| Author |
Message
|
| andymonk |
 Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 4:32 pm Post subject: Unknown ancient geometry |
 |
|
Forum Freshman
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 15
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Harold14370 |
| Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2007 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Professor
Joined: 13 Apr 2007
Posts: 1767
Location: Pennsylvania
|
| I don't see any math or science here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| andymonk |
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Freshman
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 15
|
| Harold14370 wrote: |
| I don't see any math or science here. |
The COMPLETE ancient flower of life contains the three dimensional metatron cube which holds all the platonic solids. Not just the building blocks of life,but the building blocks of creation itself.  I think that has something to do with mathematics!?
Last edited by andymonk on Fri Aug 03, 2007 4:51 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| marnixR |
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Isotope
Joined: 10 Apr 2007
Posts: 2783
Location: Cardiff, Wales
|
platonic solids is not science, or at the very least very outdated science
_________________
if you find this place too crowded or too confrontational, how about trying Philosophorum,
the amicable forum where small is beautiful and even the trolls are intelligent
biology without evolution is but stamp collecting |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Jeremyhfht |
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 3:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Resident Psychologist
Joined: 18 Jul 2006
Posts: 2247
|
While this does have mostly to do with religion, I think it does have mathematical properties.
Does it not, to you, resemble a Fractal?
_________________
"Always look on the bright side of life" |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Harold14370 |
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 5:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Professor
Joined: 13 Apr 2007
Posts: 1767
Location: Pennsylvania
|
| The mere fact that it is a geometrical shape does not make it science. I suppose somebody could study the properties of the Flower of Life and develop hypotheses, theorems, proofs, etc. But all I see is religious stuff. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| shawngoldw |
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2007 6:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Junior
Joined: 22 Jun 2006
Posts: 273
|
| It looks so cool! But what is it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| andymonk |
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Freshman
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 15
|
| shawngoldw wrote: |
| It looks so cool! But what is it? |
The COMPLETE ancient flower of life is an interdimensional tool,a portal,a link back to awareness of the universal consciousness(god,the collective unconscious or whatever you would like to call it). The universal consciousness we were all part of before we entered this material world. The original fol(found in "the osireion" at abydos in egypt)is incomplete because it is only the first layer of three. The complete flower has the other two layers added,making it three dimensional. If you relax(sit three feet away from the screen)and let the flower slowly draw your eyes out of focus,the flower will open. Try and not focus on any one point,blankly stare,take the flower in as a whole. Do not strain your eyes as it will happen naturally. We do not see with our eyes,we see THROUGH our eyes. Let your mind focus,dont fight it. You may get a headache and itchy eyes,this will quickly disappear. This is not a known science,but if you let it happen,you will be supprised by what appears. (use the hand drawn flower) 4love and light 2all  x The complete ancient flower of life is not a stereogram,a magic eye image or any other man made optical illusion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| andymonk |
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 4:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Freshman
Joined: 12 Jul 2007
Posts: 15
|
The incomplete fol is found all over the ancient world. The oldest and original incomplete fol is found on several pillars within "the osireion" at abydos in egypt. The osireion(the tomb of osiris)is known to be the oldest building in egypt. To this day,no egyptologists or archaeologists can or wont give a date for the flower. Neither will they explain why,who or what the flower was put there for. Any opinions? I believe the flower has been delibarately ignored so world secret societies can keep the flowers secrets hidden.  http://www.users.bigpond.com/MSN/gary_fletcher/osireion.html http://www.grahamhancock.com/library/fotg/c45-5.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| streamSystems |
| Posted: Fri Aug 03, 2007 8:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Banned
Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 950
Location: a reality you have all yet to properly explain
|
You're referring to the idea of geometrical shapes being deciphered into a mathematical language that is relevant to physics, to space-time, right?
Graphs and charts represent a symbolic visual account for a feature of numerical change of variables according to set parameters that bind the nature of the graph-chart. Some charts are simple using only a flat plane, like a pie-chart, and some charts are complex requiring the use of all three axes of space-time (x-y-z), representing how points change through that 3-dimensional axis. Basically, Graphs and charts are diagrams representing numerical relationships in visual terms. The term “graph” is usually reserved for a diagram showing the relationship of two variable quantities, each measured along one of a pair of lines called axes, whereas charts can be of many different types.
The simplest graphs give a visual indication of a series of changing values, and thus graphs are used to show trends. Another use of graphs is in the representation, and sometimes the solution, of mathematical equations. Graphs also provide a valuable resource for solving simultaneous equations, solving equation trends. Moreover, instead of solving two related equations mathematically, it is often possible to graph the two equations to find their point of intersection. The simple mathematical uses of graphs can be extended to cover very complex equations. Many physical laws have been discovered by analysis of the raw data produced by experiment when they were plotted on graphs. The field of mathematics called calculus is relevant to the study of graphs. It is concerned with such things as calculating the gradient, or slope, of a line plotted on a graph from the equation defining that line. The gradient of a curve can reveal important information. The steeper the curve, the more rapidly the quantity shown is varying. Thus, in a graph of numbers of cases of infectious disease against time, the steeper the curve, the more rapidly the disease is spreading, and the greater the cause for alarm. Graphs need not always have two axes at right angles. For instance, in special purposes, the axes may be inclined at an angle to one another, or may even be curved. There may not even be two axes.
In summary, graphs aim to explain and predict defined systems of interest that aim to generate a type of MAP of that defined system of inquiry………….a type of picture of how values changes in relation to one another, generally as a change through time.
What is being presented here it seems, with your interest, and a good one, in geometry, in ancient symbols, is if contemporary science aims to construct such a MAP of reality.
Indeed, science AIMS to generate graphs, graphs that explain space-time. But why does science fail to construct such graphs that account for a more anciently, presumed, science and mathema5tics of space-time, of space-time itself? Because contemporary science does not know how to begin constructing the framework of that graph, the axes, and the time coordinates. Science has not been able to account properly for the basic variables and tracks of space and time for science to properly construct a graph framework to then use to construct space-time upon…………and have represented as a picture.
I have found a theory where that problem is solved. That problem of how to construct “what” graph is solved in first establishing what the basic formwork of space and time is (the lines, the points, and so on), to then CREATE that graph that pictures reality for what it is, ideally. The problem is solved by first addressing what a “number” is, and how numbers can relate to one another. Basically, graphs require numbers to be related to one another. The theory I am proposing to you establishes how numbers relate to one another. Ideally, numbers relate to one another in a manner that highlights what the ideal graph system of axes is for us to employ to then explain the grander features of space and time. If you're interested, the theory is available at the linked website below.
Take a look at the eye of ra: is it simple airflow symbolic dynamics of sustained winged flight..........is that not a symbolic graph of a physical reality, of something held in the sky?
_________________
Does a theory of everything therefore need to be purely theoretical and only account for the known laws and forces in handling the improbability of fortune telling?
the www feature below can explain it better. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| talanum1 |
| Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 6:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Sophomore
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Posts: 107
Location: South Africa
|
Do those crop circles get measured (questionmark). They have messages.
I deciphered one (the circle with the half-moon like symbol in the middle):
it may mean: "Start form the negative and you will encounter the positive
in two ways."
I got this from the binary numbers on the rim. The four symbols come
from cyclic permutations of the numbers 21, 27, 14, 21.
_________________
Found cross product of two vectors in >3D. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| streamSystems |
| Posted: Mon Aug 20, 2007 7:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Banned
Joined: 22 May 2007
Posts: 950
Location: a reality you have all yet to properly explain
|
I don't know.
You know..........
Is there a question "relevant" to your "time of day"........."like I don'nt have one"......................why don't I just go "camping"............like your "question"??????????
......what "if" some persson who had a way of using "I"........."helped"..........
?????
_________________
Does a theory of everything therefore need to be purely theoretical and only account for the known laws and forces in handling the improbability of fortune telling?
the www feature below can explain it better. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| talanum1 |
| Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 7:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Sophomore
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Posts: 107
Location: South Africa
|
streamSystems: are you implying I read something in nonsense? That diagram is too well worked out to be nonsense.
_________________
Found cross product of two vectors in >3D. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| GhostofMaxwell |
| Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 7:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
Banned
Joined: 11 Aug 2007
Posts: 903
Location: Thames estuary
|
Link is dead/
_________________
Es ist Zeit fĂĽr sauberen
You guys |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
| Ophiolite |
| Posted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 9:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Radioactive Isotope
Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 4858
Location: Scotland
|
Sorry andy, I'm moving this to pseudoscience. It has all the hallmarks. No reason an intersting discussion can't be continued there, however.
_________________
The Universe is not only weirder than we imagine it is weirder than we can imagine. J.B.S.Haldane. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
