| Author |
Message
|
| icewendigo |
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 9:31 am Post subject: Iron Planet, any energy from gravity? |
|
|
 Forum Senior

Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 352
|
If you had an iron planet the size of Neptune for example, I presume the gravity would cause a lot of pressure in the core which would heat up the Iron and radiate into space.
a) Is this an inexhaustible source of energy?
b) where is the engery comming from, is the planet loosing mass? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Arch2008 |
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 10:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Freshman

Joined: 01 Apr 2008 Posts: 47
|
| No, to a and b. The heat energy of the core (caused by friction of the outer layers pushing inward) would eventually radiate outwards by convection and the planet would cool. The total energy would be zero, since it costs energy to create this iron giant in the first place. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| icewendigo |
Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
 Forum Senior

Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 352
|
| So you would eventually have a core that is both densly packed by the massive gravity and nonetheless cold? I didnt know that, thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| thyristor |
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 1:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Freshman

Joined: 11 Feb 2008 Posts: 64 Location: Sweden
|
Isn't it possible that the heawould be created by radioactive reaction as well? _________________ 373 13213-mbm-13213 373 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| sunshinewarrior |
Posted: Fri May 02, 2008 2:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
 Forum Ph.D.

Joined: 26 Sep 2007 Posts: 825 Location: London
|
| thyristor wrote: |
| Isn't it possible that the heawould be created by radioactive reaction as well? |
Iron has the most stable nucleus of all the elements. Unless gravity crushed it to neutron star status there would, I suspect, be minimal conventional radioactivity. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| kojax |
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 12:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Ph.D.

Joined: 27 Mar 2007 Posts: 713
|
A) - Not inexhaustible
B) - Of course it's losing mass, though maybe not very fast. (E = MC^2)
The previous posters are right that the heat would radiate out into space, but the planet would probably still be pretty hot most of the time because the vacuum of space is not the best heat conductor.
Neither fusion nor fission are likely to occur because Iron is at about the atomic weight that fission and fusion reactions get their energy by moving toward. It might still happen, but it would consume energy instead of creating it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| sak |
Posted: Sat May 03, 2008 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Forum Freshman

Joined: 21 Sep 2007 Posts: 81
|
| It is friction which creates heat energy, not the gravity. Generated heat will evaporate by conduction and radiation. Since the friction is generated by gravity which is a property of matter and no energy is used to maintain it, the radiated heat energy could also be free of cost!!!!!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|