Notices
Results 1 to 27 of 27

Thread: energy flow

  1. #1 energy flow 
    ioa
    ioa is offline
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    13
    The amount of solar energy falling on the surface of the sea in the English
    Channel is 2.1 × 10^6 kJ m−2 y−1. Photosynthetic phytoplankton in the water
    assimilate energy from sunlight to generate a gross primary production
    (GPP) of 6.3 × 103 kJ m−2 y−1 and a net primary production (NPP) of
    5.0 × 103 kJ m−2 y−1. Herbivorous zooplankton consume phytoplankton
    biomass equivalent to 4.0 × 103 kJ m−2 y−1 of energy and the rest of the
    phytoplankton die and sink to the bottom, so that 1.0 × 103 kJ m−2 y−1
    passes to detritivores and decomposers. Zooplankton convert
    7.1 × 10^2 kJ m−2 y−1 of the phytoplankton they consume to biomass, which
    then passes to numerous predators that feed on the zooplankton. The waste
    products of the zooplankton, equivalent to 4.9 × 102 kJ m−2 y−1, sink to the
    bottom and are consumed by detritivores and decomposers..


    (i) Calculate the percentage of the solar energy falling on the surface of the
    water that is lost and does not pass into the food chain of this
    ecosystem.
    (ii) Calculate how much energy is lost from this ecosystem through
    zooplankton respiration.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,294
    No one here is going to do your homework for you.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    ioa
    ioa is offline
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    13
    i didnt post it here in order for someone to do my homework. i just need directions on how to deal with this exercise
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Bullshit Intolerant PhDemon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
    Posts
    5,294
    Well you have to at least attempt it before anyone here will help you, post your thoughts about how you will go about it and people are more likely to help you.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Forum Professor Zwirko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    55° N, 3° W
    Posts
    1,085
    Draw a diagram. Should be straightforward once you can see where everything is going.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    ioa
    ioa is offline
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    13
    i. 1.3*10^3 diFFErence GPP-NPP


    SO ANSWER 0.06 % AS %*SOLAR ENERG=RESPIRATION (1.3*10^3)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Forum Professor Zwirko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    55° N, 3° W
    Posts
    1,085
    I never enjoyed this sort of biology, so I'm very rusty on this stuff, so take anything I say with a pinch of salt.


    I don't really understand your notation, but it seems to me as if you have calculated losses from GPP due to respiration, rather than the percentage of solar energy not utilised by the food chain. I would expect to see a number well over 90% since photosynthetic efficiency is quite low anyway.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    8,416
    Ya notation can be messy and I think the original question lost quite a bit of the meaning when it was copy pasted.

    My preference by a long shot is simply use "E" notional instead of the cluttering up things with the x10 power terms.

    --
    Look at the first part. You appear to be looking for % amount lost between solar and GPP. That's not a simple ration between solar and GPP but a difference between solar and GPP divided by solar * 100.
    Meteorologist/Naturalist & Retired Soldier
    “The Holy Land is everywhere” Black Elk
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    ioa
    ioa is offline
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    13
    I see. so for part 1
    SO I WILL DO
    2.1 E^6 - (6.3 E^3)=2.09 E^6

    2.09 E^6 / 2.1E^6 =0.99
    0.99*10
    SO 99%?????
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Forum Professor Zwirko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    55° N, 3° W
    Posts
    1,085
    Radiant energy from the sun falls on the sea surface and is absorbed by phytoplankton. This energy is "converted" in to biomass (GPP). The synthesis of that biomass required energy (R). What's left, primary productiony (NPP) is available to the trophic level below (NPP = GPP - R). Energy lost to the foodchain at the top would have to include R. In other words, I think you should be looking at NPP rather than GPP.

    It'll still be a very large percentage though.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11  
    ioa
    ioa is offline
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    13
    I can not get it. I found really difficult to understand which equations to use
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    ioa
    ioa is offline
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    13
    so I will do

    ((1.2 E ^6) -(6.3 E^3))/(1.2 E^6) =0.99

    .99*100=99???
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13  
    Forum Professor Zwirko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    55° N, 3° W
    Posts
    1,085
    NPP/solar = percentage of solar energy that is incorporated into the food chain. The phytoplankton had to use energy (i.e. respiration) to help make the gross primary production, so we can't use the GPP figure. We need to look at the net primary production instead (NPP).

    5.0 × 103 kJ m-2 y-1 / 2.1 × 106 kJ m−2 y−1


    So, 99.761% is lost.




    I admit that this figure looks scarily wrong since it's just a cat's whisker away from being a total loss. However, the number falls within the acceptable range of values one would expect to see since the efficiency of the conversion of solar energy into the energy contained in carbon compounds is very, very low - often below 1%.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14  
    ioa
    ioa is offline
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    13
    Thank you!! For my second query i did so far

    4 e^3 - 7.1e^2- 4.9 e^2=2800"

    is this wrong too?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #15  
    exchemist
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    London
    Posts
    3,317
    Quote Originally Posted by Zwirko View Post
    NPP/solar = percentage of solar energy that is incorporated into the food chain. The phytoplankton had to use energy (i.e. respiration) to help make the gross primary production, so we can't use the GPP figure. We need to look at the net primary production instead (NPP).

    5.0 × 103 kJ m-2 y-1 / 2.1 × 106 kJ m−2 y−1


    So, 99.761% is lost.




    I admit that this figure looks scarily wrong since it's just a cat's whisker away from being a total loss. However, the number falls within the acceptable range of values one would expect to see since the efficiency of the conversion of solar energy into the energy contained in carbon compounds is very, very low - often below 1%.
    Assuming the original "5.0 x 103" in the OP was a typo and meant 5.0 x 10^3, and given the the quoted figure for incident solar energy, then the amount converted is clearly around 0.25%, so yes ~99.75% is not converted. Mind you I think the term "lost" is an oddly loaded one in this context, as I can't see why anyone would expect that plankton in the sea would be expected to capture more than a tiny fraction of the incident solar energy. If they captured it all then the sea would not warm and cool and there would be nothing to drive the weather systems of the planet!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #16  
    Forum Professor Zwirko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    55° N, 3° W
    Posts
    1,085
    I don't know why terms like "lost" and "efficiency" are used either, as they make plants look they have failed in some regard. Only a fraction of the incident solar radiation gets incorporated into the food chain, so maybe the rest is erm "lost"?

    Perhaps those who started studying these things in depth from an energetics perspective were trained primarily in thermodynamics and got carried away with their metaphors or something...
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #17  
    ioa
    ioa is offline
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    13
    Thank you!! For my second query i did so far

    4 e^3 - 7.1e^2- 4.9 e^2=2800"

    is this wrong too?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #18  
    Forum Professor Zwirko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    55° N, 3° W
    Posts
    1,085
    temporary deleted. back in a moment.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #19  
    Forum Professor Zwirko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    55° N, 3° W
    Posts
    1,085
    Any sort of biology that happens on a scale larger than a few micrometers is really not my area of expertise. So, bearing that in mind, I'd suggest the following (which could be wrong):


    There are two respiration values we need to look for.


    1) The phytoplankton respiration value can be found by subtracting NPP from GPP.


    GPP = 6.3 × 103 kJ m−2 y−1
    NPP = 5.0 × 103 kJ m−2 y−1


    So, losses due to respiration here = 1.3 × 103 kJ m−2 y−1




    2) The zooplankton consume the equivalent of = 4 x 103 kJ m−2 y−1
    Of this, they convert = 7.1 X 102 kJ m−2 y−1 to biomass.
    Respiration will be difference.


    So, losses due to zooplankton respiration = 3.29 × 103 kJ m−2 y−1




    Adding them both gives 4.59 x 103 kJ m−2 y−1


    Maybe. Anyone think that makes sense?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  21. #20  
    ioa
    ioa is offline
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    13
    Originally Posted by Zwirko NPP/solar = percentage of solar energy that is incorporated into the food chain. The phytoplankton had to use energy (i.e. respiration) to help make the gross primary production, so we can't use the GPP figure. We need to look at the net primary production instead (NPP).

    5.0 × 103 kJ m-2 y-1 / 2.1 × 106 kJ m−2 y−1


    So, 99.761% is lost.


    how we came to this solution? when I divide them I get 2.38 E^-3
    Reply With Quote  
     

  22. #21  
    Moderator Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    8,416
    Quote Originally Posted by ioa View Post
    how we came to this solution? when I divide them I get 2.38 E^-3
    What is 2.39E-3 in %?

    multiply by 100, so it's 0.239%

    So

    100% - 0.239% = 97.762%

    You'll need to become more comfortable with %s.
    Meteorologist/Naturalist & Retired Soldier
    “The Holy Land is everywhere” Black Elk
    Reply With Quote  
     

  23. #22  
    ioa
    ioa is offline
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by Zwirko View Post
    Any sort of biology that happens on a scale larger than a few micrometers is really not my area of expertise. So, bearing that in mind, I'd suggest the following (which could be wrong):


    There are two respiration values we need to look for.


    1) The phytoplankton respiration value can be found by subtracting NPP from GPP.


    GPP = 6.3 × 103 kJ m−2 y−1
    NPP = 5.0 × 103 kJ m−2 y−1


    So, losses due to respiration here = 1.3 × 103 kJ m−2 y−1




    2) The zooplankton consume the equivalent of = 4 x 103 kJ m−2 y−1
    Of this, they convert = 7.1 X 102 kJ m−2 y−1 to biomass.
    Respiration will be difference.


    So, losses due to zooplankton respiration = 3.29 × 103 kJ m−2 y−1




    Adding them both gives 4.59 x 103 kJ m−2 y−1


    Maybe. Anyone think that makes sense?


    why do i have to find phytoplankton respiration?? and where do we find 3.29 x10^3?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  24. #23  
    Forum Professor Zwirko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    55° N, 3° W
    Posts
    1,085
    You're right. I misread the question thinking it was referring to zoo- and phyto- for some reason.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  25. #24  
    ioa
    ioa is offline
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    13
    Quote Originally Posted by Zwirko View Post
    You're right. I misread the question thinking it was referring to zoo- and phyto- for some reason.

    so what is the way to find only zooplankton espiration? it says that In your calculation, show your working, usingword equations that describe the relationships between respiration,
    biomass consumption, energy assimilation and energy lost as waste
    products. Give your final answer to two significant figures.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  26. #25  
    Forum Professor Zwirko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    55° N, 3° W
    Posts
    1,085
    As I said at the top, I'm not at all familiar with this topic. I don't know the answer with confidence.

    You should really be asking the person who gave you this assignment for help - that's what they are there for. If you are having problems with a topic don't be scared to ask for help. Ask to speak to your teacher after class or something. Or try and study the topic from the beginning again.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  27. #26  
    ioa
    ioa is offline
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    13
    my teacher didn't want to help and as I have to give it in 30 mins I don't know what to do
    Reply With Quote  
     

  28. #27  
    ioa
    ioa is offline
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    13
    can anyone else help?????? please
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Time flow vs. Entropy flow
    By kojax in forum Personal Theories & Alternative Ideas
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: May 11th, 2011, 01:42 AM
  2. Dark Flow
    By Andy Swainson in forum Astronomy & Cosmology
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: November 9th, 2010, 11:25 AM
  3. Flow of energy through living organisms
    By Misr in forum Biology
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: March 11th, 2010, 11:51 AM
  4. Coral reef energy flow
    By emetzner in forum Biology
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: April 5th, 2009, 09:13 AM
  5. Flow of Logic
    By Cold Fusion in forum Philosophy
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: July 6th, 2008, 08:48 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •