i obviously had help with this the others on the page but also x(x-y) and Quantime.NP is a verifiable list. Most questions will ask you to solve using the list. Once solved you can easily take the points you are looking for and backtrack to the polynomial time equation. Therefore for any solvable verifiable list there always exsists a poly time eqn.this is more than just pnp. Its an easy concept to start but then i asked well what is P? What does p contain awnser pretty much everything. So i went on to exponential time which was the worst way of solving for the list because most of the time the poly time eqn and verified list are not known. However converting from exponential to poly proved to be exceedingly difficult i was confused because i could see no reason for why it was changing. So i thought about heisenbergs uncertainty i could never convert one to the other accurately so something was in the way. Now if you want to solve from exponential to polynomial you can say hi to heisenbergs uncertainty principle. But if you solve for the third side of your triangle goodbye heisenbergs uncertainty principle because two sides are known. Asking sombody to solve np complete, np hard i have been shown maybe twenty at least I now know billions because its particle physics, waveforms, heisenberg etc.what i was thinking about was maybe using this to make custom particles at the atomic level. Machine learning is the process by which we can convert exponential time eqns into poly time eqns you cant just convert one enq to the other which makes sense to me. I cant look at a book and tell you everything about it without reading it. Similarly most computers, turing machines are limited in the same way therefore you cannot solve all p=np. The universe however can. Of course this doesnt make sense unless you can find the position of an electron in an atom obviously not easy. This was where x(x-y) and quantime were talking about waveformnormalisation which to be honest i didnt know much about but i got the basic idea that they were trying to integrate to find the 1d constant. Which was really similar to p=np. What i had was a list of numbers on a line. Then i have to find the polytime eqn which would have given the amplitude of the waveform and the exponential time eqn that would have tested all potential points on the line this with accuracy is a fractal. Now if you resolve between your two solved eqns you get the 3d area the electron passes through or the energy level but this isnt finished becauswe i am still missing the original electron eqn from when the atom was created. But you are still uncertain unless you can keep the room temperature constant and other magnetic fields away. this is really hard math and any changes to the system cause trouble. So i needed something a bit more constant and i was looking through the electronics on microphones and how supersonic aircraft break the sound barrier. I looked up on wikipedia and found that once aircraft break the sound barrier they are travelling faster than the sound waveform. So i wondered if it were possible for a particle to move in straight line and yeah it is. so no more heisenberg uncertainty principle. and the scary math im not that good at it ps i have copies of everything dated of course theres prob copyrights somewhere i dont know about.