Notices
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Hello, I have a question about "grain size"

  1. #1 Hello, I have a question about "grain size" 
    New Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    1
    Hello, I'm trying to understand an article and there's phrase that always shows up: "grain size". I know that it's connected to some kind of measurement or something like that, but in the article I'm reading it doesn't make sense thay way. I'm posting an example of one of the sentences that have the phrase in them and would be very happy if any of you could possibly help me out to understand what it means in the sentence. Thank you.
    "This suggests that, for robust misconceptions, refutation at the
    belief or mental-model level is not the right grain size to achieve conceptual change."
    And another example: "In order to understand the difference between incorrect
    knowledge and misconceived/conflicting knowledge, we need to consider the representation of
    knowledge at three different grain sizes: individual beliefs, mental models, and categories."

    Thanks.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    16,965
    Has this text been translated into English from another language? It doesn't sound like normal English usage to me. (But then again, it appears to be some sort of philosophical text in which case they could have made up all sorts wacky terminology to support their ad hoc argument).

    "Granularity" is used to mean different levels of analysis/detail. That might be closer to what is meant. But things like "individual beliefs, mental models, and categories" sound like completely different types of things rather than different levels of detail.


    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Posts
    8,795
    My interpretation would be that an individual belief could be something like "My house is haunted." It would be harder to convince someone their house is not haunted, if they have a mental model of souls wandering the earth after they die. I suppose that "category" would be some higher level of belief, perhaps some religious context.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. "MOND", Prelude to "Critique of the Universe, Introduction"
    By Gary Anthony Kent in forum Astronomy & Cosmology
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: January 28th, 2012, 01:31 AM
  2. "Dating" posts split from "Purpose of life" thread
    By Christopher Ball in forum Pseudoscience
    Replies: 155
    Last Post: October 16th, 2011, 05:37 AM
  3. "Dating" posts split from "Purpose of life" thread
    By Christopher Ball in forum Earth Sciences
    Replies: 90
    Last Post: October 11th, 2011, 10:35 AM
  4. question: if supposily "GOD" was to stand before.
    By Gods servant in forum Scientific Study of Religion
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: March 4th, 2009, 12:05 PM
  5. is "jesus" a pseudo-science "user"?
    By streamSystems in forum Pseudoscience
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: August 22nd, 2007, 12:07 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •