Black holes pull in?
How about everything else pulls out.
Depense how you look at it.
Just an idea.
Thank you
Paul.

Black holes pull in?
How about everything else pulls out.
Depense how you look at it.
Just an idea.
Thank you
Paul.
Not really. It is just gravity. Same as the earth. Would you say that rather than gravity holding us down everything else is holding us up?Depense how you look at it.
A black hole isn't just a figment of imagination, they are real.
A black hole, one of the mysteries in the universe.
The concept of a black hole or a singularity is based upon the spacetime as one inherent thing.
Our idea of gravity is totally wrong. Physics Class 101: Big things attract smaller things.
The definition of 'big' doesn't suit the sentence. In modern quantum physics the new definition of gravity is (simplified):
The theoratical particles gravisons (AKA Higgsbosons) stick to atoms. The more gravitons stick on an atom, the more it affects the spacetime continuum.
Or the more it has a gravity. Imagine the 4D (3D + time) as a 2D trampoline. Put a brick in the middle and a smaller ball at the edge. The ball will roll to the middle, to the brick.
In this case the brick has the most HBs that are sticking, the ball has also HBs but few.
The 13 elementary particles have all a specific function. The HBs relay the force known as gravity. They have an influence on the Higgsfield. The Higgsfield is all around us, that's why gravity is instantly over lightyears apart.
That is the way a black hole works, it isn't just gravity, it's a lot more.
If you bring in the Mtheory, there are 11 dimensions and an infinite amount of realities.
The Higgsfield will, according to the Mtheory, also have an effect on the other dimensions. That's the way people brought up the idea of a White Hole. That should be the opposite of a black hole, the place where the antigravity nullifies the immense gravity (the HBs influence) and spit out all the absorbed mater and energy wich are submitted by a wormhole. Not the sciencefiction ones, the socalled EinsteinRosen bridges. (Look them up if you don't believe me).
I will not bore you guys with the specifics of time relativity, a direct result of the Higgsfield.
If you have any more questions, feel free to ask.
Gravitons are not the same particle as the Higgs Boson.
Huh?
You really need to hit the books...
Gravity propagates at c.
And what's all this about sushi rice?
26 dimensions, except that many are curled up...
I looked it up and I don't believe you.
I have one... could you please bore us some more? It's entertaining.
I have concluded, through intensive observations, that blackholes are all existentialist stars who were unsatisfied with their existence as hydrogen clouds and decided to blow up themselves to become something equally unsatisfying.
Are rivers formed by the gravitational flow of water and the accompanying erosion, or did the continents drift atop their plates and get really, really close at contacting each other, but not hit each other, leaving a long rigid space full of water?
u know what........... uncles.......you should talk to my grandpa
This is not at all what classical physics says; gravity is not a function of size. Where did you get that idea from ?Our idea of gravity is totally wrong. Physics Class 101: Big things attract smaller things.
As was pointed out already, Higgs bosons are not the same as gravitons. Furthermore, the hypothetical graviton mediates only changes in the gravitational field, not the field itself; static gravitational fields thus act instantaneously. As a massless, uncharged spin2 vector boson the graviton also doesn't "stick" to anything ( whatever that means ).The theoratical particles gravisons (AKA Higgsbosons) stick to atoms.
Actually there are currently 18 known ones, not counting the graviton or antiparticles.The 13 elementary particles have all a specific function.
The region of spacetime enclosed by the event horizon is not causally connected to our universe; outside the event horizon there is just gravity, Hawking radiation, and possibly electromagnetic fields if one permits the possibility of black holes with a net electric charge.That is the way a black hole works, it isn't just gravity, it's a lot more.
no actually???
Gravity seems like a relatively simple idea to me. ( which probably means I have it wrong). Gravity is an attractive force excerted by all bodies in proportion to their mass. The attractive force between two bodies is the sum of of the gravitational force exerted by each and is proportional to the sum of their masses. Gravity does lessen with distance but slowly and never reaches zero. Plotted as a hyperbolic curve?
Quantum gravity states that the observed gravitational forces is a warping of spacetime.
All good except:
General relativity describes gravity as warping of spacetime. A quantum theory of gravity (which we don't have yet) would combine this with quantum mechanics. Currently they seem incompatible.Quantum gravity states that the observed gravitational forces is a warping of spacetime.
This is correct in Newtonian mechanics ( weak fields ), but for very strong gravitational fields other factors than just mass come into play as well. This is described by General Relativity.The attractive force between two bodies is the sum of of the gravitational force exerted by each and is proportional to the sum of their masses.
« Basic Question  Time Dilation at Near Lightspeed » 