Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Siesmic Ocean wave detection

  1. #1 Siesmic Ocean wave detection 
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Washington State
    Since the 1950s oceanographers have known that seismographs sometimes pick up ocean waves and sometimes referred to them as Microseismic waves. There was little practical applications until pretty recently.

    In the past few years though a few scientist have been looking at the microsiesmic data both and land and in a new series of undersea instruments that survive powerful storms better than buoys or ships.

    The new applications of the data are being used to study recent storms and providing a lot of information about frequency and size of storm waves. This should improve both sea state forecast, analysis of the storm itself, and forecast of coastal damage.

    In a different application of microsiesmic data to research large storms of the past, particularly before there was a dense network of land stations. The buoy network is also pretty new and ships either avoided such storms after radio become common, didn't survive, or when they did report were largely reporting their dead reckoning position prior to Loran navigation. Ships also tend to follow narrow band of ship routes after reliable engines were invented while sailing ships traversed a wider range of seas.

    Anyhow scientist are starting to sort through the seismograph data that goes back the 19th century, digitizing what was recorded on paper, and analyzing that data for P-waves from strong ocean storms hundreds of miles away. This should help identify frequency and intensity of past storms--something of great interest given the warming of the past century.

    Like many of the natural sciences this is an example of using data from other fields
    in ways never imagined to fill in gaps and seams in the past. I think it's neat.

    Meteorologist/Naturalist & Retired Soldier
    “The Holy Land is everywhere” Black Elk
    Reply With Quote  


  3. #2  
    Forum Senior
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    An intersting idea. I like how as science progresses what we once considered to be "noise" emerges as "signal".

    It will be interesting to see how much confidence thay can have in their identification of a storm without the corroboration of more robust data sets. How well will this technique be able to stand on its own two feet, back in single handedly identificying storms in history? Will they manage to convince the scientific community?

    Don't bother visiting my Earth Sciences forum, it died a death due to lack of love
    Reply With Quote  

Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts