
Originally Posted by
Heliopolis
My draft paper is to test the waters and so far, it seems, people don't know how to respond to my research or they try and obfuscate in a petty and pedantic way which shows that they are point scoring and not debating as is what I hoped would be the case.
Heliopolis, from the outset you have positioned yourself as though you not only expected to rejected/ignored, but actaully wanted this to happen, as though such rejection would in some way vindicate your position.
The truh may be far removed from that perception, nevertheless that is the perception you have created with your choice of remarks, examples of which include:
From your opening post:
Trouble is, will the Darwinian fundamentalists ( as Gould referred
to them as) try and kill me before i can publish in a peer-reviewed
journal?
How can I promulgate my work in the face of academic fascism?
I mean, Good Lord man, why don't you go stand in a freeway and shout at the oncoming traffic, 'Hit me you bastards, hit me'. If you genuinely want your ideas to be considered in an objective, scientific fashion, don't start the discussion with a pile of emotional whining.
Yes, I do fear that prejudice will stand it my way and that there are too many people with too much to lose
The whole thing stinks of a mass cover up.
There is much power, too much money at stake.
You may not
be a nutter, but you would do well to consider that you
sound like a nutter.
I am dropping hint after hint...but you are not getting it......
BIG CLUE: The Mutational Load
No more clues.
Science and the exposition of science is not about
dropping hints or
giving clues. You are not in some kindergarten playground here. If you wish for your ideas to be given serious consideration then you need to act seriously and drop this childish posturing.
Heliopolis, you may find this hard to accept, but I am on your side, but for you to be listened to you need to adopt a different approach to the presentation of your hypothesis. It is not too late.