Do you think the correct philosophy of science allows using evidence of evidence to support hypotheses?
This is actually the case with the gravity models:
1. they are falsified by direct observations (flat rotation curves of galaxies)
2. they are supported by the dark matter hypothesis to falsify the observations (!) hypothesis as evidence for another hypothesis
Seems to me that mainstream science has wandered off to pseudoscience.
How do you interpret the scientific method?
Is using evidence of evidence to support an hypothesis good science?