
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts