Notices
Results 1 to 18 of 18
Like Tree3Likes
  • 1 Post By Dywyddyr
  • 1 Post By Strange
  • 1 Post By sculptor

Thread: Definition of Psychology

  1. #1 Definition of Psychology 
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    7
    Hi!

    Based on general knowledge, may one broadly define psychology -from the Greek psyche (soul) and the Greek logia (study)- as the study of the mind and the study of the conscious or unconscious interaction between the mind and the body?

    Thank you for your comments.

    Dr. T.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Genius Duck Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    12,052
    Psychology is an academic and applied discipline that involves the scientific study of mental functions and behaviors.
    Wiki is useful.


    Doctor T likes this.
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    17,036
    Quote Originally Posted by Doctor T;420593Based on general knowledge, may one broadly define psychology -from the Greek [I
    psyche[/I] (soul) and the Greek logia (study)- as the study of the mind and the study of the conscious or unconscious interaction between the mind and the body?
    I hope you are not attempting a definition based on the etymology. That never works well.

    Psychology - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary
    Doctor T likes this.
    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    7
    Dear Dywyddyr and Strange,

    Thank you for your prompt replies.

    I was trying to develop my own broad definition based on general knowledge, not to use any of the myriad of existing definitions. In your opinion, is my definition flawed?

    By the way, Dywyddyr, Wikipedia is not "credible" source.

    Doctor T
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Genius Duck Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    12,052
    Quote Originally Posted by Doctor T View Post
    By the way, Dywyddyr, Wikipedia is not "credible" source.
    Doctor T
    Obviously your knowledge needs improving on a number of topics.
    You could Google that too, try "reliability of Wikipedia".
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    7
    Dear Dywyddyyr,

    Thank you for your prompt reply.

    I agree you that learning is a life-long commitment. However, Wikipedia, which is not peer-reviewed, is definitely not recognized by scholars as a "credible" source.

    Doctor T
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Genius Duck Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    12,052
    Quote Originally Posted by Doctor T View Post
    Dear Dywyddyyr,
    is definitely not recognized by scholars as a "credible" source.
    Doctor T
    Oh dear, you didn't bother to check before replying did you?
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    17,036
    Quote Originally Posted by Doctor T View Post
    I was trying to develop my own broad definition based on general knowledge
    ...
    Wikipedia is not "credible" source.
    You don't see a contradiction there? Is "general knowledge" a credible source? Is it peer reviewed?

    How do you develop a definition based on general knowledge? Make it a pub quiz question?

    Why would you expect definitions of a word to be peer-reviewed anyway?

    And why develop your own definition? Are you working your way through the entire dictionary redefining words? How did you get on with "glory"?

    'I don't know what you mean by "glory",' Alice said.

    Humpty Dumpty smiled contemptuously. 'Of course you don't — till I tell you. I meant "there's a nice knock-down argument for you!"'

    'But "glory" doesn't mean "a nice knock-down argument",' Alice objected.

    'When I use a word,' Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.'
    In your opinion, is my definition flawed?
    How does it compare with other definitions?
    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    7
    Dear Dywyddr,

    Thank you for your prompt reply.

    I did Google "reliability of Wikipedia as a reliable source." An excerpt of one of search results follows:

    "On the subject of Wikipedia’s reliability, both the site [italics added] and the scholars agree, the encyclopedia is a 'tarting point' which leads 'students to citable sources.'” (Walker, 2010).

    Doctor T

    Reference:

    Walker, D. (2010). Is Wikipedia a reliable source? Ardsley on Hudson, NY: Ground Report. URL: Hyperlocal News & Opinion Around the World | GroundReport
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    7
    Dear Strange,

    Thank you for your prompt response.

    Perhaps this will clarify my purpose:

    Although I hold a doctoral degree in business, I am currently taking an introductory online course in psychology. I was trying to formulate what psychology means to me based on my general knowlege, not a scholarly definition, but a definition that serves as a framework for what I am about to study and I was looking for non-psychologists opinions of my definition.

    Doctor T
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11  
    Genius Duck Dywyddyr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Location
    Scunthorpe, UK
    Posts
    12,052
    "[Dywyddyr] makes a grumpy bastard like me seem like a happy go lucky scamp" - PhDemon
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    17,036
    Quote Originally Posted by Doctor T View Post
    Walker, D. (2010). Is Wikipedia a reliable source? Ardsley on Hudson, NY: Ground Report. URL: Hyperlocal News & Opinion Around the World | GroundReport
    Why not link to the actual report? http://www.groundreport.com/Business...Source/2925153

    And how do we know we can trust "Walker, D" (1) or "ground report"? Is it peer reviewed?

    (1) 50% of his references are to ... Wikipedia!

    Double standards, again.
    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    17,036
    But I like the idea that Wikipedia is a "tarting point".
    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    17,036
    Quote Originally Posted by Doctor T View Post
    Dear Strange,

    Thank you for your prompt response.

    Perhaps this will clarify my purpose:

    Although I hold a doctoral degree in business, I am currently taking an introductory online course in psychology. I was trying to formulate what psychology means to me based on my general knowlege, not a scholarly definition, but a definition that serves as a framework for what I am about to study and I was looking for non-psychologists opinions of my definition.

    Doctor T
    I am beginning to wonder if this is some sort of experiment...
    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #15  
    Forum Radioactive Isotope sculptor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    4,211
    Any study of psychology must include experiment.
    and here's the kicker
    It is generally considered unethical to conduct a study wherein the subjects are not informed that they are the subjects of a psychological study, and an informed subject will behave differently due to the knowledge that (s)he is a subject of a study.
    Doctor T likes this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #16  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    7
    Dear Forum Professor,

    Good point!

    However, the lack of informed consent is not only unethical, but is not allowed by the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of institutions of higher learning.

    Doctor T
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #17  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    9
    The scientific study of mind, human behavior and mental characteristics of a human being along with its attitude is Psychology.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #18  
    Forum Masters Degree LuciDreaming's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Cambridgeshire
    Posts
    656
    Quote Originally Posted by Surabhi View Post
    The scientific study of mind, human behavior and mental characteristics of a human being along with its attitude is Psychology.
    You forgot to mention the social interaction element - psychology is the study of mind/brain, behaviour and social interaction between humans.
    "And we should consider every day lost on which we have not danced at least once. And we should call every truth false which was not accompanied by at least one laugh" Nietzsche.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. limit definition
    By CMR80606 in forum Mathematics
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: November 19th, 2009, 10:28 PM
  2. what is ur definition of life
    By Always.Asking in forum Biology
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: May 27th, 2009, 11:15 PM
  3. definition of multiple
    By saaz in forum Mathematics
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: March 18th, 2009, 12:09 AM
  4. Definition of Globalization
    By newnothing in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: March 7th, 2009, 12:51 AM
  5. Definition
    By Artemis in forum Scientific Study of Religion
    Replies: 45
    Last Post: September 13th, 2006, 02:00 AM
Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •