Notices
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 100 of 105
Like Tree2Likes

Thread: Are males superior to females?

  1. #1 Are males superior to females? 
    Guest
    My contention is that Females are far superior to males.Have a look around this forum at the sheer volume of ill-researched junk that appears on it, girls don't behave like that - they are happy to sit back and learn, filter out all the rubbish and select the best option for their purpose. They have been denied many opportunities by males which would have shown they are at least equal to men.

    Males do not [generally] have the ability to admit that anyone else is superior to them in any way.


    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Forum Freshman coolaak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    28
    i am to always thinking that females are superior to males. We as males think about sex alot because it was programmed into us. Now i'm not saying that saying females dont think about sex however females seem to make better decisions and do not let sex influence their lives. Plus i've read alot of books saying that men are going to die off at some point because the power of the two fold reproductive advantage that cloning presents will be to powerful for us as a species to not use. I'm definitly not saying thats right either. What i am saying is that to me females are better equipped for the future. One man can in theory can impregnate an huge amount of women.


    Polyjeet likes this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Guest
    Basically I agree.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    Have a look around this forum at the sheer volume of ill-researched junk that appears on it, girls don't behave like that
    how can you be so sure? its not like everybody yells out if they are females/males

    Plus i've read alot of books saying that men are going to die off at some point because the power of the two fold reproductive advantage that cloning presents will be to powerful for us as a species to not use. I'm definitly not saying thats right either
    we can use this to get rid of females aswells. So thats nothing saying females are better

    What i am saying is that to me females are better equipped for the future. One man can in theory can impregnate an huge amount of women.
    thats neither a thing saying they are better, rather saying males have the advantage here of spreading their genes way faster than females. This is why we think of sex more and females are rather choosy of partners

    We as males think about sex alot because it was programmed into us
    we can´t effect that. So its nothing bad for either sex.

    Now i'm not saying that saying females dont think about sex however females seem to make better decisions and do not let sex influence their lives.
    maybe, but they let their emotions effect their decisions wich is equally bad and irrational. Someone from either sex not controlled by emotion/sex are superior to both by that

    They have been denied many opportunities by males which would have shown they are at least equal to men.
    thats wrong. but they are equal to males

    Males do not [generally] have the ability to admit that anyone else is superior to them in any way.
    thats a problem. But it has to do with our compatetive nature for females wich is geneticly programemd into our bodies. some males succed to go pass these.
    Our genetic doesn´t make either one more superior than the other. We are both geneticly "designed"(not as in a god or anything have to do with it) to optimise our reproduction. Males have the ability to have sex with many. therefor they develop more often a behavior where they go from female to female and compete by that for them. While females can only take 1-2 partners. so they have to be choosy.

    Conclution: Neither sex is superior to the other but both are better in certain areas the other isn´t
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    Guest
    You sure sound like you don't want to admit to being wrong! - on this one (at the moment) you are outnumbered! - This is a democracy! - we win!
    nah - nah - nahnahnah! :wink:


    If ALL the human males at any point vanished in an instant the girls would find a way to survive not just for their generation but for more generations. For example any frozen sperm in the world could easily be 'called into service' Contrast this with what would happen if all the females dissappeared, - it would be the end of the race.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    for bieng old your chidlish.
    First of all, i see from a biological percpective. and from that its all facts. Wich my statement is. its facts. Both are good in certain areas the other one isn´t. And the differenses take out each other and leave a 0 differens
    or a kvote of 1
    And this isnt a democrazy in that sentence
    Secondly. i have repeadetly admited that i have been wrong. Bieng wrong is a part of bieng human.
    And in this case youré not admiting that you are biologicly wrong. So please admit it so you can change atleast some of your data instant of adding to it by your own ways
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Guest
    I have had a couple of whisky's today as a dry run for my birthday tomorrow - Being childish, well that proves my point even I am inferior to females, I think of all the people who have started wars, committed genicide etc and very few female names crop up. Males are destructive - females are creative. They are NOT equal, each have different 'strengths and weaknesses' as you rightly point out, I simply believe they {the girls}win out overall.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    I think of all the people who have started wars, committed genicide etc and very few female names crop up. Males are destructive - females are creative. They are NOT equal, each have different 'strengths and weaknesses' as you rightly point out, I simply believe they {the girls}win out overall.
    womans have never been able to start war since they have never been in positions in society to do it.
    Males aren´t destructive. Womans aren´t destructive. Males have testosteron wich makes them take out their rage more often. Its genetical. and if we shall begin talking about genetical superiority we can begin classefy human races aswell. why don´t we adopt the old books, saying white europens are the most superior race, and black ones are the most inferior deevolved race among human species?
    Males are creative more than womans by genetic. Since they have 2 X-chromosones they will have 2 genes saying about their creativity and will most likly drag them to the normal level. While males have only one. We are able to with just one single gene become more creative. They need 2 wich makes it less probeble of happening.

    Its this ability to "see" creativity that have given humanity its brain power. Since in early time creativity was a sign of strenght. and by that a good choice for offpsrings. Without males womans wouldn´t be smart at all. They would be like apes.

    Conclution: By bilogical fact and the fact that its ethical wrong to place anything as genetical superior no sex is superior. If one sex is superior a human race is superior to others. Certain things isn´t superior. This is one. Accept the fact that you are wrong and disprove your own claims or keep walking and show yourself is right by making a fool of yourself

    Resistence is futile
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by zelos
    womans have never been able to start war since they have never been in positions in society to do it.
    Golda Meir, Margaret Thatcher, Boudica all admirably showed they were able to respond to threats and wage war.

    Quote Originally Posted by zelos
    Males aren´t destructive. Womans aren´t destructive. Males have testosteron wich makes them take out their rage more often.
    Males love blowing things up, war games etc not to mention all the sacked cities throughout history. As for testosterone it does not matter what the hormone is, it is the effect we are debating.

    Quote Originally Posted by zelos
    Its genetical. and if we shall begin talking about genetical superiority we can begin classefy human races aswell. why don´t we adopt the old books, saying white europens are the most superior race, and black ones are the most inferior deevolved race among human species?
    You are simply going off topic here to deflect a lost argument.

    Quote Originally Posted by zelos
    Males are creative more than womans by genetic. Since they have 2 X-chromosones they will have 2 genes saying about their creativity and will most likly drag them to the normal level. While males have only one. We are able to with just one single gene become more creative. They need 2 wich makes it less probeble of happening.
    Could you point to some sort of evidence that that is true?
    From my knowledge of genetics, I'd say what you have written there is not at all right.

    Quote Originally Posted by zelos
    Its this ability to "see" creativity that have given humanity its brain power.
    Since in early time creativity was a sign of strenght. and by that a good choice for offpsrings. Without males womans wouldn´t be smart at all. They would be like apes.
    I see an opening here for your genes to die out, in that the girls may take offence to you suggesting they would be apes without males. If this were to happen, (ie you were to be rejected by girls) I could point to Darwin and say "only the fittest survive" - in this case that would be the girls and not Zelos. Ergo the girls ARE superior to Zelos!

    Quote Originally Posted by zelos
    Conclution: By bilogical fact and the fact that its ethical wrong to place anything as genetical superior no sex is superior. If one sex is superior a human race is superior to others. Certain things isn´t superior. This is one. Accept the fact that you are wrong and disprove your own claims or keep walking and show yourself is right by making a fool of yourself
    I will leave it to others to decide which of us (if either), has with elequence, shown himself to be the fool.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    Forum Ph.D. william's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Wherever I go, there I am
    Posts
    935
    Bilco wrote:
    I see an opening here for your genes to die out....
    I can't stop laughing!
    "... the polhode rolls without slipping on the herpolhode lying in the invariable plane."
    ~Footnote in Goldstein's Mechanics, 3rd ed. p. 202
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    Males love blowing things up, war games etc not to mention all the sacked cities throughout history. As for testosterone it does not matter what the hormone is, it is the effect we are debating.
    lets blame the car it crashes then

    You are simply going off topic here to deflect a lost argument.
    im not entirely going off topic, a bit but not entirely. Since if you can say girls are geneticly superior you have the right to say anything is geneticly superior to anything else and by that we cansay like hitler did. Arier are the perfect race, the most superior race. HAIL (Just for notice i am not a nazi) Can say one sex is superior than say once race is superior. We are going back to 19th centry.

    Could you point to some sort of evidence that that is true?
    Sure, tell me the date when you can read swedish. I read it in a swedish article and don´t know any other source for now.

    From my knowledge of genetics, I'd say what you have written there is not at all right.
    ive read plenty of places where the intelligence/creativity is on the X chromosone. Wich also explains why the amount of geniuses/idiots in males are much higher than for females. since we only have 1 chromosone of X it will take 1 good gene, or 1 bad gene for us to be good/bad. and girls need 2 wich is less probeble

    I see an opening here for your genes to die out, in that the girls may take offence to you suggesting they would be apes without males. If this were to happen, (ie you were to be rejected by girls) I could point to Darwin and say "only the fittest survive" - in this case that would be the girls and not Zelos. Ergo
    I don´t care about what they think, i care how it is. We would be apes without them, they would be apes without us. We need them, They need us. Each need the other. Thats how it allways has and allways will be. If they were superior they wouldn´t need us at ANY TIME. if they are depended on us they aren´t superior

    Ergo the girls ARE superior to Zelos!
    This is a direct insult. You have insulted me enough already so i suggest you stop. GIRLS ISNT SUPERIOR TO ME. A girl CAN be but NOT necciserly.
    Males arent superior to any female. but one male can be superior to one female.

    I will leave it to others to decide which of us (if either), has with elequence, shown himself to be the fool.
    Think about it for a short period. Go 250 years back in time. remove all males. if humanity survives then. and ONLY THEN are girls truly superior. else they are depended on us. and a superior bieng isn´t depended on anything except itself.

    Logic dictates that neither is superior. End of story. Accept it. Femenist.
    How can you say that they are superior when some call males a walking dildo? for bieng so much superior they are very pathetic. Even humanity is supposed to be so superior to other species. Yet we do such primetive things. No matter sex.

    Conclution: This topic is about a sex strategy, not biological objectivity. A objective mind don´t see superiority. Since there is none.
    Logic dictates also that if they were superior, they would be alone and males would have since a long time ago been dead.
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  13. #12  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    Males love blowing things up, war games etc not to mention all the sacked cities throughout history. As for testosterone it does not matter what the hormone is, it is the effect we are debating.
    lets blame the car it crashes then

    You are simply going off topic here to deflect a lost argument.
    im not entirely going off topic, a bit but not entirely. Since if you can say girls are geneticly superior you have the right to say anything is geneticly superior to anything else and by that we cansay like hitler did. Arier are the perfect race, the most superior race. HAIL (Just for notice i am not a nazi) Can say one sex is superior than say once race is superior. We are going back to 19th centry.

    Could you point to some sort of evidence that that is true?
    Sure, tell me the date when you can read swedish. I read it in a swedish article and don´t know any other source for now.

    From my knowledge of genetics, I'd say what you have written there is not at all right.
    ive read plenty of places where the intelligence/creativity is on the X chromosone. Wich also explains why the amount of geniuses/idiots in males are much higher than for females. since we only have 1 chromosone of X it will take 1 good gene, or 1 bad gene for us to be good/bad. and girls need 2 wich is less probeble

    I see an opening here for your genes to die out, in that the girls may take offence to you suggesting they would be apes without males. If this were to happen, (ie you were to be rejected by girls) I could point to Darwin and say "only the fittest survive" - in this case that would be the girls and not Zelos. Ergo
    I don´t care about what they think, i care how it is. We would be apes without them, they would be apes without us. We need them, They need us. Each need the other. Thats how it allways has and allways will be. If they were superior they wouldn´t need us at ANY TIME. if they are depended on us they aren´t superior

    Ergo the girls ARE superior to Zelos!
    This is a direct insult. You have insulted me enough already so i suggest you stop. GIRLS ISNT SUPERIOR TO ME. A girl CAN be but NOT necciserly.
    Males arent superior to any female. but one male can be superior to one female.

    I will leave it to others to decide which of us (if either), has with elequence, shown himself to be the fool.
    Think about it for a short period. Go 250 years back in time. remove all males. if humanity survives then. and ONLY THEN are girls truly superior. else they are depended on us. and a superior bieng isn´t depended on anything except itself.

    Logic dictates that neither is superior. End of story. Accept it. Femenist.
    How can you say that they are superior when some call males a walking dildo? for bieng so much superior they are very pathetic. Even humanity is supposed to be so superior to other species. Yet we do such primetive things. No matter sex.

    Conclution: This topic is about a sex strategy, not biological objectivity. A objective mind don´t see superiority. Since there is none.

    What's that about the car? it makes no sense whatever.
    I say girls are superior, we both agree they are genetically different.
    I don't see why you want to run off at a tangent and point to Hitler, he has nothing to do with this thread. One paragraph in a swedish magazine does not a new science make. Superiority has nothing to do with dependancy or for that matter the ability to exist seperately.
    How can it be an insult to say the girls are more intelligent than you?
    you are NOT the most intelligent person in the world, there ARE women who are more intelligent than you - surely you must understand that!
    Stop trying to tell me I am insulting you - I am NOT - I'm telling it like it is.
    As a male you merely fit my profile - your own testosterone will not let you see 'sense' - If I said you were superior to women you would agree without any hesitation, unfortunately for you after many years of observation of both sexes I conclude the girls are better, not at everthing but overall better. And so far your posts have only served to re-inforce my belief.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  14. #13  
    Forum Cosmic Wizard SkinWalker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Grand Prairie, TX
    Posts
    2,377
    Human males are far superior to females at writing their names in the snow; however, females are far superior to males at breast feeding.

    "Superiority" is a relative term, isn't it?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  15. #14  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by SkinWalker
    Human males are far superior to females at writing their names in the snow; however, females are far superior to males at breast feeding.

    "Superiority" is a relative term, isn't it?
    A very clever post, whatever one's point of view one must agree with it.
    I for what it truly says, others for what is written.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  16. #15  
    Forum Ph.D. william's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Wherever I go, there I am
    Posts
    935
    I'm not sure...
    I fair well at breast feeding too....
    "... the polhode rolls without slipping on the herpolhode lying in the invariable plane."
    ~Footnote in Goldstein's Mechanics, 3rd ed. p. 202
    Reply With Quote  
     

  17. #16  
    Forum Sophomore kingjacob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    between time and timbuktu
    Posts
    131
    This is an interesting topic, because my girlfriend says enough for me to believe it that I am smarter than her. And my ego has allowed me to believe that but now that I think about it, while I may know more math, science, history, philosophy, etc than she does, she is able to get me with all my knowledge to sit through a ballet, Its not sex that she uses to get me to do this but some unknown womenly ability, So while I may be smarter, when gauging superiority who's more superior the tool or the user?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  18. #17  
    Forum Freshman Leukocyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    56
    This thread is stereotype city.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  19. #18  
    Forum Sophomore kingjacob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    between time and timbuktu
    Posts
    131
    Quote Originally Posted by Leukocyte
    This thread is stereotype city.
    You cant generalize without stereotypes :wink:
    Reply With Quote  
     

  20. #19  
    Forum Freshman Odyssey_WMD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    5
    Women cant be superior to men, they seem to have to many mental, emotional hurdels in thier way to stay focused enough to be. Its just not in thier make-up= to want power and strength but rather beauty and love.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  21. #20  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    What's that about the car? it makes no sense whatever.
    I say girls are superior, we both agree they are genetically different.
    I don't see why you want to run off at a tangent and point to Hitler, he has nothing to do with this thread. One paragraph in a swedish magazine does not a new science make. Superiority has nothing to do with dependancy or for that matter the ability to exist seperately.
    How can it be an insult to say the girls are more intelligent than you?
    you are NOT the most intelligent person in the world, there ARE women who are more intelligent than you - surely you must understand that!
    Stop trying to tell me I am insulting you - I am NOT - I'm telling it like it is.
    your own testosterone will not let you see 'sense' - your own testosterone will not let you see 'sense' - If I said you were superior to women you would agree without any hesitation, unfortunately for you after many years of observation of both sexes I conclude the girls are better, not at everthing but overall better. And so far your posts have only served to re-inforce
    I say girls are superior, we both agree they are genetically different.
    and by that you say one can be geneticla superior and by that we should also say a race in human species are superior than the others, we can take hitlers arier race then, or maybe europen in general?


    How can it be an insult to say the girls are more intelligent than you?
    since many isn´t. a carrot is more intelligent thatn you are.
    i can agree on a female as INDIVIDUAL can be more intelligent than me, but not as a GROUP since thats not scientificly true

    you are NOT the most intelligent person in the world
    true

    there ARE women who are more intelligent than you - surely you must understand that!
    most likly. but they are more intelligent as INDIVIDUALS not as a GROUP since i have seen many girls bieng less intelligent than me. and there is plenty of them.

    Stop trying to tell me I am insulting you - I am NOT - I'm telling it like it is.
    yes you are. and no your not. Its not how it is. they would be alone of they were geneitcly superior wich they arent since there is about 50/50 males/females

    Stop trying to tell me I am insulting you - I am NOT - I'm telling it like it is.
    unlike most males, i don´t let emotons and sex come in the way for objectivity in science and how it is. so i don´t fit here

    If I said you were superior to women you would agree without any hesitation
    if you mean me as individual, nha. there is allways someone better
    me as a male then no aswell. since males aren´t superior. nor is females

    unfortunately for you after many years of observation of both sexes I conclude the girls are better, not at everthing but overall better.
    oh like what? ive looked throu how i see womans(with my eyes), how they react how they are. it is anything BUT superior. They are not generally better since a emotional bieng can´t be superior

    so far your posts have only served to re-inforce
    your denying biological facts. They arent superior, if they were males would have never been evolved. End of story. Dont re-inforce your own stupidity by acting stupid.

    Just for fun, since we consider some genetical superior here. Since i contain genes that the greatest scientists of all time i am superior to you. If females can be genetical superior so can i as individual with superior genes
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  22. #21  
    Guest
    We can go on like this forever, I believe they are, you believe they're not, it's a subjective issue. I think skinwalker summed it up, we can piss in the snow - they can make babies.


    Quote Originally Posted by Leukocyte
    This thread is stereotype city.
    Another profound embryonic "Look mum, I can reach the PC" type contribution.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  23. #22  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    We can go on like this forever, I believe they are, you believe they're not, it's a subjective issue
    50% yes 50% no
    a objective eye in biology don´t say that any species is superior, nor is any sex. Every sex/species/cast/what ever biology related is a different sulution to the same problem.
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  24. #23  
    Forum Professor Zwolver's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,631
    if there was something better than a woman or a man they would have dominated the world by now.

    but.. what if you dump a load of men on an island and a load of women on another island. who would be able to survive the longest?
    Growing up, i marveled at star-trek's science, and ignored the perfect society. Now, i try to ignore their science, and marvel at the society.

    Imagine, being able to create matter out of thin air, and not coming up with using drones for boarding hostile ships. Or using drones to defend your own ship. Heck, using drones to block energy attacks, counterattack or for surveillance. Unless, of course, they are nano-machines in your blood, which is a billion times more complex..
    Reply With Quote  
     

  25. #24  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    We can go on like this forever, I believe they are, you believe they're not, it's a subjective issue
    50% yes 50% no
    a objective eye in biology don´t say that any species is superior, nor is any sex. Every sex/species/cast/what ever biology related is a different sulution to the same problem.
    Zelos,

    Er, I hate to point out the obvious but I made it very clear my opinion is subjective. to put it another way I did not indicate I was offering an objective view. It is simply a matter of opinion whether one sex is superior to another unless you agree a particular [single] class [eg strength, dexterity etc]. I am stating that overall I believe females are superior to males, my belief is a fact, in that I do believe this. Even IF you were to weigh up all the strengths/weaknesses of both sexes you would still have to decide whether 'this ability' is worth more or less than 'that ability' which means eventually, however you look at it,the final decision is SUBJECTIVE not OBJECTIVE.


    Objectively it can be decided whether men are [generally] taller than women.

    Objectively it can be decided whether women are [generally] better than men at cooking.

    But which of these is more important [in terms of superior] is subjective!

    In essence I agree to differ with you.



    Edit:

    Quote Originally Posted by Zwolver
    if there was something better than a woman or a man they would have dominated the world by now.

    but.. what if you dump a load of men on an island and a load of women on another island. who would be able to survive the longest?

    The women unquestionably, and if one or more of them were pregnant they would be able to survive for [possibly] multiple generations.

    Men statistically do not live as long as females.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  26. #25  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    Er, I hate to point out the obvious but I made it very clear my opinion is subjective. to put it another way I did not indicate I was offering an objective view. It is simply a matter of opinion whether one sex is superior to another unless you agree a particular [single] class [eg strength, dexterity etc]. I am stating that overall I believe females are superior to males, my belief is a fact, in that I do believe this. Even IF you were to weigh up all the strengths/weaknesses of both sexes you would still have to decide whether 'this ability' is worth more or less than 'that ability' which means eventually, however you look at it,the final decision is SUBJECTIVE not OBJECTIVE.
    since its subjectiveto say what ever one is superior than the other the objective thing must logicly be that none is superior
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  27. #26  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    Er, I hate to point out the obvious but I made it very clear my opinion is subjective. to put it another way I did not indicate I was offering an objective view. It is simply a matter of opinion whether one sex is superior to another unless you agree a particular [single] class [eg strength, dexterity etc]. I am stating that overall I believe females are superior to males, my belief is a fact, in that I do believe this. Even IF you were to weigh up all the strengths/weaknesses of both sexes you would still have to decide whether 'this ability' is worth more or less than 'that ability' which means eventually, however you look at it,the final decision is SUBJECTIVE not OBJECTIVE.
    since its subjectiveto say what ever one is superior than the other the objective thing must logicly be that none is superior
    No Zelos that is crap, again you lose, again you are singularly unable to resolve the fact that you have lost an argument, "I heard somebody say it on TV" is not a basis for science. Every time I shoot down your arguments you try to open another crack.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  28. #27  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    65
    Well, I'm not sure but I believe to be one of the few, if not the first, girls saying anything about this subject.

    Well, I think we could make it without men. We already have the tools for that. We would just need a bag of frozen sperm and no one would miss you guys. Of course I don't like the idea of killing you all because the only friends I have are actually men.

    Someone wrote men are far more intelligent, am I right? Well.. I read a lot, I study even on vacations and.. well.. I know a lot more than most people I know (males and females).

    This might be a "I heard somebody say it on TV" kind of stuff but I think both sexes have [generally] the same intelligence genotype.. so..
    We have the same brains, I believe.
    But women win when it comes to reproduction and the continuity of our species.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  29. #28  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by VMStudent
    Well, I'm not sure but I believe to be one of the few, if not the first, girls saying anything about this subject.

    Well, I think we could make it without men. We already have the tools for that. We would just need a bag of frozen sperm and no one would miss you guys. Of course I don't like the idea of killing you all because the only friends I have are actually men.

    Someone wrote men are far more intelligent, am I right? Well.. I read a lot, I study even on vacations and.. well.. I know a lot more than most people I know (males and females).

    This might be a "I heard somebody say it on TV" kind of stuff but I think both sexes have [generally] the same intelligence genotype.. so..
    We have the same brains, I believe.
    But women win when it comes to reproduction and the continuity of our species.
    Having been around for 70 Years, no-one will ever convince me that us guys are superior to the ladies. I am a member of Mensa and I prefer the company of the girls to the guys anyday. As I am 70 years old today no-one is allowed to disagree with me!

    I use the word 'superior' - it does not mean stronger, more intelligent, taller or any other single quantity - Superior means to me 'overall better'.

    Do you really need a bag of frozen sperm?? What in a sperm actually sets off fertilisation? IF it is just the presence of other DNA would it not be possible to fertilise one egg from the contents of another? - ok it only produces females, but would it work?.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  30. #29  
    Forum Freshman Boomerang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    UK/Australia
    Posts
    19
    Very interesting points and exchange of views, I do not believe the either of the sexes is superior to each other.

    Going back to the “sex” subject mention by a member, women have their sexual freedom more now than before, just like men but I would just like to add one point that I believe it is very important, and that I have been noticing in society more often than before, I think the roles are inverting, males are becoming more like what females use to be (housewife’s, taking care of the kids, basically assuming more and more family responsibilities) while women are no longer conservative about themselves and their bodies.

    Regards
    "Aequam memento rebus in arduis servare mentem"
    Reply With Quote  
     

  31. #30  
    Forum Freshman Leukocyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    56
    Another profound embryonic "Look mum, I can reach the PC" type contribution.
    Being 70 and being in MENSA doesn't give you an excuse to be condescending.

    There IS a lot of gender stereotyping in here, and as SkinWalker had already summed up half of my thoughts by describing 'superior' as being relative, I thought I'd give you the other half.

    It didn't give you any reason to call me a child.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  32. #31  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    No Zelos that is crap, again you lose, again you are singularly unable to resolve the fact that you have lost an argument, "I heard somebody say it on TV" is not a basis for science. Every time I shoot down your arguments you try to open another crack.
    did you look in a mirror and thought it was me? since you are talking about yourself. You talk about superiority and yet say come with nothing that is superior. and if we can call one sex superior we can call certain human races superior. that step isn´t big

    Well, I think we could make it without men. We already have the tools for that. We would just need a bag of frozen sperm and no one would miss you guys. Of course I don't like the idea of killing you all because the only friends I have are actually men.
    wait another 10 years and womans wont be neccisery. Nothing at all from them

    But women win when it comes to reproduction and the continuity of our species.
    let a woman be alone with another woman with no help and it they won´t reproduce. So reproduction is equal aswell they both need each other but also can be without each other

    As I am 70 years old today no-one is allowed to disagree with me!
    we have all the right since you are old and by nature own standards shouldn´t exist today. You are going out so lay back and leave room for the young ones since it is we who rule the world now.

    Being 70 and being in MENSA doesn't give you an excuse to be condescending.

    There IS a lot of gender stereotyping in here, and as SkinWalker had already summed up half of my thoughts by describing 'superior' as being relative, I thought I'd give you the other half.

    It didn't give you any reason to call me a child.
    you have to forgive him, he is old and probebly going senile. maybe also alzheimer. Today i bet he is more depended on us young than ever. if we don´t pay taxes he probebly won´t have anywhere to live nor anything to eat
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  33. #32 Re: Are males superior to females? 
    Forum Junior Artemis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    297
    Quote Originally Posted by billco
    My contention is that Females are far superior to males.Have a look around this forum at the sheer volume of ill-researched junk that appears on it, girls don't behave like that - they are happy to sit back and learn, filter out all the rubbish and select the best option for their purpose. They have been denied many opportunities by males which would have shown they are at least equal to men.

    Males do not [generally] have the ability to admit that anyone else is superior to them in any way.
    I don’t think Females are superior to males, cause if they were they wouldn’t let themselves be dominates by males for so many years. Probably man and women need each other in life. Women are better at some things then men, understanding emotions of a other for example, but men have their own skills such as …. Eehhh…. Well never mind. What I mean is that if women were superior to men they would have lived separated, cause they wouldn’t need men. If people don’t need each other they don’t do things together. If you don’t need someone to help you with your essay then nobody will. If you don’t need to marry a man or woman, then why should you? Certainly not just for the babies?!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  34. #33  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    Women are better at some things then men, understanding emotions of a other for example, but men have their own skills such as …. Eehhh…. Well never mind.
    we have our strenght and our logical brain

    The rest is right, we need both each other and therefor none is superior
    Its logical and resistence is futile
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  35. #34 Re: Are males superior to females? 
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Artemis
    Quote Originally Posted by billco
    My contention is that Females are far superior to males.Have a look around this forum at the sheer volume of ill-researched junk that appears on it, girls don't behave like that - they are happy to sit back and learn, filter out all the rubbish and select the best option for their purpose. They have been denied many opportunities by males which would have shown they are at least equal to men.

    Males do not [generally] have the ability to admit that anyone else is superior to them in any way.
    I don’t think Females are superior to males, cause if they were they wouldn’t let themselves be dominates by males for so many years. Probably man and women need each other in life. Women are better at some things then men, understanding emotions of a other for example, but men have their own skills such as …. Eehhh…. Well never mind. What I mean is that if women were superior to men they would have lived separated, cause they wouldn’t need men. If people don’t need each other they don’t do things together. If you don’t need someone to help you with your essay then nobody will. If you don’t need to marry a man or woman, then why should you? Certainly not just for the babies?!

    We allow ourselves to be dominated by some pretty thick politicians, I don't believe dominant and superior are the same thing.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  36. #35  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    We allow ourselves to be dominated by some pretty thick politicians,
    democrazy, we choosed them.
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  37. #36  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    We allow ourselves to be dominated by some pretty thick politicians,
    democrazy, we choosed them.
    No Zelos we did not choosed them, we may have voted for them but their own party chosed them.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  38. #37  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    We choose those who choose them and by that its we who decied. since if we don´t wont on those parties or what ever it is they won´t be elected.
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  39. #38  
    Forum Sophomore kingjacob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    between time and timbuktu
    Posts
    131
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    We choose those who choose them and by that its we who decied. since if we don´t wont on those parties or what ever it is they won´t be elected.
    You are correct, we all could vote for an unknown independent that would be better for the Job but instead the majority of people vote straight by party because its easier.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  40. #39  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by kingjacob
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    We choose those who choose them and by that its we who decied. since if we don´t wont on those parties or what ever it is they won´t be elected.
    You are correct, we all could vote for an unknown independent that would be better for the Job but instead the majority of people vote straight by party because its easier.

    Now theres a point, we all agree politicians are stupid? and most politicians are..... MEN so women ARE superior! :wink:
    Reply With Quote  
     

  41. #40  
    Forum Sophomore kingjacob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    between time and timbuktu
    Posts
    131
    Quote Originally Posted by billco
    Quote Originally Posted by kingjacob
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    We choose those who choose them and by that its we who decied. since if we don´t wont on those parties or what ever it is they won´t be elected.
    You are correct, we all could vote for an unknown independent that would be better for the Job but instead the majority of people vote straight by party because its easier.

    Now theres a point, we all agree politicians are stupid? and most politicians are..... MEN so women ARE superior! :wink:
    I almost agreed with you until I remembered who my senator was, Mrs. Hutchison.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  42. #41  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by kingjacob
    Quote Originally Posted by billco
    Quote Originally Posted by kingjacob
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    We choose those who choose them and by that its we who decied. since if we don´t wont on those parties or what ever it is they won´t be elected.
    You are correct, we all could vote for an unknown independent that would be better for the Job but instead the majority of people vote straight by party because its easier.

    Now theres a point, we all agree politicians are stupid? and most politicians are..... MEN so women ARE superior! :wink:
    I almost agreed with you until I remembered who my senator was, Mrs. Hutchison.

    Er could be a drag artist?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  43. #42  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    27
    the only thing that this thread proved is that sometimes age comes with widsom and some times age comes alone.

    Women have been discouraged from genres such as sculpture that require studio training or expensive materials.

    But in philosophy, mathematics, and poetry, the only materials are pen and paper.

    Male conspiracy cannot explain ALL female failures.

    I am convinced that, even without restrictions, there still would have been no female Pascal, Milton, or Kant.

    Plus the studies that indicate that men as a whole are 10%
    more intelligent...

    Men are stronger,more intelligent and have what it takes to succeed.Unfair life isn`t it?

    Owned?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  44. #43  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    Now theres a point, we all agree politicians are stupid? and most politicians are..... MEN so women ARE superior!
    thats alot of bullshit. neither men nor woman are superior

    ThanatosX, damn straight right
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  45. #44  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by ThanatosX
    the only thing that this thread proved is that sometimes age comes with widsom and some times age comes alone.

    Women have been discouraged from genres such as sculpture that require studio training or expensive materials.

    But in philosophy, mathematics, and poetry, the only materials are pen and paper.

    Male conspiracy cannot explain ALL female failures.

    I am convinced that, even without restrictions, there still would have been no female Pascal, Milton, or Kant.

    Plus the studies that indicate that men as a whole are 10%
    more intelligent...

    Men are stronger,more intelligent and have what it takes to succeed.Unfair life isn`t it?

    Owned?

    I take it you are having a dig at me, I have NOT at any time said that females are stronger, wiser, more intelligent than males. I have merely indicated that if you take all attributes of males and females and were to weigh them against each other - then you may (like I) arrive at the notion that females are superior to males. It is a subjective opinion it may be wrong but it does NOT deserve derision.

    IN the meantime perhaps you would care to name some of these studies so that I may review them and if necessary alter my conclusion.
    Would you also care to enlighten me upon what you class as 'female failures'?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  46. #45  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    Males are superior
    Subjective
    Females are superior
    Subjective

    Logicly neither is objectivly right. Therefor neither is right
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  47. #46  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    27
    From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
    (Redirected from UK study claims men more intelligent then women)

    August 27, 2005

    The human brain.

    In a study accepted for publication by the British Journal of Psychology, Dr. Paul Irwing (Manchester Business School, Senior Lecturer in Organizational Psychology) and Prof. Richard Lynn (University of Ulster, Professor Emeritus) conclude that men are on average five points ahead on IQ tests. The study also found that men outnumbered women in increasing numbers as intelligence levels rise. There were twice as many with IQ scores of 125, a level typical for people with first-class degrees. When scores rose to 155, a level associated with genius, there were 5.5 men for every woman.

    Professor Lynn has a number of previous articles arguing that there are differences in intelligence between racial groups. In a 2003 study, he found a correlation between average IQ and prosperity in 60 countries. In a letter to The Psychologist, Professor Lynn claimed “Men have larger brains than women by about 10% and larger brains confer greater brain power, so men must necessarily be on average more intelligent than women.” Most psychologists view brain size as less significant than numerous other gender differences. One reason brain size may not be significant is that the majority of the brain is not involved in "providing intelligence" but rather performs mundane tasks; such as regulating pulse and breathing, processing inputs from the five senses, and providing redundancy in case of brain damage. Larger brains may contain more space devoted to such functions, and the same or even less space devoted to intelligence. Colloquially, elephants and whales have brains many times the size of the human brain, yet do not appear to be more intelligent.

    Earlier this year, the president of Harvard University, Lawrence Summers, sparked a controversy when he suggested that "intrinsic aptitude" was responsible for the low numbers of women at the top in many fields, especially in science and engineering. In response to Summers comment, Stephen Pinker and Elizabeth Spelke held a debate on the conclusions which can be drawn from the extensive existing scientific research on gender differences. Spelke held that discrimination remained the primary factor keeping women from going into physics, mathematics, and computer science; while Pinker suggested that life choices were more important today. This debate is considered an exceptionally good introduction to the subject for lay-persons.

    Several subtle points popularized by the Pinker vs. Spelke debate are relevant to the Irwing & Lynn study. First, females benefit significantly from single sex education, but single sex education has little impact upon males. As a consequence, the Irwing & Lynn study can not lay claim to a biological difference in intelligence, unless it restricts itself to women attending all girls schools. Secondly, the process of natural selection leads males of any species to have more variance in most traits. As a result, Stephen Pinker suggests that one should find "more geniuses and more idiots" among human males (see Pinker slide 41). As a consequence, any omission of people at the lower end of the IQ spectrum would bias the average male IQ upward, relative to the average female IQ .

    Neither Pinker nor Spelke suggests brain size is particularly important. However, both agree that men and women have different mental strengths and even handle various mental tasks differently. Both see these differences as an asset to the scientific community.

    IQ tests have been criticized for testing how similar a person's thought processes are to the author of the tests, primarily men, rather than how intelligent they are. In particular, some tests have been biased towards thought processes where males are dominant, such as 3D spatial rotation and visualization. Tests devised by females would be more likely to emphasize female strengths, such as computation and communication. Many modern IQ tests attempt to control for gender differences by including more questions targeted at female strengths. However, such efforts are hampered by the lack of a clear definition of intelligence
    Reply With Quote  
     

  48. #47  
    Forum Junior Artemis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    297
    Now I’m reading al this stuff, but I still don’t think males or females are superior. I even begin to doubt is humans are superior to animals :wink:

    You'll al have to try harder if you want to convince me!!
    Student Neurobiology
    Reply With Quote  
     

  49. #48  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    i agree with artemis, neither is superior but they are better than the other in certain areas
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  50. #49  
    Jon
    Jon is offline
    Forum Sophomore Jon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Minnesota, U.S.
    Posts
    162
    Holy Balls!

    Okay! Why is there some crazy argument about superiority? Who ever said superiority is subjective hit the nail on the head!

    We can say a car is superior to a horse, but then again, when was the last time a horse charged you 3 bucks for a trip into town?! :?

    First, to address some of the arguments...

    1) If the men all died, the sperm would eventually run out and the species still doomed. If the females were able to have male children, then it would break the experiment and there would be no proof women could continue generations without men.

    2) Women and men have the same potential for becoming intelligent... and though I see many more intelligent females than males, I do realize that intelligence is a measure of what you know, despite the fact that both sexes have the same ability at learning and processing information (which is of course important, because knowledge is useless unless you can use it... duh).

    3) Many other species have two sexes, and they manage just fine. Are we to say that, not able to get along, us humans are worse than a pride of lions?

    Okay... and lastly, who in the Hell in their right mind would start a thread of such sexist crap without a single shred of objective evidence in support of his opinion?




    J0N
    :-)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  51. #50  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    19
    For all of you Americans, I'll have you know that girls are making an impressive comeback.

    This year's current SAT scores revealed that females beat males in one (of three) categories (happened to be writing) for the first time... ever.

    Enough said. Males are far superior when it comes to most academics, English aside. Males are generally superior in mathematics, and we all know how well math relates to science, so if you're going to fight for female superiority, this is not the place to do it.

    Anyway, to stand up for females, they have a tendency to do better at multi-tasking, but it comes with a hitch; they can't focus on one particular thing out of several, while males are good at it.

    Confusing subject, but overall, I'd say females and males are very similar as far as general intelligence and superiority goes.

    Oh, and for the record, billco, since I assume you're female, you're really giving your sex a bad name... how about ignorant?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  52. #51  
    Forum Junior Artemis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    297
    Is it possible that this thread isn’t about superiority, but about getting your right? Since it nobody will agree and you can’t really proof your believes are true I think it isn’t a good scientific thread (It’s fun to watch though ).

    About superiority, I still believe we need both sexes and I still don’t see why some people still think we don’t. Men and women have different skills so you would have to declare what skill is superior to the other. This would take ages and probably won’t solve the discussion because everybody has his own ideas about what being superior means.

    So are we going to continue this thread as it goes now or are we going discus every skill of a man/woman that would be superior to another skill of a women/man
    Student Neurobiology
    Reply With Quote  
     

  53. #52  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    73
    I could be wrong but I get the feeling that billco created this thread as a bit of Zelos baiting....

    I think it was in response to Zelos' point that without men, all women would still be apes.
    Or something to that effect.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  54. #53  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Its All Relative
    I could be wrong but I get the feeling that billco created this thread as a bit of Zelos baiting....

    I think it was in response to Zelos' point that without men, all women would still be apes.
    Or something to that effect.
    8)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  55. #54  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    well i am right, without us they would, and without them we would. but i think we wouldnt have come to be even apes without the 2 sexes
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  56. #55  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    28
    I do not think that one is more important than the other.

    Males and females however play different roles but no role makes you "superior"

    Both are needed to produce human life and without the other human life will not be possible. Both are essential so both are important.

    That is my opinion

    Effervescent
    Reply With Quote  
     

  57. #56  
    Forum Freshman SinMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Dordrecht, The Netherlands
    Posts
    35
    woo guys, this is a huge topic, honestly i didn't read it entirely, but I can give my opinion. Agreeing with some of you and telling you that I am a male:

    Women are equal to men in some ways while they are not in other ways. For example, men are humans as women are. They have feelings etc... Men are physically stronger than women. But mentally are women maybe stonger. Women have the strength to love and devote their self to protecting and caring of their childeren, while men lack this ability (in general).

    I think it is impossible and pretty "childish" to be talking about which one is superior to the other, because both my eyes are essential for me to watch the world in 3D.
    Q:What's better than being perfect? A:Accepting yourself!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  58. #57  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by SinMan
    woo guys, this is a huge topic, honestly i didn't read it entirely, but I can give my opinion. Agreeing with some of you and telling you that I am a male:

    Women are equal to men in some ways while they are not in other ways. For example, men are humans as women are. They have feelings etc... Men are physically stronger than women. But mentally are women maybe stonger. Women have the strength to love and devote their self to protecting and caring of their childeren, while men lack this ability (in general).

    I think it is impossible and pretty "childish" to be talking about which one is superior to the other, because both my eyes are essential for me to watch the world in 3D.
    You can learn more about your fellow humans as they 'discuss' this topic than probably any other.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  59. #58  
    Forum Freshman SinMan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Dordrecht, The Netherlands
    Posts
    35
    Quote Originally Posted by billco
    Quote Originally Posted by SinMan
    woo guys, this is a huge topic, honestly i didn't read it entirely, but I can give my opinion. Agreeing with some of you and telling you that I am a male:

    Women are equal to men in some ways while they are not in other ways. For example, men are humans as women are. They have feelings etc... Men are physically stronger than women. But mentally are women maybe stonger. Women have the strength to love and devote their self to protecting and caring of their childeren, while men lack this ability (in general).

    I think it is impossible and pretty "childish" to be talking about which one is superior to the other, because both my eyes are essential for me to watch the world in 3D.
    You can learn more about your fellow humans as they 'discuss' this topic than probably any other.
    quite complicated for am man like me to understand
    Q:What's better than being perfect? A:Accepting yourself!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  60. #59  
    Guest
    Well I have read what you have all written and decided I need to alter my opinion wither respect to females being far superior in my opininon.

    There are areas in which females are superior to males, and other areas in which males are superior to females. All in all, at the end of the day, when everything has been said, and all differences have been thrashed out, when all the cliche's have been cast aside to avoid using sound bytes, the difference is less, overall than I had originally estimated.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  61. #60  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    HAAA
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  62. #61  
    Forum Sophomore kingjacob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    between time and timbuktu
    Posts
    131
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    HAAA
    the smartest thing anyones said so far,
    Reply With Quote  
     

  63. #62  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    not really, just feel this as a big victory in billcos and mine endless debating about everything that isnt relevant
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  64. #63  
    Guest
    Writing one's name in the snow clearly, has more significance towards superiority than I had originally estimated. (Punctuation as intended).
    Reply With Quote  
     

  65. #64  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    its not about the penis. Nor the breasts. nor the lack of either.
    Its more about mental and physical advantages that is rather more individualy.
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  66. #65  
    Forum Ph.D.
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    935
    Here's an interesting story:

    men smarter than women?

    Possible flaws in the the study? Are tests biased toward males? Are males truly more intelligent? Hell if I know
    Reply With Quote  
     

  67. #66  
    Forum Senior Imaplanck.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    344
    I think males are superior to females in many senses, but obviously not all. It would be extremely shortsighted to not see that males have accomplished a great deal more in the sciences for one.
    "A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeeded be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death." Albert Einstein
    Reply With Quote  
     

  68. #67  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Imaplanck.
    I think males are superior to females in many senses, but obviously not all. It would be extremely shortsighted to not see that males have accomplished a great deal more in the sciences for one.
    Probably because the girls were excluded from the sciences for many years. Today there are more but the guys are in charge so they take the credit.

    Not to mention.....

    http://www.bios.niu.edu/wis/profiles.html
    Anderson, Elizabeth Garrett, English physician
    Blackwell, Elizabeth, American physician
    Blackwell, Emily, American physician
    Cannon, Annie Jump, American astronomer
    Carr, Marjorie Harris, conservationist
    Cavell, Edith, English nurse
    Chodorow, Nancy, American psychologist
    Cole, Rebecca, African-American physician
    Curie, Marie Sklodowska, chemist and physicist
    Elion, Gertrude Belle, American pharmacologist
    Fossey, Dian, primatologist
    Freud, Anna, British psychoanalyst
    Germain, Sophie, French mathematician
    Gilbreth, Lillian Evelyn, American consulting engineer, household efficiency expert
    Goodall, Jane, English ethologist
    H-L
    Hamilton, Alice, American toxicologist, physician, and educator
    Hodgkin, Dorothy Mary Crowfoot, English chemist and X-ray crystallographer
    Hopper, Grace, American computer scientist and admiral
    Horney, Karen, American psychiatrist
    Hypatia, Alexandrian Neoplatonic philosopher and mathematician
    Jemison, Mae C., American physician, astronaut
    Jex-Blake, Sophia, English physician
    Kenny, Elizabeth, Australian nurse
    Klein, Melanie, British psychoanalyst
    Kovalevsky, Sonya , Russian mathematician
    Ladd-Franklin, Christine, American scientist
    Leakey, Mary Douglas, British archaeologist and paleontologist
    Levi-Montalcini, Rita, Italian-American neurologist
    Maathai, Wangari, Kenyan conservationist and Nobel Peace Prize winner
    Mayer, Maria Goeppert, physicist
    McClintock, Barbara, American geneticist
    Mead, Margaret, American anthropologist
    Meitner, Lise, Austrian-Swedish physicist and mathematician
    Mitchell, Maria, American astronomer and educator
    Montessori, Maria , Italian educator and physician.
    Morton, Rosalie Slaughter, American surgeon
    N-Y
    Niebla, Elvia, American environmental scientist
    Nightingale, Florence, English nurse
    Ochoa, Ellen, American engineer and astronaut
    Pinckney, Eliza Lucas, American horticulturist
    Richards, Ellen Henrietta Swallow, American chemist, educator, home economics
    Ride, Sally K., American astrophysicist and astronaut
    Rosch, Eleanor, American psychologist
    Semple, Ellen Churchill, American geographer
    Slye, Maud, American pathologist
    Stopes, Marie Carmichael, English paleobotanist and eugenicist
    Walker, Mary Edwards, American surgeon and feminist
    Yalow, Rosalyn Sussman, American medical physicist

    And a few thousand others....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  69. #68  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    Probably because the girls were excluded from the sciences for many years. Today there are more but the guys are in charge so they take the credit.
    i think its not only that. It has probebly more to do with that girls tend to think emotional wich doesnt fit science where you have to be logical wich males are better at. And also that males tend often to be more over the regular population in intelligence (it goes the opposite direction aswell) wich is also required for science (more of)
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  70. #69  
    Forum Senior Imaplanck.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    344
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    Probably because the girls were excluded from the sciences for many years. Today there are more but the guys are in charge so they take the credit.
    i think its not only that. It has probebly more to do with that girls tend to think emotional wich doesnt fit science where you have to be logical wich males are better at. And also that males tend often to be more over the regular population in intelligence (it goes the opposite direction aswell) wich is also required for science (more of)
    Yes thats my point, it's like the sense of direction(or lack there of) of men compared to women. Im not being sexist it's just a obvious product of evolution that tends the male and female brain to differ.
    "A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeeded be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death." Albert Einstein
    Reply With Quote  
     

  71. #70  
    Forum Junior Artemis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    297
    Not only that. Also the interest in science is less by the females. In most scientific classes there are about two girls and twenty-eight boys, not having interest doesn’t mean your not suitable for science.
    Student Neurobiology
    Reply With Quote  
     

  72. #71  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    Girls are probebly not interessted since its not their type of subjects
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  73. #72  
    Forum Junior Powerdoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    270
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    Girls are probebly not interessted since its not their type of subjects
    Zelos : you are a borg : you know that female are superior even they belong to the same collective : your queen told you that
    Reply With Quote  
     

  74. #73  
    Universal Mind John Galt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    14,169
    This may have been mentioned before. I haven't read the entire thread.

    Females appear to be somewhat better equipped for childbirth than males. This would appear to be a superior characteristic.

    Not to mention their damnable abilities at multi-tasking.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  75. #74  
    Forum Professor Pendragon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Nederland
    Posts
    1,085
    Quote Originally Posted by billco
    Quote Originally Posted by Leukocyte
    This thread is stereotype city.
    Another profound embryonic "Look mum, I can reach the PC" type contribution.
    This may be very late, but just to rectify: don't insult people without provocation.

    And hey, this thread is about stereotypes. Nothing wrong with that, but just don't be so masculine to deny it :P
    Reply With Quote  
     

  76. #75  
    Forum Junior Artemis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Amsterdam
    Posts
    297
    Quote Originally Posted by Ophiolite
    Not to mention their damnable abilities at multi-tasking.
    According to a commercial here in Holland that is because of the kind of sanitary towel they use (libresse)
    Student Neurobiology
    Reply With Quote  
     

  77. #76  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    Quote Originally Posted by Powerdoc
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    Girls are probebly not interessted since its not their type of subjects
    Zelos : you are a borg : you know that female are superior even they belong to the same collective : your queen told you that
    im borg.
    Im perfect
    Im allways right
    Neither is superior

    Females appear to be somewhat better equipped for childbirth than males. This would appear to be a superior characteristic.

    Not to mention their damnable abilities at multi-tasking.
    maybe becuase they had to have it in stone age?
    doesnt make them any more superior
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  78. #77  
    Forum Senior Imaplanck.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    344
    How do you really define superior. There's little doubt that the male gender and male characteristics have advanced our progress to such a high level today, but without the nurturing and ironing skills from the female contingent, would we have even have been populated enough to have survived this long?
    "A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeeded be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death." Albert Einstein
    Reply With Quote  
     

  79. #78  
    Guest
    All males submit to females at some point in their lives.....
    The reverse is NOT true.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  80. #79  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    The reverse is NOT true.
    familiar with BDSM? some girls love to submit to a guy so youre wrong

    Realise it, neither is superior over all we are both adapted to fill the role we were to have in our stone age society. In that area we are superior(both sexes) but over all we are equals and thats why we should have equal rights
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  81. #80  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    The reverse is NOT true.
    familiar with BDSM? some girls love to submit to a guy so youre wrong

    Realise it, neither is superior over all we are both adapted to fill the role we were to have in our stone age society. In that area we are superior(both sexes) but over all we are equals and thats why we should have equal rights
    I did say ALL males... the REVERSE is ... ALL females

    BDSM? means nothing to me.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  82. #81  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    let me ask you, what do submit mean to you?
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  83. #82  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    let me ask you, what do submit mean to you?
    I just looked BDSM up on the Net, from the types of URL's I don't think I'll look at any of them or go into the subject any further.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  84. #83  
    Forum Senior Imaplanck.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    344
    Quote Originally Posted by billco
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    let me ask you, what do submit mean to you?
    I just looked BDSM up on the Net, from the types of URL's I don't think I'll look at any of them or go into the subject any further.
    Come on! you know you want to
    "A man's ethical behavior should be based effectually on sympathy, education, and social ties; no religious basis is necessary. Man would indeeded be in a poor way if he had to be restrained by fear of punishment and hope of reward after death." Albert Einstein
    Reply With Quote  
     

  85. #84  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    320
    the truth is we arre all equal in our own way
    Reply With Quote  
     

  86. #85  
    Forum Junior Powerdoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    270
    We are all equal, but some are more equal than others
    Reply With Quote  
     

  87. #86  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Powerdoc
    We are all equal, but some are more equal than others
    Who said anything about equality? we are talking superiority here and the girls ARE superior - The more I tell'em that the more I am loved by them ergo it is true. 8)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  88. #87  
    Forum Junior Powerdoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    270
    Quote Originally Posted by billco
    Quote Originally Posted by Powerdoc
    We are all equal, but some are more equal than others
    Who said anything about equality? we are talking superiority here and the girls ARE superior - The more I tell'em that the more I am loved by them ergo it is true. 8)
    So you are the new casanova !
    Reply With Quote  
     

  89. #88  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Powerdoc
    Quote Originally Posted by billco
    Quote Originally Posted by Powerdoc
    We are all equal, but some are more equal than others
    Who said anything about equality? we are talking superiority here and the girls ARE superior - The more I tell'em that the more I am loved by them ergo it is true. 8)
    So you are the new casanova !
    Isn't it my biological duty to attract the ladies? Since I am not a hunk but an old wrinkly these days I have to use my intelligence... 8)
    Reply With Quote  
     

  90. #89  
    Forum Junior Powerdoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    270
    Quote Originally Posted by billco
    Quote Originally Posted by Powerdoc
    Quote Originally Posted by billco
    Quote Originally Posted by Powerdoc
    We are all equal, but some are more equal than others
    Who said anything about equality? we are talking superiority here and the girls ARE superior - The more I tell'em that the more I am loved by them ergo it is true. 8)
    So you are the new casanova !
    Isn't it my biological duty to attract the ladies? Since I am not a hunk but an old wrinkly these days I have to use my intelligence... 8)
    Exactly like casanova.
    BTW the great seductor of the old time, where not very handsome, but where prince of seduction granted their intelligence.

    PS : my wife don't want that exercice my biological duties. Isn't it sad ?
    Reply With Quote  
     

  91. #90  
    Guest
    I shan't die of the pox though, probably just be crushed to death!
    Reply With Quote  
     

  92. #91  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    we are talking superiority here and the girls ARE superior
    billco maybe in your time it was commonly accepted to lie but today we dont like it
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  93. #92  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    we are talking superiority here and the girls ARE superior
    billco maybe in your time it was commonly accepted to lie but today we dont like it
    "im borg. "

    Everytime you post, you post a lie, or two or three or four or tens.

    I guess you hate yourself as well as everything and everyone else. I suggest instead of calling people liars, you finally try and escape from your emryonic capsule.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  94. #93  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    i rarly lie on forums. maybe a lie per 100 posts apphere but not as often as it has done from you on this topic
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  95. #94  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    i rarly lie on forums. maybe a lie per 100 posts apphere but not as often as it has done from you on this topic
    OK, so you don't know what a lie is. Very well, every time you say '! Am Borg', or "I am the destroyer of planets" or all that other crap (which is not funny, witty, clever,intelligent, or grown-up) you are telling lies.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  96. #95  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    so you don't know what a lie is. Very well, every time you say '! Am Borg', or "I am the destroyer of planets" or all that other crap (which is not funny, witty, clever,intelligent, or grown-up) you are telling lies.
    today we have something called a joke.
    its a differens between joking and lieing
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  97. #96  
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Zelos
    so you don't know what a lie is. Very well, every time you say '! Am Borg', or "I am the destroyer of planets" or all that other crap (which is not funny, witty, clever,intelligent, or grown-up) you are telling lies.
    today we have something called a joke.
    its a differens between joking and lieing
    No, you are the joke.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  98. #97  
    Forum Isotope Zelos's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    2,755
    the biggest joke here, is the fact youre still sane/alive

    if you cant handle jokes maybe you should finish stuff and "go on"
    I am zelos. Destroyer of planets, exterminator of life, conquerer of worlds. I have come to rule this uiniverse. And there is nothing u pathetic biengs can do to stop me

    On the eighth day Zelos said: 'Let there be darkness,' and the light was never again seen.

    The king of posting
    Reply With Quote  
     

  99. #98  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    27
    Based on the maturity and intelligence shown in this thread, I think you can accurately say that females are more superior to males....
    Reply With Quote  
     

  100. #99  
    Forum Junior Powerdoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    270
    Quote Originally Posted by The_Science_Geek
    Based on the maturity and intelligence shown in this thread, I think you can accurately say that females are more superior to males....
    more clever I don't know, but more wise, it seems to be. This type of thread lead nowhere because it's a little bit comparing apple and orange.
    If your main point of vue is the warrior one, the man is superior. If your main point fo vue is the peaceful instinct, women are superior. In fact the answer to this thread teach more about the writer of the posts than anything else [/code]
    Reply With Quote  
     

  101. #100  
    Guest
    My original post did not restrict the species to human. My belief remains, I contend females are far superior to males.
    Reply With Quote  
     

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •