Notices
Results 1 to 25 of 25

Thread: Please read. If you understand it, you'll understand YOU

  1. #1 Please read. If you understand it, you'll understand YOU 
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    58
    Religion
    Please go out of your way and take the time to read this, through, fully; and do your best to understand.

    Religion.

    With it people are torn what to believe; It gives everyone doubts. Most religions believe in one God, and say that the other religions are wrong for believing in their god, and that their God should be prayed to - if people choose to believe in God then why not do what I do. I believe that there is a supernatural being, named God.

    I don't brand myself with any particular religion, however I take a good look at what I am given. I have life, I have vision, I can feel inspired, I can climb walls. Abilities I'm able to ->learn<- process me further. I must eat to survive and I have the weapons to hunt if I need to, or a government run country to live in. I must eat, the food that I need grows in the same process I do. To be something, it must have lived, or 'occurred'. When it was in its primitive stages it had essentially grew < from nothing to something.

    So we grow, and we get old, and we die.
    But we only grow.

    When your old, you are still growing; there are no pit stops.
    We say 'present day', but really there is no present day, because the day isn't stopping. It's always commencing. "Today, I seen a fit chick" Yes but not at this precise moment, it happened, today as described, but, the timing is wrong. There is no present day, as the universe is growing; every second it gets older. We try to catch up with it on the news, but when they tell it to you, it is in the past; them telling you, is it commencing. So we think of, 'today I seen something', when it should be measured on the universes age, as 'today' is on our minuscule planet.

    So think for a second what you're told. You are born, told to follow these rules: live in 'days', 'weeks', 'years', 'centuries' and obviously 'grow'.

    But really you're just growing. We see things come from nothing all of the time through reproduction. We understand that something is born, then it grows. Then we see "Light," and think "Hey, I need Light". Then we need food, "Hey, I need food". We see people we hate, "Hey, I hate him". That interaction in itself is in less than milliseconds. We have a inaccurate time keeping system, that we keep from following the flow on our planet. You see it as 24 hour days and 14 years, but really it's different. Because from point 0 -> there was time. We match it in seconds, and place them seconds into a day, because it is 'convenient' for us to do so, we see time commence - from the get go; we name it, '1 second', but hang on a minute, exactly how long is 1 second, 1 second right? It's not stopping though, we make it stop by giving it the word one second. In 1 seconds time I'll be pressing the full stop button. I pressed it, at that point, but it missed. It didn't 'hit' the time so to speak, because when I did it, everything was still going forwards. So as I pressed it, that action commenced; "I did it 1 second after I said I would. True, but why is it 1 second? Sure it's using the time-scale of our solar system; which we see as 24 hour days; its how long it takes our earth to spin once. Then you have other solar phenomenons, that signifies a year, or an amount of years. Then we take 'Light', and we place a number on it. We say it travels at 299792458 meters a second - but it doesn't stop. It goes forward and 'evolves' or 'grow' constantly.

    24 hours in a day, 60 seconds in a minute, 365 days in a year. We can turn 360 degrees, look, move and grow in 1 of 8 directions. One of these directions we look is in front of us; we understand that that is 'our front side', it's established. We know that our back are behind us.

    Now do the Maths
    I can look behind me and see the further 8 directions that I couldn't see before. So, 8+8 = 16. However, we have to turn in the process. What we see whilst turning is the 'in-between'.

    360 is made up of four 90 Degree quadrants right??. They are the possible directions. However we have a top and a bottom, and a front and back, so that 360 image has cubed. Became 3D so to speak, there now are a total of 46 656 000 directions.

    However, if we look from OUR point of view it's 23328000 directions, so 50% of the picture.

    I can also move, and 'grow'. I can see other things than exist as opposites, The fertile ground grows a plant. The man and women make a child.

    "The rock lay 'under' the bush, because it was planted 'over' it" - even the term 'over and under', it's harmonic even.

    I see billions of people, but I only see 2 kinds and 2 shades. I see black people and white people and a mixture of both, one more black, one less black. Because of this, there are 4 different colours, so to speak.

    We have opposites, our 4 original; a man and a women create a child, which then GROWS to a mother or father. The child is born, there after it grows into an adult, but it continues to grow. It grows until it dies.

    - Baby is BORN
    - GROWS into a mother or father, (doesn't stop growing)

    Then you have MAN and WOMAN. So the 4 factors are there: BABY, GROWING, MAN, WOMAN.
    Now you have the mixed races - Black, white, less black, less white.

    There are 2 factors: BLACK and WHITE; each have spawned an in-between colour through different racial reproduction. We only have 2 possible differences, the person is either MORE Black or MORE White. That's 4 different factors.

    So you cube the BABY, GROWING, MAN, WOMAN - (4 factors). 4 different, harmonic opposites, equating: 64.

    Our earth, sees the exact same pattern as us. It spins on a 46 656 000 directional 3D Axis, but on a much larger scale. So essentially it is GROWING. It was once a BABY, It must have a MOTHER and FATHER. Was it TIME and LIGHT? If so, we are TIME and LIGHT, we have been a BABY and we are continuing to GROW.

    TIME and LIGHT
    BABY and GROW

    However, when two humans reproduce, they spawn one of 2 kinds; Man or Woman. So that begs the questions, what genders were time and light. Are we turning into LIGHT, or TIME?

    HOWEVER: we have the GROWING ability. We know that things can EVOLVE. So LIGHT and TIME have spawned a BABY, and it's EVOLVING, it's not stopping.

    Remember the 64 races?
    A baby can only grow, then die, to be one of 64 races.
    A man can only be one of 64 races
    A woman can be one of 64 races
    A baby can EVOLVE as one of 64 races.


    Don't you like how in numbers, you have 'odds' and 'evens'. 'plus' and 'minus'.
    Multiplication is making the long winded +? or -? question; shorter, lol, to prevent it being longer.
    And division is also a short cut, can be worked out in a simple form; the equations we see are short cuts to explain a deeper meanings.

    Here's the complex bit. We have 10 numbers, which exist only as two opposites.

    | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 |, the number GROWS (it's still a number, and a small one).
    To create the NUMBER, NUMBERS must exist, and thus their harmonic opposites. That's 4 factors right there. Think this:

    1 - 2, they exist as opposites, 1 - 2 - 3, DOESN'T.
    1 - 2 - 3 - 4 they exist as opposites, 2 sets.

    (1) would be 1. (male or female)
    (2) would be 2. (male or female, acting as '1's harmonic opposite)

    The number 1 grows to two, it does have a journey or time before it does, so it has a baby stage. It is GROWING to 2. Effectively by doing so it is duplicating itself. It is now 1's opposite. But it doesn't stop growing. So the 2 opposites created 3, but because the 2 opposites rely, on the rule of two opposites;-

    BABY - GROW - MALE - FEMALE

    1 grows to 2
    1 is born, because without the opposite 2, it ceases to exist
    1 itself
    and 2 itself

    1, 2 create both 3 AND 4
    1, 2 create both 3 AND 4 in their original image.
    There both numbers, but 2 different kinds!
    They are also opposites.

    1 - 2 - 3 - 4 then you have
    1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5, which isn't in the correct pattern, so 6 is produced along with the 5.
    1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6; there we go, opposites right??, wrong.
    1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8: we get harmonic opposites when we reach the 7 and the 8.

    Now just resort back to this part, it might confuse you:

    the next set of harmonic opposites is at 64, but we can take 16 as an example of what it would look like.

    1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 -16

    16, is composed of 2 lots of the below 8.

    So

    8+8 = 16
    8+7 = 15
    8+6 = 14
    8+5 = 13
    8+4 = 12
    8+3 = 11
    8+2 = 10
    8+1 = 9

    BUT

    7+8 = 15
    7+7 = 14
    7+6 = 13
    7+5 = 12
    7+4 = 11
    7+3 = 10
    7+2 = 9
    7+1 = 8

    and each of the harmonic opposites count down in that order.

    8+8 = 16
    7+8 = 15
    6+8 = 14
    5+8 = 13
    4+8 = 12
    3+8 = 11
    2+8 = 10
    1+8 = 9

    possible with 8 sets of numbers.



    Which also exist as harmonic opposites.
    Although there was a joke about it on fourchan, Magnets, I'm gonna use them to explain my point further.

    The attract on on side, and repent on the other. That's 4 possible variables.

    -+ and - - and + + and -+
    -+ are made in '+' and '-' image.
    as is -+
    - -. do not attract, but still exist as harmonic opposites.
    as is ++

    The reason I've put opposites as what they are, is because that's what they are, 16 opposites.
    Merged post follows:


    look at my view.

    I can see, another man... another woman, another child, and I can grow
    I can also see an element, another element, another element, and it evolve.

    I think there are only 3 elements, as fire is from air.

    AIR, WATER, EARTH, all have effects with each other, but as an exact opposite, no effect... weird huh?

    same as travel, LAND, SEA, SKY

    I can see things evolving in LAND, SEA, and SKY

    LAND SEA SKY, EVOLVE?

    I SEE THEM AS OPPOSITES TO ME, WITH THE SAME PATTERN, EXACT HARMONIC OPPOSITES.
    Merged post follows:


    Look at AIR WATER EARTH, EVOLUTION
    We have, GRAVITY, TIME, SPACE, DEATH,

    I don't know what the water would be to be honest, anti matter?

    GRAVITY, ANTIMATTER, SPACE, DEATH

    death is not growing, neither living.
    space is not land, but an empty drift.
    antimatter is not water, but it is there.
    gravity sucks in, while wind blows


    Waters the hard 1.
    Merged post follows:


    The Christian cross

    It's a + sign right?

    Maybe, It was research that played Chinese whispers.

    The only harmonic difference would be a square. it would need two more elements, and a different concept.
    Merged post follows:


    I see. So it would have to be a SQUARE and a CIRCLE ( IN 3D ), playing as their exact harmonic opposites.
    Merged post follows:


    THATS IT

    The PLUS and MINUS were created 1st

    +-

    LOOK AT IT at a 90 degree angle.

    +-



    Now think, we have,
    ++ -- +- -+
    -- ++ -+ +-
    -+ -- +- -+
    +- ++ -+ +-

    which, need to make an harmonic opposite

    SQUARE, CIRCLE, TRIANGLE, DIAMOND


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Forum Isotope (In)Sanity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Mesa AZ
    Posts
    2,697
    WTF is this dribble ?


    Pleased to meet you. Hope you guess my name
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    58
    Potentially the most dangerous information someone could hold.
    I'll let the mods decide whether it's worth it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    58
    No one scientist wants to give out a valid opinion? or oppose my theory?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Forum Professor
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,595
    Shannon; Since you seem to be running around these Science Forums, with the same message and makeing no apparent point, you might explain what, why, how, an 18yo, unmarried (your words) came up with that 'stuff'....It did take some time and I'm just a little curious if there might be some point for your time.

    By the way, (In)Sanity owns (his words) this site....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Forum Ph.D. Raziell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    928
    The long text made my willingness to read your post drop by about 60%

    Still hesistant i saw the word "Religion" and it dropped by another 80% for a -40%. I dont think i even have the patience to finnish this sen
    A lie is a lie even if everyone believes it. The truth is the truth even if nobody believes it. - David Stevens
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    58
    LAND, SEA and AIR are harmonic opposites.

    It would of began, LAND + AIR (1 + 2)
    Creating, WATER as an opposite, and GROWTH as an opposite =
    1 + 2 + 3 + 4

    LAND + AIR are harmonic opposites to begin with

    LAND would not exist without it's opposite, AIR. (1, doesn't exist. It breaks the rule of harmonic opposites we live by!)
    So air, is born, as lands opposite. (1, 2)

    Then, water is born as a BABY and GROWS
    (1,2) create (3) BUT in (1,2)'s image. So (3), becomes, (3, 4)

    Can you not see HARMONIC opposites?

    + -, these are normal opposites.

    there are 2 combos.:

    1. -+
    2. +-

    2 factors.

    +
    -

    Now, using the above 'rule' so to speak.

    + = MAN
    - = WOMAN

    Man, does not exist as 1, it has an opposite, 2. So man becomes:

    ++
    as does woman --


    Think of it as: OLD, YOUNG, MAN, WOMEN

    Obviously, YOUNG, must of been here before OLD; but for it to exist, it's opposite must.

    A MAN and WOMAN give birth to YOUNG, which then GROWS OLD.
    Merged post follows:


    I did my diagram wrong before.

    -+--+-++
    +-++-+--
    -+--+-++
    +-++-+--
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    Are you... Really?

    I don't know whether to feel sorry for you for thinking this crap makes sense, to pity your very existence, or just to laugh uncontrollably at the inane nonsense presented to us... I think I'm going with laughter, seeing as how this crap is complete and total bullshit.
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by Arcane_Mathematician
    Are you... Really?

    I don't know whether to feel sorry for you for thinking this crap makes sense, to pity your very existence, or just to laugh uncontrollably at the inane nonsense presented to us... I think I'm going with laughter, seeing as how this crap is complete and total bullshit.
    Explain to me how I'm incorrect.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    8,306
    LAND, SEA and AIR are harmonic opposites.

    It would of began, LAND + AIR (1 + 2)
    Creating, WATER as an opposite, and GROWTH as an opposite =
    1 + 2 + 3 + 4

    LAND + AIR are harmonic opposites to begin with

    LAND would not exist without it's opposite, AIR. (1, doesn't exist. It breaks the rule of harmonic opposites we live by!)
    So air, is born, as lands opposite. (1, 2)
    Arbitrary assigning values to things than than using circular logic is proof of nothing.

    That's why you are incorrect as well are other pseudo religious cubic philosophies.
    Meteorologist/Naturalist & Retired Soldier
    “The Holy Land is everywhere” Black Elk
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by Lynx_Fox
    LAND, SEA and AIR are harmonic opposites.

    It would of began, LAND + AIR (1 + 2)
    Creating, WATER as an opposite, and GROWTH as an opposite =
    1 + 2 + 3 + 4

    LAND + AIR are harmonic opposites to begin with

    LAND would not exist without it's opposite, AIR. (1, doesn't exist. It breaks the rule of harmonic opposites we live by!)
    So air, is born, as lands opposite. (1, 2)
    Arbitrary assigning values to things than than using circular logic is proof of nothing.

    That's why you are incorrect as well are other pseudo religious cubic philosophies.
    A Circle is created from 4 variables
    Left, right, top, bottom

    A sphere, 6
    top, bottom, left, right, front, back


    Without the harmonic: top and bottom, front and back, left and right
    the sphere ceases to exist.

    However; top and bottom, front and back, left and right, are not harmonic.
    BUT
    The circle consists of 2 halves.
    50% of it, will always be visible.
    It's opposite, is its back-side. From its front side it is able to see another sphere. As it's opposite, 50% of another sphere.

    Back ( ) - ( ) Back
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    58
    We can never see our backside, it's always behind us.
    Take magnets again, + and -
    - against - repents
    + against + repents
    - against + attracts
    + against - attracts

    Because opposites attract.
    I can see another Human, because he is my opposite; existing as an opposite.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    87
    Shannon, you do realize that magnets do not have "+" and "-" but N and S, which are purely conventional. If you are so sure that opposites attract, you should give another example, because the N pole of a compass points to the Earth's North geographic pole. People realized that differently-constituted ends of magnets repel each other after they had named the poles of the magnet as such.

    Also, I do not understand what exactly is your theory, nor how do you get to certain conclusions. For instance:

    Here's the complex bit. We have 10 numbers, which exist only as two opposites.

    | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 |, the number GROWS (it's still a number, and a small one).
    To create the NUMBER, NUMBERS must exist, and thus their harmonic opposites. That's 4 factors right there. Think this:

    1 - 2, they exist as opposites, 1 - 2 - 3, DOESN'T.
    1 - 2 - 3 - 4 they exist as opposites, 2 sets.
    Why do 10 numbers exist only as two opposites, and why do they have to be the first 10 numbers?

    And what exactly is an opposite of a number?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    58
    Quote Originally Posted by AlexandruLazar
    Shannon, you do realize that magnets do not have "+" and "-" but N and S, which are purely conventional. If you are so sure that opposites attract, you should give another example, because the N pole of a compass points to the Earth's North geographic pole. People realized that differently-constituted ends of magnets repel each other after they had named the poles of the magnet as such.

    Also, I do not understand what exactly is your theory, nor how do you get to certain conclusions. For instance:

    Here's the complex bit. We have 10 numbers, which exist only as two opposites.

    | 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 |, the number GROWS (it's still a number, and a small one).
    To create the NUMBER, NUMBERS must exist, and thus their harmonic opposites. That's 4 factors right there. Think this:

    1 - 2, they exist as opposites, 1 - 2 - 3, DOESN'T.
    1 - 2 - 3 - 4 they exist as opposites, 2 sets.
    Why do 10 numbers exist only as two opposites, and why do they have to be the first 10 numbers?

    And what exactly is an opposite of a number?

    10 wouldn't work, I used it as an example. The closest harmonic opposites would be 1-8.

    1 - 2 - 3 - 4 ! 5 - 6 - 7 - 8

    8 is 4 more than 4
    8 is 5 more than 3
    8 is 6 more than 2
    8 is 7 more than 1

    7 is 3 more than 4
    7 is 4 more than 3
    7 is 5 more than 2
    7 is 6 more than 1

    6 is 2 more than 4
    6 is 3 more than 3
    6 is 4 more than 2
    6 is 5 more than 1

    5 is 1 more than 4
    5 is 2 more than 3
    5 is 3 more than 2
    5 is 4 more than 1

    Harmonic.


    10 numbers breaks the harmony. As we began with two opposites

    1,2 - which then became
    1,2,3,4 - which, in harmony, became
    1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8.

    Now if you have 10

    1, 2, 3, 4, 5, | 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
    You lose the harmony.


    [5,6] exist as opposites of [7,8]

    So our next harmony is found.

    [1, 2], [3, 4], [5, 6], [7, 8] | [9, 10], [11, 12], [13, 14], [15, 16]




    notes ~ don't read these

    4 + 4 = 8
    4 + 3 = 7
    4 + 2 = 6
    4 + 1 = 5

    3 + 4 = 7
    3 + 3 = 6
    3 + 2 = 5
    3 + 1 = 4

    2 + 4 = 6
    2 + 3 = 5
    2 + 2 = 4
    2 + 1 = 3

    1 + 4 = 5
    1 + 3 = 4
    1 + 2 = 3
    1 + 1 = 2



    Do you see that,
    [1,2], [3,4], [5,6], [7,8], [9,10]
    exist at 1 opposite?

    [1,2,3,4,5] [6,7,8,9,10]


    NEXT REACHING HARMONY AT

    [1,2,3,4,5] [6,7,8,9,10] [11,12,13,14,15] [16,17,18,19,20]
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #15  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    87
    Do you see that,
    [1,2], [3,4], [5,6], [7,8], [9,10]
    exist at 1 opposite?
    No. I see that +1 and -1 exist as opposites. I see that 1 and 2 exist as parent and creation, since multiplicity begins with one, but I don't see why they should be opposites.

    Maybe you should try to define what opposites are and what exactly is this harmony.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #16  
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    Quote Originally Posted by Shannon
    Quote Originally Posted by Lynx_Fox
    LAND, SEA and AIR are harmonic opposites.

    It would of began, LAND + AIR (1 + 2)
    Creating, WATER as an opposite, and GROWTH as an opposite =
    1 + 2 + 3 + 4

    LAND + AIR are harmonic opposites to begin with

    LAND would not exist without it's opposite, AIR. (1, doesn't exist. It breaks the rule of harmonic opposites we live by!)
    So air, is born, as lands opposite. (1, 2)
    Arbitrary assigning values to things than than using circular logic is proof of nothing.

    That's why you are incorrect as well are other pseudo religious cubic philosophies.
    A Circle is created from 4 variables
    Left, right, top, bottom

    A sphere, 6
    top, bottom, left, right, front, back


    Without the harmonic: top and bottom, front and back, left and right
    the sphere ceases to exist.

    However; top and bottom, front and back, left and right, are not harmonic.
    BUT
    The circle consists of 2 halves.
    50% of it, will always be visible.
    It's opposite, is its back-side. From its front side it is able to see another sphere. As it's opposite, 50% of another sphere.

    Back ( ) - ( ) Back
    actually, 50% of a circle is usually never visible. It's normally some amount more or less depending on the size of the circle and it's distance from you. The moon is a good example of a sphere that is less than 50% visible always. it is on average 46% visible, if I'm not mistaken, and any cosmologist can correct me. Your "harmonics" are arbitrary and make no sense aside from convenience and evaluation of the function I can define both a circle and a sphere without arbitrary directions, and using no more than what is necessary. assign an arbitrary value to r(constant) and you have a spherical shell, further assign an arbitrary value to phi that is not 0 or \pi and you have circle.

    My spherical function Using this function on spherical coordinates will suffice without arbitrary "harmonic" directions.
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #17  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    58
    Look guys, I'm no scientist, and I'll probably never be one.

    I'll write up a description of harmonies, to TRY and explain them.

    I have a question, to you, that will help me do this: Did the big bang start out small?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #18  
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    relative to the current volume of the universe now, yes, but to, say, a pea, no.
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #19  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    58
    So are you saying that 'pea' was always here?

    EDIT: You said it wasn't a pea; so that 'size' of the universe was always here? How big are you saying it is?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  21. #20  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    58
    After its initial appearance, it apparently inflated (the "Big Bang"), expanded and cooled, going from very, very small and very, very hot, to the size and temperature of our current universe. It continues to expand and cool to this day and we are inside of it: incredible creatures living on a unique planet, circling a beautiful star clustered together with several hundred billion other stars in a galaxy soaring through the cosmos, all of which is inside of an expanding universe that began as an infinitesimal singularity which appeared out of nowhere for reasons unknown. This is the Big Bang theory.

    It went from very small, to very big; and hot to cold. Cooling and Expanding.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  22. #21  
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    in accordance with the laws of thermodynamics, yes, that sounds about right. The universe existed for an instant at planks length. It quickly expanded to the size of a planet, and by quickly I mean nearly instantaneously.

    Is there a point to this line of reasoning?
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  23. #22  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    58
    Yes, as it ties in slightly with my, imaginative, theory.

    In the first stages, the universe was very simple I imagine. Surely it wouldn't have been filled with lots of different things. Instead just some basic processes, small --> big, and, hot --> cold. It also expanded in 6 directions right? I don't want to annoy you but in a cube kind of way, right?

    I'm talking about the very first milliseconds (or any lower seconds there are), the universe went from nothing, to something. However, it seems so impossible; but then you take the big bang theory. The universe, went from very small, to very large. Very hot to very cold, and it expanded in 6 directions, in a cube. So say if we had a recording of it, and you paused in 0.000000000000000000001seconds into its beginning, it would be a very small, very hot, cube. Getting very cold, very big, as a cube?

    Sorry, I'm probably sounding stupid; but I enjoy philosophy and science, so please just see it as 'Interest' rather than stupidity.

    Hot to Cold
    --> Cooling, would be hot Evolving, so to speak.

    Hot is the opposite to cold, and after cooling, the result is in Hot and Colds image, but for the result to exist it has to have an opposite, heating.

    So maybe the first opposite; time maybe? As time exists as a opposite of itself right? Time is +1 - +1. A duplicating thing, going from one point, to the next, to put it as simple as possible. I'm sure there are great explanations of time but I don't know them; also it's been said that bending time, or travelling back in time could be possible, I've took that into consideration. Then light, as it points in each direction? (purely guess-work, bare with me) In the primitive stage of light, would it have been 4 directions, up, down, left, right. Which then met time, (+1 +1), and combined so to speak to create a huge expanding universe of expanding opposites. As the opposites exist as opposites, up, down, left, right. The universe would gain, front and back, gaining top and bottom in the process. As well as small and big, and hot and cold.

    In my theory, I used: Man and Woman, in place of the Hot and Cold.

    Man and Woman create a baby who grows into a Man or a Woman; and I went further by saying that Man and Woman are a Mother and Father, meaning Man and Woman would be derivative terms.

    I say the Mother and Father are the opposites to Baby and Grow; which are in the same image as the first processes in the universe. Opposites, within opposites. Most science I see is very 'oneist', rather than thinking of the universe as opposites, seeing things as single entities, when without there opposite they cease to exist.

    I said land and air, and got flamed. When I say land, I mean, 'Ground Level' and when I say sky, I mean, Above 'Ground Level'. Without the ground level existing, neither does its above counterpart.

    We need to drink to survive, and eat. Which are opposites in themselves. As well as not eating and not drinking. What would be the opposites to all four? Not eating, eating, drinking, not drinking. In themselves, they are opposites. Like what I said earlier about Man not being able to exist without another Man, Baby and Woman.

    Eating, Not Eating, Drinking, Not Drinking
    Drink, No Drink, Food, No Food

    Now I don't know what the opposites of them are, but I bet you I can find out what they are.


    EDIT: Ground would need an opposite also, Water, I guess?

    Would I be break more boundaries by saying two of the following create the other or are the reason for it's existence: Gas, Liquid, Solid
    Reply With Quote  
     

  24. #23  
    Forum Isotope
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Transient
    Posts
    2,914
    it really wasn't a cube, but more of a sphere, expanding in all directions, yes.

    I understand your interest, but it is wholly a philosophical thing you are contemplating, and not scientific in any respect. Opposites exist in physics, but not in the sense you are thinking. Particles have antiparticles, that are essentially opposites, but that's about it. the antiparticle of an electron is a positron. Photons are their own antiparticles. But there is no multiplicity around the number 2 that you have. Things don't quite happen that way in nature. In all reality, with all our pretty philosophy, the one thing we need to really take to heart is that nature exists and behaves regardless of what we think about it.

    most "opposites" in physics aren't really opposites in and of themselves, but have to be rendered that way by us. Heat has no opposite. Hence the kelvin scale. You can be hot, or less hot. "Cold" is not a scientific term and doesn't mean anything in regards to physics.

    I would highly recommend you look up some books on entropy. They will do you good.
    Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
    -Plato

    Reply With Quote  
     

  25. #24  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    58
    I'll look up entropy, thanks for replying.

    I understand, vaguely, what entropy is from your description; however when I read the wiki page it's a bit too much for someone not educated much in science. It's perplexing, so I'll do some research until I understand the concept.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  26. #25  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Nirgendwo und Ueberall
    Posts
    1,300
    I just looked into the abyss..and the abyss looked into me. There was no mutual understanding as you proposed. EPIC FAIL
    Reply With Quote  
     

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •