So you think current climate or that of 1980s is optimal? Defend your position, preferably on another thread more suitable.
In view of vast changes in climate before technology and even humanity appeared, the AGW crowd's belief that they can substantially affect global climate is pretty naive.
Proposing to change this is also hubris.
Attempting to do so by the sole means of reduction of CO2 emissions is politically motivated agenda driving "science", in effect prostituting research.
Worst of all, AGW is not topic of this thread, you digress. Prince might mention also that terms "Right" and "Left" are political in nature and not scientific except as applied to bilaterally symmetrical organisms in biology. Such terminology only serves to obfuscate the REAL issue, which is, YOU ARE WRONG.
Integral Fast Reactor - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia