Notices
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Riemann Hypothesis

  1. #1 Riemann Hypothesis 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    5
    I think a best answer to the question about the significance of Riemann Hypothesis
    is done in the submissions ArXiv 1006.0381 and ArXiv 1208.4525.
    Phisical aspects of the question is given in ArXiv. 1102.5668


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    16,965
    Are you Ilgar Jabbarov?


    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    5
    Dear Strage, tahnk you for reply.
    If you hve questions to the autor you can write to his e-mails
    given in ArXiv 1208.4525. The russian variant of the ArXiv 1006.0381
    may be found in the page of autor in Reserch Gate.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    16,965
    Are you Ilgar Jabbarov?
    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    5
    Thank you. I hope guidelines request not to address the opinions to personal traits.
    By this reason I will swerve from the answer to this question. The original aim of my
    creation of this thread (for what I especially joined) is to express my thoughts about
    the theme of early discussions "What is the significance of the Riemann Hypothesis?".
    If the RH firstly was conjectured for understandind of distribution of prime numbers,
    various approches directed to solving of the problem and various equivalences showed
    that RH is connected with many of basic questions of mathematics. These reasonings sufficiently
    brightly showed in the indicated submissions. A new measure introduced there makes
    a necessity to look many questions of the classical measure theoy from the new point of view
    destroying old representations. And solution of RH looks as a simplest application of a new
    approch. Amasing behavior of some curves in infinite dimensional spaces which is nonsatisfied
    in finite dimensions has a deep lasting conclusions. From this point of view it is very small the probability
    that the RH can be solved by many ways, especially by using of Haar or product measures.
    It is possible to make some phisical abservations from the said above.
    Last edited by uchitel; July 19th, 2013 at 05:54 PM. Reason: to correct some misprints
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    16,965
    I'll take that as a "yes".

    Has your proof been published in a peer-reviewed journal? If not, why not?

    My understanding is that there is a significant prize available for proving the Riemann hypothesis. Are you planning to apply for this? If not, why not?
    Millennium Prize Problems
    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    5
    Which incentives engaged earlier researchers?
    If someone tries to solve a mathimatical problem for the purpose
    of to win prizes, takes a risk to loss much more.
    Only that mathematician can be sucsessive in way of solving the problem
    like RH which stimulated with perfectly other principles.
    I think the reviewer convinced of the equality all the regular mesures
    defined in infinite dimensional spaces nesessarily will
    reject a paper like 1006.0381 or others.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Ascended Member Ascended's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Norfolk
    Posts
    3,414
    There have been several mathematicians that have worked on the Riemann Hypothesis long before any financial prize was on offer, they did it because they could and that's what they enjoyed, just like climber's climb mountains.

    Great mathematicians like Hilbert and Littlewood have all contributed work towards the Riemann Hypothesis and for all intensive purposes it's accepted as true, but it's the definitive proof that is still required to prove it and this is why the money is on offer.

    Should the prize money be withdrawn if a mathematician was capable of producing such a proof they would still go ahead for the fame and prestige.
    Everything has its beauty, but not everyone sees it. - confucius
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    5
    “It is my belief that RH is a genuinely arithmetic question that likely will not succumb to methods of analysis.”- B. Conrey.
    I agree with this opinion in the following reduction that RH will not succumb to methods of modern analysis. Modern means here the state of mathematics up to Bourbaki. Many of famous mathematicians counts that RH is not soluble in the frame of existing system of axioms.
    I am sharing with you the thoughts concerning Prize, relevantly recall the case of dr. G. Perelman. It is clear that any proof of the RH will not stop new investigations to find another solutions of the problem. Beauty of the mathematics is focused in its unpredictability.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Riemann Hypothesis
    By ellatha in forum Mathematics
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: February 2nd, 2013, 10:12 AM
  2. What is the significance of the Riemann Hypothesis?
    By Eonos115 in forum Mathematics
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: November 15th, 2011, 04:31 PM
  3. Riemann hypothesis projections
    By jonbon in forum Mathematics
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: July 4th, 2009, 10:17 PM
  4. Riemann Hypothesis Proof !
    By Mathew Cherian in forum Mathematics
    Replies: 78
    Last Post: August 28th, 2008, 09:13 AM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •