Thread: Biefield-Brown Lifter combustion engine

I've had a concept drawn out for a jet engine that uses the Biefield-Brown effect instead of a turbine to move the air. My attempts to test it out haven't been working though. I don't think my homemade power supply has a high enough voltage. If anyone has a working lifter setup and would like to try this, please give me your results! I used a metal tube suspended in a cardboard tube. The metal tube was poked with several SMALL holes and one end was hooked up to a rubber hose that lead to the fuel source. Kerosene should make for a good fuel. If you're goin to attempt this, make sure you're in an open area, away from anything flammable and the engine is securely mounted.

so do you use the metal tube for the Biefield-Brown effect? a vacuum effect could suffice to draw air but this is basically a rocket. Rotational motion is one advantage of a turbine as you can generate electricity and get higher efficiency and more power due to the compression...how are you going to compress the air with a Biefield-Brown effect? Or get power for auxiliary components?

Good point. The compression wouldn't be a problem if it maintained the shape of a jet engine. The compression comes from the chambers inside getting smaller before combustion turbojet.jpg. I didn't really think of of the power generation.. Do you think static electricity could be a possibility? Airplane built up a lot of static on the wings while in flight.