Notices
Results 1 to 11 of 11
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By JackMonedula

Thread: THE HYPOTHESIS OF BIO INTERNET. what do u guys think about this theory

  1. #1 THE HYPOTHESIS OF BIO INTERNET. what do u guys think about this theory 
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3
    The hypothesis of biological internet

    (the source of universal knowledge)



    As you know there are many similarities between a human body and a computer. A human body is a biological supercomputer .So if computers have a internet then why not humans .That crossed my mind and i thought that if a human body is a supercomputer then it must have a biological Wi-Fi router with it. Then i thought what about the signal transfer then i think about trees. What if trees are like Towers who transmit the single to all over the world. Then i think we also must have biological internet.as you know that telepathy is real.in my view the simple theory about telepathy would be that we use our biological Wi-Fi router to send thoughts ...the tress acts like towers and transmit the single to all over the world. and the person picks the thought though his own biological Wi-Fi router.
    So i think that we humans also have a big biological internet. This biological internet is the source of all knowledge. Think about it albert Einstein didn't born with the knowledge he discovered he must had accessed the biological internet somehow with his superconscious... so somehow the superconscious must act like a bio Wi-Fi router and the trees acts like towers and creates the biological internet and connects us with the biological internet
    So this means.....

    We humans also have a big biological internet ...which is full of knowledge. Or u can say the source of universal knowledge.

    our super conscious acts like a bio Wi-Fi router..


    The trees acts like towers and transmit the singles to all over the world and connects us with the biological internet.

    Trees maintain this biological internet.




    ]I know it is just a hypotheses and I don’t have many scientific evidences right now…the only evidence I currently have is this…


    ….
    As you know man progressed on the scientific discoveries .From the ancient time to now we humans progressed because of science…

    Science progressed with the help of the geniuses who discovered new scientific ideas. Like the first man who discovered fire, like albert Einstein who discovered the e=mc2 formula...like newton and many others…
    But do u ever wonders how they discovered it .does they born with the idea or they are geniuses or they have big brain power. Most of the geniuses even don’t complete school. Some sucked at mathematics, some on history, some on geography.so how they discovered it.?

    That is where the biological internet theory comes in. let’s explain this with the help of biological internet theory.. Most of the geniuses find a problem from nature like newton found a problem from nature that why the apple fell on the ground? Why doesn’t it go up?

    As you know the super conscious of human mind is source of all knowledge. They say it is the drop of god. But does the super conscious really know all the knowledge of the universe or does the brain know all the knowledge. Or does the super conscious of the geniuses have all the knowledge of universe. What do u think how does the geniuses gets the answer accidently…or it is just an accident.

    Not really. So think it like this… newton found the problem then thought about the answer. Somehow he knew how to access the biological internet. his super conscious which acts like a Wi-Fi router connects with the biological internet ..(biological internet is the source of all universe knowledge.it has all the universe knowledge. Note that trees acts like tower here to transmit the signal). His super conscious then searches the biological internet and finds the answers. Then newton gets the answer.

    Look how simple the biological internet theory is. It is same for the ancient philosophers like the Buddha, guru Nanok , Mahabir, Constantine ,other grade religious philosophers who gave us the idea of love between humans. They knew how to access the biological internet and get the knowledge.

    The biological internet contains all the knowledge u can imagine

    Now the benefits we can get if we progressed on biological internet theory or u can say the biological internet hypotheses


    Image what happens when everyone can access the biological internet. Imagine all the knowledge we can get. We don’t have to wait for some genius to come up and find a new discovery….when everyone can accesses the knowledge of biological internet. The humanity will progress with the speed of light.
    how many discoveries can be made if we can access the biological internet which has all the universe knowledge.

    We can cure cancer.

    We can invent bio machines. We can stop hunger. We can invent a technology that is friendly with nature.

    we can save the planet.

    As you can see the possibilities are unlimited.


    And I am still researching on this hypothesis hopefully I will complete


    Last edited by shubho; July 16th, 2012 at 02:31 AM. Reason: sorry for mispelling the bio internet would be--biological internet
    Reply With Quote  
     

  2.  
     

  3. #2  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    17,036
    Quote Originally Posted by shubho View Post
    A human body is a biological supercomputer .
    This is an analogy, as such you can only take it so far before it breaks down.

    i thought that if a human body is a supercomputer then it must have a biological Wi-Fi router with it.
    This is really bad logic. It is equivalent to: Tables have four legs and are made of wood. My cat has four legs so it must be made of wood.

    Most of the geniuses even don’t complete school.
    Really? Got any evidence to support that? It certainly isn't true of either Newton or Einstein.

    The rest is just nonsense based on this false start.


    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  4. #3  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Stockholm Sweden
    Posts
    39
    as you know that telepathy is real.
    There is no evidence what so ever for telepathy to be real! It is like beauty. In the eyes of the beholder.
    Believers in Telepathy and other such pseudoscience think that it is real and they think there is evidence
    for it but that is only in the minds of the believers. No peer reviewed consensus on such has emerged
    despite them have tested it since 1873 something. Seems to be only wishful thinking or unrealistic dreams

    .(biological internet is the source of all universe knowledge.it has all the universe knowledge.
    What you talk about is an old myth named Akasha or similar name. Jung's unconscious being a common knowledge.
    No evidence for such either. Are you trying to see if you can pull this off without none notice it

    Or do you really believe in such stuff?
    John Galt likes this.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  5. #4  
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by Strange View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by shubho View Post
    A human body is a biological supercomputer .
    This is an analogy, as such you can only take it so far before it breaks down.

    i thought that if a human body is a supercomputer then it must have a biological Wi-Fi router with it.
    This is really bad logic. It is equivalent to: Tables have four legs and are made of wood. My cat has four legs so it must be made of wood.

    Most of the geniuses even don’t complete school.
    Really? Got any evidence to support that? It certainly isn't true of either Newton or Einstein.

    The rest is just nonsense based on this false start.
    thanks for your opinion i am really glad to see that some one spend his time to read this...as you can see it is just an hypothesis. it has some errors and i am researching.well looks like i need to modify this and gather some more evidence. thanks again i really appreciate it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  6. #5  
    New Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by JackMonedula View Post
    as you know that telepathy is real.
    There is no evidence what so ever for telepathy to be real! It is like beauty. In the eyes of the beholder.
    Believers in Telepathy and other such pseudoscience think that it is real and they think there is evidence
    for it but that is only in the minds of the believers. No peer reviewed consensus on such has emerged
    despite them have tested it since 1873 something. Seems to be only wishful thinking or unrealistic dreams

    .(biological internet is the source of all universe knowledge.it has all the universe knowledge.
    What you talk about is an old myth named Akasha or similar name. Jung's unconscious being a common knowledge.
    No evidence for such either. Are you trying to see if you can pull this off without none notice it

    Or do you really believe in such stuff?

    first of all thanks for reading my hypothesis..i realy am glad...

    well as far i have read TELEPATHY GENUINE AND FRAUDULEN BY W. W. BAGGALLY i know that telepathy is real but it still don't have very much evidence.

    btw i really don't know about akasha ..i never thought for a moment that my imagination has already has an old myth. thank you for pointing this out. i am going to read more about this akasha. if i can find some information..

    thanks again for your opinion i really appreciate it.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  7. #6  
    Brassica oleracea Strange's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    喫茶店
    Posts
    17,036
    Quote Originally Posted by shubho View Post
    i know that telepathy is real but it still don't have very much evidence.
    No, it isn't. And you don't have any evidence.
    ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat
    Reply With Quote  
     

  8. #7  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Stockholm Sweden
    Posts
    39
    it is just an hypothesis.
    Well I should not be too harse on you but the word you use there
    "hypothesis". mean something very paricular in the Science ways of using words

    I would go with you that you speculate or do a wild guess or maybe a personal reflexion
    or do a individual interpretation of a personal experience?

    A scientific hypothesis is something very special with traditions on how to set them up writing paper for peer review?
    But I am no scientist and I can be wrong but I would never use such strong word as it is just an hypothesis.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  9. #8  
    Forum Freshman
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Posts
    30
    Good luck with your probably doomed research project. But if you want to study a more realistic understanding of the progressive growth of humanity's knowledge base, I'd study sociology or history of science.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  10. #9  
    Suspended
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    226
    Quote Originally Posted by Strange View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by shubho View Post
    i know that telepathy is real but it still don't have very much evidence.
    No, it isn't. And you don't have any evidence.
    It's a questionable claim. There may be no evidence but I wouldn't conclude that it or a similar phenomenon is completely fictitious. The OP may also take this viewpoint, except he/she uses it despite the lack of presented evidence.
    Reply With Quote  
     

  11. #10  
    The Enchanter westwind's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Posts
    1,079
    shubho is a new Threader. This early proposal/idea is not that far off the beam for a new member. It has content. It is set out in a reasonable format. It begs correction or merit. Other new Members have Posted. This is what Science Forum is all about. One day shubho might be another Strange, another John Galt. He has ventured into difficult territory, on the edge of recognized Physics. Bordering on the paranormal. Crackpot territory. I don't think shubho is a crackpot. He is like I. I believe ideas spring from the unconscience. This depository of genetic inheritance, fed possibly by generational input from physic experiences over previous lives. This archive of available logic, stored in our sub-conscious and available only to those who have a mental key to its resources, will come up with answers. Now steady on I say to my Peers in this Forum, isn't it better to be debating controversial topics to illicit information that otherwise may not come out, than poo-hooing the possibilities with superior condecending ingrained, unmoveable beliefs. westwind.
    Words words words, were it better I caught your tears, and washed my face in them, and felt their sting. - westwind
    Reply With Quote  
     

  12. #11  
    Forum Professor Zwolver's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    1,673
    I don't get it..

    The idea for making a human body into a computerchip is not new.

    But it is used by creating biochips from partially specified stemcells from mice or rats.

    Connecting all the information of the world directly to your brain will cause more then a simple headdace, it'll litteraly blow your mind, apart..

    We have senses for a reason, as to we can interpret sensations on a managable level. Even so, it can become unmanagable even with our senses that were "designed" for that.

    Some advices if you must continue with this feat, that is technology wise LONG past interstellar travel.
    - Firstly, try to create a datastream, that is managable by a special chip in your brain. So you can subconciously transmit data from senses to your mind.. Then this data should trigger some kind of storage, to store this data. Preferably in the same chip, or else in your brain.

    Btw, this is absolutely impossible with the technology from now... From 10 years from now... Or in your lifetime..
    Growing up, i marveled at star-trek's science, and ignored the perfect society. Now, i try to ignore their science, and marvel at the society.

    Imagine, being able to create matter out of thin air, and not coming up with using drones for boarding hostile ships. Or using drones to defend your own ship. Heck, using drones to block energy attacks, counterattack or for surveillance. Unless, of course, they are nano-machines in your blood, which is a billion times more complex..
    Reply With Quote  
     

Similar Threads

  1. Going for a BA in Bio now...
    By gottspieler in forum Biology
    Replies: 48
    Last Post: July 14th, 2010, 08:04 AM
  2. Bio/modern technology
    By zendra in forum Biology
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: December 17th, 2009, 08:39 PM
  3. Bio degree
    By flaja in forum Biology
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: January 4th, 2009, 12:31 PM
  4. Riemann Hypothesis by Graph Theory
    By talanum1 in forum Mathematics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: October 5th, 2008, 10:00 AM
  5. Bio Info
    By gowri123 in forum Biology
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: December 12th, 2007, 11:55 PM
Bookmarks
Bookmarks
Posting Permissions
  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •