Notices
Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By John Galt

Thread: On vs. Onto

  1. #1 On vs. Onto 
    Forum Sophomore
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    176
    Sheep were driven onto/on rocks and wrecked in the storm.


    Would you tell me which one is right?


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  

    Related Discussions:

     

  3. #2  
    Life-Size Nanoputian Flick Montana's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Flatland
    Posts
    5,438
    I'm not sure sheep would be wrecked in a storm, but if it were ships, I would go with onto or into.

    If you say the ships were driven on the rocks, it sounds like they were on the rocks to start with... or maybe captain was having a scotch on ice.


    "Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us." -Calvin
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,169
    Driven onto suggests that this was an event that occured at a point in time. At time A the ships were not on the rocks; a little time later they were on the rocks. They were driven onto them.

    However, I drive my car on the road. It is a continuous thing, not a singel event.

    "I was in a field and drove my car onto the road. Once it was on the road, I drove on the road to the nearest town."
    KALSTER likes this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Time Lord
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    5,305
    The "to" of onto makes this clear, so if you omit it we think you did that for a reason. If you say "the sheep were driven under rocks", you have no choice, and we take the most obvious meaning.
    A pong by any other name is still a pong. -williampinn
    Reply With Quote  
     

Tags for this Thread

View Tag Cloud

Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •